RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This review synthesised the evidence for the effect of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. 10 databases were searched to December 2023. Prospective experimental studies exploring prehabilitation interventions in adults undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery were included. Prehabilitation was any preoperative intervention to improve physical or psychological outcomes. Included studies required a comparator group or alternative preoperative intervention as well as baseline, presurgical and postoperative assessment points. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (v.2). Data synthesis was narrative (SWiM guidance). RESULTS: 6028 studies were screened, with 25 studies included. Prehabilitation interventions were: inspiratory muscle training (five studies n = 450); exercise (nine studies n = 683); psychological (one study n = 400); and nutritional (ten studies n = 487). High quality studies showed preoperative improvements in impairments directly targeted by the interventions. Generally, these did not translate into functional or postoperative improvements, but multimodal interventions were more promising. CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports prehabilitation as safe to preserve or improve preoperative function. Heterogeneity in outcomes and variable study quality means definitive conclusions regarding interventions are not yet possible, limiting implementation. Agreement of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness evaluation is required.
Prehabilitation interventions are safe and when combined optimally may preserve or improve preoperative function in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery.Multimodal interventions (including exercise, nutritional, and psychological components) showed promise which supports the delivery of prehabilitation by multidisciplinary teams.Development of a core outcome set and agreed time points for both preoperative and postoperative outcomes is needed for effective evidence synthesis.Focus on long term outcomes is necessary to determine cost effectiveness and commissioning of resources.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on respiratory muscle strength, lung function and quality of life (QOL) in adults with spinal cord injuries (SCI). METHODS: Databases were searched up to June 2022; CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PEDRo, and PubMed. Following PRISMA reporting guidelines, two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data. Study quality and levels of evidence were assessed. RESULTS: Following selection from 624 initial search results, six randomised controlled trials were identified, comprising 124 participants. Quality of Evidence was very low to moderate. Meta-analysis showed that post intervention, IMT significantly improved maximal inspiratory pressure (MD 15.72 cmH2O, 95% CI 5.02, 26.41, p = 0.004) when compared with a control intervention. There was no significant benefit for physical QOL (SMD 0.12, 95% CI -1.01, 1.25, p = 0.84), mental QOL (SMD -0.2, 95% CI -1.72, 1.33, p = 0.80), maximal expiratory pressure (MD 5.19 cmH2O, 95% CI -4.16, 14.55, p = 0.80), or FEV1 (MD 0.26 L, 95% CI -0.19, 0.7, p = 0.26). Sensitivity analyses found larger effects for studies with 8 week interventions (MD 17.5 cmH2O (95% CI 3.36 to 31.66)) and spring loaded devices alone (MD 21.18 cmH2O, 95% CI 9.65 to 32.72). CONCLUSION: Moderate quality evidence suggests IMT improves respiratory strength in adults with an SCI. The mental and physical QOL outcomes provided very low quality of evidence, with considerable heterogeneity between study results, leading to inconsistency. Further research is warranted to investigate medium and long-term impact of robust IMT protocols, accounting for patient motivation and adherence to IMT.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONInspiratory muscle training (IMT) significantly improves respiratory muscle strength in adults with spinal cord injuries-irrespective of time since injury, or degree of injury completeness.IMT is a feasible, safe, and worthwhile intervention to implement with adults with spinal cord injuries and can be utilized in a variety of settings.IMT interventions that are 8 weeks long and utilize a spring-loaded inspiratory threshold device may generate the largest improvements in respiratory strength.
