Analysis of Nasal Bone Fractures: A 17-year Study of 3785 Patients.

In our previous study, we classified nasal bone fractures into 6 types based on computed tomography and the patterns of the nasal bone fractures (NBF) in 503 patients treated between 1998 and 2004. In the present study, we analyzed 3785 patients treated between 2005 and 2021. The age, sex, etiology, associated injuries, pattern of fractures, and treatments were reviewed, and radiographic studies were analyzed. The highest incidence was in the age group of 10 to 19 years (N=870, 23.0%), followed by 20 to 29 years (N=792, 20.9%) and 30 to 39 years (N=635, 16.8%). The most common causes of injury were slip or fall-down (42.3%), violence (24.3%), sports (19.2%), traffic accidents (8.9%), and work-related (5.3%). Most of the patients had tenderness (96.1%) and swelling (78.8%). Other findings were depression (27.1%) and nasal deviation (25.8%). Crepitus was heard in only 0.4% of the patients. The patterns of the NBFs classified by computed tomography findings were type IIA (unilateral simple fracture with displacement/without telescoping, 1283 cases, 33.9%), IIB (bilateral simple fracture with displacement/without telescoping, 786 cases, 20.8%), IIAs (unilateral simple fracture with septal fracture and displacement/without telescoping, 566 cases, 14.9%), IIBs (bilateral simple fracture with septal fracture and displacement/without telescoping 530 cases, 14.0%), I (simple fracture without displacement, 522 cases, 13.8%), and III (comminuted with telescoping or depression, 98 cases, 2.6%). In most of the cases (3,666, 96.9%), closed reduction was performed. The present analysis is one of the largest data sets on NBF in Korea, which could provide reference values for diagnosing and managing nasal bone fractures.

Surgical outcomes of suprafascial and subfascial radial forearm free flaps in head and neck reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Conventional radial forearm free flaps (RFFFs) are known to be safe, but can result in donor site complications. Based on our experiences with suprafascial and subfascial RFFFs, we evaluated the safety of flap survival and surgical outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of head and neck reconstructions using RFFFs from 2006 to 2021. Thirty-two patients underwent procedures using either subfascial (group A) or suprafascial (group B) dissection for flap elevation. Data were collected on patient characteristics, flap size, and donor and recipient complications, and the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 32 patients were in group A and 19 were in group B. Group A included 10 men and three women, with a mean age of 56.15 years, and group B included 16 men and three women, with a mean age of 59.11 years. The mean defect areas were 42.83 cm² and 33.32 cm², and the mean flap sizes were 50.96 cm² and 44.54 cm² in groups A and B, respectively. There were 13 donor site complications: eight (61.5%) in group A and five (26.3%) in group B. Flexor tendon exposure occurred in three patients in group A and in none in group B. All flaps survived completely. A recipient site complication occurred in two patients (15.4%) in group A and three patients (15.8%) in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Complications and flap survival were similar between the two groups. However, tendon exposure at the donor site was less prevalent in the suprafascial group, and the treatment period was shorter. Based on our data, suprafascial RFFF is a reliable and safe procedure for reconstruction of the head and neck.

Reconstruction of Rapidly Growing Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Cheek With Multidisciplinary Cooperation.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and very aggressive skin cancer. An 83-year-old female presented with a 1.5 cm-sized non-tender mass on her left cheek and was diagnosed with MCC. The margin of MCC was well-defined and there was no cervical node metastasis on pre-operative computed tomography. Three weeks after the first visit, the mass rapidly increased in size. We checked the magnetic resonance imaging, a rapid-growing 2.5 cm sized nodular region and metastatic cervical lymph node were found. We performed wide excision of the MCC and neck lymph need dissection with multidisciplinary cooperation. The soft tissue defect was about 6.0×5.0 cm 2 in size and reconstructed with radial forearm free flap. On permanent biopsy, the size of MCC was 3.0×2.3 cm 2 . There was no recurrence of MCC with radiation therapy during an 18-month follow-up. We experienced an older patient with a rapid - growing MCC and cervical lymph node metastasis in a brief time. With our experience, we discuss the evaluation and treatment plan of the rapid-growing MCC for good results.

Teaching Models for Correct Rhombic Flaps.

