Biodegradability of bioplastics in different aquatic environments: A systematic review.

Bioplastics were first introduced as environmentally friendly materials, with properties similar to those of conventional plastics. A bioplastic is defined as biodegradable if it can be decomposed into carbon dioxide under aerobic degradation, or methane and CO2 under anaerobic conditions, inorganic compounds, and new cellular biomass, by the action of naturally occurring microorganisms. This definition however does not provide any information on the environmental conditions, timescale and extent at which decomposition processes should occur. With regard to the aquatic environment, recognized standards have been established to assess the ability of plastics to undergo biodegradation; however, these standards fail to provide clear targets to be met to allow labelling of a bioplastic as biodegradable. Moreover, these standards grant the user an extensive leeway in the choice of process parameters. For these reasons, the comparison of results deriving from different studies is challenging. The authors analysed and discussed the degree of biodegradability of a series of biodegradable bioplastics in aquatic environments (both fresh and salt water) using the results obtained in the laboratory and from on-site testing in the context of different research studies. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), CO2 evolution, surface erosion and weight loss were the main parameters used by researchers to describe the percentage of biodegradation. The results showed a large variability both in weight loss and BOD, even when evaluating the same type of bioplastics. This confirms the need for a reference range of values to be established with regard to parameters applied in defining the biodegradability of bioplastics.

Can Perioperative Antibiotic Choice Impact Rates of Infectious Complications After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Single-Blind, Prospective Randomized Trial.

Objective: National guidelines recommend periprocedural antibiotics before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), yet it is not clear which is superior. We conducted a randomized trial to compare two guideline-recommended antibiotics: ciprofloxacin (cipro) vs cefazolin, on PCNL outcomes, focusing on the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Methods: Adult patients who were not considered high risk for surgical or infectious complications and undergoing PCNL were randomized to receive either cipro or cefazolin perioperatively. All had negative preoperative urine cultures. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, including SIRS criteria, intraoperative urine culture, duration of hospitalization, and need for intensive care. SIRS is defined by ≥2 of the following: body temperature <96.8°F or >100.4°F, heart rate >90 bpm, respiratory rate >20 per minute, and white blood cell count <4000 or >12,000 cells/mm3. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled and randomized (79 cefazolin and 68 cipro). All preoperative characteristics were similar (p > 0.05), except for mean age, which was higher in the cipro group (64 vs 57 years, p = 0.03). Intra- and postoperative findings were similar, with no difference between groups (p > 0.05), except a longer mean hospital stay in the cefazolin group (2 hours longer, p = 0.02). There was no difference between SIRS episodes in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Despite the relatively broader coverage for urinary tract pathogens with ciprofloxacin, this prospective randomized trial did not show superiority over cefazolin. Our findings therefore support two appropriate options for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing PCNL who are nonhigh risk for infectious complications.

Comparison of Radiation Exposure for Pregnant Patients Requiring Intervention for Suspected Obstructing Nephrolithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the differences in radiation exposure per suspected stone episode between percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PCN), stent, and primary ureteroscopy (URS).The incidence of nephrolithiasis in pregnancy is low; however, repercussions for both mother and fetus can be significant. In cases of suspected obstructing nephrolithiasis, intervention may be required, including ureteral stent, PCN, or URS, with the potential for multiple subsequent procedures that often utilize fluoroscopy. METHODS: Pregnant patients who required an intervention (stent, PCN, or URS) for suspected obstructing nephrolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was total fluoroscopy exposure per suspected stone episode. Secondary outcomes included fluoroscopic exposure per procedure and number of procedures required. RESULTS: After excluding patients with renal anomalies and incomplete radiation data, 78 out of 100 patients were included in the analysis. Forty patients (51.3%) underwent initial stent placement, 22 (28.2%) underwent initial PCN placement, and 16 (20.5%) underwent primary URS. Total mean radiation exposure per stone episode was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCN, (286.9 mGy vs 3.7 mGy (stent) and 0.2 mGy (URS), P <.001). In addition, patients who underwent initial PCN placement had significantly more procedures (P <.001) and mean radiation exposure per procedure was higher (P <.001). More than 40% of PCNs experienced dysfunction, and mean duration between PCN exchanges was 16.5 days. CONCLUSION: In pregnant patients with suspected obstructing nephrolithiasis requiring intervention, initial PCN placement was associated with a significantly higher number of procedures, radiation exposure per procedure, and total radiation exposure per suspected stone episode compared to stent and URS.

