RESUMEN
Microplastics play a significant role in interactions between organisms and hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs), leading to a joint toxic effect on aquatic organisms. This study extensively investigated the tissue-specific accumulation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) resulting from different sized microplastics in tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) using a passive dosing device. Based on biological feeding behavior considerations, 1 mm and 2 µm polystyrene (PS) microplastics with concentrations of 2 and 5 mg L-1 were investigated. A physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) model was applied to evaluate the exchange kinetics and fluxes among the tissues. Moreover, an in vitro simulation experiment was conducted to theoretically validate the vector effect. The findings demonstrated that the effects caused by HOCs and microplastics on organisms were influenced by multiple factors such as size and surface properties. The mass transfer kinetics of HOCs in specific tissues were closely related to their adsorption capacity and position microplastics could reach. Specifically, although 2 µm microplastics exhibited high adsorption capacity for PCBs, they were only retained in the intestines and did not significantly contribute to the bioaccumulation of PCBs in gills or muscle. While 1 mm microplastics were ingested but just paused in the mouth and subsequently flew through the gills with oral mucus. Their vector effects increased the desorption of microplastic-bound PCB-118 in the gill mucus microcosm, thereby facilitating the mass transfer and accumulation of PCB-118 in gills and muscle. This study sheds new light on how the size-dependent vector generated by microplastics affects the tissue-specific accumulation of HOCs in aquatic organisms.
Asunto(s)
Bifenilos Policlorados , Tilapia , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Animales , Microplásticos , Plásticos/metabolismo , Bifenilos Policlorados/análisis , Tilapia/metabolismo , Bioacumulación , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Organismos Acuáticos/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), with a high incidence in old-age population, adversely affects their life quality. The valgus knee bracing is an important physical therapy for KOA, but its clinical effects on pain release and functional improvement remained unclear. This meta-analysis is to systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes of valgus knee bracing in patients with KOA. METHODS: A meta-analysis of clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pain and functional changes in patients with KOA after using valgus knee braces. The search period was ranged from the inception of the database to May 2020. The enrolled research databases included PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Two investigators independently formulated inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria and screened and determined the final enrolled literature. Then the outcome indicators were extracted and organized from the included literature, and the risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1. RESULTS: A total of 10 articles were included in this study, including 739 patients. Eight articles were related to the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and the results showed that RR = - 0.29, 95% CI - 0.73, 0.15], P = 0.20; four articles were related to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function score, and the results showed that RR = - 0.15, 95% CI [- 0.41, 0.11], P = 0.26; two articles were related to the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the results showed that RR = 0.58, 95% CI [- 4.25, 5.42], P = 0.81; and three articles were related to the KOOS Activities of Daily Living (KOOS-ADL), and the results showed that RR = 0.04, 95% CI [- 0.62, 0.69], P = 0.91. These results indicated that the valgus knee bracing has no statistical significance in pain and functional activity improvement of patients with KOA. The subgroup analysis showed that the follow-up time was the source of the heterogeneity of the VAS pain score. CONCLUSION: Our current evidence suggests that valgus knee bracing may not improve pain release and function activates in KOA patients in the long-term period, but only being beneficial to the short-term rehabilitation.
Asunto(s)
Tirantes , Rodilla , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/rehabilitación , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Actividades Cotidianas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/rehabilitación , Dimensión del Dolor , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The sclerotic zone in the osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH), containing condensed trabecular bone and abundant neovascularization, is the transition area between osteonecrosis and normal tissue. Due to the prominent feature in ONFH, the characteristics of the sclerotic zone might indicate the femoral head survival of the disease. Thirty ONFH patients (41 hips) with ring-shaped sclerotic zone at Association Research Circulation Osseous-II were recruited during 1996 to 2019, and the corresponding radiographic images in their follow-up are reviewed retrospectively. Two subtypes (type A and B) are defined to discriminate different locations of ring-shaped sclerotic zone in the femoral head (center or subchondral bone plate) in accordance with the radiographic images. The natural history of the enrolled subjects was followed up for average 9 years to record and compare their collapse incidences as well as the progress of hip symptoms. Chi-square test shows that the occurrence rates of symptomatic hip of type A are significantly lower than that of type B and differences between these two groups were significant (P < 0.05). Kaplan Meier survival curve analysis shows that the mean survival time of type A is 247.600 M (95% CI: 203.072 â¼ 292.128 M) and type B is 88.795 M (95% CI: 72.607 â¼ 104.984 M). The survival rate of femoral head of type A is significantly higher than that of type B (P < 0.005). This study demonstrates that type A shows a more satisfactory clinical outcomes and lower femoral head collapse rate in a mid-term follow-up.