Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery for Macular Edema Associated With Noninfectious Uveitis.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical trials in the literature that focus on suprachoroidal drug delivery for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis and other posterior segment diseases. Methods: A synthesis of the literature was performed. Results: In 2021, suprachoroidal space triamcinolone acetonide, a corticosteroid delivery system used for the treatment of uveitic macular edema (ME), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The drug-delivery system targets the suprachoroidal space using a microneedle-based device and has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Suprachoroidally administered investigational therapies have also been assessed in clinical trials for other posterior segment diseases, including diabetic ME, retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, and choroidal melanoma. Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of suprachoroidal corticosteroid injections to treat uveitic ME have been shown in recent phase III clinical trials. Multiple programs are also investigating this modality of drug delivery for use in many other retinal and choroidal pathologies.

Deep sequencing as a diagnostic tool in patients with suspected primary vitreoretinal lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic utility of metagenomic deep sequencing (MDS) to cytology, flow cytometry and gene rearrangement by PCR in ocular samples of patients with suspected vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL). METHODS: Patients with suspected VRL underwent ocular sampling of one or both eyes at the Emory Eye Center from September 2017 to June 2022. Ocular samples were evaluated with MDS and conventional diagnostics. MDS was performed at the Ralph and Sophie Heintz Laboratory at the F.I. Proctor Foundation. Relevant demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected from medical records. Patients were diagnosed with VRL based on clinical assessment and conventional diagnostic testing. RESULTS: This study included 13 patients with suspected VRL who underwent diagnostic vitrectomy, including 1 patient who had an additional subretinal biopsy. Six patients (46.2%) were diagnosed with VRL. Among patients diagnosed with VRL, MDS detected pathogenic mutations in 5 out of 6 patients (83.3%) while cytology was positive for VRL in 4 out of 6 patients (66.7%), flow cytometry in 4 out of 4 patients (100.0%) and PCR in 4 out of 4 patients (100.0%). MDS detected mutations in MYD88 in 2 out of 6 patients diagnosed with VRL. In 7 patients (53.8%) not diagnosed with VRL, MDS detected pathogenic lymphoma mutations in 2 patients (28.6%). DISCUSSION: MDS detected pathogenic mutations in five out of six patients diagnosed with VRL, including in two patients with negative cytology, demonstrating its potential to improve diagnostic rates of VRL as an adjunctive test.

Case report: CMV retinitis following local and systemic immunosuppression.

We report the case of a 71-year-old man who presented 2 years following renal transplantation with diffuse, unilateral cytomegalovirus retinitis five weeks after receiving an intravitreal dexamethasone implant device for the management of central retinal vein occlusion. Examination of the left eye showed diffuse retinal hemorrhages, attenuated and tortuous retinal vessels, and superior retinal whitening. The patient was successfully treated with serial intravitreal foscarnet injections and oral valganciclovir with disease regression observed by 12 weeks after presentation. The patient's visual acuity and examination remained stable at 9-months follow-up.

Common Practice Patterns in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Retinal Necrosis: A Survey Study of Uveitis Specialists.

