First Phase Development of a Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Midface Oncology.

Background: Facial cancer surgery involving the midface (comprising the lower eyelids, nose, cheeks, and upper lip) can have debilitating life-changing functional, social, and psychological impacts on the patient. Midface symptoms are inadequately captured by existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are increasingly used for individual patient care, quality improvement, and standardized reporting of treatment outcomes. This study aimed to present our findings from the first phase of the development of a midface, specifically periocular and nasal, PROM. Methods: After international guidance for PROM development, the first phase comprised identification of salient issues and item generation. Fifteen patients who had midface surgery and 10 clinicians from various specialties with more than 5 years' experience treating these patients were recruited. Semi-structured interviews explored aesthetic, functional, social, and psychological outcomes, with specific attention to deficiencies in current PROMs. Thematic analysis was used to develop an item pool, and group interviews with clinicians were carried out to create and refine PROM scales. Results: Qualitative data from patient interviews were grouped into aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial domains for the eyelids and nose. Ninety-nine draft items were generated across these domains. Following focus group discussions, the final version of the midface-specific PROM contained 31 items (13 eye-specific, 10-nose-specific, eight general midface items). Conclusions: This midface-specific PROM is valuable in assessing and comparing patient-reported outcomes in those who have undergone complex resection and reconstruction of the midface. This PROM is currently undergoing field testing.

Validation of a risk prediction calculator in Australian patients undergoing head and neck microsurgery reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) surgical risk calculator (SRC) is an open access calculator predicting patients' risk of postoperative complications. This study aims to assess the validity of the SRC in patients undergoing microsurgical free flap reconstruction at an Australian tertiary referral centre. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 200 consecutive patients treated up to November 2020. SRC-predicted rates of postoperative complications and hospital length of stay (LOS) were compared to those observed for the ablative and reconstructive components of the procedure. The performance of the SRC was assessed using Brier scores, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: For both ablative and reconstructive components, the SRC discriminates well for pneumonia and urinary tract infection, and it is calibrated well for readmission and sepsis, but it does not discriminate and calibrate well for any single outcome. SRC-predicted hospital LOS and actual LOS did not correlate well for the reconstructive component, but they correlated strongly for the ablative component. CONCLUSIONS: The SRC is a poor predictor of postoperative complication rates and hospital LOS in patients undergoing head and neck microsurgical reconstruction.

Benchmarking Survival Outcomes Following Surgical Management of pT3 and pT4 Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

BACKGROUND: pT3/4 head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (HNcSCCs) are associated with poor outcomes, including local recurrence, metastasis and death. Whilst surgery remains the standard treatment for advanced HNcSCC, novel systemic therapies, such as immunotherapy, are being used earlier in the treatment paradigm. It is imperative that the clinical outcomes of surgery are clearly described so that conventional and emerging treatment modalities can be better integrated and sequenced in the management of pT3/4 HNcSCC. METHODS: Patients with confirmed pT3/4 HNcSCC undergoing curative surgical resection between 2014-2020 were identified retrospectively from a prospectively maintained research database. The primary outcomes of interest were locoregional control (LRC), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome was surgical complication rate. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (median age 74, range 41-94 years) were included, 90% of which had pT3 tumors; 36.5% received adjuvant radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 24.3 (range 1.0-84.3) months. LRC at 5 years was 62.0%, DSS at 5 years was 83.7%, and OS at 5 years was 71.9%. Median time to recurrence was 8.4 months. LRC was reduced in the presence of margin involvement and previous treatment (radiotherapy/surgery). The major surgical complication rate was 9.6%. CONCLUSIONS: More than 60% of patients treated surgically for pT3/4 head and neck cSCC were alive and free of disease at 5 years posttreatment. High-risk features such as margin involvement and having had previous treatment (radiotherapy/surgery) should be used to guide adjuvant therapy.

Conventional cardiac risk factors associated with trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab has had a major impact on the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer patients. However, it is associated with cardiotoxicity, expressed as an asymptomatic decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and less often as clinical HF. The aim of this meta-analysis is to identify the association of conventional cardiovascular risk factors with the development of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (TIC). METHODS: A literature search of PubMed was conducted to identify studies examining the association between cardiovascular risk factors and TIC. Data were extracted and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated examining the odds of developing TIC for each of the risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies were included in the analysis. Age (OR:0.7; 95%CI 0.318-1.09; P= 0.0004), hypertension (OR:0.69; 95%CI 0.26-1.12; P = 0.001), smoking(OR:0.35; 95%CI 0.01- 0.69; P = 0.038), diabetes mellitus (OR:0.44; 95%CI 0.24- 0.68; P = 0.0001) and family history of CAD (OR:5.51, 95%CI 1.76-17.25; P< 0.00001)were significantly associated with the development of cardiotoxicity. Known history of CAD (OR: 3.72; 95%CI 2.11-6.57; P = 0.0005) was also associated with the development of TIC. CONCLUSION(S): Identifying women at risk for TIC have several important potential applications. Clinicians may decide to assess LVEF more frequently in patients at highest risk for TIC in order to detect LV systolic dysfunction earlier. Additionally, this could help identify patients who would benefit most from prophylactic therapy for preventing TIC.

Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vermilion Lip.

BACKGROUND: The vermilion lip is a unique anatomical junction between cutaneous and mucosal surfaces. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vermilion lip (vlSCC) was previously classified as oral SCC (oSCC) under the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition (AJCC7), but has been recategorized as a cutaneous SCC of the head and neck (HNcSCC) in the AJCC 8th edition (AJCC8). We investigated the locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for the various pathological T categories and disease stages of vlSCC as per AJCC8. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 297 patients diagnosed with vlSCC between January 2004 and February 2019. For this study, vlSCC cases were staged according to both AJCC7 and AJCC8. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models were used to analyze differences in LRC, DFS, and OS between each pT category and disease stage, and log-rank tests were performed for subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Restaging of vlSCC using the AJCC8 resulted in 19% of patients being upstaged to pT3, and 16% being upstaged to stage III. No patients were downstaged in pT stage or overall stage. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that when the AJCC8 HNcSCC staging system is applied to vlSCC, there are important aberrations leading to unwarranted upstaging of pT1 and redundancy of pT2. Understanding of these limitations are important in considering treatment escalation.