GIFTS: Geriatric Intensive Functional Therapy Sessions - For the older trauma patient.

BACKGROUND: Considering resources for comprehensive geriatric (GERI) care, it would be beneficial for geriatric trauma (GTP) and medical patients to be co-managed in one program focusing on ancillary therapeutics (AT): physical (PT), occupational (OT), speech (SLP), respiratory (RT) and sleep wake hygiene (SWH). This pilot describes outcomes of GTP in a hospital-wide program focused on GERI-specific AT. METHODS: GTP and GERI patients were screened by program coordinator (PC) for enrollment at one Level II trauma center from Aug 2021-Dec 2022. Enrolled patients (EP) were admitted to trauma or medicine floors and received repetitive AT with attention to SWH throughout hospitalization and compared to similar non-enrolled patients (NEP). Excluded patients had any of the following: indication of geriatric syndrome with FRAIL 5, no frailty with FRAIL 0, comfort focused plans, or arrived from skilled care. Retrospective chart review of demographics and outcomes was completed for both EP and NEP. RESULTS: 224 EP (28 trauma (TR)) were compared to 574 NEP (148 TR). EP showed shorter LOS (mean 3.8 vs 6.1, p = 0.0001), less delirium (3.1% vs 9.6%, p = 0.00222), less time to ambulate (13 h vs 39 h, p = 0.0005), and higher likelihood to discharge home (56% vs 27%, p < 0.0001) as compared to NEP. Median FRAIL was 3 for both groups. Medical enrolled (M-EP) ambulated the soonest at 11 average hours, compared to 23 hours for TR-EP, compared to 39 hours for NEP. Zero delirium events among TR-EP; 25% among TR-NEP, p = 0.00288. CONCLUSION: Despite a small trauma cohort, results support feasibility to include GTP in hospital-wide programs with GERI specific AT. Mobility and cognitive strategies may improve opportunities to avoid delirium, decrease LOS and influence more frequent disposition to home. TYPE OF STUDY: Original observational retrospective review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV- Therapeutic / Care Management.

How care decisions are made among interdisciplinary providers caring for critically injured patients: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Injury is the leading cause of death in people under 45 years of age in the United States; however, how care decisions occur in critical injury is poorly understood. This exploratory study sought to generate hypotheses about how care decisions are made among interdisciplinary providers caring for patients who have been critically injured. METHODS: This was a qualitative study conducted at two intensive care units in a level 1 trauma center in an urban, teaching, safety-net hospital. Semistructured interviews consisted of case scenarios with competing clinical priorities presented to 25 interdisciplinary providers, elucidating how decisions are approached. Responses were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Thematic analysis was conducted to discover central themes. Category formulation and sorting was done for data reduction and thematic structuring of the data. The range and central tendency of these themes are reported. RESULTS: The central theme for how care decisions are made among interdisciplinary providers was through the distribution of shared responsibility. The distribution of shared responsibility depended on interdisciplinary communication to navigate the two subthemes of time and roles. Time had to be navigated carefully, because it was both an opportunity for data acquisition and consensus building but also a pressure to decisively progress care. Roles were distinct but interchangeable and consisted of experts, actualizers, and questioners. CONCLUSION: Care decisions are made in the context of shared responsibility among interdisciplinary providers. Interdisciplinary communication is a means of establishing roles and navigating time to distribute shared responsibility among interdisciplinary providers.

Neurologic Emergencies Presenting as Trauma Activations to an Urban Level I Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: It is speculated that there is overlap between neurologic emergencies and trauma, yet to date there has not been a study looking at the prevalence of neurologic emergencies amongst trauma activations. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prevalence of neurologic emergencies in patients presenting to a level I trauma center as trauma team activations (TTAs). We explored a subset of acute ischemic stroke patients to determine delays in management. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of trauma registry data capturing all TTAs at a level I trauma and stroke center from 2011 to 2016. Neurologic emergencies were defined as ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or status epilepticus. Among patients diagnosed with acute ischemic strokes, we compared stroke metrics with hospital stroke data during the same period. RESULTS: There were 18,859 trauma activations during the study period, of which 117 (0.6%) had a neurologic emergency. There were 52 patients with ischemic stroke (45%), 39 with intracerebral hemorrhage (34%), 15 with subarachnoid hemorrhage (13%), and 10 with status epilepticus (9%). Among the 52 patients with ischemic stroke, 20 (38%) received intravenous thrombolysis. The median time to computed tomography scan was 23 min and the median time to thrombolysis (tissue plasminogen activator) was 60 min. When compared with non-TTA patients during the same time period, both median time to computed tomography scan and time to tissue plasminogen activator were similar (p = 0.16 and p = 0.6, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic emergencies, though relatively uncommon, do exist among TTAs. Despite the TTA, eligible patients met the benchmarks for acute stroke care delivery.

Management of duodenal trauma: A retrospective review from the Panamerican Trauma Society.

