Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 22(1): 345, 2022 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35705944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (NOWS) is a significant public health issue and while millions of neonates are affected each year, an optimal pharmacologic weaning protocol has yet to be demonstrated. In this study, we compare hospital length of stay (LOS) and length of treatment (LOT) for treatment of neonatal opioid withdrawal (NOWS) with morphine versus methadone. METHODS: This was a single-site, open-label, randomized controlled pilot study conducted from October 2016-September 2018. Infants were eligible if their primary in-utero drug exposure was heroin, oral opioids, or methadone and they were born at greater than or equal to 34 weeks gestation. Infants were excluded for serious medical comorbidities and primary in-utero exposure to buprenorphine. RESULTS: Sixty-one infants were enrolled; 30 were randomized to methadone treatment, and 31 to morphine treatment. Overall 46% of infants required treatment for NOWS. LOS and LOT for infants treated with morphine was 17.9 days and 14.7 days respectively, compared to 16.1 days and 12.8 days for babies treated with methadone (p = 0.5, p = 0.54). Infants treated with morphine received lower total morphine equivalents than those treated with methadone (9.7 vs. 33, p < 0.01). Three treated infants in the methadone group required transfer to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, versus no infants in the morphine group. CONCLUSIONS: Infants treated with morphine versus methadone had no significant differences in LOS or LOT in this pilot study. Infants treated with methadone received up to 3 times the opioid based on morphine equivalents as infants treated with morphine and had more transfers to the NICU for over sedation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Morphine Versus Methadone for Opiate Exposed Infants With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome NCT02851303 , initiated 01/08/2016.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos Piloto
2.
Am Fam Physician ; 105(4): 388-396, 2022 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35426632

RESUMEN

Infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are increasing in the United States. Because most infections are asymptomatic, screening is key to preventing complications such as pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility and decreasing community and vertical neonatal transmission. All sexually active people with a cervix who are younger than 25 years and older people with a cervix who have risk factors should be screened annually for chlamydial and gonococcal infections. Sexually active men who have sex with men should be screened at least annually. Physicians should obtain a sexual history free from assumptions about sex partners or practices. Acceptable specimen types for testing include vaginal, endocervical, rectal, pharyngeal, and urethral swabs, and first-stream urine samples. Uncomplicated gonococcal infection should be treated with a single 500-mg dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone in people weighing less than 331 lb (150 kg). Preferred chlamydia treatment is a seven-day course of doxycycline, 100 mg taken by mouth twice per day. All nonpregnant people should be tested for reinfection approximately three months after treatment or at the first visit in the 12 months after treatment. Pregnant patients diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhea should have a test of cure four weeks after treatment.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia , Gonorrea , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Anciano , Infecciones por Chlamydia/complicaciones , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Chlamydia trachomatis , Femenino , Gonorrea/complicaciones , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Embarazo , Estados Unidos
3.
J Affect Disord ; 295: 530-540, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34509068

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although not routinely assessed, prenatal posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with poor maternal mental health and mother-infant bonding. Prenatal PTSD may also be associated with birth weight and gestational age outcomes, but this remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the association of prenatal PTSD with risk of low birth weight (LBW) or preterm birth (PTB) (dichotomous medically-defined cut-offs) or with birth weight (BW) or gestational age (GA) (continuous variables). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Web of Science, MedLine, PubMed, and PsychInfo. Data were collected and processed according to Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottowa Quality Assessment Scale. Pooled effect sizes were estimated with random-effects models (correlation for continuous and odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes). RESULTS: Sixteen studies with 51,470 participants (prenatal PTSD 8%) were included in 4 meta-analyses. Maternal prenatal PTSD was associated with higher risks of LBW (OR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.26, 3.03; P = .003), PTB (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.16, 1.73; P = .001), and reduced GA (r = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.06, -0.01; P = .002). LIMITATIONS: Different designs across studies, variety of PTSD assessment practices, and a small pool of studies were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest prenatal PTSD presents increased risks of LBW, PTB, and reduced GA. Evidence of physical harm to neonates from prenatal PTSD provides a powerful rationale to increase prenatal PTSD screening and identify effective prenatal interventions to improve maternal and child outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Prematuro , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Peso al Nacer , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología
4.
Breastfeed Med ; 15(1): 17-23, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31692370

