Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 49(1): 1-15, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37818931

OBJECTIVES: Ototoxicity is a common disabling side effect of platinum-based chemotherapy. This study aimed to assess the evidence on the management of platinum-induced ototoxicity in adult cancer patients. METHODS: Four databases were searched up to 1 November 2022. Original studies were included if they reported on a pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic intervention to prevent or treat platinum ototoxicity in adults. The articles' quality was assessed via two grading scales. RESULTS: Nineteen randomised controlled trials and five quasi-experimental studies with 1673 patients were analysed. Eleven interventions were identified, nine pharmacological and two non-pharmacological. Six of the interventions (sodium thiosulphate, corticoids, sertraline, statins, multivitamins and D-methionine) showed mild benefits in preventing cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Only one trial assessed corticoids as a potential treatment. Overall, only six trials were deemed with a low risk of bias. The majority of studies inadequately documented intervention-related adverse effects, thereby limiting safety conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Current interventions have mild benefits in preventing cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in adult cancer patients. Sodium thiosulphate is the most promising intervention as a preventive strategy. Rigorous, high-quality research is warranted, encompassing an evaluation of all potential symptoms and innovative treatment modalities.


Antineoplastic Agents , Hearing Loss , Neoplasms , Ototoxicity , Adult , Humans , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Ototoxicity/etiology , Ototoxicity/prevention & control , Ototoxicity/drug therapy , Hearing Loss/chemically induced , Hearing Loss/prevention & control , Hearing Loss/drug therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Rev. colomb. cancerol ; 27(1): 91-102, 2023. graf, tab
Article Es | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1451963

Introducción. En melanoma metastásico, uno de los estándares de tratamiento es la inmunoterapia anti-PD-1 y anti-CTLA-4. El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar factores pronósticos asociados con la supervivencia de pacientes con melanoma metastásico, con primera línea con inmunoterapia anti-PD-1 o anti-PD-1 y anti-CTLA-4, en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia.Métodos. Se revisaron 63 historias clínicas del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de enero de 2016 a abril de 2020. Se realizó un análisis de supervivencia con método de Kaplan-Meier, prueba log-rank y regresión de Cox.Resultados. La mayoría de los pacientes fueron mujeres (58,7%); 47,6% tenían subtipo lentiginoso acral, 17,4% BRAF mutado, 20,6% compromiso en SNC, 50,8% recibieron nivolumab, 41,3% pembrolizumab y 7,9% nivolumab + ipilimumab. La mediana de supervivencia libre de progresión fue de 7,3 meses, con una tasa a 1, 2 y 3 años de 38,0%, 22,0% y 12,0% respectivamente; la mediana de supervivencia global fue 12,2 meses con una tasa a 1, 2 y 3 años de 50,0%, 25,0% y 19,0%. Como factor pronóstico protector para SLP se encontró el recibir nivolumab en comparación con pembrolizumab (HR=0,427; IC95% 0,21-0,86) y para SG el estado funcional al diagnóstico (ECOG 2 HR=12,38; IC95% 2,20-69,45).Conclusión. La SLP y SG fueron menores a la de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en población caucásica, pero similar a la encontrada en estudios que incluyen mayor proporción del subtipo histológico lentiginoso acral, como la nuestra. Se encontraron como factores pronósticos el tipo de inmunoterapia utilizada y el estado funcional al diagnóstico.


Introduction: In metastatic melanoma, one of the standard treatments is anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy. This research aimed to determine prognostic factors associated with the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma who started first-line treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) (Bogotá, Colombia).Methods: A total of 63 medical records from the INC were reviewed from January 2016 to April 2020. A survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression.Results: Most patients were women (58.7%); 47.6% had acral lentiginous subtype, 17.4% BRAF-mutated melanoma, 20.6% CNS involvement, 50.8% received nivolumab, 41.3% pembrolizumab, and 7.9% nivolumab + ipilimumab. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months with a rate at 1, 2, and 3 years of 38%, 22%, and 12%, respectively, while median overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months with a rate of 50%, 25%, and 19% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. A protective prognostic factor for PFS was to receive nivolumab compared to pembrolizumab (HR=0.427; CI95% 0.21-0.86), and for OS, functional status at diagnosis (ECOG 2 HR=12.38; CI95% 2.20-69.45).Conclusion: PFS and OS were lower than those of randomized clinical trials in the Caucasian population, but similar to those found in studies that include a higher proportion of the acral lentiginous histological subtype, such as ours. The type of immunotherapy used and functional status at diagnosis were found as prognostic factors


Humans , Skin Neoplasms , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
...