Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pharm Sci ; 113(3): 735-743, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37722452

RESUMEN

Protein products in hospitals often have to be compounded before administration to the patient. This may comprise reconstitution of lyophilizates, dilution, storage, and transport. However, the operations for compounding and administration in the hospital may lead to changes in product quality and possibly even impact patient safety. We surveyed healthcare practitioners from three clinical units using a questionnaire and open dialogue to document common procedures and their justification and to document differences in handling procedures. The survey covered dose compounding, transportation, storage and administration. One key observation was that drug vial optimization procedures were used for some products, e.g., use of one single-use vial for several patients. This included the use of spikes and needles or closed system transfer devices (CSTDs). Filters or light protection aids were used only when specified by the manufacturer. A further observation was a different handling of the overfill in pre-filled infusion containers, possibly impacting total dose. Lastly, we documented the complexity of infusion administration setups for administration of multiple drugs. In this case, flushing procedures or the placement and use of filters in the setup vary. Our study has revealed important differences in handling and administration practice. We propose that drug developers and hospitals should collaborate to establish unified handling procedures.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Equipos de Seguridad , Humanos , Suiza , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Composición de Medicamentos
2.
J Pharm Sci ; 113(4): 990-998, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37813303

RESUMEN

Residual volumes of infusion solutions vary greatly due to container and dimensional variances. Manufacturers use overfill to compensate, but the exact amounts vary significantly. This variability in overfill - when carrier solutions are used to dilute other parenteral preparations - may lead to variable concentrations and dosing, hence, potential risk for patients. We analyzed the overfill and residual volume of 22 pre-filled infusion containers and evaluated the impact on the (simulated) dosing accuracy of a therapeutic drug product for different handling scenarios. In addition, compendial properties of the diluents (i.e. sub-visible particles, pH, color and opalescence) were assessed. The overfill and residual volume between different containers for the same diluent varied. As container size increased, the relative volume of overfill decreased while the residual volume remained constant. The design and material of the containers (e.g. port systems) defined the residual volume. Different handling scenarios led to differences in dosing accuracy. As a result, no universal approach applicable for all containers can be defined. To ensure the right dose, it is recommended to pre-select the preferred diluent, evaluate fill volumes of carrier solutions, and assess in-use compatibility of the product solution with its diluent in terms of concentration and volume.


Asunto(s)
Embalaje de Medicamentos , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales
3.
J Pharm Sci ; 113(2): 419-426, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37989442

RESUMEN

Closed System Transfer Devices (CSTDs) are increasingly used in healthcare settings to facilitate compounding of hazardous drugs but increasingly also therapeutic proteins. However, their use may significantly impact the quality of the sterile product. For example, contamination of the product solution may occur by leaching of silicone or particulates from the CSTDs. It was therefore the aim of the present study to identify and quantify the types of silicone oil in a panel of typically used CSTDs. Particles found after simulated CSTD compounding processes were evaluated using Light Obscuration and Micro-Flow Imaging and were confirmed to be silicone oil particles. The number of particulates shed from CTSDs was in single cases exceeding pharmacopeial limits for a final parenteral product. Using X-ray microtomography, lubrication was shown to be primarily applied at connecting parts of the CSTD. Quantitative and qualitative analysis by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) revealed a total released amount between 0.8 and 16 mg per CSTD of polydimethylsiloxane or polymethyltrifluoropropylsiloxane per CSTD. While pronounced differences in total silicone content between CSTDs were observed, it did not fully correlate with particle contamination in the test solutions, potentially due to variations in CSTD design. The impact of typical surfactants in biological formulations on silicone migration into product was additionally evaluated. We conclude that CSTDs may compromise final product quality, as (different types of) silicone oil may be released from these devices and contaminate the administered product.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Siliconas , Aceites de Silicona , Composición de Medicamentos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA