Multi-length or 24 cm ureteric stent? A multicentre randomised comparison of stent-related symptoms using a validated questionnaire.

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: One of the suggested factors for stent-related symptoms is that excess distal intravesical stent mass may cause bladder irritation. There is a lack of studies investigating this in a randomised controlled fashion using a validated questionnaire. This study compared two of the most commonly used length of stents (a 30 cm multi-length vs a 24 cm long stent) and showed no significance difference in stent-related symptoms in patients with either of these stents. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether excessive redundant intravesical stent component contributes to the severity of stent-related symptoms in patients with a ureteric stent. We compared stent-related symptoms in patients who had either a standard 24 cm or multi-length ureteric stent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 162 patients with upper urinary tract calculi requiring ureteric stent insertion were randomised to receive either a 6 F × 24 cm Contour(TM) or multi-length 6 F × 22-30 cm Contour VL(TM) stent. Patients were requested to complete the validated Bristol Ureteric Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at 1 and 4 weeks after stent insertion and 4 weeks after removal. The mean scores for each domain of the USSQ for both groups were compared using the Student's t-test. Any adverse events, e.g. stent migration, early removal of stent due to stent-related symptoms and failure of stent insertion, were also recorded. RESULTS: In all, 153 patients who had successful stent insertion were requested to complete the USSQ and 74% of patients returned at least the week 1 questionnaire. At 1 and 4 weeks with the stent in situ, comparison of the mean scores showed no significant difference in urinary symptoms, pain, general health, work performance, sexual dysfunction and number of days patients stayed in bed or reduced their routine activities. Three (2%) patients had their stent removed early due to stent-related symptoms and five (3%) had failed stent insertion. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not find any difference in symptoms between the 24 cm or multi-length Contour stents. However, the study was not powered to detect small differences particularly for the pain symptom domain. Stents should only be used sparingly and the stent dwell-time should be minimised.

How successful is the conservative management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in adults?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the conservative management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO), according to severity, accepted in paediatric urology but rarely reported in adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 23 patients (median age 58 years, 17 men and six women) with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic PUJO were managed conservatively. The patients' age, preference and comorbidities were considered. The diagnosis of PUJO was based on intravenous urography and isotopic renography. After stringently reviewing the renograms based on relative renal function (RRF) and output efficiency (OE), 15 patients had an OE consistent with definitive PUJO. One patient had no further imaging due to associated comorbidities. Ten patients had right PUJO, three left and one with bilateral PUJO, with unilateral conservative management. The follow-up included annual renography and clinical consultation. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty was considered for patients with a >10% loss of RRF and/or <40% RRF during the follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 14 of 15 patients had renograms during the follow-up. The mean RRF of the affected kidney at diagnosis was 48.6% which marginally decreased to 46.7% after a median (range) follow-up of 44 (23-75) months. The RRF of 11 patients remained stable and in three decreased significantly (median 11% RRF), requiring pyeloplasty. None of the patients became symptomatic throughout the follow-up. CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic adults the conservative management of PUJO appears to be safe during a short- to medium-term follow-up. We recommend that patients are regularly followed with renography and seen promptly should they become symptomatic. A longer follow-up is needed in a larger group to confirm these findings.

Nephron-sparing surgery: a call for greater application of established techniques.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the results of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) over a 15-year period in a large UK teaching hospital and to compare results with other series including minimally invasive techniques, as nephron-sparing techniques are still under-utilized in the surgical treatment of renal carcinoma. A standardized technique is described that we think minimizes the risk of postoperative urinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 141 patients who underwent OPN performed over a 15-year period in one centre by the senior author (D.M.A.W.). A notable feature of this series compared with others is the high proportion of patients undergoing other major synchronous surgery. RESULTS: In all, 141 patients underwent 147 OPNs, with six undergoing bilateral procedures, of which 82 were for imperative indications (single kidney, bilateral synchronous tumours, or pre-existing renal impairment). There were three perioperative deaths, two in patients undergoing other synchronous major surgery. In all, 38 patients had postoperative complications: 28 patients required blood transfusion (four required intervention for their bleeding), five required acute dialysis and three late dialysis. There was a 90% cancer-specific survival rate at a median follow-up of 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: This series confirms the trend towards improved outcomes and decreased complications in OPN at a time when its place is challenged by minimally invasive techniques.