Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Int J Oncol ; 64(6)2024 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757345

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the leading causes of cancer­related mortality worldwide, is challenging to identify in its early stages and prone to metastasis, and the prognosis of patients with this disease is poor. Treatment options for HCC are limited, with even radical treatments being associated with a risk of recurrence or transformation in the short term. Furthermore, the multi­tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for first­line therapy have marked drawbacks, including drug resistance and side effects. The rise and breakthrough of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have provided a novel direction for HCC immunotherapy but these have the drawback of low response rates. Since avoiding apoptosis is a universal feature of cancer, the induction of non­apoptotic regulatory cell death (NARCD) is a novel strategy for HCC immunotherapy. At present, NARCD pathways, including ferroptosis, pyroptosis and necroptosis, are novel potential forms of immunogenic cell death, which have synergistic effects with antitumor immunity, transforming immune 'cold' tumors into immune 'hot' tumors and exerting antitumor effects. Therefore, these pathways may be targeted as a novel treatment strategy for HCC. In the present review, the roles of ferroptosis, pyroptosis and necroptosis in antitumor immunity in HCC are discussed, and the relevant targets and signaling pathways, and the current status of combined therapy with ICIs are summarized. The prospects of targeting ferroptosis, pyroptosis and necroptosis in HCC immunotherapy are also considered.


Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Ferroptosis , Immunotherapy , Liver Neoplasms , Necroptosis , Pyroptosis , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/immunology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/immunology , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Pyroptosis/drug effects , Pyroptosis/immunology , Ferroptosis/drug effects , Necroptosis/immunology , Necroptosis/drug effects , Immunotherapy/methods , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Animals
2.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 2024 Mar 25.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528290

Men are inevitably plagued by prostate disease throughout their lives. However, the understanding of the pathogenesis of prostate diseases is still limited. In the 1960s, McNeal proposed the theory of prostate zones: the prostate was divided into three main zones: transition zone, central zone, and peripheral zone. Over the past 50 years, significant differences between different prostate zones have been gradually revealed. We summarized the most significant differences in different zones of the prostate. For the first time, we proposed the "apparent difference in prostate zones" concept. This new concept has been proposed to understand the different zones of the prostate better. It also provided new ideas for exploring the susceptibility of lesions in different prostate zones. Despite the reported differences between zones, the treatment of prostate-related diseases remains partition agnostic. Therefore, we also discussed the clinical significance of the "apparent difference in the prostate zone" and emphasized the necessity of prostate zones.

...