Displacement of Lower Pole Stones During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Improves Stone-free Status: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Lower pole renal stones are associated with the lowest stone-free status of any location in the urinary tract during retrograde intrarenal surgery. Prior work has suggested displacing lower pole stones to a more accessible part of the kidney to improve stone-free status. We sought to prospectively compare the efficacy of laser lithotripsy in situ vs after displacement during retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2017 and May 2022 patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole stones were randomized into an in situ or displacement group. Demographics, comorbidities, and operative parameters were documented. Primary outcome was stone-free status, determined by combination of abdominal x-ray and renal ultrasound at 30-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included operative time, 30-day complications, emergency department visits, and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients (69 per group) were enrolled and analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Stone-free status significantly favored the displacement group over the in situ group (95% vs 74%, P = .003, n=62 in each group). Operative time, total laser energy usage, 30-day complications, and 30-day emergency department visits or hospital readmissions were similar between groups. On multivariate analysis only study group allocation was significantly associated with stone-free status (P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Basket displacement of lower pole stones results in a significantly higher stone-free status compared to in situ lithotripsy. The technique is simple, atraumatic, and requires no additional equipment costs and little additional operative time, making it a practical tool in the treatment of lower pole stones.

Heterogeneity in stone culture protocols and endourologist practice patterns: a multi-institutional survey.

Kidney stone cultures can be beneficial in identifying bacteria not detected in urine, yet how stone cultures are performed among endourologists, under what conditions, and by what laboratory methods remain largely unknown. Stone cultures are not addressed by current clinical guidelines. A comprehensive REDCap electronic survey sought responses from directed (n = 20) and listserv elicited (n = 108) endourologists specializing in kidney stone disease. Questions included which clinical scenarios prompt a stone culture order, how results influence post-operative antibiotics, and what microbiology lab protocols exist at each institution with respect to processing and resulting stone cultures. Logistic regression statistical analysis determined what factors were associated with performing stone cultures. Of 128 unique responses, 11% identified as female and the mean years of practicing was 16 (range 1-46). A specific 'stone culture' order was available to only 50% (64/128) of those surveyed, while 32% (41/128) reported culturing stone by placing a urine culture order. The duration of antibiotics given for a positive stone culture varied, with 4-7 days (46%) and 8-14 days (21%) the most reported. More years in practice was associated with fewer stone cultures ordered, while higher annual volume of percutaneous nephrolithotomy was associated with ordering more stone cultures (p < 0.01). Endourologists have differing practice patterns with respect to ordering stone cultures and utilizing the results to guide post-operative antibiotics. With inconsistent microbiology lab stone culture protocols across multiple institutions, more uniform processing is needed for future studies to assess the clinical benefit of stone cultures and direct future guidelines.

