Creating hemodialysis autogenous access in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) in childhood and adolescence is rare, with relatively few published reports of pediatric ESRD vascular access. This study analyzes a 10-year experience creating arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) in children and adolescents. Our goal is to review our strategy for creating functional autogenous vascular access in younger patients and report our results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data and outcomes for consecutive vascular access patients aged ≤19 years during a 10-year period. Each patient had preoperative vascular ultrasound mapping by the operating surgeon in addition to physical examination. A distal forearm radiocephalic AVF was the first access choice when feasible, and a proximal radial artery inflow AVF was the next option. Demographic data, inflow artery, venous outflow target, and required transposition vs direct AVFs were variables included in the analysis. Primary and cumulative patency were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-seven AVFs were created in 35 patients. No grafts were used. Ages were 6 to 19 years (mean, 15 years), and 20 were male. Causes of ESRD included glomerular disease (n = 18) and urinary obstruction or reflux (n = 7), among others. Three had previous AVFs, and 10 were obese. The proximal radial artery supplied AVF inflow in 25 patients and the brachial artery in only seven. Eleven individuals required a transposition and one a vein translocation to the contralateral arm. No patients developed hand ischemia, although two later required banding procedures for high flow. Eleven patients had successful transplants. A single patient died, unrelated to the vascular access. Five AVFs failed. Of these, two had new successful AVFs created, two regained renal function, one was transplanted, and one declined other procedures. Primary and cumulative patency rates were 75% and 85% at 12 months, 70% and 85% at 24 months, and 51% and 85% at 36 months, respectively. Median follow-up was 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: Creating an AVF for hemodialysis is a successful vascular access strategy for pediatric and adolescent patients. Proximal radial artery AVFs provided safe and functional access when a distal AVF was not feasible. Cumulative AVF patency was 85% at 36 months.

Vascular Surgery Training Positions and Applicant 10-Year Trends with Consideration for Further Expansion.

BACKGROUND: There is a significant shortage of vascular surgeons in the United States and projections for these practicing surgical specialists continue to worsen. Annual appraisal of our workforce recruitment and growth is imperative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data were analyzed using the National Resident Matching Program from 2012-2022 applicant appointment years (specialty code for vascular surgery 450). Simple linear trend analysis was performed for the number of positions available and the number of applicants, stratified by fellowship or residency. RESULTS: Over the 10-year study period, the total vascular surgery trainee positions expanded from 161 to 202. Integrated residency positions increased (41 positions in 2012 vs. 84 in 2022) while available fellowship positions remained stagnant (120 in 2012 vs. 118 in 2022). Total applicants rose as well, from 213 to 311. In 2022, unmatched applicants have increased for both paradigms (25 fellowship and 84 residency applicants) and 100% of programs filled. On average, the number of residency positions offered increased by 4 each year (P < 0.0001) and the number of fellowship positions increased by 0.5 each year (P = 0.1617). The number of integrated residency applicants increased by approximately 9 per year (P = 0.001), while the number of fellowships applicants increased by approximately 1.5 per year (P = 0.121). CONCLUSIONS: Applicants for both vascular tracks have increased since 2012 indicating successful recruitment; however, all 2022 programs filled, leaving many applicants unmatched. Residency positions have continued to expand while fellowship positions have not. With the demonstrated surge among applicants, the disproportionate lack of increasing training positions, and the existing shortage of vascular surgeons, there is an urgency to meet the increasing demand. A concerted effort should be made toward adding additional residency and fellowship positions where feasible.

Creating reverse flow arteriovenous fistulas with a forearm cannulation target.

BACKGROUND: Establishing a forearm arteriovenous fistula (AVF) offers preferred cannulation sites and preserves proximal access opportunities. When a radiocephalic AVF at the wrist is not feasible and the upper arm cephalic and median cubital veins are inadequate, an AV graft or more complex access procedure is often required. Creating a retrograde flow forearm AVF (RF-AVF) is a valuable alternative where the mid-forearm median antebrachial or cephalic vein is adequate, offering forearm cannulation zones with AVF outflow through deep and superficial collaterals. We report our technique and results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our vascular access data base of consecutive patients during an 11-year study period where a RF-AVF established the only available cannulation target in the forearm. In addition to physical examination, all patients had ultrasound vessel mapping. RESULTS: A forearm access was established with a RF-AVF as the only opportunity for cannulation in 48 patients. Ages were 14-86 years (median = 62 years). Forty-four percent female, 63% diabetic, 13% obese, and 29% had previous access operations. Inflow was proximal radial artery in 47 individuals and one proximal ulnar. Nine AVFs (19%) failed at 2-66 months (median 14 months). One RF-AVF was ligated due to arm edema. Follow-up was 2-111 months (median = 23.5 months). Primary and cumulative patency rates were 62% and 91% at 12 months, and 46% and 85% at 24 months. Five patients were lost to follow-up with functioning RF-AVFs (mean 41 months). Twenty-three patients (48%) died during F/U of causes unrelated to access procedures (mean 25 months). CONCLUSIONS: Establishing a reverse flow forearm AVF offers a successful autogenous access option in the forearm for selected patients with an inadequate distal radial artery and/or cephalic vein at the wrist, avoiding more complex or staged procedures and preserving upper arm sites for future use. A proximal radial artery inflow procedure is recommended.

Venous thromboembolism as the first sign of malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is commonly associated with hypercoagulability in patients with cancer; however, there have been few investigations of VTE as the first sign of malignancy and even fewer performed in the United States. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of unrecognized malignancy in patients presenting with VTE. METHODS: We performed a 1-year retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Readmission Database, including patients aged 18 years or older, presenting with a primary diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or a pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients known to have preexisting malignant diseases were excluded. Outcomes included the rate of newly diagnosed malignancy within 6 months from the discovery of VTE and demographic or associated illness predictors for the diagnosis of malignancy. A regression analysis was performed, based on which a VTE malignancy score was developed. RESULTS: A total of 116,048 patients were identified with VTE (49.8% DVT, 41.7% PE, 8.6% DVT and PE), 16% (n = 18,294) with malignancy. Of the remaining 97,754 patients, 31% were readmitted within 6 months. The incidence of newly diagnosed malignancy within 6 months was 2.4% (n = 2354). The most common malignancies were gastrointestinal in origin (29.2%). Demographic and diagnostic predictors for malignancy included age 65 years or older, female sex, inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus, upper extremity thrombus, and a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 5 or more. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis found a cutoff VTE Malignancy score of 3 (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 89%) to be predictive of an increased risk of a newly discovered malignancy within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: VTE can be a risk indicator of underlying malignancy. Validation of a patient risk stratification score using multiple demographic or comorbid predictors for VTE on index admission may offer an opportunity for earlier diagnosis of occult malignancy.

Autogenous Vascular Access in American Indians.

BACKGROUND: American Indians (AI) or Alaska Natives, or in combination with another race, comprised 6.8 million individuals in 2010 and the population is expected to exceed 10 million in the current census. Diabetes is more common in AIs than in other races in the United States and is responsible for 69% of new onset end stage renal disease in AI patients. The incidence of obesity is also higher among AIs. As both diabetes and obesity make creating a successful autogenous vascular access more challenging, we reviewed our experience creating arteriovenous fistulas in AI patients. METHODS: Our vascular access database was reviewed for consecutive new AI patients undergoing creation of a hemodialysis vascular access during a 10-year period. Each patient underwent ultrasound vessel mapping by the operating surgeon in addition to history and physical examination. The goal for initial cannulation was 4-6 weeks after access creation. Minimal AVF flow volume for cannulation was 500 mL/min with an outflow vein diameter of 6 mm. RESULTS: 235 consecutive new AI patients were identified. All patients had an autogenous access constructed. The median age was 56 years (range, 15-89 years). Diabetes was present in 85% and 42% were female. Obesity was noted in 27% of the patients and 37% had previous vascular access operations. Primary patency at 12 and 24 months was 62% and 46%, respectively. Cumulative patency at 12 and 24 months was 96% and 94%, respectively. Female gender and previous access operations were associated with lower primary (P = 0.002 and 0.02, respectively) and cumulative patency (P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). Obesity was associated with lower cumulative access patency (P = 0.02). Overall, 74% of the access operations used the radial or ulnar artery for AVF inflow. Distal radial artery inflow AVFs were associated with longer patient survival (P = 0.01) and individuals with proximal radial inflow had longer survival when compared to brachial artery AVFs. Previous access operations were associated with shorter patient survival (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Safe and functional arteriovenous fistulas can be created for American Indians despite a higher prevalence of vascular access risk factors such as diabetes and obesity.

Predictors and Consequences of Loss to Follow-up after Vascular Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up (LTF) after surgery impacts quality of care and can adversely affect short- and long-term clinical outcomes. This study identifies modifiable factors contributing to LTF after vascular surgery and the factors' effect on short- and long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study of 440 consecutive adult patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy, infrainguinal bypass, percutaneous lower extremity revascularization, or endovascular aortic aneurysm repair at Northwestern Memorial Hospital between November 2011 and November 2013. Twenty-six patients who died within 9 months after surgery were excluded because of competing risks with the study end points. Demographics, medical history and medications, hospitalization and procedure-related factors, and postoperative complications were collected from the medical record. The primary end point was LTF 1 month after surgery (LTF1M), defined as lack of an in-person outpatient visit with a vascular surgeon 1 month after the index procedure. Secondary outcomes were LTF 1 year after surgery (LTF1Y), defined as lack of an in-person outpatient visit with a vascular surgeon between 9 and 22 months after discharge, and overall 5-year survival. RESULTS: Overall LTF1M and LTF1Y rates were 27.3% and 46.8%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in survival based on the LTF1M status (P = 0.72), but patients who were LTF1Y had significantly worse survival at 5 years (P < 0.001). Seeing a nonvascular surgeon specialist at our institution (odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-0.94, P = 0.03) and having a reintervention (OR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.08-0.37, P < 0.001) were associated with decreased LTF1Y in a multivariable model. Overall mortality was more likely with LTF1Y (hazard ratio (HR) 3.27, 95% CI: 1.86-5.76, P < 0.001) and less likely with seeing another specialist at our institution (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20-0.75, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: LTF rates after vascular surgery are high and associated with poor long-term outcomes. Patients who did not see a nonvascular surgeon specialist at our institution had higher rates of LTF1Y and worse overall mortality, suggesting that improved integration of care can improve LTF and survival.

Comparison of Direct and Less Invasive Techniques for the Treatment of Severe Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is traditionally treated with aorto-bifemoral bypass (ABF) or aorto-unifemoral bypass (AUF). However, cross-femoral bypass (CFB) and hybrid femoral endarterectomy and patch angioplasty with iliac stenting (EPS) have gained popularity as less invasive options. We sought to compare 1-year survival, primary patency, and major amputation rates between open surgical (ABF and AUF) and 2 less invasive reconstruction techniques (CFB and EPS) using a large, multicenter cohort. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent either ABF/AUF or CFB/EPS for AIOD between 2006 and 2013 in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative registry. Baseline patient and periprocedural variables were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to predict the likelihood of more invasive repair. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox models were performed for 1-year survival, primary patency, and major amputation. RESULTS: 1872 patients underwent procedures for AIOD, including 1,133 ABF/AUF and 739 CFB/EPS, during the study period. Indication was critical limb ischemia in 47.3% (n = 886). Median follow-up time was 305 days (range, 10-406). After PSM, the matched cohort included 1,094 ABF/AUF and 711 CFB/EPS patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that patient factors and procedure indication were significant predictors of 1-year mortality and major amputation, but not procedure type. ABF/AUF was associated with improved primary patency over CFB/EPS at 1 year (94.1% ± 1.1% vs. 92.3% ± 1.5%, hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.94; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a propensity-matched cohort from a multicenter vascular surgery registry, a direct approach to AIOD (ABF/AUF) demonstrated better 1-year primary patency than commonly used less invasive strategies. However, treatment approach was not a predictor of 1-year survival or limb salvage, suggesting that patient factors and procedure indication have a greater impact on outcome.

Transitions of care and long-term surveillance after vascular surgery.

Quality care of vascular surgery patients extends to the postoperative coordination of care and long-term surveillance, including the medical management of vascular disease. This is particularly highlighted in contemporary modern vascular surgery practice, as tremendous focus is being placed on postoperative adverse events and hospital readmissions. The purpose of this review is to provide a contemporary perspective of transitions of care at discharge and long-term surveillance recommendations after vascular surgery interventions.

