Propensity score-matched comparison between complete mesocolic excision and classic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of right colon cancer remains disappointing. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL), based on the same oncological principles of total mesorectal excision, has been speculated to result in a better outcome. To evaluate the oncological adequacy of CME with CVL, we carried out a comparative study with propensity score-matched analysis between two different surgical procedures performed at Italian and Egyptian University cancer centers. METHODS: Forty-six Egyptian patients underwent conventional right hemicolectomy, while eighty-eight Italian patients underwent CME with sharp dissection between the embryological planes, exposure of the superior mesenteric vessels with extended lymphadenectomy, and CVL. RESULTS: All operations were successful with no increase in postoperative complications (10% in the patients undergoing CME vs. 19.5% in Egyptian patients). Number of harvested nodes (21 vs. 13) and lymph node ratio (0.08 vs. 0.22) were significantly different in patients undergoing CME (P=0.0001 and P=0.005, respectively). In these patients, the risk of cancer relapse was reduced to as much as one third (8% vs. 22%), even in node-positive tumors, and locoregional recurrences were never experienced. The classic operation was significantly associated with poor outcome (5-year disease-free survival rates were 89.2% in the group undergoing CME and 49.1% in the classic group, P=0.02). Propensity score-matched analysis warranted optimal balance and confirmed overall results. CONCLUSIONS: Right colon cancer patients undergoing CME benefitted from more oncological adequacy, with no increased postoperative complication rate, a decreased locoregional recurrence rate, and a better long-term outcome than patients operated on with the conventional procedure.

Risk factors for chronic mastitis in morocco and egypt.

Chronic mastitis is a prolonged inflammatory breast disease, and little is known about its etiology. We identified 85 cases and 112 controls from 5 hospitals in Morocco and Egypt. Cases were women with chronic mastitis (including periductal, lobular, granulomatous, lymphocytic, and duct ectasia with mastitis). Controls had benign breast disease, including fibroadenoma, benign phyllodes, and adenosis. Both groups were identified from histopathologically diagnosed patients from 2008 to 2011, frequency-matched on age. Patient interviews elicited demographic, reproductive, breastfeeding, and clinical histories. Cases had higher parity than controls (OR = 1.75, 1.62-1.90) and more reported history of contraception use (OR = 2.73, 2.07-3.61). Cases were less likely to report wearing a bra (OR = 0.56, 0.47-0.67) and less often used both breasts for breastfeeding (OR = 4.40, 3.39-5.72). Chronic mastitis cases were significantly less likely to be employed outside home (OR = 0.71, 0.60-0.84) and more likely to report mice in their households (OR = 1.63, 1.36-1.97). This is the largest case-control study reported to date on risk factors for chronic mastitis. Our study highlights distinct reproductive risk factors for the disease. Future studies should further explore these factors and the possible immunological and susceptibility predisposing conditions.

Metastatic lobular carcinoma of the breast to the vulva: a case report and review of the literature.

UNLABELLED: Primary breast-like vulva cancer, as well as metastatic disease of breast cancer to the vulva are described to be very rare, especially many years after the treatment of the primary breast tumor. Breast cancer rarely metastasizes to the vulva without finding other metastatic sites. We report a case of a 93-year-old woman with an isolated metastatic vulvar nodule thirteen years after the surgical treatment of primary breast cancer. The prior histology was a node negative invasive lobular breast cancer. The histology of the vulvar nodule was similar to the primary breast cancer. No other metastatic sites were found by both clinical examination and imaging. When isolated metastasis to the vulva is found, a primary cancer in the gynaecological area should be excluded first. KEY WORDS: Breast cancer - Vulvar metastasis - Rare breast metastasis.