RESUMEN

Background: Women with opioid use disorder (OUD) are encouraged to breastfeed, but have lower breastfeeding rates than the general population. Objective: We examined self-reported barriers and motivators for breastfeeding in women with OUD and the relationship between maternal/postnatal factors and breastfeeding noninitiation/discontinuation. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional design was used; 40 women with OUD who were eligible to breastfeed were included. Information about breastfeeding initiation, duration, barriers/motivators, demographic characteristics, and self-efficacy was obtained through semi-structured interviews at 4-8 weeks postpartum. Wilcoxon rank sum or Fisher's exact test was used to examine the relationship between maternal/postnatal factors and never-initiated/discontinued breastfeeding. Results: Respondents were 29.3 ± 5.3 years old; most were prescribed buprenorphine (77.5%); and 36.8% of infants were treated for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome with methadone or morphine. Most (75.0%) participants initiated breastfeeding; 50.0% continued breastfeeding at 4-8 weeks. The most common motivators included infant health (100%) and bonding (45.0%). On average, women reported discontinuing breastfeeding at 3.3 ± 1.1 weeks postpartum. The most common barriers were concerns regarding transfer of medications or other substances to the infant (50.0%) and concerns about breast milk supply (35.0%). Mean self-efficacy scores were similar among those who continued versus never-initiated/discontinued breastfeeding (33.5 versus 33.0; p = 0.388). Neonatal intensive care unit admission was associated with never-initiated/discontinued breastfeeding (p = 0.047). Conclusion: Women with OUD share many similar motivators and barriers to breastfeeding with the general population. Unique concerns include infant exposure to medications or substances, even in those who are eligible to breastfeed, which should be addressed by targeted education for patients and providers.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Motivación , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/rehabilitación , Adulto , Lactancia Materna/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Metadona , New Mexico/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Periodo Posparto , Apoyo Social , Adulto Joven
5.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 64(2): 217-224, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30864287

RESUMEN

Opioid use disorder among pregnant women is common and rapidly increasing nationwide. Group prenatal care is an innovative alternative to individual care for pregnant women and has been shown to improve women's and health care providers' satisfaction and adherence to care. We describe a novel group prenatal care program colocated in an opioid treatment program that integrates prenatal care, substance use disorder counseling, and medication-assisted treatment. Our interprofessional model draws on the unique contributions of physicians, midwives, nurses, and mental health professionals to address the complex needs of pregnant women with opioid use disorder. Participants reported increased trust and engagement with health care providers and peers, improved prenatal care and birth experience, and increased resilience for relapse prevention. Group prenatal care is an accepted and promising model for women with opioid use disorder in pregnancy and has the potential to improve outcomes for women and newborns.


Asunto(s)
Procesos de Grupo , Colaboración Intersectorial , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Atención Prenatal/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Participación de los Interesados
6.
J Hum Lact ; 35(1): 71-79, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29723483