A prospective randomized study evaluating the necessity of narcotics following ureteroscopy for urinary stone disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of non-narcotic analgesics and preoperative counseling in managing postoperative pain and narcotic use following ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URS). METHODS: Adult patients at a single academic center undergoing URS for nephrourolithiasis were recruited. After informed consent, subjects were randomized into three groups: NARC-15 tablets oxycodone-acetaminophen 5/325 mg (A-OXY), 2. NSAID-15 tablets ibuprofen (IBU) 600 mg, 3. CNSL-15 tablets A-OXY, 15 tablets IBU, and preoperative counseling from the surgeon to avoid narcotic if possible. Patients who did not receive an intraoperative stent were excluded. At the time of stent removal subjects completed the Universal Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), and a pill count was performed. USSQ pain indices were the primary study endpoint. RESULTS: Of 115 patients enrolled, 104 met the primary endpoint and were included in the analysis. No significant differences were noted in patient demographic, clinical, or operative characteristics. No differences were noted in median USSQ pain indices. The CNSL group used a significantly lower median number of A-OXY pills compared to the NARC group (2.4 vs. 5.4, p = 0.001) and less IBU compared to the NSAID group (3.1 vs. 5.9, p = 0.008). No differences in median total pill count, office calls, medication requests, nor ED visits were noted. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that patients can achieve equivalent postoperative analgesic satisfaction with non-narcotics compared to opiates following URS. Further, counseling patients on postoperative pain before surgery can reduce the total number of postoperative narcotic and non-narcotic medications taken. We suggest surgeons strongly consider omission of narcotic prescriptions following non-complicated URS.

IsoPSA® Reduces Provider Recommendations for Biopsy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men with Total Prostate Specific Antigen ≥4 ng/ml: A Real-World Observational Clinical Utility Study.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the impact of the IsoPSA® test for prostate cancer risk assessment on provider patient management decisions in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: A total of 38 providers, including advanced practice providers, fellowship trained oncologists and general urologists in the Cleveland Clinic health system including both community-based practices and academic locations, enrolled 900 men being evaluated for prostate cancer; 734 met inclusion criteria (age ≥50 years, total serum prostate specific antigen [PSA] ≥4 and <100 ng/ml and no history of prostate cancer) and IsoPSA indication for use. A standard template was used to document biopsy recommendation prior to and after receiving IsoPSA results. The primary outcome was the number of biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging recommendation changes occurring after IsoPSA testing. RESULTS: IsoPSA testing resulted in a 55% (284 vs 638) net reduction in recommendations for prostate biopsy for men with total PSA ≥4 ng/ml. Additionally, a 9% reduction in recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging was observed. There was strong concordance between IsoPSA results and provider recommendations for prostate biopsy, with 87% of patients with an IsoPSA index above the threshold recommended for biopsy and 92% of patients with an IsoPSA index below the threshold not recommended for biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world clinical setting, providers from diverse training backgrounds and practice settings readily adopted IsoPSA with substantial reductions in the rate of recommended prostate biopsies in patients with elevated PSA values (≥4 ng/ml). There was a high concordance between recommendation for or against prostate biopsy and the IsoPSA result.

Is metformin use associated with changes in urinary parameters in stone formers?

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of nephrolithiasis and is often treated with metformin. The relationship between metformin and nephrolithiasis formation remains unclear, as studies have demonstrated conflicting results. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of stone-forming patients at our stone clinic prior to the initiation of stone-directed medical management. Patients were grouped based on diabetic status and diabetic medication regimen. Outcomes evaluated were 24-hour urinary parameters and specimen stone type using univariate Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-squared analyses. Multivariate analyses controlling for metabolic syndrome components and HbA1c were performed. RESULTS: Data were available for 505 patients, of whom 147 were diabetic and 358 were not. On multivariate analyses controlling for HbA1c and other comorbidities, diabetic patients on metformin still had worse urinary parameters, including urine pH, than non-diabetic patients (pH=-0.33, -0.37, p<0.05). Patients with DM on metformin did not exhibit significant differences in 24-hour urine findings compared to patients with DM not on metformin (p>0.05 for all urinary parameters). CONCLUSIONS: Stone-forming patients with DM on metformin were associated with urinary abnormalities similar to those not on metformin. Cohort studies comparing urinary parameters of patients prospectively started on metformin are necessary to further elucidate metformin's role, if any, in combatting nephrolithiasis.

