Bacterial content of the human pancreatic duct: An observational study.

Background: Pancreatic fistula/PF is a challenging surgical complication. We could recently show that intestinal bacteria such as Enterobacterales colonize the PF fluid even after a "sterile" operation like distal pancreatectomy/DP. Therefore, we explored the bacterial flora of the human pancreatic duct in a patient collective undergoing pancreatic surgery. Methods: In this observational study, upon transection of the pancreas during surgery, a swab was inserted into the main duct, and the micro-organismal content was correlated with clinical characteristics. Results: Between February 2017 and February 2020, an intraoperative swab from the pancreatic duct was obtained from a total of 54 patients who underwent pancreatico-duodenectomy/PD or DP. The swabs were sterile in 39 cases (72.2%), detected intestinal bacteria in 10 cases (18.5%), and other bacteria in 5 cases (9.3%). There was no correlation of the micro-organismal content of the pancreatic duct swab with bacteria detected in the PF fluid or bile. Preoperative ERCP was associated with a higher frequency of bacterial colonization of the pancreatic duct (33.3% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.005). There was no correlation of the pancreatic duct swabs with postoperative complications. Discussion: The human main pancreatic duct is usually sterile, and its bacterial colonization does not correlate with the occurrence of PF. Therefore, the mechanisms leading to infection of PF warrant in-depth, mechanistic investigation.

Future directions in preclinical and translational cancer neuroscience research.

Recent advances in cancer neuroscience necessitate the systematic analysis of neural influences in cancer as potential therapeutic targets in oncology. Here, we outline recommendations for future preclinical and translational research in this field.

Clinically Actionable Strategies for Studying Neural Influences in Cancer.

Neuro-glial activation is a recently identified hallmark of growing cancers. Targeting tumor hyperinnervation in preclinical and small clinical trials has yielded promising antitumor effects, highlighting the need of systematic analysis of neural influences in cancer (NIC). Here, we outline the strategies translating these findings from bench to the clinic.

Live surgical demonstrations for minimally invasive colorectal training.

PURPOSE: Live surgical demonstrations are considered an effective educational tool providing a chance for trainees to observe a real-time decision-making process of expert surgeons. No data exists evaluating the impact of live surgical demonstrations on the outcomes of minimally invasive colorectal surgery. This study evaluates perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the setting of live surgical demonstrations. METHODS: Patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery which was performed as live surgical demonstrations (the study group) performed between 2006 and 2018 were reviewed. These patients were case-matched with those undergoing operations in routine practice (the control group). The study and control group were compared for intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-nine live surgery cases in the study group were case-matched with its thirty-nine counterparts as the control group. Operating time was longer (200 vs 165 min; p = 0.002) and estimated intraoperative blood loss was higher in the study group (100 vs 55 ml; p = 0.008). Patients in the study group stayed longer in the hospital (6 vs 5 days; p = 0.001). While conversion (n = 4 vs n = 1, p = 0.358) and intraoperative complications (n = 6 vs n = 2, p = 0.2) were more frequent in the study group, these outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Overall complications were higher in the study group (n = 22 vs n = 9, p = 0.003). One patient underwent a reoperation due to postoperative bleeding, and one mortality occurred in the live surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Live surgical demonstrations in minimally invasive colorectal surgery seem to be associated with increased risk of operative morbidity.