RESUMEN
Gram-negative bacterial endotoxins can cause pathophysiological effects such as high fever when introduced into the bloodstream. Therefore, endotoxin testing is necessary when producing injectable pharmaceuticals. The pharmaceutical industry has widely used Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) to certify product quality. However, ethical concerns have been raised and the increasing scarcity of Limulus polyphemus necessitates the development of novel testing techniques. Recombinant factor C (rFC) was developed using genetic engineering techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of rFC testing and compare it with the LAL method. The specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, and robustness of the rFC assay were evaluated. After validation, the rFC assay was found to be suitable for endotoxin detection. We compared the accuracy of the rFC and LAL assays using reference standard endotoxin. The rFC assay was as accurate as the LAL assay. We also compared the two assays using biopharmaceuticals. Greater interference occurred in some samples when the rFC assay was used than when the LAL assay was used. However, the rFC assay overcame the interference when the samples were diluted. Overall, we suggest that rFC can be applied to test biopharmaceuticals.
RESUMEN
Informal verbal interaction is the core matrix for human social life. A mechanism for coordinating this basic mode of interaction is a system of turn-taking that regulates who is to speak and when. Yet relatively little is known about how this system varies across cultures. The anthropological literature reports significant cultural differences in the timing of turn-taking in ordinary conversation. We test these claims and show that in fact there are striking universals in the underlying pattern of response latency in conversation. Using a worldwide sample of 10 languages drawn from traditional indigenous communities to major world languages, we show that all of the languages tested provide clear evidence for a general avoidance of overlapping talk and a minimization of silence between conversational turns. In addition, all of the languages show the same factors explaining within-language variation in speed of response. We do, however, find differences across the languages in the average gap between turns, within a range of 250 ms from the cross-language mean. We believe that a natural sensitivity to these tempo differences leads to a subjective perception of dramatic or even fundamental differences as offered in ethnographic reports of conversational style. Our empirical evidence suggests robust human universals in this domain, where local variations are quantitative only, pointing to a single shared infrastructure for language use with likely ethological foundations.