Factors Affecting Patient Radiation Exposure During Prone and Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Purpose: Radiation exposure from fluoroscopy poses risks to patients and surgeons. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has traditionally required fluoroscopy, however, the use of ultrasound (US) has decreased radiation exposure. US guidance in supine PCNL (S-PCNL) may further reduce radiation exposure. In this study, we investigate patient and operative factors affecting fluoroscopy time (second), total radiation dose (mGy), and effective dose (ED, mSv) in patients undergoing US-guided S-PCNL or prone PCNL (P-PCNL). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing US-guided PCNL in prone and supine positions. Patients with multiple access tracts, pre-existing renal access, or fluoroscopic renal access were excluded. Patient demographic and radiologic and operative data were collected, and compared between the two groups. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included: 45 P-PCNL and 54 S-PCNL. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. Operative time, access location, tract length, and total radiation dose (mGy) also did not differ. S-PCNL was associated with lower ED (2.92 ± 0.32 mSv vs 5.3 ± 0.7 mSv, p = 0.0014) despite increased fluoroscopy time (86.32 ± 7.7 seconds vs 51.00 ± 5.1 seconds, p = 0.004), and was more likely a mini-PCNL (35.2% vs 15.9%, p = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, S-PCNL remained associated with reduced ED compared with P-PCNL (p = 0.002), whereas body mass index (p < 0.001) and staghorn calculi (p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased ED. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ED in US-guided PCNL is increased in the prone position compared with supine position, and in overweight patients regardless of position. US-guided S-PCNL may decrease radiation exposure to patients and surgeons compared with US-guided P-PCNL.

Stent duration and increased pain in the hours after ureteral stent removal.

INTRODUCTION To assess the relationship between pain after ureteral stent removal and patient and procedural factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated survey designed to assess the relationship between quality of life and treatment decisions in kidney stone disease was randomly distributed to patients with a history of a ureteral stent in seven medical centers across North America participating in an endourology research collaborative between July 2016 and June 2018. The primary outcome was increased pain after ureteral stent removal. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 327 surveys were analyzed. Twenty seven percent of patients reported increased pain in the hours after ureteral stent removal. Patients with a stent ≤ 7 days were significantly more likely to experience pain after stent removal compared to those with a stent > 7 days (33.3% versus 22.8%, p = 0.04). Female gender (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.42-4.10) was associated with increased pain after stent removal, while increasing age was inversely associated (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.74). After adjustment, patients with a stent > 7 days were significantly less likely to report pain in the hours after removal (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in four patients will experience increased pain after ureteral stent removal. Female patients, younger patients, and patients with a stent ≤ 7 days were more likely to experience an increase in pain immediately following stent removal. Understanding factors associated with post-stent removal pain may be helpful in counseling patients at high risk stent removal morbidity.

Novel treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in situ with docetaxel in BCG refractory patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with upper-tract carcinoma in situ (UT-CIS) that have failed treatment with BCG are recommended for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We describe a cohort of patients with BCG-refractory UT-CIS that were treated with docetaxel, a novel agent in the approach to topical therapy. METHODS: Patients with pathologically proven UT-CIS from 2012 to 2020 with an imperative indication for organ preservation and history of BCG-refractory disease were included. Each patient underwent ureteroscopy with biopsy and selective cytology pre- and postinduction, and after each maintenance course. Complete response (CR) was defined as the absence of visualized lesions on ureteroscopy, negative selective cytology, and absence of clinical progression. No response (NR) was defined as persistence of lesions after induction or absence of visualized lesions with persistently positive cytology. RESULTS: Seven patients and 10 renal units were treated. Six of the 10 renal units had initial CR (60%). Three patients with NR went on to have RNU, one of which subsequently died due to cancer-specific mortality. One patient with bilateral disease had NR in 10 renal unit and cure in the other. This patient subsequently developed recurrence in his remaining renal unit. A second patient had CR in both kidneys for 6 years, but 1 year after finishing maintenance regimen developed HG disease in 1 ureter. Average follow-up was 33 months. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates efficacy of docetaxel as a treatment option for patients with UT-CIS with a contraindication to RNU after failing BCG. Response rates of 60% appear to be similar to those of BCG-refractory bladder CIS.