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND:: Women taking methadone or buprenorphine are encouraged to breastfeed if stable without polysubstance use. RESEARCH AIM:: We aimed to determine the difference between stated intention to breastfeed prenatally in women taking methadone or buprenorphine compared with breastfeeding at discharge and 2 months postpartum. Secondary outcomes were determining whether breastfeeding was more common in women taking buprenorphine, in women without hepatitis C infection, and in women without a history of heroin use, and whether breastfeeding reduced the need for pharmacological treatment of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. METHODS:: This was a retrospective cohort study of 228 women enrolled in a perinatal substance abuse treatment program. Electronic medical records were reviewed to abstract data on mother-infant dyads. Chi-square tests were used to analyze our outcomes. RESULTS:: Women taking buprenorphine had a higher prevalence of breastfeeding compared with women taking methadone (83% [ n = 100] vs. 71% [ n = 76]; χ2 = 4.35, p = .03), despite no difference in their prenatal intention to breastfeed (87% vs. 81%; χ2 = 1.28, p = .25). Only 31% ( n = 38) of women taking buprenorphine and 19.6% ( n = 21) of women taking methadone exclusively breastfed at discharge (χ2 = 5.43, p = .06). Exclusively breastfed infants required less pharmacological treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome compared with formula-fed infants (15.8% [ n = 21] vs. 47.4% [ n = 38]; χ2 = 19.72, p < .05). CONCLUSION:: Despite most women reporting a high prenatal intention to breastfeed, exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge postpartum was low. Breastfeeding was associated with a decreased likelihood of pharmacological treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Intención , Estudios Longitudinales , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal , New Mexico/epidemiología , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/complicaciones , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(6): 665.e1-665.e8, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28842126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immediate postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion is increasing in frequency in the United States, but few studies have investigated the effect of early placement on breast-feeding outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effect of immediate vs delayed postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion on breast-feeding outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted this noninferiority randomized controlled trial at the University of Utah and the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Centers from February 2014 through March 2016. Eligible women were pregnant and planned to breast-feed, spoke English or Spanish, were aged 18-40 years, and desired a levonorgestrel intrauterine device. Enrolled women were randomized 1:1 to immediate postpartum insertion or delayed insertion at 4-12 weeks' postpartum. Prespecified exclusion criteria included delivery <37.0 weeks' gestational age, chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, contraindications to levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion, and medical complications of pregnancy that could affect breast-feeding. We conducted per-protocol analysis as the primary approach, as it is considered the standard for noninferiority studies; we also report the alternative intent-to-treat analysis. We powered the study for the primary outcome, breast-feeding continuation at 8 weeks, to detect a 15% noninferiority margin between groups, requiring 132 participants in each arm. The secondary study outcome, time to lactogenesis, used a validated measure, and was analyzed by survival analysis and log rank test. We followed up participants for ongoing data collection for 6 months. Only the data analysis team was blinded to the intervention. RESULTS: We met the enrollment target with 319 participants, but lost 34 prior to randomization and excluded an additional 26 for medical complications prior to delivery. The final analytic sample included 132 in the immediate group and 127 in the delayed group. Report of any breast-feeding at 8 weeks in the immediate group (79%; 95% confidence interval, 70-86%) was noninferior to that of the delayed group (84%; 95% confidence interval, 76-91%). The 5% difference in breast-feeding continuation at 8 weeks between the groups fell within the noninferiority margin (95% confidence interval, -5.6 to 15%). Time to lactogenesis (mean ± SD) in the immediate group, 65.3 ± 25.7 hours, was noninferior to that of the delayed group, 63.6 ± 21.6 hours. The mean difference between groups was 1.7 hours (95% confidence interval, -4.8 to 8.2 hours), noninferior by log-rank test. A total of 24 intrauterine device expulsions occurred in the immediate group compared to 2 in the delayed group (19% vs 2%, P < .001), consistent with the known higher expulsion rate with immediate vs delayed postpartum intrauterine device insertion. No intrauterine device perforations occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: Our results of noninferior breast-feeding outcomes between women with immediate and delayed postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion suggest that immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion is an acceptable option for women planning to breast-feed and use the levonorgestrel intrauterine device. Expulsion rates are higher with immediate postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion compared to delayed insertion, but this disadvantage may be outweighed by the advantages of immediate initiation of contraception. Providers should offer immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion to breast-feeding women planning to use the levonorgestrel intrauterine device.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Parto , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Expulsión de Dispositivo Intrauterino , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Implantación de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
8.
Birth ; 44(3): 222-229, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28481464

