Approach to radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer after the LACC trial and associated complications: a NSQIP study.

BACKGROUND: The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) study results revolutionized our understanding of the best surgical management for this disease. Following its publication, guidelines state that the standard and recommended approach for radical hysterectomy is with an open abdominal approach. Nevertheless, the impact of the LACC trial on real-world changes in the surgical approach to radical hysterectomy remains elusive. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the trends and routes of radical hysterectomies and to evaluate post-operative complication rates before and after the LACC trial (2018). STUDY DESIGN: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was used to examine radical hysterectomies performed for cervical cancer between 2012-2022. We excluded vaginal radical hysterectomies and simple hysterectomies. The primary outcome measures were the trends in route of surgery [minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs. laparotomy] and surgical complications rate, stratified by periods before and after the publication of the LACC trial in 2018 (2012-2017 vs. 2019-2022). The secondary outcome measure was major complications associated specifically with the different routes of surgery. RESULTS: Of the 3,611 patients included, 2,080 (57.6%) underwent laparotomy and 1,531 (42.4%) underwent MIS radical hysterectomy. There was a significant increase in the MIS approach from 2012 to 2017 (45.6% MIS in 2012 to 75.3% MIS in 2017, p<.001), and a significant decrease in MIS from 2018 to 2022 (50.4% MIS in 2018 to 11.4% MIS in 2022, p<.001). The rate of minor complications was lower in the period before the LACC trial [317 (16.9%) vs. 288 (21.3%), p=.002]. Major complications rate was similar before and after the LACC trial [139 (7.4%) vs. 78 (5.8%), p=.26]. The rates of blood transfusions and superficial surgical site infections were lower in the period before the LACC trial [137 (7.3%) vs. 133 (9.8%), p=.012 and 20 (1.1%) vs. 53 (3.9%), p<.001, respectively]. In a comparison of MIS vs. laparotomy radical hysterectomy during the entire study period, patients in the MIS group had lower rates of minor complications [190 (12.4%) vs. 472 (22.7%), p<.001] and the rate of major complications was similar in both groups [100 (6.5%) in the MIS group vs. 139 (6.7%) in the laparotomy group, p=.89]. In a specific complications analysis, the rates of blood transfusion and superficial surgical site infections were lower in the MIS groups (2.4% vs. 12.7%, and 0.6% vs. 3.4%, p<.001 for both comparisons) and the rate of deep incisional surgical site infections was lower in the MIS group (0.2% vs. 0.7%, p=.048). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, the route of radical hysterectomy was not independently associated with occurrence of major complications [aOR 95% CI 1.02 (0.63-1.65)]. CONCLUSION: While the proportion of MIS radical hysterectomy decreased abruptly following the LACC trial, there was no change in the rate of major post-operative complications. In addition, hysterectomy route was not associated with major post-operative complications.

Neighborhood economic vulnerability as a predictor for patterns of care and outcomes for patients with uterine cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability as it relates to racial disparity in uterine cancer treatment and survival. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of uterine cancer who underwent hysterectomy in New York State from 2004 to 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability as quantified by the Area Deprivation Index was calculated. Primary outcome was guideline adherent treatment; secondary outcome was 5 year overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 34,356 patients were included in the final cohort. Residence within a vulnerable neighborhood was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy (59.7% vs 75.7% with aRR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86) and timely surgery (63.7% vs. 74.5% with aRR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.87). All-cause mortality was 24% higher for those who resided in vulnerable neighborhoods compared to affluent neighborhoods (aHR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.32). The greatest Black/White racial disparity in 5 year overall survival was seen in the most affluent neighborhoods at 18.6%, with survival being 79.8% for White patients and 61.2% for Black patients (aHR 1.31; 95% CI 1.14-1.51). For patients with advanced stage disease, this disparity was driven by improved survival for White patients with increasing neighborhood affluence but no change in survival for Black patients. On adjusted analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, insurance, tumor histology, stage, and grade, the disparity remained widest in the most affluent neighborhoods in NYC (aHR = 1.59; 95%CI 1.26-1.2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability is associated with poor outcomes for patients with uterine cancer. The greatest Black/White survival disparities are in the wealthiest neighborhoods. Neighborhood affluence may not affect survival of Black patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer.

Temporal trends of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with gynecologic malignancy in the United States.

