Comparison of preoperative chemotherapy using docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil with cisplatin and fluorouracil in patients with advanced carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

We retrospectively compared preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) with cisplatin and fluorouracil (CF) in patients with esophageal cancer. The study included patients with advanced thoracic esophageal carcinoma (excluding T4 tumors) receiving preoperative chemotherapy. In the DCF group, five patients received two courses of treatment every 4 weeks, and 33 patients received three courses every 3 weeks. In the CF group, 38 patients received two courses of treatment every 4 weeks. Patients underwent curative surgery 4-5 weeks after completing chemotherapy. Patient demographic characteristics did not differ between the two study groups. The incidence of a grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was significantly higher in the DCF group (33 patients) than in the CF group (five patients; P < 0.001). Curative resection was accomplished in 79% of patients in the DCF group and 66% in the CF group (P = 0.305). There were no in-hospital deaths. The incidence of perioperative complications did not differ between the groups. A grade 2 or 3 histological response was attained in a significantly higher proportion of patients in the DCF group (63%) than in the CF group (5%; P < 0.001). Progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly higher in the DCF group (P = 0.013, hazard ratio 0.473; P = 0.001, hazard ratio 0.344). In conclusion, a grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was common in the DCF group but was managed by supportive therapy. Histological response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were significantly higher in the DCF group compared with the CF group.

A new operative technique for the resection of gastric tube cancer by means of lifting the anterior chest wall and videoscope-assisted surgery.

The prolonged survival of patients receiving surgery for esophageal cancer has led to an increased incidence of adenocarcinoma arising in the gastric tube used for reconstruction (gastric tube cancer). In patients with advanced gastric tube cancer, resection of the gastric tube should be considered, but currently available procedures are very invasive. In patients undergoing curative surgery for gastric tube cancer that has developed after reconstruction through the retrosternal route, the gastric tube is usually resected through a median sternotomy, followed by reconstruction with the colon. However, postoperative complications often occur and treatment outcomes remain poor. We developed a new surgical technique for gastric tube resection without performing a sternotomy in patients with gastric tube cancer who had previously undergone reconstruction through the retrosternal route. Our technique was used to treat two patients. Two Kirschner wires were passed subcutaneously through the anterior chest; the chest was lifted to extend the retrosternal space and secure an adequate surgical field. The stomach was separated from the surrounding tissue under videoscopic guidance. Total resection of the gastric tube was done. The retrosternal space was used to lift the jejunum. Roux-en-Y reconstruction was performed. Neither patient had suture line failure or surgical site infection. Their recovery was uneventful. Our surgical technique has several potential advantages including (i) reduced surgical stress; (ii) the ability to use the retrosternal space for reconstruction after gastric tube resection; and (iii) a reduced risk of serious infections such as osteomyelitis in patients with suture line failure. Our findings require confirmation by additional studies.

Minimum leakage rate (0.5%) of stapled esophagojejunostomy with sacrifice of a small part of the jejunum after total gastrectomy in 390 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: The development of new surgical instruments and devices has facilitated the performance of esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy. However, total prevention of dehiscence of anastomoses remains difficult. We introduced a new procedure for esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler, requiring sacrifice of only a small part of the jejunum. METHODS: The study group comprised 390 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction by Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy, performed with a circular stapler, sacrificing a small part of the jejunum after total gastrectomy. We assessed anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stenosis after surgery. RESULTS: Only 2 patients (0.5%) had leakage and 4 (1.0%) had anastomotic stenosis after reconstruction. All the patients were cured by conservative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagojejunostomy performed with a circular stapler after total gastrectomy, with sacrifice of only a small part of the jejunum, is a useful and easy procedure, with a leakage rate of 0.5%.