Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Seizure ; 96: 121-127, 2022 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35202928

PURPOSE: Between 16-77% of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy report seizures before diagnosis but little is known about the risk factors for diagnostic delay. Here, we examined the association between prior seizures and neuroimaging findings in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. METHODS: Adults diagnosed with focal epilepsy at First Seizure Clinics (FSC) at the Royal Melbourne Hospital or Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia, between 2000 and 2010 were included. Medical records were audited for seizure history accrued from the detailed FSC interview. Potentially epileptogenic brain abnormality type, location and extent was determined from neuroimaging. Statistical analysis comprised multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 735 patients, 44% reported seizure/s before the index seizure. Among the 260 individuals with a potentially epileptogenic brain imaging abnormality, 34% reported prior seizures. Of 475 individuals with no abnormality, 50% reported prior seizures (p < 0.001). Patients with post-stroke changes had lower odds of prior seizures (n = 24/95, OR 0.5, p = 0.005) compared to patients without abnormalities, as did patients with high-grade tumors (n = 1/10, OR 0.1, p = 0.04). Abnormality location or extent was not associated with seizures. Prior seizures were inversely associated with age, patients aged >50 years had lower odds compared to those 18-30 years (OR 0.5, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A history of prior seizures is less common in patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy associated with antecedent stroke or high-grade tumor than in those without a lesion, and is also less common in older individuals. These findings may be related to age, biological mechanisms or aspects of diagnosis and assessment of these events.


Epilepsies, Partial , Epilepsy , Adult , Aged , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Delayed Diagnosis , Epilepsies, Partial/diagnosis , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Humans , Middle Aged , Seizures/diagnosis
2.
Epilepsia Open ; 6(1): 171-180, 2021 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33681660

Objective: 'First seizure' clinics (FSCs) aim to achieve early expert assessment for individuals with possible new-onset epilepsy. These clinics also have substantial potential for research into epilepsy evolution, outcomes, and costs. However, a paucity of FSCs details has implications for interpretation and utilization of this research. Methods: We reviewed investigation findings over 11 years (2000-2010) from two established independent FSCs at Austin Health (AH) and Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), Australia. These adult clinics are in major public hospitals and operate with similar levels of expertise. Organizational differences include screening and dedicated administration at AH. Included were N = 1555 patients diagnosed with new-onset unprovoked seizures/epilepsy (AH n = 901, RMH n = 654). Protocol-driven interviews and investigations had been recorded prospectively and were extracted from medical records for study. Results: Median patient age was 37 (IQR 26-52, range 18-94) years (AH 34 vs RMH 42 years; P < .001). Eighty-six percent of patients attended FSC within three weeks postindex seizure (median AH 12 vs RMH 25 days; P < .01). By their first appointment, 42% had experienced ≥2 seizures. An EEG was obtained within three weeks postindex seizure in 73% of patients, demonstrating epileptiform discharges in 25% (AH 33% vs RMH 15%). Seventy-six percent of patients had an MRI within 6 weeks. Of those with imaging (n = 1500), 19% had potentially epileptogenic abnormalities (RMH 28% vs AH 12%; P < .01). At both sites, changes due to previous stroke/hemorrhage were the commonest lesions, followed by traumatic brain injury. ≥WHO level 1 brain tumors diagnosed at presentation comprised a very small proportion (<1%) at each clinic. At both sites, epilepsy type could be determined in 60% of patients; RMH had more focal and AH more generalized epilepsy diagnoses. Significance: Differences between the clinics' administrative and screening practices may contribute to differences in investigation findings. Insight into these differences will facilitate interpretation and utilization, and planning of future research.


Ambulatory Care Facilities/standards , Seizures/diagnosis , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities/organization & administration , Australia , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data
...