RESUMEN
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent global health concern, especially in countries facing instability or conflicts, with compromised healthcare systems. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) established an acute trauma hospital in Aden, Yemen, treating mainly war-wounded civilians, and implemented an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme. This study aimed to describe clinical characteristics and identify antibiotic susceptibility patterns representative of patients treated with antibiotics. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study using routinely collected data from all patients treated with antibiotics in the MSF-Aden Acute Trauma hospital between January 2018 and June 2021. Routine clinical data from patients' files was entered into an AMS electronic database and microbiological data were entered into WHONET. Both databases were imported and merged in REDCap and analysed using RStudio. Results: Three hundred and sixty-three of 481 (75%) included patients were injured by violence-related trauma. Most were men aged 19-45 years (nâ=â331; 68.8%). In total, 598 infections were diagnosed and treated. MDR organisms were identified in 362 (60.5%) infections in 311 (65%) patients. Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) (nâ=â143; 24%) were the most common, followed by osteomyelitis (nâ=â125; 21%) and intra-abdominal-infections (IAIs) (nâ=â116; 19%), and 111 (19%) secondary bloodstream infections were identified. Escherichia coli was the most frequently identified pathogen, causing IAI (nâ=â87; 28%) and SSTI (nâ=â43; 16%), while Staphylococcus aureus caused mainly osteomyelitis (nâ=â84; 19%). Most Gram-negatives were ESBL producers, including E. coli (nâ=â193; 81.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (nâ=â72; 77.4%) and Enterobacter cloacae (nâ=â39; 50%) while most S. aureus were methicillin resistant (nâ=â93; 72.6%). Conclusions: High rates of MDR were found. This information will facilitate a comprehensive review of the empirical antibiotic treatment guidelines.
RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000767.].
RESUMEN
The true burden of COVID-19 in Yemen is underestimated. The healthcare system is dysfunctional and there is a high shortage of health care workers in the country. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 remains limited and official surveillance data is restricted to those who are severe or highly suspected. In this study, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) aimed to conduct serological screening using rapid tests for asymptomatic staff at the MSF Aden Trauma Center to determine the SARS-CoV-2 antibody seropositivity. Four months after the peak of the first wave, we offered all the staff at the MSF Aden Trauma Center PCR if symptomatic, and a baseline SARS-CoV-2 serology screening followed by follow-up screenings. A final round was scheduled four months after the baseline. A rapid serology lateral flow test, NG-Test IgM-IgG was used in all rounds and in the final round, an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for seropositivity. The level of agreement between the different serology assays used was investigated. Overall 69 out of 356 participants (19.4%, 95% CI 17.9-20.8) tested positive by NG-Test between September and November 2020. A sub-sample of 161 staff members were retested in January 2021. Of these, the NG-Test detected only 13 positive cases, whereas the ECLIA detected 109 positive cases. The adjusted seroprevalence by ECLIA was 59% (95%CI 52.2-65.9). The non-medical staff had significantly lower odds of seropositivity compared to the medical staff (AOR 0.43, 95% CI 0.15-0.7, p<0.001). The positive percent agreement between the two tests was very low (11%). Our results suggest a very high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in healthcare workers in Yemen, highlighting the need for regular testing and rapid vaccination of all healthcare workers in the country.