INTRODUCTION: The operative management of duodenal trauma remains controversial. Our hypothesis is that a simplified operative approach could lead to better outcomes. METHODS: We conducted an international multicenter study, involving 13 centers. We performed a retrospective review from January 2007 to December of 2016. Data on demographics, mechanism of trauma, blood loss, operative time, and associated injured organs were collected. Outcomes included postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis, leak, need for unplanned surgery, length of stay, renal failure, and mortality. We used the Research Electronic Data Capture tool to store the data. Poisson regression using a backward selection method was used to identify independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: We collected data of 372 patients with duodenal injuries. Although the duodenal trauma was complex (median Injury Severity Score [ISS], 18 [interquartile range, 2-3]; Abbreviated Injury Scale, 3.5 [3-4]; American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade, 3 [2-3]), primary repair alone was the most common type of operative management (80%, n = 299). Overall mortality was 24%. On univariate analysis, mortality was associated with male gender, lower admission systolic blood pressure, need for transfusion before operative repair, higher intraoperative blood loss, longer operative time, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, higher ISS, and associated pancreatic injury. Poisson regression showed higher ISS, associated pancreatic injury, postoperative renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, the need for preoperative transfusion, and male gender remained significant predictors of mortality. Duodenal suture line leak was statistically significantly lower, and patients had primary repair over every American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade of injury. CONCLUSIONS: The need for transfusion prior to the operating room, associated pancreatic injuries, and postoperative renal failure are predictors of mortality for patients with duodenal injuries. Primary repair alone is a common and safe operative repair even for complex injuries when feasible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Routine computed tomography after recent operative exploration for penetrating trauma: What injuries do we miss?

BACKGROUND: Patients with penetrating trauma who cannot be stabilized undergo operative intervention without preoperative imaging. In such cases, postoperative imaging may reveal additional injuries not identified during the initial operative exploration. The purpose of this study is to explore the utility of postoperative CT imaging in the setting of penetrating trauma. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with penetrating trauma treated at an urban Level 1 trauma center between 2010 and 2015. Patients were included if they underwent an emergent laparotomy without preoperative imaging. Patients were excluded if they had prior imaging or concomitant blunt injury. For the purposes of this study, occult injury was defined as a CT scan finding not mentioned in the first operative report. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patient characteristics who had received imaging immediately postoperatively with those who had not. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, 328 patients who had a laparotomy for penetrating trauma over the study period, 225 patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-three (32%) patients underwent CT scanning immediately postoperatively with occult injuries identified in 38 (52%) patients. The most frequent occult injuries were orthopedic (20 of 43) and genitourinary (9 of 43). Importantly, 10 (26%) of the 38 patients required an intervention for these occult injuries. Those selected for immediate postoperative imaging were more likely to have sustained gunshot wounds and were significantly more severely injured (higher Injury Severity Score and longer length of hospital stay) when compared to patients who did not receive immediate imaging. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of immediate postoperative CT after emergent laparotomy especially when there is a high index of suspicion for spine or genitourinary injuries and in patients who have sustained ballistic penetrating injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV; diagnostic tests or criteria, level IV.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia: Which patients have long term benefit?

PURPOSE: Biliary dyskinesia (BD) is described as biliary colic in the absence of gallstones. The diagnosis relies on imaging studies and decreased excretion of bile in response to cholecystokinin during quantitative cholescintigraphy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for relieving symptoms in patients diagnosed with BD and correlate gallbladder ejection fraction (EF) with symptom relief. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at a single institution of all patients who underwent LC for BD from January 2005 through January 2012. The diagnosis of BD was determined by a normal gallbladder as viewed with ultrasonography and cholescintigraphy with a gallbladder EF less than or equal to 45%. Data collection included demographics, results of imaging studies, pathologic diagnosis, and early postoperative pain relief. Patients were contacted by phone after being discharged from the surgeon's care for evaluation of symptom relief. Data were analyzed with nonparametric statistical methods, including Mann-Whitney U test, receiver operator characteristic, Fisher exact test, and χ(2) test. All data are expressed as median and 25th and 75th percentile range. RESULTS: There were 126 patients who had a LC for BD during the study period. The median biliary EF was 20% (10-29%). The most common pathologic finding was chronic cholecystitis (n = 95; 75%). Median length of follow-up in the perioperative period was 11 days (8-17), during which time 98 patients (78%) had relief of symptoms. Phone interviews (n = 53; 42%) confirmed 66% (n = 35) of patients remained free of pain. There was no difference in the mean EF among those with resolution of pain 20% (10-29%) compared with patients with persistent pain 23% (11-29%), P = .62. Obese patients were more likely to have persistent symptoms in the perioperative period with a shift to lower body mass index at the time of the phone survey. Receiver operator characteristic characteristic for the association between scintigraphic EF and resolution of postoperative pain demonstrated no association, with the area under the curve equal to 0.47. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients in this series with BD had resolution of symptoms with LC. However, cholescintigraphy EF did not correlate with outcome. Further studies are needed to better identify patients diagnosed with BD who will benefit from LC.