Escape MD: Using an Escape Room as a Gamified Educational and Skill-Building Teaching Tool for Internal Medicine Residents.

Purpose To create an innovative medicine-themed escape room (EsR) and assess its feasibility as a learner-centered educational model for medical trainees. This platform could be used to teach and reinforce medical knowledge as well as enhance team-building skills. Materials and Methods We created an internal medicine (IM) themed EsR, in which participants are locked and instructed to solve a series of puzzles using both medical and nonmedical concepts to "escape" the room within a given set of time. The players must use their critical thinking and communication skills to solve puzzles consisting of complex activities (such as image identification and object matching or retrieval) linked in a nonlinear pattern. A pre-activity survey was used to collect basic demographic information and initial perceptions of the activity. A post-activity survey consisting of a modified Likert scale and free-response questions was used to assess perceived activity use and satisfaction. The activity was followed by a debriefing session with a faculty member to reflect on individual and team-based learning. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Results Each week, a group of four to seven residents participated in a one-hour long EsR session, which was replicated 15 times over five weeks, for a total of 86 internal medicine residents. 76 of 86 residents completed the post-activity survey. Overall, residents expressed a high level of satisfaction with the session (x̄ = 4.89), found it fun to play (x̄ = 4.89), and felt immersed in medicine (x̄ = 3.95). Residents thought the activity was most suitable for reinforcing knowledge (x̄ = 4.26) and greatly tested their communication skills (x̄ = 4.48).  Conclusion The medical EsR experience was enjoyed by the vast majority of residents with very positive oral and survey feedback. Hence, we successfully created an active, learner-centered, gamified teaching tool that can be used for teaching/reinforcing medical concepts in a fun, competitive, and team-building format. The EsR, as a teaching tool, can be replicated with ease several times and requires very few resources to create.

Using standardized patient encounters to teach longitudinal continuity of care in a family medicine clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Despite demonstrated benefits of continuity of care, longitudinal care experiences are difficult to provide to medical students. A series of standardized patient encounters was developed as an innovative curricular element to address this gap in training for medical students in a family medicine clerkship. The objective of this paper is to describe the development and implementation of the curriculum, evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum for increasing student confidence around continuity of care and chronic disease management, and explore student opinions of the value of the experience. METHODS: The encounters simulate continuity of care in typical family medicine practice over four standardized patient visits, providing students with experience in longitudinal relationships, ongoing management of chronic and acute conditions, lifestyle counseling, and the use of an electronic medical record. Perceptions of the curriculum were obtained using a pre-post survey asking students to self-rate experience and confidence in continuity relationships, chronic disease management, and lifestyle counseling. Students were also asked about the overall effectiveness of the encounters for simulating family practice and continuity of care. Open-ended comments were gathered through weekly reflection papers submitted by the students. RESULTS: Of 138 third-year medical students, 137 completed the pre-survey, 126 completed the post-survey, and 125 (91%) completed both the pre- and the post-survey. Evaluation results demonstrated that students highly valued the experience. Complete confidence data for 116 students demonstrated increased confidence pre-post (t(115) = 14.92, p < .001) in managing chronic disease and establishing relationships. Open-ended comments reflected how the experience fostered appreciation for the significance of patient-doctor relationships and continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS: This curriculum offers a promising approach to providing students with continuity of care experience. The model addresses a general lack of training in continuity of care in medical schools and provides a standardized method for teaching chronic disease management and continuity relationships.

Breaking bad news: use of cancer survivors in role-playing exercises.

PURPOSE: To teach medical students how to deliver a diagnosis of cancer using role-play with a cancer survivor volunteer. METHOD: Medical students participated in a curricular module on "breaking bad news." Its novel aspect was the inclusion of role-playing exercises during which the student communicated the initial diagnosis of cancer to a cancer survivor volunteer. The clinical scenario was based on the volunteer's own history of cancer. The exercise required the student to become knowledgeable about the volunteer's cancer and its mode of presentation, deliver the diagnosis using previously demonstrated methods, and then receive verbal feedback from the volunteer. A panel discussion with the cancer survivor volunteers concluded the module. The efficacy of this curricular module was assessed by the students' performance during the role-playing exercise, gain in confidence in communicating bad news, and overall rating of the learning experience. RESULTS: The interaction of the students with the cancer survivors was the strength of this curriculum, providing the students with an important perspective on physician-patient relationships and coping with cancer. The students demonstrated a high level of adherence to preferred communication techniques, gained significant confidence with the task of "breaking bad news," and were very satisfied with the module. Participation in these role-playing exercises by the cancer survivor volunteers was viewed as emotionally demanding but also rewarding. Recruitment and retention of the volunteers were not obstacles to this activity. CONCLUSION: Role-playing with cancer survivor volunteers can be an effective method of teaching medical students how to communicate bad news.

Utilization of standardized patients to evaluate clinical and interpersonal skills of surgical residents.

BACKGROUND: This project was designed to determine the growth of interpersonal skills during the first year of a surgical residency. METHODS: All categorical surgical residents were given a clinical skills examination of abdominal pain using standardized patients during their orientation (T1). The categorical residents were retested after 11 months (T2). The assessment tool was based on a 12-item modified version of the 5-point Likert Interpersonal Scale (IP) used on the National Board of Medical Examiners prototype Clinical Skills Examination and a 24-item, done-or-not-done, history-taking checklist. Residents' self-evaluation scores were compared to standardized patients' assessment scores. Data were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient, Wilcoxon signed rank test, Student t test, and Cronbach alpha. RESULTS: Thirty-eight categorical residents were evaluated at T1 and T2. At T1, in the history-taking exercise, the scores of the standardized patients and residents correlated (Pearson = .541, P = .000). In the interpersonal skills exercise, the scores of the standardized patients and residents did not correlate (Pearson = -0.238, P = .150). At T2, there was a significant improvement in the residents' self-evaluation scores in both the history-taking exercise (t = -3.280, P = .002) and the interpersonal skills exercise (t = 2.506, P = 0.017). In the history-taking exercise, the standardized patients' assessment scores correlated with the residents' self-evaluation scores (Pearson = 0.561, P = .000). In the interpersonal skills exercise, the standardized patients' assessment scores did not correlate with the residents' self-evaluation scores (Pearson = 0.078, P = .646). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical residents demonstrate a consistently low level of self-awareness regarding their interpersonal skills. Observed improvement in resident self-evaluation may be a function of growth in self-confidence.