A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is usually performed with eversion (ECEA) or conventional (CCEA) technique. Previous studies report conflicting results with respect to outcomes for ECEA and CCEA. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes for ECEA and CCEA. METHODS: Deidentified data for CEA patients were obtained from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (SVS VQI) database for years 2003 to 2013. Second (contralateral) CEA, reoperative CEA, CEA after previous carotid stenting, or CEA concurrent with cardiac surgery were excluded, leaving 2365 ECEA and 17,155 CCEA for comparison. Univariate analysis compared patients, procedures, and outcomes. Survival analysis was also performed for mortality. Multivariate analysis was used selectively to examine the possible independent predictive value of variables on outcomes. RESULTS: Groups were similar with respect to sex, demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative neurologic symptoms, except that ECEA patients tended to be older (71.3 vs 69.8 years; P < .001). CCEA was more often performed with general anesthesia (92% vs 80%; P < .001) and with a shunt (59% vs 24%; P < .001). Immediate perioperative ipsilateral neurologic events (ECEA, 1.3% vs CCEA, 1.2%; P = .86) and any ipsilateral stroke (ECEA, 0.8% vs CCEA, 0.9%; P = .84) were uncommon in both groups. ECEA tended to take less time (median 99 vs 114 minutes; P < .001). However, ECEA more often required a return to the operating room for bleeding (1.4% vs 0.8%; P = .002), a difference that logistic regression analysis showed was only partly explained by differential use of protamine. Life-table estimated 1-year freedom from any cortical neurologic event was similar (96.7% vs 96.7%). Estimated survival was similar comparing ECEA with CCEA at 1 year (96.7% vs 95.9%); however, estimated survival tended to decline more rapidly in ECEA patients after ∼2 years. Cox proportional hazards modeling confirmed that independent predictors of mortality included age, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and smoking, but also demonstrated that CEA type was not an independent predictor of mortality. The 1-year freedom from recurrent stenosis >50% was lower for ECEA (88.8% vs 94.3%, P < .001). However, ECEA and CCEA both had a very high rate of freedom from reoperation at 1 year (99.5% vs 99.6%; P = .67). CONCLUSIONS: ECEA and CCEA appear to provide similar freedom from neurologic morbidity, death, and reintervention. ECEA was associated with significantly shorter procedure times. Furthermore, ECEA obviates the expenses, including increased operative time, associated with use of a patch in CCEA, and a shunt, more often used in CCEA in this database. These potential benefits may be reduced by a slightly greater requirement for early return to the operating room for bleeding.

Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Subclavian Revascularization Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines for management of the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are based on low-quality evidence, and there is limited literature that addresses optimal revascularization techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of LSA coverage during TEVAR and revascularization techniques. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study from 2001 to 2013. Patients were categorized by LSA revascularization and by revascularization technique, carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB), or subclavian-carotid transposition (SCT). Thirty-day and mid-term stroke, spinal cord ischemia, vocal cord paralysis, upper extremity ischemia, primary patency of revascularization, and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Eighty patients underwent TEVAR with LSA coverage, 25% (n = 20) were unrevascularized and the remaining patients underwent CSB (n = 22 [27.5%]) or SCT (n = 38 [47.5%]). Mean follow-up time was 24.9 months. Comparisons between unrevascularized and revascularized patients were significant for a higher rate of 30-day stroke (25% vs 2%; p = 0.003) and upper extremity ischemia (15% vs 0%; p = 0.014). However, there was no difference in 30-day or mid-term rates of spinal cord ischemia, vocal cord paralysis, or mortality. There were no statistically significant differences in 30-day or midterm outcomes for CSB vs SCT. Primary patency of revascularizations was 100%. Survival analysis comparing unrevascularized vs revascularized LSA was statistically significant for freedom from stroke and upper extremity ischemia (p = 0.02 and p = 0.003, respectively). After adjustment for advanced age, urgency, and coronary artery disease, LSA revascularization was associated with lower rates of perioperative adverse events (odds ratio = 0.23; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: During TEVAR, LSA coverage without revascularization is associated with an increased risk of stroke and upper extremity ischemia. When LSA coverage is required during TEVAR, CSB and SCT are equally acceptable options.