Just the facts: brachial plexus blocks for upper extremity injuries in the emergency department.

Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) are becoming a more common method for pain control in the emergency department. Specifically, brachial plexus blocks have shown promise for acute upper extremity injuries as well as an alternative to procedural sedation for glenohumeral reductions. Unfortunately, there is minimal discussion in the EM literature regarding phrenic nerve paralysis (a well-known complication from brachial plexus blocks). The anatomy of the brachial plexus, its relationship to the phrenic nerve, and why ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks can cause phrenic nerve paralysis and resultant respiratory impairment will be discussed. The focus on patient safety is paramount, and those with preexisting respiratory conditions, extremes of age or weight, spinal deformities, previous neck injuries, and anatomical variations are at greater risk. We put forth different block strategies for risk mitigation, including patient selection, volume and type of anesthetic, block location, postprocedural monitoring, and specific discharge instructions. Understanding the benefits and risks of UGNBs is critical for emergency physicians to provide effective pain control while ensuring optimal patient safety.

Emergency department burr hole simulation using 3D-printed model.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic epidural hematoma (EDH) with the potential to displace the brain tissue and increase intracranial pressure (ICP), is a life-threatening condition that requires emergent intervention. In rare circumstances, Emergency Physician (EP) may have to do skull trephination to reduce the ICP as a temporary measure. SPECIFIC AIMS: To evaluate emergency medicine (EM) residents' comfort in performing emergency department (ED) burr holes and to assess their difficulties and evaluate comfort level before and after simulated EDH cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D-printed skull, electrical and manual drills were used for the simulation. Subjective comfort level pre and post-procedure, as well as objective procedural skills and time to complete the drill, were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty EM residents participated in the simulation study. The median time to perforate through the skull was 4 s for the electric drill and 10 s for the manual drill. A comfort level of 5 and above was reported by 12 participants for the manual drill and by 17 participants for the electric drill. Six participants had mild and 2 participants had moderate observed difficulty in handling the manual and electric drill. Most participants performed both procedures successfully with one attempt only. Three participants have an overall comfort level above 5 before the simulation and 13 participants had overall comfort level above 5 post-simulation. CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed model assisted the ED burr hole simulation and the residents could perform the procedure with minimum difficulties.

Development and Utilization of 3D Printed Material for Thoracotomy Simulation.

Medical simulation is a widely used training modality that is particularly useful for procedures that are technically difficult or rare. The use of simulations for educational purposes has increased dramatically over the years, with most emergency medicine (EM) programs primarily using mannequin-based simulations to teach medical students and residents. As an alternative to using mannequin, we built a 3D printed models for practicing invasive procedures. Repeated simulations may help further increase comfort levels in performing an emergency department (ED) thoracotomy in particular, and perhaps this can be extrapolated to all invasive procedures. Using this model, a simulation training conducted with EM residents at an inner city teaching hospital showed improved confidence. A total of 21 residents participated in each of the three surveys [(1) initially, (2) after watching the educational video, and (3) after participating in the simulation]. Their comfort levels increased from baseline after watching the educational video (9.5%). The comfort level further improved from baseline after performing the hands on simulation (71.4%).

Classification of full-thickness rotator cuff lesions: a review.

Rotator cuff lesions (RCL) have considerable variability in location, tear pattern, functional impairment, and repairability.Historical classifications for differentiating these lesions have been based upon factors such as the size and shape of the tear, and the degree of atrophy and fatty infiltration. Additional recent descriptions include bipolar rotator cuff insufficiency, 'Fosbury flop tears', and musculotendinous lesions.Recommended treatment is based on the location of the lesion, patient factors and associated pathology, and often includes personal experience and data from case series. Development of a more comprehensive classification which integrates historical and newer descriptions of RCLs may help to guide treatment further. Cite this article: Lädermann A, Burkhart SS, Hoffmeyer P, et al. Classification of full thickness rotator cuff lesions: a review. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:420-430. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160005.