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breech presentation affects 3-4% of pregnancies at term and malpresentation is the primary indication for 10-15% of cesarean deliveries. External cephalic version is an effective intervention that can decrease the need for cesarean delivery; however, timely identification of breech presentation is required. We hypothesized that women with a fetus in a breech presentation that is diagnosed after 38 weeks' estimated gestational age have a decreased likelihood of external cephalic version attempted and an increased likelihood of cesarean delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. A chart review was performed for 251 women with breech presentation at term presenting to our tertiary referral university hospital for external cephalic version, cesarean for breech presentation, or vaginal breech delivery. RESULTS: Vaginal delivery was significantly more likely (31.1% vs 12.5%; P<.01) in women with breech presentation diagnosed before 38 weeks' estimated gestational age as external cephalic version was offered, and subsequently attempted in a greater proportion of women diagnosed before 38 weeks. External cephalic version was more successful when performed by physicians with greater procedural volume during the 3.5 year period of the study (59.1% for providers performing at least 10 procedures vs 31.3% if performing fewer than 10 procedures, P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the need for interventions to increase timely diagnosis of breech presentation as well as improved patient counseling and use of experienced providers for external cephalic version.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas/terapia , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Presentación de Nalgas/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Versión Fetal
10.
Am Fam Physician ; 92(3): 202-8, 2015 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26280140

RESUMEN

Most of the nearly 4 million births in the United States annually are normal spontaneous vaginal deliveries. In the first stage of labor, normal birth outcomes can be improved by encouraging the patient to walk and stay in upright positions, waiting until at least 6 cm dilation to diagnose active stage arrest, providing continuous labor support, using intermittent auscultation in low-risk deliveries, and following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for group B streptococcus prophylaxis. Most women with a low transverse uterine incision are candidates for a trial of labor after cesarean delivery and should be counseled accordingly. Pain management during labor includes complementary modalities and systemic opioids, epidural anesthesia, and pudendal block. Outcomes in the second stage of labor can be improved by using warm perineal compresses, allowing women more time to push before intervening, and offering labor support. Delayed pushing increases the length of the second stage of labor and does not affect the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. A tight nuchal cord can be clamped twice and cut before delivery of the shoulders, or the baby may be delivered using a somersault maneuver in which the cord is left nuchal and the distance from the cord to placenta minimized by pushing the head toward the maternal thigh. After delivery, skin-to-skin contact with the mother is recommended. Beyond 35 weeks' gestation, there is no benefit to bulb suctioning the nose and mouth. Postpartum maternal and neonatal outcomes can be improved through delayed cord clamping, active management to prevent postpartum hemorrhage, careful examination for external anal sphincter injuries, and use of absorbable synthetic suture for second-degree perineal laceration repair. Practices that will not improve outcomes and may result in negative outcomes include discontinuation of epidurals late in labor and routine episiotomy.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/normas , Trabajo de Parto/fisiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Educación Médica Continua , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
11.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 41(2): 307-15, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24845492

RESUMEN

During early gestation, drugs have teratogenic effects and can be associated with structural anomalies in the fetus. Substance abuse can also have physiologic effects on the mother and fetus, including decreased uterine blood flow, increased vascular resistance, and an increase in fetal blood pressure. Women at increased risk for stillbirth should undergo antepartum fetal surveillance initiated at 32 weeks of gestation. Because of the high incidence of low birth weight, fetal anomalies, preterm delivery, and growth restriction in these patients, ultrasonography for appropriate pregnancy dating, a detailed anatomic survey, and cervical length should be performed at 20 weeks' gestation.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Fetal , Trabajo de Parto , Madres/psicología , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 40(4): 647-70, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24286994

RESUMEN

New data have emerged to support changes in first-trimester abortion practice in regard to antibiotic prophylaxis, cervical ripening, the use of manual vacuum aspiration, and pain management. This article addresses these new recommendations and reviews techniques in performing manual and electric vacuum uterine aspiration procedures before 14 weeks' gestation, including very early abortion (<7 weeks' gestation), technically difficult abortions, management of complications, and postabortal contraception. The information discussed also applies to miscarriage management.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aborto Inducido , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Legrado por Aspiración/métodos , Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Aborto Inducido/instrumentación , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Consejo/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Edad Materna , Registros Médicos , Seguridad del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva , Legrado por Aspiración/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA