Preferences for different treatment options among people living with acromegaly in the US.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is a rare hormonal disorder that results in enlargement of the face, hands and feet. It is associated with comorbidities, increased mortality, reduced quality of life and economic burden. Adequate treatment is critical to alleviate symptoms; however, the treatment burden is substantial. To understand how different treatment aspects might ease the burden, this study investigated preferences for treatment options among people with acromegaly in the US, using a choice experiment (CE). METHODS: An online CE was conducted based on a similar study among the US general population. Respondents were recruited through Acromegaly Community in the US, and all eligible respondents were included. The survey assessed six treatment options that varied according to administration, frequency, storage, treatment setting, needle type and injection pain. RESULTS: 109 adults with acromegaly completed the survey between October and December 2022. On average, the population had lived with symptoms for 15 years, while the average number of years with the diagnosis was eight. Respondents preferred subcutaneous injections every fourth week and preferred them at home rather than at the hospital. Most respondents preferred subcutaneous injections right under the skin administered once every fourth week with a pen at home over oral capsules administered twice daily at home. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that new treatment options administered as subcutaneous injections right under the skin once every fourth week at home have the potential to lower the treatment burden among people with acromegaly, emphasizing the importance of taking each person's preference into consideration when choosing treatment.

Perceptions, behaviours and potential barriers to effective obesity care. Results from the ACTION-DK study.

AIM: Weight bias, stigma and discrimination are pervasive in the health care system and society and may result in biased treatment of people living with obesity (PwO). We aimed to identify perceptions, attitudes and potential barriers that exist between people with obesity and health care professionals (HCPs) in Denmark. METHODS: The ACTION-DK survey was a cross-sectional, non-interventional, descriptive study conducted in Denmark. The cohort included 879 PwO (body mass index ≥30.0 kg/m2 ) based on self-reported height and body weight, and 100 HCPs from the primary and secondary sectors who frequently encountered PwO. RESULTS: Several discrepancies between PwO and HCPs were identified, including recognition of obesity as a chronic disease (PwO: 49% vs. HCPs: 84%) and whether PwO were responsible for their weight loss (PwO: 81% vs. HCPs: 17%). Among PwO, 46% were motivated to lose weight, but only 28% of HCPs shared this perception. Untimely initiation of obesity care consultations was also identified as a potential barrier to proper obesity care, as PwO waited 7 years, on average, from their initial decision to lose weight before having their first obesity care consultation. In addition, only 24% of PwO had a follow-up consultation after the initial obesity care discussion. Almost half of HCPs (46%) considered weight loss medication effective, but only 10% brought up this possibility during an obesity care discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that it is pivotal to improve obesity care in Denmark by ensuring a better follow-up and alignment of the perceptions and attitudes toward obesity between PwO and HCPs.

Utilities associated with stoma-related complications: peristomal skin complications and leakages.

AIM: Peristomal skin complications (PSCs) and leakages are major issues for people living with a stoma. The purpose of this study is to understand how these stoma-linked complications impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a UK population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used time trade-off (TTO) methodology to quantify health state utilities associated with two stoma-related complications: PSC and leakages. Respondents assessed 10 different health states with different PSC severity levels (no, mild, moderate or severe PSC) and frequencies of leakage events (2, 12 or 48 leakages onto clothes per year, and no leakage due to a digital solution). The average disutility value for each health state was also assessed. The study was conducted via a web-based survey in the UK adult general population. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The analysis included 758 respondents. Respondents considered living with a stoma with no PSC to be more favorable than the other health states. Severe pain, itching and/or burning (PIB) was associated with the largest disutility compared to no PSC. The disutility (0-1 scale) compared to no PSC was 0.287 (p < .0001), 0.106 (p < .0001) and 0.025 (p=.0005) for PIB scores of 8, 5 and 2, respectively, on a 1-10 scale. More frequent leakage events were associated with lower utility. The utility decreases compared to no PSC were 0.114 (p < .0001), 0.057 (p < .0001) and 0.022 (p < .0001) for 48, 12 and 2 leakage events per year, respectively. The health state with a digital notification solution that notifies the user before a leakage event happens was considered as good as no PSC. CONCLUSIONS: Experiencing mild, moderate, and severe levels of PSC or leakage onto clothes is associated with a significant reduction in HRQoL compared to no PSC and/or no leakage. Stoma appliances that reduce the skin complications or keep leakage from reaching the clothes are likely to improve HRQoL.

Costs of the COVID-19 pandemic associated with obesity in Europe: A health-care cost model.

Excess weight is associated with severe outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to estimate the total secondary care costs by body mass index (BMI, kg/m2 ) category when hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Europe during the first wave of the pandemic from January to June 2020. Building a health-care cost model, this study aimed to estimate the total costs of COVID-19. Information on risk of hospitalization, admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and risk of ventilation were based on published data. Average cost per patient and in total were calculated based on risks of admission to ICU, risk of invasive mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay when hospitalized and published costs associated with hospitalization. The total direct costs of secondary care during the first wave of COVID-19 in Europe were estimated at EUR 13.9 billon, whereof 76% accounted for treating people with overweight and obesity. The average cost per hospital admission increased with BMI, from EUR 15831 for BMI <25 kg/m2 to EUR 30982 for BMI ≥40 kg/m2 . This study reveals that excess weight contributes disproportionally to the costs of COVID-19. This might reflect that overweight and obesity caused the COVID-19 pandemic to result in more severe outcomes for citizens and higher secondary care costs throughout Europe.

Costs of COVID-19 pandemic associated with diabetes in Europe: a health care cost model.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes is associated with progression to severe COVID-19. The objective of this study was to estimate to what extent the increased risk among people with diabetes could impact the secondary care costs of COVID-19 throughout Europe during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic from January to June 2020. METHODS: Applying a health care cost model based on inputs from data published in international peer-reviewed journals, identified via a rapid literature review this study aimed to estimate the total secondary sector costs of COVID-19. Estimates of unit costs were based on data from Denmark, France, Spain and the UK. We calculated average costs per patient without diabetes and according to four diabetes categories based on risk of hospitalization, admission to intensive care unit, ventilator support and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The estimated cost per hospital admission during the first wave of COVID-19 in Europe ranged between EUR 25,018 among people with type 2 diabetes in good glycaemic control to EUR 57,244 among people with type 1 diabetes in poor glycaemic control, reflecting higher risk of intensive care, ventilator support and longer hospital stay according to diabetes category, while the corresponding cost for people without diabetes was estimated at EUR 16,993. The total direct costs of secondary care of COVID-19 in Europe were estimated at EUR 13.9 billion. Thus, 23.5% of the total costs accounted for treating people with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of a greater focus on prevention and adequate treatment of diabetes and the need for special attention to avoid infection with COVID-19 to the extent possible among those already diagnosed with diabetes.