The aim of this study was to introduce teaching models for correct rhombic flaps. For the line of maximal extensibility (LME) and flap design, surgical fabric (model 1), scored corrugated cardboard (model 2), and scored polyethylene sheet (model 3) were used. For choosing the correct flaps, a silicone face (model 4) was used. Seven participants in the Plastic Surgery Department were recruited for the workshop. In models 1 to 3, a 2-cm diameter circle and relaxed skin tension line were indicated. Participants were requested to design Limberg flaps. Each flap was elevated, transposed, and fixed with sutures (model 1) or cellophane tape (models 2 and 3). In model 4, a 1-cm diameter circle was indicated on the cheek. Participants were requested to design correct Limberg flaps. Although participants were not provided an article describing how to create correct Limberg flaps, they eventually created correct flaps through trial and error. Participants drew 2 parallel lines tangential to the defect and following the LME, perpendicular to the relaxed skin tension lines, which are the same as the scoring marks. They then drew 2 other sides of 2 possible parallelograms by tilting them medially and laterally with angles of 60 and 120 degrees each. Thus, 4 possible Limberg flaps to close the defect were drawn. Among the 8 possible flaps, 4 flaps that did not follow the LME were eliminated. Scored polyethylene sheet had the best extensibility and least distortion among the 3 models. Through this workshop, participants learned to design rhombic flaps correctly, using 2 parallel LMEs.

Unusual anomaly of the radial artery encountered during the elevation of a radial forearm free flap: a case report.

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) has become popular for head and neck reconstructions. Owing to a constant anatomy the RFFF is relatively easy to dissect. Nevertheless, anatomical variations of the radial artery have been reported. Some variations could affect the survival of the flap. This paper reports an unusual anomaly of the radial artery where the radial artery was not located between the brachioradialis (BR) and flexor carpi radialis. The radial artery was observed above the BR and on the radial side of the BR. The survival of the elevated flap was deemed questionable because it had only few perforators. So we decided to discard the flap and to elevate another free flap for the head and neck defect. The donor area on the forearm was covered using the original skin of the first flap as a full-thickness skin graft. This case highlights a means to deal with anomalies of the radial artery encountered during the elevation of RFFF and the checking process for variations of the radial artery before RFFF.

Reconstruction of Multiple Digital Defects by Temporary Syndactylization Using a Lateral Arm Free Flap.

Background Soft tissue defects of the multiple finger present challenges to reconstruction surgeons. Here, we introduce the use of a lateral arm free flap and syndactylization for the coverage of multiple finger soft tissue defects. Methods This retrospective study was conducted based on reviews of the medical records of 13 patients with multiple soft tissue defects of fingers ( n = 33) that underwent temporary syndactylization with a microvascular lateral arm flap for temporary syndactylization from January 2010 to December 2020. Surgical and functional outcomes, times of flap division, complications, and demographic data were analyzed. Results Middle fingers were most frequently affected, followed by ring and index fingers. Mean patient age was 43.58 years. The 13 patients had suffered 10 traumas, 2 thermal burns, and 1 scar contracture. Release of temporary syndactyly was performed 3 to 9 weeks after syndactylization. All flaps survived, but partial necrosis occurred in one patient, who required a local transposition flap after syndactylization release. The mean follow-up was 15.8 months. Conclusion Coverage of multiple finger defects by temporary syndactylization using a free lateral arm flap with subsequent division offers an alternative treatment option.

Reconstruction of a large chest wall defect using bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps and V-Y rotation advancement flaps: a case report.

Bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flaps are commonly used to reconstruct large chest wall defects. We report a case of large chest wall defect reconstruction using bilateral PMMC flaps augmented with axillary V-Y advancement rotation flaps for additional flap advancement. A 74-year-old male patient was operated on for recurrent glottic squamous cell carcinoma. Excision of the tumor resulted in a 10×10 cm defect in the anterior chest wall. Bilateral PMMC flaps were raised to cover the chest wall defect. For further flap advancement, V-Y rotation advancement flaps from both axillae were added to allow complete closure. All flaps survived completely, and postoperative shoulder abduction was not limited (100° on the right side and 92° on the left). Age-related skin redundancy in the axillae enabled the use of V-Y rotation advancement flaps without limitation of shoulder motion. Bilateral PMMC advancement flaps and the additional use of V-Y rotation advancement flaps from both axillae may be a useful reconstructive option for very large chest wall defects in older patients.