Simple Solution to a Difficult Problem: Removal of Large Bladder Calculi Using a Laparoscopic Entrapment Sac.

Introduction and Objectives: Percutaneous management of large bladder calculi with the use of a laparoscopic entrapment sac is a minimally invasive procedure that may have advantages over open cystolithotomy and transurethral cystolithotripsy, as well as standard percutaneous cystolithotomy. We first performed this procedure in 2008, and refined it after our initial publication in 2013 by changing the position from lithotomy to supine by using a urethral catheter postoperatively instead of a suprapubic (SP) catheter, by using ultrasound guidance for access, and by changing the procedure from being inpatient to outpatient. Our objective is to assess the continued feasibility of percutaneous entrapment sac cystolithotomy (PESC) and describe modifications that simplify the technique (mPESC), comparing outcomes and complications. Methods: Forty seven male patients underwent PESC from 2008 to 2019, 16 who had PESC and 31 who had mPESC. After extraction of calculi, either an SP catheter was placed, or the wound was closed and a urethral catheter was placed. Operative and follow-up parameters were compared between the two cohorts. Results: All patients were rendered stone free. Procedure time and length of stay were both significantly shorter in the mPESC cohort. Stone burden and estimated blood loss were equivalent between cohorts. There were no complications of urethral trauma in either cohort. The PESC cohort had higher rates of leakage from the SP site (25% vs 0%), increased need for catheter over 5 days (18.8% vs 0%), and greater likelihood of recurrent retention (12.5% vs 6%). Conclusions: Modifications of PESC, mPESC, leads to fewer complications and reduced length of stay compared with the original PESC procedure. This safe and efficacious technique can reduce morbidity during the management of large bladder calculi and is well suited for an outpatient procedure.

Long-Term Outcomes of Laser Incision and Triamcinolone Injection for the Management of Ureteroenteric Anastomotic Strictures.

Purpose: Benign ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture (UEAS) is a common postoperative complication after urinary diversion with an incidence of 3%-10%. Our objective is to report long-term follow-up of our technique for endoscopically managing UEAS after cystectomy. Materials and Methods: Patients with endoscopically managed benign UEAS after cystectomy were included. Intervention entailed anetegrade flexible ureteroscopy with biopsy followed by laser incision of the stricture and of periureteral and peri-ileal tissues 1 cm below and 1 cm above the stricture into fat. Triamcinolone injection was then performed, followed by balloon dilation of the incised area to 24F. Parallel Double-J ureteral stents or upside down nephrostomy tubes were placed for 6 weeks. CT scans were obtained at 3 months and 1 year after surgery, and renal ultrasound at 6 and 9 months, and then annually. Results: Twenty-one patients, and a total of 24 UEAS were treated. Urinary diversion included ileal conduit (n = 12), neobladder (n = 7), and Indiana pouch (n = 2). Twenty out of 24 strictures had no recurrence, including three patients who had bilateral disease, yielding an overall success rate of 83.3%. The remaining three patients with recurrence had evidence of stricture within 3 months. Follow-up ranged from 8 to 102 months, with a median of 30 months. Conclusions: Patients treated endoscopically for UEAS have been shown to have acceptable immediate success with less morbidity when compared with ureteral reimplantation. Our technique of laser incision, triamcinolone injection, balloon dilation, and temporary stent placement has a success rate of over 80% and is unique in that long-term data confirms the durability of this endoscopic procedure.

