Sustained Virologic Response of Patients Hospitalized Compared With Those Not Hospitalized During Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus With Direct-Acting Antivirals.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have resulted in great success through high attainment of sustained virologic response (SVR). Risk factors for DAA treatment failure are important to identify because of worsened outcomes with failure and high treatment cost. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify whether hospitalization during treatment affects SVR. The primary outcome was the difference in SVR at 12 weeks after treatment. METHODS: This multicenter, single health system retrospective cohort review compared achievement of SVR between patients hospitalized during DAA treatment for HCV with those not hospitalized during treatment. RESULTS: Patients in the hospitalized cohort (n = 94) had more severe disease at baseline than nonhospitalized patients (n = 167) as indicated through higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, Fibrosis-4 scores, and imaging-suggested or biopsy-confirmed cirrhosis. Patients hospitalized during treatment had lower SVR rates compared with those not hospitalized (87.2% vs 95.2%; P = 0.043) but failed to reach significance when inpatient mortality was excluded on secondary analysis (91.1% vs 95.2%; P = 0.195). Patients who were hospitalized and did not achieve SVR had higher MELD scores, were more likely to have intensive care unit stay, and had longer hospital stay compared with those who achieved SVR. Of 94 patients, 93 provided home supply of DAAs during hospitalization. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Patients hospitalized during DAA treatment for HCV had reduced rates of SVR. This reduced SVR rate may be driven by inpatient mortality and severity of liver disease. Patient education to bring home supply of medication for use during admission is an effective intervention.

Multidisciplinary Team Utilizing Pharmacists in Multimodal, Bundled Care Reduce Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Hospital Readmission Rates.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major contributor of morbidity and mortality in the United States resulting in high hospitalization and readmission rates. For health systems, identifying an effective strategy to reduce COPD readmissions has remained difficult. Multiple COPD care bundles have been developed with varying degrees of success. Bundles that were multidisciplinary and included pharmacists were successful in reducing readmissions. OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess a multidisciplinary, 5-element, COPD care bundle that was implemented in an academic, urban safety-net hospital to reduce COPD readmissions and the role of pharmacists in bundle implementation. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team collaborated to develop a 5-element COPD care bundle that met unmet patient needs. The bundle elements included the following, with pharmacy responsible for the first two: optimization of COPD inhalers, 30-day supply of insurance-compatible inhalers, individualized patient inhaler teaching, provision of standardized discharge instructions, and scheduling of a 15-day discharge follow-up appointment. Bundle was implemented with multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to develop intra- and interdepartment processes. RESULTS: Prior to bundle implementation, the health system COPD readmission rates were 22.7%. Reliable implementation of the bundle reduced readmissions to 14.7% over a 6-month period. Pharmacy adherence to completion of the bundle was over 95% over 2 years of bundle use. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists have a crucial role in hospital-based transitions of care to reduce COPD readmissions.

Promoting pharmacy-based referrals to the tobacco quitline: a pilot study of academic detailing administered by pharmacy students.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot study of a student-delivered academic detailing initiative to promote brief, pharmacy-based tobacco cessation interventions, and referrals to the tobacco quitline. METHODS: Pharmacy students (n = 11) received training and delivered academic detailing sessions for promoting brief tobacco cessation interventions at community pharmacies (n = 37). Six months after the session, a survey was faxed to each pharmacy to assess (1) the quality and acceptance of the academic detailing session and the materials provided during the session and (2) tobacco cessation counseling perceptions and practices. RESULTS: Pharmacists from 30 (81%) sites responded to the survey; of these, 37% reported that they increased the number of patients asked about smoking since the academic detailing session, 70% reported an increase in the number of participants advised to quit smoking, 57% reported an increase in the number of patients counseled, and 50% reported routinely providing referrals to the tobacco quitline. CONCLUSION: pharmacy students are capable of providing academic detailing for brief tobacco cessation interventions in community pharmacies. Results of this pilot study suggest a positive impact of this service on pharmacists' counseling behavior for tobacco cessation.