PURPOSE: Due to lack of large randomized clinical trials to determine best practices in treating acute retinal necrosis (ARN), there is not a clear consensus amongst ophthalmologists on how to best manage this potentially blinding condition. The aim of this study is to survey common practice patterns and analyze the factors that affect ophthalmologists' management of ARN. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to uveitis and retina specialists who are members of the American Uveitis Society (AUS) via email to query practice patterns regarding ARN. The survey included 22 questions with an additional 10 questions based on response. Survey question topics included demographic information, diagnostic testing, antiviral therapy, corticosteroids, and surgical procedures. RESULTS: 67 surveys were included for analysis. Most respondents (87%) always or frequently obtain intraocular aqueous fluid for diagnostic PCR testing. The majority of respondents would administer intravitreal antiviral injections to a unilateral immunocompetent ARN patient (67%), but would be even more likely to do so for a bilateral immunosuppressed ARN patient (87%). Respondents tend to treat ARN with systemic rather than local corticosteroids, with the majority (63%) of respondents initiating corticosteroid treatment 48 hours after treatment. Most respondents (79%) never perform a vitrectomy to manage ARN unless the patient has a retinal detachment or tear. The majority (63%) rarely or never perform prophylactic laser barricade, but may consider laser treatment if there is extensive retinal involvement. CONCLUSION: Current practice patterns for diagnosis and management of ARN among AUS members generally align with the suggested practices outlined by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Clinical characteristics and aetiology of uveitis in a viral haemorrhagic fever zone.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Studies on uveitis in Sierra Leone were conducted prior to the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic of 2013-16, which was associated with uveitis in 20% of survivors. They did not include imaging or investigation of tuberculosis and used laboratory services outside the country. We performed a cross-sectional study on patients presenting with uveitis to establish their clinical characteristics and identify the impact of in-country laboratory diagnoses. METHODS: We invited uveitis cases presenting to Eye Clinics in Sierra Leone from March to September 2022 to participate in the study. They underwent a diagnostic work-up, including fundus and ocular coherence tomography imaging. Active uveitis cases underwent further investigations including serology and immunological tests for syphilis, tuberculosis, herpetic viruses and HIV and chest radiographs. RESULTS: We recruited 128 patients. The median age was 34 (IQR 19) years and there was an equal gender split. Panuveitis was the predominant anatomical uveitis type (n = 51, 40%), followed by posterior uveitis (n = 36, 28%). Bilateral disease affected 40 patients (31%). Active uveitis was identified in 75 (59%) cases. ICD 11 definition of blindness with VA < 3/60 occurred in 55 (33%) uveitis eyes. Aetiology of uveitis from clinical and laboratory assessment demonstrated that most cases were of undifferentiated aetiology (n = 66, 52%), followed by toxoplasmosis (n = 46, 36%). Trauma contributed to eight (6%) cases, syphilis to 5 (4%) cases and Ebola to 2 (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Uveitis was associated with high levels of visual impairment. Posterior and panuveitis contributed to the highest proportion of uveitis cases. Laboratory studies helped differentiate syphilis as a significant aetiology of uveitis.

Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitic Macular Edema with Periocular and Intraocular Corticosteroid Therapies: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the evidence on the effectiveness and complications of periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies for noninfectious uveitic macular edema. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted last in December 2021 and a post-assessment search was conducted in March 2023. The searches were limited to articles published in English and no date restrictions were imposed. The combined searches yielded 739 citations; 53 articles were selected for inclusion because the studies (1) evaluated periocular corticosteroid injection, intraocular corticosteroid injection or implant, suprachoroidal corticosteroid injection, or a combination thereof for uveitic macular edema; (2) had outcomes that included visual acuity (VA) or macular edema assessed clinically or imaged by OCT or fluorescein angiography; and (3) included more than 20 patients. RESULTS: This assessment reviewed 23 articles that provided level I or level II evidence from 18 studies on the use of periocular, suprachoroidal, and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections and intravitreal dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants or inserts in noninfectious uveitic macular edema. These reports consistently demonstrated that all investigated periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies improved VA, macular structure, or both. One comparative study showed that intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and the dexamethasone intravitreal implant had effectiveness superior to that of periocular triamcinolone acetonide injection for these outcomes. As a group, the studies highlighted the potential for these therapies to elevate intraocular pressure and to accelerate cataract formation. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature provides high-quality evidence that periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies are effective and safe for the treatment of noninfectious uveitic macular edema. However, information on the relative effectiveness and complication rates across the different therapies is limited. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Effectiveness of Conventional Digital Fundus Photography-Based Teleretinal Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: This American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmic Technology Assessment aims to assess the effectiveness of conventional teleretinal screening (TS) in detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted most recently in July 2023 to identify data published between 2006 and 2023 on any of the following elements related to TS effectiveness: (1) the accuracy of TS in detecting DR or DME compared with traditional ophthalmic screening with dilated fundus examination or 7-standard field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography, (2) the impact of TS on DR screening compliance rates or other patient behaviors, and (3) cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction of TS compared with traditional DR screening. Identified studies then were rated based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine grading system. RESULTS: Eight level I studies, 14 level II studies, and 2 level III studies were identified in total. Although cross-study comparison is challenging because of differences in reference standards and grading methods, TS demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and good specificity in detecting DR; moderate to good agreement between TS and reference-standard DR grading was observed. Performance of TS was not as robust in detecting DME, although the number of studies evaluating DME specifically was limited. Two level I studies, 5 level II studies, and 1 level III study supported that TS had a positive impact on overall DR screening compliance, even increasing it by more than 2-fold in one study. Studies assessing cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction were not graded formally, but they generally showed that TS was cost-effective and preferred by patients over traditional surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional TS is an effective approach to DR screening not only for its accuracy in detecting referable-level disease, but also for improving screening compliance in a cost-effective manner that may be preferred by patients. Further research is needed to elucidate the ideal approach of TS that may involve integration of artificial intelligence or other imaging technologies in the future. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Systemic and Ocular Manifestations of Arboviral Infections: A Review.

