ESPRAS Survey: National and European Societies for Plastic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The European Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (ESPRAS) comprises 40 national societies across Europe. In addition to ESPRAS, there are 8 different European Plastic Surgery societies representing Plastic Surgeons in Europe. The 4th European Leadership Forum (ELF) of ESPRAS, held under the motto "Stronger together in Europe" in Munich in 2023, aimed to collect and disseminate information regarding the national member societies of ESPRAS and European societies for Plastic Surgeons. The purpose was to identify synergies and redundancies and promote improved cooperation and exchange to enhance coordinated decision-making at the European level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted regarding the organisational structures, objectives and challenges of national and European societies for Plastic Surgeons in Europe. This survey was distributed to official representatives (Presidents, Vice Presidents and General Secretaries) and delegates of national and European societies at the ELF meeting. Missing information was completed using data obtained from the official websites of the respective European societies. Preliminary results were discussed during the 4th ELF meeting in Munich in March 2023. RESULTS: The ESPRAS survey included 22 national and 9 European Plastic Surgery societies representing more than 7000 Plastic Surgeons in Europe. Most national societies consist of less than 500 full members (median 182 members (interquartile range (IQR) 54-400); n=22). European societies, which covered the full spectrum or subspecialities, differed in membership types and congress cycles, with some requiring applications by individuals and others including national societies. The main purposes of the societies include research, representation against other disciplines, specialisation and education as well as more individual goals like patient care and policy regulation. CONCLUSION: This ESPRAS survey offers key insights into the structures, requirements and challenges of national and European societies for Plastic Surgeons, highlighting the relevance of ongoing close exchange between the societies to foster professional advancement and reduce redundancies. Future efforts of the ELF will continue to further explore strategies for enhancing collaboration and harmonisation within the European Plastic Surgery landscape.

Efficacy of a retinoid complex plus anti-inflammatory component cream alone or in combination with prebiotic food supplement in adult acne: A randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, multicenter trial on 184 women.

BACKGROUND: Adult female acne (AFA) nowadays is a very common skin condition affecting mainly women aged between 25 and 40. The treatment of AFA could be challenging. STUDY AIM: We evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of a cream formulation containing two retinoid molecules (hydroxypinacolone/retinyl palmitate) combined with Iris Florentina root extract and a complex of three oligopeptides (C) applied twice a day (morning and evening) alone or in combination (C + O) with a food supplement containing a mixture of prebiotic molecules (FOS&GOS) zinc, lactoferrin, and niacinamide. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, assessor-blinded, 12-week trial, we assessed the efficacy of these two regimens in the evolution of AFA lesions (non-inflammatory: NI-L; inflammatory: IL; and total number of lesions: TL). Additional efficacy endpoints were the evolution of the 6-point (from 0 to 5) GEA and Adult Female Acne Scoring Tool (AFAST) scores. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four women (mean age 32 ± 6 years) with AFA agreed to participate after obtaining informed consent. They were randomized (2:1) to the topical product (n = 123) (Group C) or to the combination (n = 61) (Group C + O) treatment. All enrolled patients concluded the trial with no drop-out. At baseline, NI-L, IL, and TL acne lesion count were 15 ± 9, 9 ± 5, and 24 ± 14 in the Group C and 19 ± 8, 9 ± 4, and 29 ± 10 in Group C + O. In comparison with the number of the acne lesions at the baseline, both treatment regimens induced a significant reduction (p = 0.0001, ANOVA test) at Week 12 in NI-L, IL, and TL by -54%, -63%, and - 59% in Group C and by -55%, -73%, and - 61% in the Group C + O, respectively. At Week 12, the absolute IL count reduction vs. baseline was significantly (p = 0.0158) greater in Group C + O (-7.0) in comparison with Group C (-5.5). The GEA absolute score reduction in Group C + O group was significantly greater in comparison with Group C (-1.5 vs. -1.1; p = 0.0097). In the Group C + O, a greater percentage of success treatment (defined as a GEA score of 0/1 at Week 12) was observed in comparison with Group C (39% vs. 27%; p = 0.06). AFAST score at baseline was 2.4 ± 0.5 in group C and 2.8 ± 0.6 in group C + O. AFAST score was reduced by 21% and by 51% after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment in group C and by 22% and 55% in group C + O, respectively. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated. Not relevant adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: A cream containing retinoid molecules and Iris Florentina root extract is effective and well tolerated in the management of AFA. The treatment combination with a prebiotic and anti-inflammatory food supplement offers an additional clinical benefit mainly in reducing inflammatory lesions and improving the severity acne score.

Prognostic factors related to surgical outcome of liver metastases of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The role of hepatectomy for patients with liver metastases of breast cancer (LMBC) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to share our experience with hepatic resection in a relatively unselected group of patients with LMBC and analyse the prognostic factors and indications for surgery. METHODS: In 2000 to 2006, 42 female patients with a mean age of 58.2 years (range, 39 to 69 years) with LMBC diagnosed by means of abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging in the hospital. They were considered for surgery because of limited comorbidities, presence of seven or fewer liver tumors and absence of (or limited and stable) extrahepatic disease on preoperative imaging. Patients' demographics, metastatic characteristics as well as clinical and operative parameters were being studied. Overall actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were calculated since the hepatic resection onwards using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Metastatic tumor size of ≤4 cm (p=0.03), R0 resection (p=0.02), negative portal lymph nodes (p=0.01), response to chemotherapy (p=0.02), and positive hormone receptor status (p=0.03) were associated with better survival outcomes on univariate analysis. However, it did not show survival benefits on multivariate analysis. The disease-free survival and overall survival are 29.40 and 43 months, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 84.61%, 64.11%, and 38.45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Selected patients with isolated LMBC may benefit from surgical management; although, indications remain unclear and the risks may outweigh the benefits in patients with a generally poor prognosis. Improvements in preoperative staging and progressive application of new multimodality treatments will be the key to improved survival rates in this severe disease. The careful selection of patients is associated with a satisfactory long-term survival rate.