RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To define the factors associated with overprescription of antibiotics by general practitioners (GPs) for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic. METHODS: Anonymised electronic prescribing records of 1370 GPs were analysed. Diagnosis and prescriptions were retrieved. The initiation rate by GP for 2020 was compared with 2017-2019. Prescribing habits of GPs who initiated antibiotics for > 10% of COVID-19 patients were compared with those who did not. Regional differences in prescribing habits of GPs who had consulted at least one COVID-19 patient were also analysed. RESULTS: For the March-April 2020 period, GPs who initiated antibiotics for > 10% of COVID-19 patients had more consultations than those who did not. They also more frequently prescribed antibiotics for non-COVID-19 patients consulting with rhinitis and broad-spectrum antibiotics for treating cystitis. Finally, GPs in the Île-de-France region saw more COVID-19 patients and more frequently initiated antibiotics. General practitioners in southern France had a higher but non-significant ratio of azithromycin initiation rate over total antibiotic initiation rate. CONCLUSION: This study identified a subset of GPs with overprescribing profiles for COVID-19 and other viral infections; they also tended to prescribe broad-spectrum antibiotics for a long duration. There were also regional differences concerning antibiotic initiation rates and the ratio of azithromycin prescribed. It will be necessary to evaluate the evolution of prescribing practices during subsequent waves.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Médicos Generales , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Electrónica , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Prueba de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Delayed treatment is associated with a higher risk of severe malaria. In malaria-endemic areas, the main factors associated with delay in seeking healthcare are low educational level and traditional beliefs. In imported malaria, determinants of delay in seeking healthcare are currently unknown. METHODS: We studied all patients presenting with malaria, from 1 January 2017 to 14 February 2022, in the hospital of Melun, France. Demographic and medical data were recorded for all patients, and socio-professional data were recorded for a subgroup of hospitalized adults. Relative-risks and 95% confidence intervals were determined using univariate analysis by cross-tabulation. RESULTS: There were 234 patients included, all travelling from Africa. Among them, 218 (93%) were infected with P. falciparum, 77 (33%) had severe malaria, 26 (11%) were <18 years old and 81 were included during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. There were 135 hospitalized adults (58% of all patients). The median time to hospital admission (THA) , defined by the period from onset of symptoms to arrival at hospital, was 3 days (IQR = 2-5). A THA ≥3 days tended to be more frequent in travellers visiting friends and relatives (VFR; RR = 1.44, 95% CI = [1.0-2.05], P = 0.06), while it was less frequent in children and teenagers (RR = 0.58, 95% CI = [0.39-0.84], P = 0.01). Gender, African background, unemployment, living alone and absence of referring physician were not associated with delay in seeking healthcare. Consulting during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was neither associated with a longer THA nor with a higher rate of severe malaria. CONCLUSION: In contrast to an endemic area, socio-economic factors did not impact on delay in seeking healthcare in imported malaria. Prevention should focus on VFR subjects, who tend to consult later than other travellers.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , COVID-19 , Malaria Falciparum , Malaria , Adulto , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Malaria/prevención & control , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Viaje , Hospitales , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
Open lower limb fractures are common injuries, and the occurrence of infectious complications after open fractures is a usual problem. The rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) and the nature and resistance of the germs responsible for SSIs remain poorly described. Our aim was to describe the bacterial epidemiology of SSIs after surgical management of an open lower limb fracture. We conducted a retrospective monocentric cohort study from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2020 based on the analysis of inpatient records in a non-university hospital of Ile de France region. All patients who underwent surgery for an open lower limb fracture were included. A total of 149 patients were included. In our population, 19 (12.7%) patients developed an SSI. Of these 19 patients, the sample was polymicrobial in 9 (47.4%) patients. In 9 (45%) cases, the samples identified a group 3 enterobacteria, Enterobacter cloacae being the main one in 7 (36.9%) cases. Staphylococci were identified in 11 patients, with Staphylococcus aureus in 9 (47.4%). All Staphylococcus aureus were susceptible to methicillin, and all enterobacteria were susceptible to C3G. Among all SSI, 10 (58.8%) contained at least one germ resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC). The SSIs rate was 12.7%. The main pathogens identified were Enterobacter cloacae and Staphylococcus aureus. The presence of early SSI caused by group 3 Enterobacteriaceae renders current antibiotic prophylaxis protocols inadequate with AMC in half the cases.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Aim of this study is to analyse the characteristics of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) inpatients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, including coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients who developed VAP from March to May 2020 (VAP COVID-19). They were compared to non-COVID-19 patients who developed VAP from January 2011 to December 2019 (VAP NO COVID-19) and COVID-19 patients who did not develop VAP (NO VAP COVID-19). RESULTS: Overall, 42 patients were included in the VAP COVID-19group, 37 in the NO VAP COVID-19 group, and 188 in the VAP NO COVID-19 group. VAP COVID-19 had significantly higher rates of shock (71% vs. 48%, p = 0.009), death in ICU (52% vs. 30%, p = 0.011), VAP recurrence (28% vs. 4%, p < 0.0001), positive blood culture (26% vs. 13%, p = 0.038), and polymicrobial culture (28% vs. 13%, p = 0.011) than VAP NO COVID-19. At the multivariate analysis, death in patients with VAP was associated with shock (p = 0.032) and SARS-CoV-2 (p = 0.008) infection. CONCLUSIONS: VAP in COVID-19 patients is associated with shock, bloodstream, and polymicrobial infections.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This is a subanalysis of a previous study which compared the effectiveness of trimetoprim-sulfametoxazole (TMP-SMX) with all other regimens for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Aim of the current study was to focus on the effectiveness of a strategy based on TMP-SMX as de-escalation from ß-lactam including regimens. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients who were hospitalized for VAP from 2011 to 2019. Patients were distributed in two groups: NO SWITCH TO TMP-SMX group, including patients who received ß-lactams for all treatment duration, and SWITCH TO TMP-SMX group, which included patients who switched to TMP-SMX from a ß-lactam including regimen after microbiology diagnosis. Three clinical outcomes were analyzed: mortality at 30 days from the start of the antibiotic treatment (T30), mortality at the end of treatment (EoT), and acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria during hospitalization in intensive care unit. RESULTS: Overall, 70 patients were included in the current study, 32/70 (45.7%) in NO SWITCH TO TMP-SMX group and 38/70 (54.3%) in SWITCH TO TMP-SMX group, 37/70 (52.8%) had been already included in the previous study. No significant differences in clinical outcomes and patient's characteristics were found when the two groups were compared. CONCLUSIONS: De-escalation to TMP-SMX for VAP treatment was not associated with higher mortality at EoT and T30 than standard treatment with ß-lactam. Monotherapy with TMP-SMX as de-escalation from broad-spectrum empirical regimens is a ß-lactam sparing strategy worthy to be further investigated in either multicenter cohort studies or randomized clinical trials.