PURPOSE: To provide an overview of pre-selected emerging arboviruses (arthropod-borne viruses) that cause ocular inflammation in humans. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature published between 1997 and 2023 was conducted in PubMed database. We describe current insights into epidemiology, systemic and ocular manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of arboviral diseases including West Nile fever, Dengue fever, Chikungunya, Rift Valley fever, Zika, and Yellow fever. RESULTS: Arboviruses refer to a group of ribonucleic acid viruses transmitted to humans by the bite of hematophagous arthropods, mainly mosquitoes. They mostly circulate in tropical and subtropical zones and pose important public health challenges worldwide because of rising incidence, expanding geographic range, and occurrence of prominent outbreaks as a result of climate change, travel, and globalization. The clinical signs associated with infection from these arboviruses are often inapparent, mild, or non-specific, but they may include serious, potentially disabling or life-threatening complications. A wide spectrum of ophthalmic manifestations has been described including conjunctival involvement, anterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, various forms of posterior uveitis, maculopathy, optic neuropathy, and other neuro-ophthalmic manifestations. Diagnosis of arboviral diseases is confirmed with either real time polymerase chain reaction or serology. Management involves supportive care as there are currently no specific antiviral drug options. Corticosteroids are often used for the treatment of associated ocular inflammation. Most patients have a good visual prognosis, but there may be permanent visual impairment due to ocular structural complications in some. Community-based integrated mosquito management programs and personal protection measures against mosquito bites are the best ways to prevent human infection and disease. CONCLUSION: Emerging arboviral diseases should be considered in the differential diagnosis of ocular inflammatory conditions in patients living in or returning from endemic regions. Early clinical consideration followed by confirmatory testing can limit or prevent unnecessary treatments for non-arboviral causes of ocular inflammation. Prevention of these infections is crucial.

Childhood vision impairment and blindness in West Africa: public health measures and implications for systemic health.

Childhood blindness is an issue of global health impact, affecting approximately 2 million children worldwide. Vision 2020 and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals previously identified childhood blindness as a key issue in the twentieth century, and while public health measures are underway, the precise etiologies and management require ongoing investigation and care, particularly within resource-limited settings such as sub-Saharan Africa. We systematically reviewed the literature on childhood blindness in West Africa to identify the anatomic classification and etiologies, particularly those causes of childhood blindness with systemic health implications. Treatable causes included cataract, refractive error, and corneal disease. Systemic etiologies identified included measles, rubella, vitamin A deficiency, and Ebola virus disease. While prior public health measures including vitamin A supplementation and vaccination programs have been deployed in most countries with reported data, multiple studies reported preventable or reversible etiologies of blindness and vision impairment. Ongoing research is necessary to standardize reporting for anatomies and/or etiologies of childhood blindness to determine the necessity of further development and implementation of public health measures that would ameliorate childhood blindness and vision impairment.

Diagnosis of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma masquerading infectious retinitis by retinal biopsy.

