Development, Validation, and Impact of Patient Information Booklet for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.

Background: The inadequate awareness in the general population is a primary concern for the management of various neurosurgical ailments treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). Objective: Our study aimed to assess the written patient information by focusing on readability, recall, communication, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Methodology: The senior author formulated disease-specific patient information booklets. The booklets comprised two segments: general information about GKRS and disease-specific information. The common themes for discussion were "What is your disease?", "What is gamma knife radiosurgery?", "What are the alternatives to gamma knife radiosurgery," "The benefits of gamma knife radiosurgery," "About gamma knife radiosurgery," "Recovering from gamma knife radiosurgery," "Follow up," "What are the risks," and "Contact." The booklet was emailed after the first consultation to 102 patients. Patients' socioeconomic status and comprehensibility were assessed on validated scoring. Post-GKRS, we emailed a custom-made Google feedback survey of 10 leading questions about the role of patient information booklet in educating and decision-making process. We tried to assess if the booklet helped the patient understand the disease and treatment options. Results: In total, 94% of patients read it thoroughly and understood it to their satisfaction. They also shared and discussed the information booklet with their family members and relatives (92%). Furthermore, 96% of patients found the disease-specific information informative. For 83% of patients, the information brochure cleared the doubts regarding the GKRS completely. For 66% of patients, their expectations met the reality. In addition, 94% of patients still recommended giving the booklet to the patients. All high, upper- and middle-class responders were happy and content with the patient information booklet. In contrast, 18 (90%) of the lower middle class and 2 (66.7%) of the lower class considered the information useful to the patients. Also, 90% patients found the language of the patient information booklet comprehensible and not too technical to understand. Conclusions: An essential component of disease management is to relieve the anxiety and confusion in the patient's mind and help one choose a treatment modality among the available options. A patient-centric booklet helps impart knowledge, clears doubts, and provides an opportunity to discuss options with family members.