Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lasers Surg Med ; 2024 Sep 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39308037

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study evaluates the effectiveness of pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment in early versus late treatment groups for traumatic or postoperative scars. The study aims to determine the threshold between early and late treatment. Additionally, it investigates factors that may influence wound healing outcomes. METHODS: The medical records of 147 patients who underwent PDL treatment at our institution between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients receiving PDL treatment for traumatic or postoperative scars. Out of these patients, we selected those who were willing to receive telephone interviews or re-visit at a scheduled time. Eventually, 52 participants were included in our study. A standardized questionnaire was administered to all participants during telephone interviews, encompassing inquiries regarding their medical history, treatment experiences, and the patient component of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Among the enrolled patients, 38 were contacted and interviewed via telephone, while the remaining 14 patients attended follow-up visits where photographs of their current skin condition were captured. The pretreatment and latest follow-up photographs obtained from the clinical database were independently scored in a blinded manner by two dermatologist reviewers using both the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Manchester Scar Scale. RESULTS: Among the 52 patients, 43 (82.7%) were successfully treated with good response. The correlation coefficients between week-to-treatment initiation and posttreatment MSS and VSS among patients with good response were 0.50 (p < 0.001) and 0.46 (p = 0.002), respectively. Given these findings, we established a treatment initiation threshold of 10 weeks, distinguishing patients into early and late treatment groups. The early treatment group showed borderline significantly lower posttreatment MSS and VSS scores than the late treatment group (MSS: 7.5 ± 2.1 vs. 9.3 ± 2.5, p = 0.011; VSS: 2.8 ± 2.0 vs. 4.5 ± 2.3, p = 0.011). Furthermore, both MSS and VSS of posttreatment showed significantly greater improvement in the early treatment group (4.4 ± 1.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.9; p = 0.03 and 3.8 ± 1.8 vs. 2.8 ± 1.4; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention using a PDL within 10 weeks post-injury achieved better outcomes in treating traumatic and postoperative scars based on both clinical and patient opinions.

2.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 216, 2024 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39141143

RESUMEN

This brief report discusses the challenges in treating dermal melanosis and the limitations of current laser treatments due to inadequate tissue penetration and potential side effects. It introduces laser-induced optical breakdown (LIOB) as a novel therapeutic approach using a picosecond laser with a diffractive lens array (DLA) to target dermal pigmentation effectively. LIOB induces multiphoton ionization, leading to melanin clearance through phagocytosis and apoptotic cell removal, while also promoting dermal remodeling and collagen synthesis. We present a case of successful treatment of dermal pigmentation in a 55-year-old woman using 755 nm-picosecond alexandrite laser therapy, demonstrating significant improvement without recurrence. The findings suggest that LIOB offers a promising solution for acquired dermal hypermelanosis by addressing both diffuse and localized pigmentation effectively, leading to skin rejuvenation with minimal downtime and high patient satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Melanosis/radioterapia , Melanosis/terapia , Melaninas/metabolismo , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/instrumentación , Rejuvenecimiento
4.
J Clin Med ; 13(9)2024 Apr 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731121

RESUMEN

Objective: The aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence on the clinical efficacy of different relaxation exercises on intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. Methods: A systemic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science was undertaken from the earliest record to 10 April 2024. Peer-reviewed studies that reported on healthy individuals and glaucoma patients engaging in relaxation exercises for at least three weeks were included. The primary outcome was changes in IOP levels from baseline, before the commencement of relaxation exercises, to post-exercise. Our statistical analysis employed a random-effects model, with effect sizes reported using Hedges' g. Results: Twelve studies were included, totaling 764 eyes (mean participant age ranging from 21.07 to 69.50 years). Relaxation exercises significantly reduced IOP, with Hedges' g being -1.276 (95% CI: -1.674 to -0.879) and I2 = 84.4%. Separate subgroup analyses showed that breathing exercises (Hedges' g = -0.860, p < 0.0001), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) (Hedges' g = -1.79, p < 0.0001), and ocular exercises (Hedges' g = -0.974, p < 0.0001) were associated with reduced IOP levels. The reduction in IOP following the relaxation exercises was found to be associated with baseline IOP either greater than (Hedges' g = -1.473, p < 0.0001) or less than 21 mmHg (Hedges' g = -1.22, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, this effect persisted with follow-up durations of less than (Hedges' g = -1.161, p < 0.0001) and more than one month (Hedges' g = -1.324, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The current meta-analysis indicates that relaxation exercises can significantly reduce IOP levels. Relaxation exercises are a potential class of novel treatments for glaucoma patients that deserve further evaluation.

5.
Life (Basel) ; 14(4)2024 Mar 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38672710

RESUMEN

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in an increasing population that is experiencing a wide range of long-lasting symptoms after recovery from the acute infection. Long COVID refers to this specific condition and is associated with diverse symptoms, such as fatigue, myalgias, dyspnea, headache, cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative symptoms, anxiety, depression, and a sense of despair. The potential of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) to improve chronic fatigue, cognitive impairments, and neurological disorders has been established; therefore, the use of HBOT to treat long COVID has also been studied. We conducted a literature search between 1 January 2019 and 30 October 2023, focusing on the clinical efficacy and utility of HBOT for treating long COVID and found ten clinical studies that fit the review topic, including one case report, five one-group pretest-posttest design studies, one safety report from a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and three complete reports of RCTs. Most studies found that HBOT can improve quality of life, fatigue, cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and cardiopulmonary function. Although HBOT has shown some benefits for long COVID symptoms, further rigorous large-scale RCTs are required to establish precise indications, protocols, and post-treatment evaluations.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA