Postmarketing Reports of Incomplete Dosing-Related Complications with Self-Injected PCSK9 Inhibitors: A Descriptive Study and Disproportionality Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Evolocumab and alirocumab are self-injected proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors indicated for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction. Complications in the use or functionality of self-injection devices may precipitate incomplete dosing. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to characterize postmarketing dosing failure reports involving self-injected PCSK9 inhibitors. METHODS: US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) [2016-second quarter of 2023] data were utilized for a disproportionality analysis. Eight self-injected comparator medications served as referents. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms indicating explicit or probable failure to administer a complete dose classified cases. Proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) > 2.0 and lower 95% confidence intervals (CIs) > 1.0 indicated disproportionality signals. US FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) [2013-2023] data underwent a narrative review. RESULTS: During the study period, 194,781 (evolocumab, n = 152,831; alirocumab, n = 41,950) drug-event pairs and 43,725 (evolocumab, n = 38,489; alirocumab, n = 5236) cases reported to FAERS identified PCSK9 inhibitors. MAUDE contained six evolocumab reports, half describing dose omission, and no alirocumab reports. A potential dosing failure signal was detected for evolocumab (PRR 2.01; 95% CI 1.98-2.03), but not alirocumab (PRR 0.99; 95% CI 0.97-1.02), relative to pooled comparator reports. Across three case term subcategories, incomplete dosing disproportionality signals were further identified for evolocumab patient usage complication terms (PRR 3.44; 95% CI 3.38-3.50) and alirocumab device malfunction terms (PRR 2.09; 95% CI 1.98-2.22). CONCLUSIONS: Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 inhibitor incomplete dosing-related complications are frequently reported in the postmarketing setting. Systematic efforts to understand the incidence and mechanisms of dosing failure and associated patient burdens are needed.

Equitable Representation of Pregnant and Lactating Women in Clinical Research: A Historical Review and Critical Analysis of Proposed Legislation.

A long history of policymaking and regulation constructed for the purpose of ensuring adequate fetal and infant protections has inadvertently sanctioned the widespread exclusion of pregnant and lactating patients from biomedical research, leaving a paucity of high quality data necessary for clinical decision-making. Although well-intended, the regulatory classification of pregnant women as "vulnerable," in conjunction with burdensome enrollment criteria and other factors weighing against broad inclusion, have ultimately placed the health and safety of these women and their babies in jeopardy. Robust measures are urgently needed to overcome patient and physician reluctance, address substantial evidence gaps, and rectify long-standing disparities which precipitate disproportionately poor health outcomes among this population. In February 2023, the Advancing Safe Medications for Moms and Babies Act of 2023 (the Act) was introduced in the United States House of Representatives with the overarching goal of enabling pregnant and lactating women to achieve equitable participation in clinical research and contribute to developing important biomedical knowledge to guide and improve health care delivered to these patients. This review discusses the historical influence of federal human subject protection regulations on the health and clinical treatment of pregnant and lactating women, outlines and critically analyzes the provisions incorporated into the Act, and reflects on the potential long-term impact the Act would have should it be successful in becoming law. KEY POINTS: · Pregnant and lactating patients are widely excluded from clinical research.. · Evidence guiding the treatment of these patients is limited and of unacceptably low quality.. · Proposed legislation seeks to rectify disparities and empower these patients through improved representation in research..

Dental Disorders Reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System in Association with Buprenorphine: An Analysis by Ingredient Composition and Route of Administration.

BACKGROUND: Prior research has suggested buprenorphine-containing medications may be associated with an increased risk of dental disorders. However, published data describing adverse dental reactions in buprenorphine users by active ingredient composition and route of administration are limited. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of formulation on spontaneous reporting of dental disorders among patients treated with buprenorphine. METHODS: Adverse event reports submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to measure disproportionality of dental disorder reporting as classified by 39 Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms. RESULTS: Compared to pooled reports for all other drugs across FAERS, both buprenorphine monotherapy (ROR 3.09; 95% CI 2.61-3.66) and combination buprenorphine/naloxone (ROR 14.61; 95% CI 13.34-16.01) were associated with positive disproportionality signals. Signals of disproportionate dental disorder reporting were also detected for buprenorphine medicines administered by sublingual (ROR 20.03; 95% CI 18.04-22.24), buccal (ROR 4.46; 95% CI 3.00-6.61) and oral (ROR 7.17; 95% CI 5.03-10.22) routes, but not for other modalities. In considering active ingredient and route together, sublingual buprenorphine monotherapies (ROR 23.55; 95% CI 17.84-31.11) and sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (ROR 19.47; 95% CI 17.39-21.80) were each associated with disproportionate reporting of dental disorders. CONCLUSION: Subject to the limitations of spontaneous adverse event data, this study identified significantly disproportionate reporting of dental disorders to FAERS among patients treated with buprenorphine- containing medications, including formulations administered by sublingual, buccal and oral routes. These findings are consistent with prior data and suggest that regular oral care and proper dental hygiene be emphasized for patients undergoing therapy with orally dissolving buprenorphine.