PURPOSE: To report a case of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma masquerading as infectious retinitis that was diagnosed via a retinal biopsy. OBSERVATIONS: A 72-year-old female patient was referred to our ophthalmology clinic for evaluation of retinitis and vasculitis in the right eye (OD). On examination, best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) were hand motions OD and 20/20 in the left eye (OS). Fundus examination revealed optic disc edema and diffuse retinal whitening superior to the superotemporal arcade OD. Given the high suspicion of infectious retinitis, the patient was treated with intravitreal foscarnet, systemic acyclovir, and oral prednisone and underwent a comprehensive uveitis workup, which was unremarkable for viral and autoimmune entities. Given the patient's history of diffuse large B cell lymphoma with cutaneous involvement, vitreoretinal lymphoma was suspected, prompting pars plana vitrectomy with a retinal biopsy. Biopsy and immunohistochemistry results were consistent with B-cell lymphoma, and the patient was treated with high-dose methotrexate and rituximab. At 5-month follow-up, BCVAs were hand motions OD and 20/30 OS, and fundus examination demonstrated disc edema with resolution of retinal whitening OD. She responded well to the treatment with regression of vitreoretinal lymphoma on examination and is being monitored closely for lymphoma recurrence. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Although uncommon, patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma may masquerade as infectious retinitis, and vitreoretinal lymphoma should be suspected when refractory to antiviral therapy and in the setting of a negative workup for viral etiologies. Vitrectomy with retinal biopsy may be considered to aid the diagnosis of vitreoretinal lymphoma although careful consideration of the risks and benefits is warranted.

TOWARD AN IMAGING-CENTRIC DEFINITION OF NONPARANEOPLASTIC AUTOIMMUNE RETINOPATHY.

PURPOSE: To explore characteristic imaging features of nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR) to augment diagnostic criteria. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with npAIR evaluated at the Emory Eye Center between 2013 and 2019. Multimodal fundus images were evaluated to characterize the evolution of the disease. RESULTS: Twenty-one eyes of 12 patients were classified as having npAIR. Five patients (42%) were female, with median (range) age of 59 years (45-85 years). Median baseline visual acuity was 20/30 (20/20 to hand motions). Disease was asymmetric in 11 patients (92%). Common imaging findings included absence of bone spicules (86% of affected eyes), presence of attenuated vessels (86%), and speckled hypoautofluorescence in perimacular and perivenular regions. Three eyes were noted to present early with subtle splotchy fundus autofluorescence abnormality, ultimately developing characteristic speckled perimacular hypoautofluorescence. On optical coherence tomography, 18 eyes (86%) had loss of outer retinal bands with relative foveal sparing and a tapered transition zone. CONCLUSION: Many eyes with npAIR exhibit a subacute, asymmetric, generalized photoreceptor degeneration featuring outer retinal atrophy with relative foveal sparing, retinal vascular attenuation, absence of bone spicules, and speckled hypoautofluorescence often in a perimacular and perivenular distribution. Findings of this study augment diagnostic criteria to improve specificity and accessibility of testing for npAIR.

Retinopathy Associated With Ritonavir Treatment for HIV Infection: A Case Series Reappraisal in the COVID-19 Era.

Purpose: To report 3 cases of retinopathy secondary to ritonavir use in the treatment of HIV. Methods: A retrospective review of patient records was performed for data including ophthalmic examination findings, demographic and HIV clinical characteristics, and progression of maculopathy disease. The review identified 3 patients with a history of HIV treated with antiretroviral therapy including ritonavir who had been evaluated for bilateral vision loss in both eyes. Results: A fundus examination of each patient revealed characteristic macular atrophy, and optical coherence tomography demonstrated corresponding central outer retinal atrophy. Uveitis workup results were unremarkable. Given the characteristics of macular atrophy, history of ritonavir use, and the absence of intraocular inflammation, all 3 patients were diagnosed with bilateral ritonavir-associated retinopathy. Each patients' vision continued to deteriorate, even after the cessation of ritonavir. Conclusions: Ritonavir toxicity should be considered in the differential diagnosis of retinopathy among patients with an exposure history.

