A long term outcomes analysis of severe haemophilia A boys receiving 4 years prophylaxis on the Chinese Haemophilia Individualized escalating low dose Prophylaxis (CHIPS).

BACKGROUND: The Chinese Haemophilia Individualized Prophylaxis Study (CHIPS), which was launched in 2016, reported a significant reduction in haemarthrosis over a one-year study. However, its long-term efficacy requires verification. This paper summarizes the clinical outcomes of 18 severe haemophilia A (SHA) patients who completed one year on the CHIPS and 3 more years of follow-up. METHODS: Clinical follow-up was based on the CHIPS protocol (from July 2018 to July 2021). Escalation was based on index joint bleeding, and serial ultrasound (greyscale and colour Doppler) examinations of the index joints (both sides of the ankles, knees and elbows) were conducted every 6 months via a scoring system. RESULTS: A total of 18 SHA patients completed the 3-year study. Fifteen patients dropped out due to the financial crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. The median age was 5.4 (range 4.3-6.9) years. A significant reduction in haemarthrosis was achieved, with mean annual bleeding rates reduced from 18.9 ± 2.8 to 1.7 ± 0.4 (p < 0.001), annual joint bleeding rates from 3.1 ± 0.7 to1.2 ± 0.3 (p < 0.028). 5 out of 8 target joint resolved. Sixteen doses were escalated. At study exit, the heterogeneous treatment outcomes of the SHA boys were 5 at step 4 (20-25 lU/kg, every other day), 10 at step 3 (15-20 IU/kg, 3×/week), 2 at step 2 (10-15 lU/kg, 3×/week) and 1 at step 1 (10-15 lU/kg, 2×/week). The mean FVIII consumption was 2964 IU/kg/year, with savings. The quality of life improved, with Canadian Haemophilia Outcomes-Kids Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT, Chinese Version 2.0) scores ranging from 68.8 to 78.8. There was no change in the ultrasound score. CONCLUSION: Our follow-up data on the 18 SHA boys after completing one year on the CHIPS verify the long-term efficacy of the CHIPS for haemarthrosis reduction, joint health preservation, improvement in the quality of life of the boys and cost savings.

Surgical procedures and complications in placement of totally implantable venous access port in pediatric hemophilia patients: A retrospective analysis.

This retrospective study at Beijing Children's Hospital (2020-2023) analyzed surgical procedures and complications in 24 pediatric hemophilia patients undergoing Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) insertion, primarily in the right jugular vein (RJV). We detailed the surgical process, including patient demographics and intraoperative imaging use. The choice of the RJV for TIVAP placement was influenced by its larger diameter and superficial anatomical position, potentially reducing risks like thrombosis and infection. Our findings support the RJV as a safer alternative for port placement in pediatric patients, aligning with current literature. Statistical analysis revealed no significant correlation between complications and baseline characteristics like weight and diagnosis type. However, the length of hospital stay and implant brand were significant risk factors for catheter or port displacement and removal. The limited patient number may introduce bias, suggesting a need for further studies with larger samples. Despite a 14.7 %-33 % complication rate and 5 port removals, the advantages of TIVAP, including reliable venous access, reduced discomfort, and treatment convenience, were evident. Most complications improved with symptomatic treatment, and there were no deaths due to port-related complications, underscoring the impact of TIVAP on improving pediatric hemophilia treatment.

Low-dose immune tolerance induction for severe hemophilia A inhibitor patients: Immunosuppressants are generally not necessary for inhibitor-titer below 200 BU/mL.

Importance: It remained unclear that the efficacy comparison between low-dose immune tolerance induction (LD-ITI) incorporating immunosuppressants (IS) when severe hemophilia A (SHA) patients had inhibitor-titer ≥200 Bethesda Units (BU)/mL (LD-ITI-IS200 regimen) and LD-ITI combining with IS when SHA patients had inhibitor-titer ≥40 BU/mL (LD-ITI-IS40 regimen). Objective: To compare the efficacy of the LD-ITI-IS200 regimen with that of the LD-ITI-IS40 regimen for SHA patients with high-titer inhibitors. Methods: A prospective cohort study on patients receiving LD-ITI-IS200 compared to those receiving LD-ITI-IS40 from January 2021 to December 2023. Both received LD-ITI [FVIII 50 IU/kg every other day]. IS (rituximab + prednisone) was added when peak inhibitor tier ≥200 BU/mL in the LD-ITI-IS200 regimen and ≥40 BU/mL in the LD-ITI-IS40 regimen. Success is defined as a negative inhibitor plus FVIII recovery ≥66% of the expected. Results: We enrolled 30 patients on LD-ITI-IS200 and 64 patients on LD-ITI-IS40, with similar baseline clinical characteristics. A lower IS-use rate was discovered in the LD-ITI-IS200 regimen compared to the LD-ITI-IS40 regimen (30.0% vs. 62.5%). The two regimens (LD-ITI-IS200 vs. LD-ITI-IS40) had similar success rate (70.0% vs. 79.7%), median time to success (9.4 vs. 10.6 months), and annualized bleeding rate during ITI (3.7 vs. 2.8). The cost to success was lower for LD-ITI-IS200 than for LD-ITI-IS40 (2107 vs. 3256 US Dollar/kg). Among patients with peak inhibitor-titer 40-199 BU/mL, 10 non-IS-using (on LD-ITI-IS200 regimen) and 28 IS-using (on LD-ITI-IS40 regimen) had similar success rates (70.0% vs. 78.6%) and time to success (9.0 vs. 8.8 months). Interpretation: In LD-ITI, IS are not necessary for inhibitor titer <200 BU/mL.