RESUMEN
Background: Lianhuaqingwen (LHQW), a traditional Chinese medicine comprised of 13 herbal extracts renowned for their robust heat-clearing and detoxifying properties, has gained widespread utilization in China but has yet to garner similar recognition abroad. It is believed to exhibit efficacy in ameliorating symptoms in individuals afflicted with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the precise impact of LHQW on viral shedding (VS), particularly in the context of mild or asymptomatic infections caused by the Omicron BF.4/5 or BF.7 variants of COVID-19, remained inadequately elucidated. Consequently, a real-world study was conducted, involving patients diagnosed with COVID-19, with the primary objective of ascertaining the effectiveness of LHQW in this specific clinical context. Methods: We conducted an investigation on Omicron-infected patients through a single-center, propensity score-matched real-world study conducted at Xiaotangshan Fangcang Hospital from May to November 2022. A total of 3,368 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study, all of whom presented mild or asymptomatic infections caused by either BF.4/5 or BF.7 strains of the virus. Demographic and clinical data were systematically collected from medical records. Patients were allocated to receive treatment with LHQW (designated as the treatment group) or received no LHQW treatment (designated as the not-treated/no-treatment group). Viral load was quantified utilizing quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and the duration of VS was defined as the time interval between the initial negative test result and the date of COVID-19 diagnosis or symptom onset. Results: The study encompassed a cohort of 3,368 patients, and following propensity score matching, a subset of 296 patients was meticulously chosen for subsequent analysis. Notably, baseline characteristics exhibited disparities between the treatment and not-treated/no-treatment groups. However, post-matching, these characteristics achieved a commendable level of comparability. Our findings unequivocally demonstrated that there existed no statistically significant disparity in VS. This holds true when comparing patients subjected to LHQW treatment against those not administered LHQW, as well as when contrasting individuals presenting asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 manifestations. Conclusion: No statistically significant difference in VS was observed between patients who underwent LHQW treatment and those who did not. Additional investigations are imperative to provide a comprehensive assessment of LHQW's efficacy, particularly in patients afflicted with severe COVID-19 or those infected with viral strains distinct from BF.4/5 or BF.7.
RESUMEN
The accessory proteins of coronaviruses are essential for virus-host interactions and the modulation of host immune responses. It has been reported that accessory protein ORF3a encoded by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can induce apoptosis, and accessory protein ORF6 and ORF8 could be inhibitors of the type-I interferon (IFN) signaling pathway. However, the function of accessory protein ORF7b is largely unknown. We investigated the apoptosis-inducing activity of ORF7b in cells. Cytokine levels and host innate immune responses, including expression of interferon regulatory transcription factor (IRF)-3, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-1, interferon (IFN)-ß, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and interleukin (IL)-6, were also investigated. We found that ORF7b promoted expression of IFN-ß, TNF-α, and IL-6, activated type-I IFN signaling through IRF3 phosphorylation, and activated TNFα-induced apoptosis in HEK293T cells and Vero E6 cells. These results could provide deeper understanding about the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 as well as the interaction between the accessory protein ORF7b with host immune responses.
RESUMEN
The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2), which is causing the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, poses a global health threat. However, it is easy to confuse COVID-19 with seasonal influenza in preliminary clinical diagnosis. In this study, the differences between influenza and COVID-19 in epidemiological features, clinical manifestations, comorbidities and pathogen biology were comprehensively compared and analyzed. SARS-CoV-2 causes a higher proportion of pneumonia (90.67 vs. 17.07%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (12.00 vs. 0%) than influenza A virus. The proportion of leukopenia for influenza patients was 31.71% compared with 12.00% for COVID-19 patients (P = 0.0096). The creatinine and creatine kinase were significantly elevated when there were COVID-19 patients. The basic reproductive number (R0) for SARS-CoV-2 is 2.38 compared with 1.28 for seasonal influenza A virus. The mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2 ranges from 1.12 × 10-3 to 6.25 × 10-3, while seasonal influenza virus has a lower evolutionary rate (0.60-2.00 × 10-6). Overall, this study compared the clinical features and outcomes of medically attended COVID-19 and influenza patients. In addition, the S477N and N439K mutations on spike may affect the affinity with receptor ACE2. This study will contribute to COVID-19 control and epidemic surveillance in the future.
