New solutions to old problems: A practical approach to identify samples with intravenous fluid contamination in clinical laboratories.

OBJECTIVES: Contamination with intravenous (IV) fluids is a common cause of specimen rejection or erroneous results in hospitalized patients. Identification of contaminated samples can be difficult. Common measures such as failed delta checks may not be adequately sensitive nor specific. This study aimed to determine detection criteria using commonly ordered tests to identify IV fluid contamination and validate the use of these criteria. METHODS: Confirmed contaminated and non-contaminated samples were used to identify patterns in laboratory results to develop criteria to detect IV fluid contamination. The proposed criteria were implemented at a tertiary care hospital laboratory to assess performance prospectively for 6 months, and applied to retrospective chemistry results from 3 hospitals and 1 community lab to determine feasibility and flagging rates. The algorithm was also tested at an external institution for transferability. RESULTS: The proposed algorithm had a positive predictive value of 92 %, negative predictive value of 91 % and overall agreement of 92 % when two or more criteria are met (n = 214). The flagging rates were 0.03 % to 0.07 % for hospital and 0.003 % for community laboratories. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm identified true contamination with low false flagging rates in tertiary care urban hospital laboratories. Retrospective and prospective analysis suggest the algorithm is suitable for implementation in clinical laboratories to identify samples with possible IV fluid contamination for further investigation.

The importance of verifying manufacturer's claim on specimen stability: An example in serum angiotensin converting enzyme testing.

Appropriate specimen handling is integral to quality and minimizing medical errors. Clinical laboratories often rely on manufacturer's claims for handling specimens, such as sample stability conditions. Serum angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is an example in which manufacturer claims and stability in the literature is limited. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the importance to verify manufacturer's stability using serum ACE as an example. Serum was collected from 39 healthy volunteers and ACE activity levels measured at baseline, after 4 h, 1, 3, 7 days at room temperature, after 3, 7, and 14 days refrigerated at 4 °C, after 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks frozen at -20 °C, and after three freeze/thaw cycles. An additional 42 discarded patient serum specimens were re-analyzed after 1 or 2 weeks frozen at -20 °C. To evaluate stability performance, percent difference was compared to the clinical acceptance criteria, which was defined as a ½ total allowable error of ±10.9 %. This study found serum ACE to be stable 4 h at room temperature, 14 days refrigerated at 4 °C, up to 1 week frozen at -20 °C, and up to three freeze/thaw cycles. The preferred storage condition for serum ACE is refrigerated at 4 °C as there was minimal change in percent bias over the 14 day period. The false increase observed in samples stored frozen longer than 1 week could impact clinical decision making. The stability findings differed from manufacturer claims, highlighting the importance of verifying stability, especially for esoteric testing such as serum ACE where specimens travel long distances in varying climates to reach centralized testing locations.