In this retrospective cohort study examining 13,763,447 patients with 16 different malignancies, including 1,232,841 patients with five gynecologic malignancies (uterus [n = 690,590], ovary [n = 276,812], cervix [n = 166,779], vulva [n = 81,575], and vagina [n = 17,085]), identified in the Commission-on-Cancer's National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2020, cervical cancer (25.3 %) had the highest rate of adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients among 27 gender-stratified cancer groups (25.3%). There were 8 groups that the annual rates of AYA patients statistically increased during the study period at a P < .05 level, of which 7 (87.5 %) groups were for female malignancies. Among these 7 female malignancies, the annual percentage rate increase in AYA patients was largest for colorectal cancer (4.1 %, 95 % confidence interval 3.6-4.6), followed by malignancies in the ovary (3.1 %, 95 % confidence interval 1.6-4.5 in 2014-2020), pancreas (2.1 %, 95 % confidence interval 1.0-3.2), uterus (1.2 %, 95 % confidence interval 0.3-2.0 in 2013-2020), breast (0.8 %, 95 % confidence interval 0.2-1.4 in 2012-2020), cervix (0.8 %, 95 % confidence interval 0.2-1.5 in 2011-2020), and kidney (0.4 %, 95 % confidence interval 0.1-0.9). In conclusion, these data suggested that proportion of cancers attributable to AYA patients is increasing in several obesity-related female malignancies and in the three most common gynecologic malignancies.

Antihypertensive Medication Prescription Dispensation Among Pregnant Women in the United States: A Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: Hypertension is increasingly common in pregnancy capable individuals, yet there is limited data on antihypertensive medication dispensation in peripartum individuals. OBJECTIVE: To describe antihypertensive medication dispensation from preconception through the first year postpartum. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used the Truven Health MarketScan administrative data from 2008 through 2014 to identify women in the United States with commercial or government health insurance, aged 15-54, free from heart disease, who experienced a pregnancy and filled at least one prescription for an antihypertensive medication between three months prior to conception and 12 months after the end of the pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We describe antihypertensive dispensation patterns (continuation, initiation, and discontinuation) by medication class during five time periods: preconception, first, second, and third trimesters, and the first year postpartum. RESULTS: Of 1,058,521 pregnancies, 108,614 (10.3%) were exposed to at least one antihypertensive medication dispensation. The most commonly dispensed medications across all periods combined were adrenergic blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors were the third most dispensed medication class in the preconception period (26.4%), and fills decreased to 5.7% and 1.7% in the second and third trimesters, respectively. Of the women with chronic hypertension who filled at least one prescription prior to conception, 8.4% were not dispensed an antihypertensive medication during the first year after delivery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Antihypertensive prescription dispensation of both preferred and potentially harmful agents is common in pregnancy capable individuals. Patterns of dispensation suggest room for improvement in the treatment of chronic hypertension after a pregnancy.

Weight-loss therapy in patients with obesity with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and uterine cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Although obesity is an important risk factor for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and uterine cancer, little is known about the trends in use of weight-loss therapy for patients with obesity with EIN and uterine cancer. We examined the use of weight-loss therapy among patients with obesity with EIN and uterine cancer. METHODS: The Merative MarketScan Database was used to identify patients aged 18-70 years who were obese and diagnosed with EIN or uterine cancer. The primary treatment for EIN or uterine cancer was categorized as either primary hysterectomy or hormonal therapy. Nutrition counseling, bariatric surgeries, and weight-management medications were identified as weight-loss therapy. We analyzed trends in the use of any weight-loss therapies with Cochran-Armitage tests. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to examine factors associated with weight-loss therapy use. RESULTS: Overall, 15,374 patients were identified, including 5561 (36.2%) patients with EIN and obesity, and 9813 (63.8%) patients with uterine cancer and obesity. Weight-loss therapy was utilized within 1 year after diagnosis in 480 (8.6%) patients with EIN and in 802 (8.2%) patients with uterine cancer. Use of any weight-loss therapy after diagnosis of EIN increased from 4.1% in 2009 to 12.6% in 2020 (P < .001), and the use of any weight-loss therapy after diagnosis of uterine cancer increased from 4.9% in 2009 to 11.4% in 2020 (P < .001). In a multivariable regression model, younger age and patients with high comorbidity score were associated with a higher likelihood of using any weight-loss therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of weight-loss therapy has increased, however there is still a significant underuse of this adjunctive therapy in patients with obesity with EIN or uterine cancer.

Stage IC grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary: assessment of post-operative chemotherapy de-escalation.

OBJECTIVE: Given limited real-world practice data evaluating the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines for possible post-operative chemotherapy omission as a treatment option for patients with stage IC grade 1 endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, this population-based study examined the association between post-operative chemotherapy and overall survival in this tumor group. METHODS: The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was retrospectively queried. The study population was 1207 patients with stage IC grade 1-3 endometrioid ovarian carcinoma who received primary cancer-directed surgery from 2007 to 2020. Overall survival was assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: The median age was 52, 54, and 55 years for grade 1, 2, and 3 groups, respectively (p=0.02). Grade 1 and 2 tumors were more common than grade 3 tumors (n=508 (42.1%), n=493 (40.8%), and n=206 (17.1%), respectively). Chemotherapy use rate for grade 1 tumors was lower compared with grade 2-3 tumors (67.9%, 76.5%, and 78.6%, respectively, p<0.001). When nodal evaluation was performed for grade 1 tumors, among patients who did not receive post-operative chemotherapy and among those who did, 5-year overall survival rate exceeded 90% (93.3% and 96.0%, respectively), with statistically non-significant hazard estimates (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.54, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.73). In contrast, post-operative chemotherapy omission for patients who did not undergo nodal evaluation was associated with decreased overall survival (5-year rates 82.3% vs 96.0%, aHR 5.41, 95% CI 1.95 to 15.06). Results were similar for node-evaluated grade 2 tumors (5-year overall survival rates, 94.6% and 94.4% for node-evaluated post-operative chemotherapy omission and administration, respectively), but not in grade 3 tumors. CONCLUSION: The results of this population-based study may partially support the current clinical practice guidelines for post-operative chemotherapy omission as a possible option for patients with stage IC grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary for those who had lymph node evaluation. Observed data were also supportive for node-evaluated grade 2 tumors, warranting further evaluation.

Racial and ethnic disparities in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: testing the physician-level segregated and differential treatment hypotheses.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms underlying racial and ethnic disparities in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) vs open radical prostatectomy (ORP) are unclear. We sought to test 2 physician-level hypotheses: 1) Segregated Treatment and 2) Differential Treatment. METHODS: This observational study used the New York State Cancer Registry linked to discharge records and included patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer from October 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018. For hypothesis 1, we examined the association between patient race and ethnicity and treating surgeon RARP use (high-use surgeons, low-use surgeons, and surgeons at non-RARP facilities). For hypothesis 2, we determined the association between patient race and ethnicity and receipt of RARP when matching on treating surgeon, age, year of procedure, and Gleason group. We explored the role of insurance in both analyses. RESULTS: This study included 18 926 patients (8.0% Hispanic, 16.9% non-Hispanic Black, 75.1% non-Hispanic White), with a mean age of 60.4 ± 7.1 years. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients had higher odds of being treated by low-RARP-use surgeons (odds ratio [OR] = 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20 to 3.88; OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.94, respectively) and by surgeons at non-RARP facilities (OR = 4.19, 95% CI = 2.18 to 8.07; OR = 4.60, 95% CI = 2.58 to 8.23, respectively). In the matched cohorts, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients were less likely to receive RARP than non-Hispanic White patients (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.98; OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.00, respectively). These associations were partially attenuated after accounting for insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Racial and ethnic disparities in RARP use are related to patients being treated by different surgeons and treated differently by the same surgeons. Identifying and addressing multilevel barriers to equitable surgical treatment is needed to reduce disparities among prostate cancer patients.

Fertility-preserving treatment for stage IA endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The increasing use of fertility-preserving treatments in reproductive-aged patients with early-stage endometrial cancer necessitates robust evidence on the effectiveness of oral progestins and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the outcomes following these 2 primary progestin-based therapies in reproductive-aged patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and randomized controlled trials following the Cochrane Handbook guidance. We conducted a literature search of 5 databases and 1 trial registry from inception of the study to April 16, 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting complete response within 1 year in reproductive-aged patients with clinical stage IA endometrioid cancer undergoing progestin therapy treatment were included. We used data from both observational and randomized controlled studies. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The primary exposure assessed was the type of progestational treatment (oral progestins or LNG-IUD). The primary outcome was the pooled proportion of the best complete response (CR) within 1 year of primary progestational treatment. We performed a proportional meta-analysis to estimate the treatment response. Sensitivity analyses were performed by removing studies with extreme effect sizes or removing grade 2 tumors. The risk of bias was assessed in each study using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. RESULTS: Our analysis involved 754 reproductive-aged patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer, with 490 receiving oral progestin and 264 receiving levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device as their primary progestational treatment. The pooled proportion of the best complete response within 12 months of oral progestin and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device treatment were 66% (95% CI, 55-76) and 86% (95% CI, 69-95), respectively. After removing outlier studies, the pooled proportion was 66% (95% CI, 57-73) for the oral progestin group and 89% (95% CI, 75-96) for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device group, showing reduced heterogeneity. Specifically, among studies including grade 1 tumors, the pooled proportions were 66% (95% CI, 54-77) for the oral progestin group and 83% (95% CI, 50-96) for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device group. The pooled pregnancy rate was 58% (95% CI, 37-76) after oral progestin treatment and 44% (95% CI, 6-90) after levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device treatment. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of oral progestins and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device treatment within a 12-month timeframe for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who desire to preserve fertility. These findings have the potential to assist in personalized treatment decision-making for patients.

A hot-Jupiter progenitor on a super-eccentric retrograde orbit.

Giant exoplanets orbiting close to their host stars are unlikely to have formed in their present configurations1. These 'hot Jupiter' planets are instead thought to have migrated inward from beyond the ice line and several viable migration channels have been proposed, including eccentricity excitation through angular-momentum exchange with a third body followed by tidally driven orbital circularization2,3. The discovery of the extremely eccentric (e = 0.93) giant exoplanet HD 80606 b (ref. 4) provided observational evidence that hot Jupiters may have formed through this high-eccentricity tidal-migration pathway5. However, no similar hot-Jupiter progenitors have been found and simulations predict that one factor affecting the efficacy of this mechanism is exoplanet mass, as low-mass planets are more likely to be tidally disrupted during periastron passage6-8. Here we present spectroscopic and photometric observations of TIC 241249530 b, a high-mass, transiting warm Jupiter with an extreme orbital eccentricity of e = 0.94. The orbit of TIC 241249530 b is consistent with a history of eccentricity oscillations and a future tidal circularization trajectory. Our analysis of the mass and eccentricity distributions of the transiting-warm-Jupiter population further reveals a correlation between high mass and high eccentricity.

Secondary databases in gynecologic cancer research.

Observational and cohort studies using large databases have made important contributions to gynecologic oncology. Knowledge of the advantages and potential limitations of commonly used databases benefits both readers and reviewers. In this review, researchers familiar with National Cancer Database (NCDB), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), SEER-Medicare, MarketScan, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and Premier, describe each database, its included data, access, management, storage, highlights, and limitations. A better understanding of these commonly used datasets can help readers, reviewers, and researchers to more effectively interpret and apply study results, evaluate new research studies, and develop compelling and practice-changing research.

Impact of medicaid expansion on cervical cancer screening: A state-specific difference in difference analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In 2014 the Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid coverage in states that opted to participate. Limited data are available describing the effect of Medicaid expansion on cancer screening. The objective of our study was to evaluate trends in cervical cancer screening associated with Medicaid expansion. METHODS: Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we identified female respondents ages 30-64 years with a household income below $35,000. The outcome measure was guideline-adherent cervical cancer screening. The years 2010 and 2012 constituted the pre-expansion period while 2016 and 2018 were used to capture the post-expansion period. A difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was performed to assess changes in cervical cancer screening in Medicaid expansion states compared to non-expansion states, for the overall sample and for each expansion state individually. RESULTS: The overall DID analysis showed a greater increase in cervical cancer screening by 1.1 percentage points (95% CI: 0.1 to 2.0%, P = 0.03) in expansion states compared to non-expansion states. The analysis comparing individual expansion states to non-expansion states showed that 6 expansion states had a significantly higher increase in screening relative to non-expansion states: Oregon (8.5%, P < 0.001), Kentucky (4.5%, P = 0.001), Washington (4.2%, P = 0.002), Colorado (4.3%, P = 0.008), Nevada (4.7%, P = 0.048), and Ohio (2.8%, P = 0.03). Of these states, 5 ranked among the states with the lowest baseline screening rates. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion states experienced a greater increase in cervical cancer screening relative to non-expansion states. Expansion states with lower baseline screening rates experienced greater increases in screening after expanding Medicaid.

Incidence of induced abortion among commercially insured pregnant patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize pregnancy outcomes and the incidence of induced abortion among pregnant people with a diagnosis of malignancy. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among privately insured people aged 12 to 55 years from the fourth quarter of 2015-2020 using US claims data from Merative MarketScan Research Databases. We included pregnancies from seven states with favorable policies for private insurance coverage of abortion. RESULTS: There were 1471 of 183,685 (0.8%) pregnancies with a cancer diagnosis. Among those receiving anticancer therapy, 21.6% (95% CI: 14.4-30.4%) underwent induced abortion compared with 10.9% (95% CI: 10.8-11.1%) of pregnant patients without a cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Abortion restrictions may affect many pregnant women requiring cancer treatment in early pregnancy.

Understanding sex and gender: concepts and terminology for gender affirming care.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, asexual, and other diverse individuals (LGBTQIA+) people face lower healthcare utilization rates due to discrimination, poor experiences in healthcare, and barriers to accessing care. There is an increasing need to improve care and reduce health care disparities for the LGBTQIA+ population. The medical community can begin by educating themselves on LGBTQIA+ terminology, using inclusive language and developing cultural competence in clinical settings. In order to achieve this, it is first important to understand that sex and gender are distinct and that both sex and gender exist on continuums. This article will build on this understanding by introducing basic and widely accepted terminology that will provide a foundation for providing care to LGBTQIA+ populations. By thoughtfully incorporating this knowledge into our research and clinical practice, the radiology community will enhance the healthcare experiences of all patients.

Patterns of use of primary and first-line chemotherapy for recurrence among patients with cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about real-world patterns of chemotherapy use in patients with cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE: To examine the patterns of chemotherapy use in patients with cervical cancer METHODS: We identified patients with cervical cancer in the IBM MarketScan Database who underwent primary hysterectomy or radiation therapy between 2011 and 2020 and described their treatment in the primary setting and at first recurrence. RESULTS: We identified 5390 patients: 2667 (49.5%) underwent primary hysterectomy and 2723 (50.5%) primary radiotherapy. Among patients who underwent primary hysterectomy, 979 (36.7%) received adjuvant radiation, and 617 (23.1%) received primary chemotherapy. The most common chemotherapy regimens were single-agent platinum (51.7%), platinum combination therapy (42.9%), and non-platinum (3.4%). Among patients treated with primary radiation, 73.6% received primary/concurrent chemotherapy, either platinum alone (66.4% of those who received chemotherapy), platinum combinations (32.2%), or non-platinum (1.4%). The median duration of primary chemotherapy was 1.2 months. Therapy for recurrent cervical cancer was initiated in 959 patients. The most common regimens were platinum combination (63.9%), non-platinum cytotoxic agents (16.5%), single-agent platinum (14.9%), targeted therapy with bevacizumab (6.0%), and immunotherapy with pembrolizumab (3.2%). Overall, the proportion of patients treated with single-agent platinum therapy increased from 17.4% in 2011 to 32.1% in 2019, while platinum combinations decreased from 64.1% to 41.5% over the same years. Use of non-platinum agents increased from 18.5% in 2011 to 32.9% in 2018 and 26.4% in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the most commonly used therapy in patients with cervical cancer in the primary setting and at the time of recurrence. The rate of use of non-platinum agents at first recurrence has increased over time.

Primary Cytoreduction and Survival for Patients With Less-Common Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

This cohort study examines the association between primary cytoreduction status and survival for patients with less-common, advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Utilization and Surgical Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rate and surgical outcomes of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). METHODS: We conducted a cohort study that used the prospective American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Women with EIN on postoperative pathology who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy from 2012 to 2020 were included. The cohort was dichotomized based on the performance of SLN biopsy. Patients' characteristics, perioperative morbidity, and mortality were compared between patients who underwent SLN biopsy and those who did not. Postoperative complications were defined using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. RESULTS: Overall, 4,447 patients were included; of those, 586 (13.2%) underwent SLN biopsy. The proportion of SLN biopsy has increased steadily from 0.6% in 2012 to 26.1% in 2020 ( P <.001), with a rate of 16% increase per year. In a multivariable regression that included age, body mass index (BMI), and year of surgery, a more recent year of surgery was independently associated with an increased adjusted odds ratio of undergoing SLN biopsy (1.51, 95% CI, 1.43-1.59). The mean total operative time was longer in the SLN biopsy group (139.50±50.34 minutes vs 131.64±55.95 minutes, P =.001). The rate of any complication was 5.9% compared with 6.7%, the rate of major complications was 2.3% compared with 2.4%, and the rate of minor complications was 4.1% compared with 4.9% for no SLN biopsy and SLN biopsy, respectively. In a single complications analysis, the rate of venous thromboembolism was higher in the SLN biopsy group (four [0.7%] vs four [0.1%], P =.013). In a multivariable regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, uterus weight, and preoperative hematocrit, the performance of SLN biopsy was not associated with any complications, major complications, or minor complications. CONCLUSION: The performance of SLN biopsy in EIN is increasing. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for EIN is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and a negligible increased surgical time.