Visual acuity and vision-related quality of life outcomes following cataract surgery in Ebola virus disease survivors.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess relationships between vision-related quality of life (QoL) and visual acuity (VA) in Ebola virus disease (EVD) survivors after cataract surgery in the Ebola Viral Persistence in Ocular Tissues and Fluids (EVICT) Study. Materials and Methods: EVD survivors with undetectable Ebola virus (EBOV) ribonucleic acid in their aqueous humour were eligible to receive manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). Among those that received surgery, assessments of VA and vision-related QoL were assessed pre-and post-cataract surgery. VA was converted from units on a tumbling 'E' chart to the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution VA (logMAR VA). Vision-related QoL was assessed using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25). Linear regression was used to evaluate the associations between VA and vision-related QoL. P = 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Results: Thirty-four EVD survivors underwent cataract surgery in the EVICT study. Before MSICS, the mean logMAR VA was 2.24 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.98), and the mean NEI-VFQ-25 composite score was 54 (SD: 15); however, there was no significant association between the pre-surgery measurements (average difference in VA/10 unit increase in NEI-VFQ-25: -0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.33-0.26, P = 0.80). There was a significant improvement in logMAR VA after MSICS (mean: 1.6, P < 0.001), but there was no significant change in the NEI-VFQ-25 composite (-0.87, 95% (CI): -10.32-8.59, P = 0.85). None of the subscales showed significant improvements (P > 0.12 for all); however, the magnitude of the mean change for distance activities (6.65), near activities (6.76), general vision (-7.69), social functioning (-9.13) and colour vision (13.33) met the criteria for a clinically meaningful difference (4-6). In the subset with paired measurements (n = 16), there were no significant association changes in logMAR VA and NEI VFQ-25 composite scores (P > 0.12 for all). Conclusion: Following cataract surgery, VA in EVD survivors improved, but these improvements were not reflected in NEI VFQ-25 composite scores or specific subscales; however, the small sample size limits generalizability absent more research. Differences in sociocultural context and activities that affect the QoL in resource-limited areas may contribute to the limitations seen with NEI VFQ-25. In addition, better eye dominance could contribute to any lack of association as NEI VFQ-25 evaluates vision as a whole. Further, assessment of factors contributing to improved QoL may help to define the impact of vision health in varied environments.

An update on immunological and molecular tests and their impact in infectious uveitis.

Early diagnosis of infectious uveitis can lead to prompt initiation of treatment to minimize vision-threatening sequelae. As various infectious etiologies of uveitis share similar clinical features, advancements in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (MDS) have shown significant promise in improving diagnostic capabilities. Various techniques of PCR, including real-time, multiplex, comprehensive, and broad-range, have increased the armamentarium for infectious uveitis diagnosis. Additionally, metagenomic deep sequencing technology has provided a methodology to identify causative pathogens as well as novel etiologies of uveitis. This review discusses the diagnostic tools available for infectious uveitis and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the techniques.

Ophthalmic implications of biological threat agents according to the chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives framework.

As technology continues to evolve, the possibility for a wide range of dangers to people, organizations, and countries escalate globally. The United States federal government classifies types of threats with the capability of inflicting mass casualties and societal disruption as Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Energetics/Explosives (CBRNE). Such incidents encompass accidental and intentional events ranging from weapons of mass destruction and bioterrorism to fires or spills involving hazardous or radiologic material. All of these have the capacity to inflict death or severe physical, neurological, and/or sensorial disabilities if injuries are not diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. Ophthalmic injury can provide important insight into understanding and treating patients impacted by CBRNE agents; however, improper ophthalmic management can result in suboptimal patient outcomes. This review specifically addresses the biological agents the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) deems to have the greatest capacity for bioterrorism. CBRNE biological agents, encompassing pathogens and organic toxins, are further subdivided into categories A, B, and C according to their national security threat level. In our compendium of these biological agents, we address their respective CDC category, systemic and ophthalmic manifestations, route of transmission and personal protective equipment considerations as well as pertinent vaccination and treatment guidelines.