RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We performed post-hoc analyses of the ORIGAMI study to investigate whether concomitant methotrexate (MTX) influences the clinical outcomes of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Enrolled patients (n = 325) were divided into two groups according to whether abatacept was prescribed without (MTX-) or with (MTX+) concomitant MTX. We compared the changes in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Disease Activity Score-28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), and Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) through to 52 weeks of treatment, the abatacept retention rate, and safety. RESULTS: At Week 52, the mean SDAI (8.9 vs. 8.8), DAS28-CRP (2.6 vs. 2.6), and J-HAQ (0.92 vs. 0.91) scores were comparable in the MTX- (n = 129) and MTX+ (n = 150) groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed no significant association between MTX use and SDAI (low disease activity) or J-HAQ (minimum clinically important difference). The abatacept retention rates, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, were 73.2% and 66.7% in the MTX- and MTX+ groups, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 47.5% (of 139) and 52.2% (of 159) of patients in the MTX- and MTX+ groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety of abatacept appeared comparable with or without concomitant MTX in this real-world clinical setting.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Productos Biológicos , Humanos , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Abatacept/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) as first-line (1L) therapy in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using data from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis database. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was used to estimate the cost per American College of Rheumatology response of at least 50% improvement (ACR50) responder and per patient in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission from a Japanese healthcare payers' perspective over a 2-year time horizon. Clinical characteristics of patients on ABA-1L were matched with those of patients on ABA second or later line (2L+) or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-1L directly or using propensity scores. Resource utilisation and medical costs were calculated from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database. Parameter uncertainty was addressed by sensitivity and subgroup analyses (age, treatment duration, Japanese version of Health Assessment Questionnaire [J-HAQ] score). RESULTS: Incremental costs per member per month (ΔPMPM) for ABA-1L versus TNFi-1L and ABA-2L+ were -1,571 Japanese Yen (JPY) and 81 JPY, respectively. For ABA-1L versus TNFi-1L, ΔPMPM by ACR50 response was -11,715 JPY and by CDAI and SDAI remission 11,602 JPY and 47,003 JPY, respectively. Corresponding costs for ABA-1L were lower for all outcome parameters versus those for ABA-2L+. Scenario analyses showed that ABA-1L was cost-effective over TNFi-1L in patients <65 years for any outcome. Furthermore, ABA-1L was cost-effective over ABA-2L+ for all outcomes in patients with age <65 years, disease duration <5 years and J-HAQ ≥1.5. CONCLUSIONS: ABA-1L demonstrated a favourable cost-effectiveness profile in RA patients, accruing savings for the Japanese healthcare payers.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Anciano , Humanos , Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Japón , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of abatacept over 52 weeks in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate disease activity in the prospective, 5-year, observational study (ORIGAMI study) in Japan. METHODS: Abatacept (125 mg) was administered subcutaneously once a week. Clinical outcomes included Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission at Week 52 (primary endpoint), Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ), EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D), treatment retention, and safety. The results were compared with those of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) controls from the ongoing Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) registry. RESULTS: Overall, 325 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 66.9 ± 12.7 years. The proportion of patients achieving SDAI remission (≤3.3) at Week 52 was 18.9% (95% CI: 14.3-23.6) and low disease activity (≤11) was 53.3% (95% CI: 47.4-59.1). A significant improvement was observed in J-HAQ and EQ-5D over 52 weeks in both the abatacept and csDMARD groups. The probability of abatacept treatment retention at Week 52 was 69.9% (95% CI: 64.7-75.5). Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported in 50.0% and 12.1% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept significantly improved disease activity, physical disability, and quality of life for up to 52 weeks in RA patients in a real-world setting.