Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) stands as a degenerative ailment with a substantial and escalating prevalence. The practice of traditional Chinese non-pharmacological therapy has become a prevalent complementary and adjunctive approach. A mounting body of evidence suggests its efficacy in addressing KOA. Recent investigations have delved into its underlying mechanism, yielding some headway. Consequently, this comprehensive analysis seeks to encapsulate the clinical application and molecular mechanism of traditional Chinese non-pharmacological therapy in KOA treatment. The review reveals that various therapies, such as acupuncture, electroacupuncture, warm needle acupuncture, tuina, and acupotomy, primarily target localized knee components like cartilage, subchondral bone, and synovium. Moreover, their impact extends to the central nervous system and intestinal flora. More perfect experimental design and more comprehensive research remain a promising avenue in the future.
Background: The effectiveness of acupuncture and tuina in treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is still controversial, which limits their clinical application in practice. This study aims to evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of acupuncture and tuina on KOA. Methods/design: This parallel-group, multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) will be conducted at the outpatient clinic of five traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in China. Three hundred and thirty participants with KOA will be randomly assigned to acupuncture, tuina, or home-based exercise group with a ratio of 1:1:1. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants achieving a minimal clinically important improvement defined as a ≥ 12% reduction on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain dimension on short term (week 8) and long term (week 26) compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes are knee joint conditions (pain, function, and stiffness), self-efficacy of arthritis, quality of life, and psychological conditions, which will be evaluated by the WOMAC score and the Patient Global Assessment (PGA), and in addition, the respondents index of OMERACT-OARSI, Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12), arthritis self-efficacy scale, and European five-dimensional health scale (EQ-5D). Adverse events will be collected by self-reported questionnaires predefined. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn.
OBJECTIVES: Most Asian countries have employed Chinese medicine (CM) and Western medicine to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Evidence synthesis and comparison of effectiveness are difficult since outcomes examined and presented through trials possess heterogeneity. This study aimed to solve the outcome problems for CM clinical trials in LSS by building a core outcome set (COS). METHODS: To achieve an agreement on a set of core outcome domains, a four-phase study was carried out. First, we identified candidate outcome domains by systematically reviewing trials. In addition, we identified outcome domains associated with patients by conducting semistructured interviews with patients. Next, outcome domains were processed through a national two-round Delphi survey, in which 18 patients and 21 experts were recruited. Finally, the above domains were converted as a core outcome domain set based on a consensus meeting, in which 24 stakeholders were recruited. RESULTS: Seventeen outcome subdomains were identified by the systematic review and interviews. The Delphi survey assigned a priority to four outcome domains in the first round and four outcomes additionally in the second round. The core outcome domains were determined through discussion and redefinition of outcomes in the consensus meeting: pain and discomfort, health-related quality of life, lumbar function, activities of daily living, measures of walking, patient global assessment, adverse events and CM-specific outcomes. CONCLUSION: COS-CM-LSS is likely to enhance the consistency of outcomes reported in clinical trials. In-depth research should be conducted for the exploration of the best methods to examine the above outcomes.
Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Spinal Stenosis , Humans , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Delphi Technique , Research Design , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Treatment Outcome
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of utilizing Non-Pharmaceutical Chinese Medical (NPCM) therapy singularly or in combination for the treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (DLSS). METHODS: The comprehensive search for all randomized controlled trials regarding NPCM therapies for the treatment of DLSS was performed through online databases searches, commencing from their inception to January 1st, 2023. The relevant literature underwent a thorough screening process, and the data was meticulously extracted and subjected to analysis through the implementation of RevMan 5.3 software. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was employed to assess the potential risk of bias. The synthesis of evidence was performed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RESULTS: The extensive search procedure produced 5674 records, including data from 37 studies of 38 comparisons (2965 participants). Moderate evidence was obtained demonstrating that the application of acupuncture for a duration of 6-8 weeks was significantly superior to sham acupuncture in terms of intermediate-term (6 months) alleviation of back pain (2 trials, n = 128; MD, -1.08; 95% CI, -1.81â¼-0.34) and improvement in lumbar function (2 trials, n = 128; MD, -1.40; 95% CI, -2.93â¼-0.13). The available low evidence suggested that, as compared to sham acupuncture, acupuncture was effective in reducing short-term (3 months) back pain and enhancing lumbar function but had no impact on leg pain. A trial with low risk of bias found that acupuncture was more effective than sham acupuncture in enhancing disability and walking capabilities. The other studies presented inconsistent evidence with regards to the efficacy of the various interventions employed. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of low-to-moderate quality suggests that for DLSS patients, the implementation of acupuncture in comparison to sham acupuncture presents favorable outcomes in terms of short- and intermediate-term alleviation of back pain, improvement in lumbar function, enhancement of disability and walking capacity. The conclusion regarding the efficacy of other NPCM therapies was not obtained due to the insufficient quality of the available evidence. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022307631.
Acupuncture Therapy , Spinal Stenosis , Humans , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Back Pain , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Spinal Stenosis/therapy , Medicine, Chinese Traditional
OBJECTIVES: Most of the commonly used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures were developed in the West and have been introduced into other countries for use worldwide. Arguably, this adaptation process assumes that health, as a concept, has universal cultural equivalence. This study identified those Chinese-developed HRQoL measures and summarized their contents, with which the Western-developed HRQoL measures were compared, aiming to explore cultural differences in defining and measuring health between the East and the West. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify Chinese-developed generic HRQoL measures. Two Western-developed HRQoL measures (EQ-5D, SF-36) and a cross-culturally developed measure (WHOQOL-100) were included for comparison. A qualitative content analysis was undertaken both deductively and inductively to categorize and summarize the content of the questionnaires in analyzing similarities and differences between Western and Chinese-developed HRQoL measures. RESULTS: Eight HRQoL measures that were designed in a Chinese cultural context were identified and compared with the 3 non-Chinese-developed HRQoL measures. Although there is an agreement between the East and the West regarding the domains and subdomains of HRQoL, health concepts including "emotion control," "weather adaption," "social adaption," "spirit," and "complexion" were exclusively introduced by the Chinese measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that health is a culturally grounded concept, and because of cultural differences, it cannot be taken for granted that a well-recognized Western HRQoL measure is always appropriate for use in other cultural contexts. This study implies the necessity of further examining the legitimacy of applying Western-developed HRQoL measures in other cultural settings.
Quality of Life , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
