Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Tipo de estudio
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transfusion ; 2024 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39101530

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic exerted an unprecedented impact on the blood supply from 2020 through 2022. As a result, throughout 2021 there were months our hospital had less than one-day supply of type O RBCs. To meet transfusion needs, whole RBC units were split into half units and issued to stable, non-bleeding patients. This single-institution, retrospective study examines time intervals to subsequent transfusion and total numbers of RBC units subsequently transfused after the first half or whole RBC unit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients who were transfused RBC between May 21, 2021 and November 1, 2021 were divided into in- and outpatient groups, then based on whether they received at least 1 half RBC unit or only whole RBC units during the study period. The time interval between this first half unit transfusion, or first whole unit transfusion in those who did not receive half units, and the subsequent RBC transfusion within 90 days was calculated and compared, as well as the total number of RBC units transfused 30 days after the first unit. RESULTS: In general, patients transfused with half units received a subsequent transfusion significantly earlier than those transfused with whole units. Additionally, receiving an index half unit was associated with more RBC transfusions in the following 30 days (p = .001). CONCLUSION: Transfusion of half RBC units during a severe RBC blood shortage can temporarily decrease RBC usage but will result in a shorter interval to the next transfusion and greater total number of RBC units transfused in subsequent days.

2.
Lab Med ; 55(4): 524-527, 2024 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38333931

RESUMEN

Granulocyte transfusions are indicated for patients with severe neutropenia and evidence of bacterial or fungal infection who are unresponsive to standard antimicrobial therapy. With a limited expiration time of 24 hours after collection, granulocytes are often transfused before results of infectious-disease screening tests are available, and before a transfusion service can perform a risk assessment if postdonation information is provided after the collection. The case we describe herein demonstrates a clinical scenario meeting indications for granulocyte transfusion, coupled with the clinical management undertaken after the granulocyte donor disclosed a positive result for a COVID-19 self-test taken 1 day after donation. In this case, the patient did not develop new COVID-19 symptoms and tested negative for COVID-19 after transfusion of the implicated unit. These findings add to the body of evidence in the literature that COVID-19 is not transmitted via blood transfusion.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Granulocitos , Transfusión de Leucocitos , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Donantes de Sangre , COVID-19/terapia , Transfusión de Leucocitos/métodos , Neutropenia/terapia , Neutropenia/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA