Proof of Concept: Development of a Mitral Annuloplasty Ring With Crosshatch Net.

OBJECTIVE: Here we report our preclinical, proof-of-concept testing to assess the ability of a novel device to correct mitral regurgitation. The Milwaukee Heart device aims to enable any cardiac surgeon to perform high-quality mitral valve repair using a standard annuloplasty ring with a crosshatch of microporous, monofilament suture. METHODS: Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and videographic data were collected at baseline, following induction of mitral regurgitation, and after repair using porcine hearts in an ex vivo biosimulator model. A commercially available cardiac prosthesis assessment platform was then used to assess the hydrodynamic characteristics of the study device. RESULTS: Porcine biosimulator pressure and flow metrics exhibited successful correction of mitral regurgitation following device implantation with similar values to baseline. Hydrodynamic results yielded pressure gradients and an effective orifice area comparable to currently approved prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: The study device effectively reduced mitral valve regurgitation and improved hemodynamics in our preclinical model with similar biophysical metrics to currently approved devices. Future in vivo trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy, biocompatibility, and freedom from the most likely adverse events, such as device thrombosis, embolic events, and hemolysis.

High-Dose IV Hydroxocobalamin (Vitamin B12) in Septic Shock: A Double-Blind, Allocation-Concealed, Placebo-Controlled Single-Center Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (The Intravenous Hydroxocobalamin in Septic Shock Trial).

BACKGROUND: Elevated hydrogen sulfide (H2S) contributes to vasodilatation and hypotension in septic shock, and traditional therapies do not target this pathophysiologic mechanism. High-dose IV hydroxocobalamin scavenges and prevents H2S formation, which may restore vascular tone and may accentuate recovery. No experimental human studies have tested high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin in adults with septic shock. RESEARCH QUESTION: In adults with septic shock, is comparing high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin with placebo feasible? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 single-center, double-blind, allocation-concealed, placebo-controlled, parallel-group pilot randomized controlled trial comparing high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin with placebo in critically ill adults with septic shock. Patients meeting Sepsis 3 criteria were randomized 1:1 to receive a single 5-g dose of high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin or equivalent volume 0.9% saline solution as placebo. The primary outcome was study feasibility (enrollment rate, clinical and laboratory compliance rate, and contamination rate). Secondary outcomes included between-group differences in plasma H2S concentrations and vasopressor dose before and after infusion. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled over 19 months, establishing an enrollment rate of 1.05 patients per month. Protocol adherence rates were 100% with zero contamination. In the high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin group, compared to placebo, there was a greater reduction in vasopressor dose between randomization and postinfusion (-36% vs 4%, P < .001) and randomization and 3-h postinfusion (-28% vs 10%, P = .019). In the high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin group, the plasma H2S level was reduced over 45 mins by -0.80 ± 1.73 µM, as compared with -0.21 ± 0.64 µM in the placebo group (P = .3). INTERPRETATION: This pilot trial established favorable feasibility metrics. Consistent with the proposed mechanism of benefit, high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin compared with placebo was associated with reduced vasopressor dose and H2S levels at all time points and without serious adverse events. These data provide the first proof of concept for feasibility of delivering high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin in septic shock. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03783091; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Early versus delayed enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock: a nested cohort analysis of an international multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence on the timing and efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) practices in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with circulatory shock is limited. We hypothesized early EN (EEN), as compared to delayed EN (DEN), is associated with improved clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with circulatory shock. METHODS: We analyzed a dataset from an international, multicenter, pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating protein dose in ICU patients. Data were collected from ICU admission, and EEN was defined as initiating < 48 h from ICU admission and DEN > 48 h. We identified MV patients in circulatory shock to evaluate the association between the timing of EN initiation and clinical outcomes. The regression analysis model controlled for age, mNUTRIC score, APACHE II score, sepsis, and Site. RESULTS: We included 626 patients, from 52 ICUs in 14 countries. Median age was 60 years [18-93], 55% had septic shock, 99% received norepinephrine alone, 91% received EN alone, and 50.3% were randomized to a usual protein dose. Forty-two percent of EEN patients had persistent organ dysfunction syndrome plus death at day 28, compared to 53% in the DEN group (p = 0.04). EEN was associated with more ICU-free days (9.3 ± 9.2 vs. 5.7 ± 7.9, p = 0.0002), more days alive and free of vasopressors (7.1 ± 3.1 vs. 6.3 ± 3.2, p = 0.007), and shorter duration of MV among survivors (9.8 ± 10.9 vs. 13.8 ± 14.5, p = 0.0002). This trend was no longer observed in the adjusted analysis. There were no differences in ICU/60-day mortality or feeding intolerance rates between groups. CONCLUSION: In MV patients with circulatory shock, EEN, as compared to DEN, was associated with improved clinical outcomes, but no longer when adjusting for illness severity. RCTs comparing the efficacy of EEN to DEN in MV patients with circulatory shock are warranted.