Uretero-Enteric Anastomotic Stricture Following Radical Cystectomy: A Comparison of Open, Robotic Extracorporeal, and Robotic Intracorporeal Approaches.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of benign uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures between open cystectomy, robotic cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion, and robotic cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. The effect of surgeon learning curve on stricture incidence following intracorporeal diversion was investigated as a secondary outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent radical cystectomy at an academic hospital between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome, incidence of anastomotic stricture over time, was assessed by a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. A Cox regression model adjusting for sequential case number in a surgeon's experience was used to assess intracorporeal learning curve. RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty-eight patients were included: 279 open, 382 robotic extracorporeal, and 307 robotic intracorporeal. Benign stricture incidence was 11.3% overall: 26 (9.3%) after open, 43 (11.3%) after robotic extracorporeal, and 40 (13.0%) after robotic intracorporeal. An intracorporeal approach was associated with anastomotic stricture on multivariable analysis (HR 1.66; P = .05). After 75 intracorporeal cases, stricture incidence declined from 17.5% to 4.9%. Higher sequential case volume was independently associated with reduced stricture incidence (Hazard Ratio per 10 cases: 0.90; P = .02). CONCLUSION: An intracorporeal approach to urinary reconstruction following robotic radical cystectomy was associated with an increased risk of benign uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture. In surgeons' early experience with intracorporeal diversion the difference in stricture incidence was more pronounced compared to alternative approaches; however, increased intracorporeal case volume was associated with a decline in stricture incidence leading to a modest difference between the 3 surgical approaches overall.

The use of outpatient opioid medication for acute renal colic and ureteral stents: Insights from a multi-institutional patient survey
.

AIMS: To investigate the main reasons for use of opioids during acute episodes of renal colic and for ureteral stent symptoms post-operatively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey assessing the impact of decreased quality of life and use of opioid pain medication was distributed to patients with a history of ureteral stent at seven academic centers between July 2016 and June 2018. RESULTS: A total of 365 surveys were completed. Opioid use for stone (63.9%) and stent-related pain (39.0%) was common among respondents. When assessing whether patients used more opioids for stone or stent-related pain, 47.7% reported using more for stone pain while 15.0% reported using more for stent pain. 22.6% of patients required opioids for stent-related pain and not stone pain. Increasing patient age was found to be negatively associated with using opioids for stent-related pain (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3 - 0.6). Increasing age was also found to be negatively associated with opioid use for stone pain (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4 - 0.8). Patients with a greater number of prior stones had 3.2 times the odds of using opioids for stone pain, in our adjusted model (95% CI: 2.1 - 4.7). CONCLUSION: Patients with more prior stone episodes are more likely to have used opioids for their most recent episode. Although ureteral stents have been shown to be associated with a decreased quality of life, we showed that the use of opioids for stent-related pain is less than that for stone pain. Younger patients are less likely to tolerate a stent without opioid analgesics.

Reducing Readmissions Following Radical Cystectomy: Moving Beyond Enhanced Recovery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess readmission outcomes of a traditional ER pathway as well as a targeted postdischarge intervention aimed at reducing hospital readmissions following RC. METHODS: A prospectively maintained clinical database was used to identify patients undergoing RC before and after implementation of an ER protocol at our institution. An additional intervention aimed at reducing hospital readmission included close postdischarge follow-up and outpatient intravenous hydration (ER+). Inpatient length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates were compared between groups using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and chi-square, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with hospital readmission. RESULTS: A total of 320 patients underwent RC, including 111 and 209 patients before and after ER implementation. Median (IQR) LOS decreased from 8.0 (6.0-11.0) days to 5.0 (4.0-7.0) days following ER implementation (P <.0001). Readmissions, however, were unchanged following ER implementation (P = .49). An additional targeted readmission reduction intervention (ER+) was associated with significantly reduced hospital readmissions compared to traditional ER alone (ER+ 5.9%, traditional ER 20.3%, P = .017). CONCLUSION: ER protocols consistently demonstrate reductions in LOS, and should be the standard of care following RC. In order to reduce readmissions, the urologic community must expand beyond traditional ER pathways. We report significant reductions in hospital readmission among RC patients receiving a targeted postdischarge intervention beyond traditional ER alone.