Potential cerebrovascular accident signal for risankizumab: A disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

AIMS: The interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor risankizumab was recently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in the United States. Low rates of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) were observed in risankizumab-treated patients during clinical trials. The aim of this study was to determine whether risankizumab may be associated with CVA in a real-world setting. METHODS: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing postmarketing adverse event reports submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) through the fourth quarter of 2021. A custom query consisting of 22 CVA-related Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms previously reported in clinical trials of plaque psoriasis medications was used to identify cases. Disproportionality was measured by calculating reporting odds ratios (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), whereby the lower limit of a 95% CI >1.0 and ≥ three cases was considered a signal. RESULTS: Risankizumab was associated with significantly disproportionate CVA reporting compared to all other drugs in FAERS (ROR 2.48; 95% CI 2.14-2.88) as well as 11 alternative plaque psoriasis therapeutics across five pharmacologic classes. The largest disproportionality signals for risankizumab were identified relative to apremilast (ROR 9.07; 95% CI 7.56-10.89), ixekizumab (ROR 6.75; 95% CI 5.14-8.86), guselkumab (ROR 6.74; 95% CI 4.68-9.71), certolizumab (ROR 5.70; 95% CI 4.74-6.85) and etanercept (ROR 4.91; 95% CI 4.21-5.73). CONCLUSION: This study detected a previously unreported signal of disproportionate CVA reporting with the real-world use of risankizumab. Further long-term observational data will be necessary to better characterize this unconfirmed potential safety signal.

Alopecia signals associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors in the treatment or prophylaxis of migraine: A pharmacovigilance study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although rarely observed in clinical trials, alopecia has been reported in migraine patients treated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors during the postmarketing period. This study sought to assess whether CGRP inhibitors are associated with disproportionate alopecia reporting relative to other drugs including those indicated for migraine treatment or prophylaxis in a real-world setting. DESIGN: Retrospective disproportionality analysis. DATA SOURCE: Spontaneous adverse events reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) through the fourth quarter of 2021. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms were used to define alopecia cases in FAERS. Disproportionality was measured by calculating proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A PRR >2.0 with a lower 95% CI >1.0 and ≥3 cases was considered a positive signal. During the study period, CGRP inhibitors were reported as suspect products in 55,994 adverse events including 1827 (3.26%) alopecia cases. Compared with all other drugs across FAERS, alopecia signals were detected for the collective CGRP inhibitor class (PRR 4.06; 95% CI 3.88-4.25) and fremanezumab (PRR 5.42; 95% CI 4.66-6.29), erenumab (PRR 4.29; 95% CI 4.05-4.54), galcanezumab (PRR 4.11; 95% CI 3.78-4.48), and eptinezumab (PRR 2.06; 95% CI 1.25-3.40) individually. CGRP inhibitors were consistently associated with alopecia signals relative to triptans (PRR 12.46; 95% CI 10.22-15.18) and celecoxib (PRR 3.50; 95% CI 3.19-3.83), but not in comparison with anticonvulsants, onabotulinumtoxinA, or beta-blockers across analyses. Within the CGRP inhibitor class, an alopecia signal was observed for biologics relative to drugs (PRR 6.11; 95% CI 3.79-9.87). CONCLUSION: Significant alopecia signals were identified for CGRP inhibitors relative to all other drugs and certain comparator migraine therapies based on adverse events reported to FAERS, with CGRP-targeting biologics primarily driving disproportionate reporting. Future observational data will be necessary to better characterize the potential association between real-world use of CGRP inhibitors and incident alopecia in patients with migraine.