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Productos Biológicos , Abatacept/efectos adversos , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Japón , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the long-term safety and effectiveness of abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis using real-world, Japanese, postmarketing surveillance data, focusing on serious infections and malignancies as priority events. METHODS: This 3-year, multicentre surveillance registered patients undergoing abatacept treatment by intravenous infusion between July 2011 and October 2012. RESULTS: The safety and effectiveness analysis sets included 647 and 596 patients, respectively. The total observation period for the safety analysis was 1280 patient-years. Over the 3-year follow-up, the incidence rates of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious ADRs were 19.92 per 100 patient-years (22.87% of patients) and 4.06 per 100 patient-years (6.65% of patients), respectively. Infections and infestations were the most common ADRs (14.68%), followed by respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (3.09%). Incidence rates of serious infections as ADRs and malignancy as adverse events were 1.95 and 1.02 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Retention rates at 1 and 3 years were 67.4% and 43.9%, respectively. Significant decreases from baseline were observed in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate and DAS28-C-reactive protein, as well as Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and modified HAQ scores. CONCLUSIONS: No new safety signals were detected during the 3-year observation period and effectiveness was maintained over time.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Abatacept/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The importance of citrullination in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been reported, but the degree to which individual citrullinated proteins affect the onset and progression of RA is still unclear. We aimed to identify citrullinated proteins that may play an important role in the onset and progression of RA using an individualised anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) evaluation system with citrullinated peptides as probes. METHODS: Serum samples from 50 normal donors and 51 RA patients were evaluated using a custom MagPlexTM bead array with 13 types of citrullinated peptide. The presence/absence of ACPAs that react to each citrullinated peptide in each subject was determined using the Z-score, which was calculated based on the fluorescence intensity distribution of a sample from a normal donor. Whether the fluorescence intensity was inhibited when free citrullinated peptides were added to a system was also evaluated. RESULTS: Median fluorescence intensities obtained from beads coupled with the 13 types of citrullinated peptide were all significantly higher in RA patients versus normal donors. With a Z-score ≥2 as the cut-off value for the presence of ACPAs, ACPAs that recognised five types of citrullinated peptides derived from fibrinogen A, fillagrin, clusterin, and vimentin were widely detected in RA patients. In addition, inhibition experiments showed that citrullinated vimentin, clusterin, and enolase 1A peptides inhibited coupling of ACPAs to other citrullinated peptides. CONCLUSIONS: ACPAs to many citrullinated proteins exhibited cross-reactivity to citrullinated clusterin and vimentin, suggesting the importance of citrullinated clusterin and vimentin in the early stages of RA pathogenesis.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Citrulina , Autoanticuerpos , Clusterina , Humanos , Péptidos , Péptidos Cíclicos , VimentinaRESUMEN
Objectives: To investigate the safety, effectiveness, and risk-benefit balance of intravenous abatacept (ABA) in non-elderly (<65 years: NEG) and elderly (≥65 years: EG) rheumatoid arthritis patients. Methods: This sub-analysis of an all-cases postmarketing surveillance in Japan assessed safety in all enrolled patients and effectiveness in those with Disease Activity Score 28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) measurements at ≥2 time points including baseline. Risk-benefit was evaluated based on infections and DAS28-CRP improvement >1.2. Results: The NEG and EG of the safety analysis set comprised 2,170 and 1,712 patients, respectively; corresponding 6-month ABA retention rates were 80.2% and 77.1%. The NEG had fewer adverse drug reactions (14.5% vs. 17.2%, p = .021) and infections (4.8% vs. 7.2%, p = .002) than the EG. DAS28-CRP changed similarly between groups. The proportion of patients with low-risk/high-benefit and high-risk/low-benefit were 33.1% and 6.9% (NEG) and 29.7% and 9.0% (EG). Low-risk/high-benefit patients were younger, had shorter disease duration and fewer comorbidities, and were with less use of oral glucocorticoid and prior biologics, more use of methotrexate and higher DAS28-CRP than high-risk/low-benefit patients at baseline. Conclusion: ABA was well tolerated and similarly efficacious in the EG and NEG. Identification of factors related to low-risk/high-benefit may aid appropriate patient selection.