RESUMEN
This study aimed to systematically review existing randomized clinical trials on the effect of dietary interventions on endometriosis. A search was performed on the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Clinical Trials, EMBASE, PubMed, Lilacs, and Cielo databases. The search terms were used: "endometriosis", "endometrioma", "diet", "supplements" and "nutrition". Electronic literature searches through databases yielded 866 publications. Two authors performed The study selection independently (and blinded), and disagreements were discussed. Eleven RCTs were included in the systematic review, with 716 women randomized. Most studies reported a positive effect on endometriosis pain scores; however, they were characterized by moderate or high-risk bias. Of these, six RCTs, including 457 women with endometriosis, were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with Placebo, antioxidant use was associated with a reduction in dysmenorrhea (mean difference - 1.95 [CI 95%, -3.78 to -0.13]. Supplementation was not significant for reducing chronic pelvic pain (mean difference - 2.22 [95% CI, -4.99 to 0.55] and dyspareunia (MD - 2.56 [95% CI, - 5. 22 to 0.10]. Both analyses showed a high degree of heterogeneity. Moreover, studies with low risk of bias did not show significant results compared to those on Placebo. The effects of nutrient compounds seem to have the potential to reduce pain in women with endometriosis, mainly to reduce dysmenorrhea. However, the available studies present high heterogeneity and moderate/high risk of bias. More randomized clinical trials are needed to accurately determine dietary interventions' short- and long-term efficacy and safety in managing endometriosis pain.
RESUMEN
Our main objective was to identify the male and female parameters associated with total fertilization failure (TFF) in IVF with nonmasculine indications. The present work, IRB equivalent INS 63209, is a case-control study that evaluated all cases with TFF after conventional IVF at the Center for Human Reproduction from January 2010 to December 2019 (n = 154). As a control group, we analyzed all patients who did not experience fertilization failure after conventional IVF in the same period (n = 475). We evaluated various parameters, both male and female, assessed during infertility treatment, and only cases without masculine etiology (normal seminal parameters) were included. Ages (female and male) were not different between the groups. Moreover, AMH (anti-Müllerian hormone), semen volume, preprocessing concentration and preprocessing motility were not significantly different (P > 0.05). However, the number of collected oocytes (study versus control groups, median [25-75 interquartile]: 2 [1-5] and 5 [3-8]); MII (2 [1-4] and 5 [2-7]); and postprocessing motility (85 [70-90] and 90 [80-95]) were significantly different between both groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, a logistic regression analysis including all significant data demonstrated that the number of collected oocytes was significantly related to IVF failure. Patients with fewer than 5 oocytes had an OR of - 1.37 (- 0.938 to - 1.827) for TFF after conventional IVF. Our results showed that a lower follicular response to controlled ovarian stimulation, evidenced by a decreased number of collected oocytes, was the most important parameter associated with IVF failure in nonmasculine infertility.