Minimally-invasive airway management and early cleft palate repair in infants born with Robin sequence.

The objective of this study was to report outcomes of early cleft palate repair in infants born with Robin sequence (RS). A retrospective case series in a tertiary referral paediatric hospital was carried out, examining a consecutive series of 69 infants born with RS and cleft palate. A minimally invasive approach was taken to upper airway obstruction, with liberal nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use, guided by sleep studies. The palate was repaired between 6 and 9 months with a modified Malek technique. The most frequently used airway adjunct (59.4% of patients) was an NPA and the median duration of use was 5.6 months. All patients underwent a modified Malek cleft palate repair at a median of 7 months of age. Overnight oximetry demonstrated higher mean oxygen saturation (SpO2) across the group from initial neonatal admission to discharge (median 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 95-98%) vs 97.45% (IQR 96.5-98%) (P = 0.2, N = 34). Of those with a cardiorespiratory polysomnogram, the obstructive apnoea-hypopnea index (OAHI) was significantly lower postoperatively (5.9 vs 2.8, P = 0.028). This study supports the use of non-surgical airway strategies and early cleft palate repair in infants born with RS and cleft palate.

Patient Factors Influencing Speech Outcomes in Velopharyngeal Function Following Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of patient factors influencing velopharyngeal function for speech following initial cleft palate repair. DESIGN: A literature search of relevant databases from inception until 2018 was performed using medical subject headings and keywords related to cleft palate, palatoplasty and speech assessment. Following three stage screening data extraction was performed. SETTING: Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant literature. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising data on 47 658 participants. INTERVENTIONS: Individuals undergoing initial palatoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies including participants undergoing initial cleft palate repair where the frequency of secondary speech surgery and/or velopharyngeal function for speech was recorded. RESULTS: Patient factors reported included cleft phenotype (95% studies), biological sex (64%), syndrome diagnosis (44%), hearing loss (28%), developmental delay (16%), Robin Sequence (16%) and 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome (11%). Meta-analysis provided strong evidence that rates of secondary surgery and velopharyngeal dysfunction varied according to cleft phenotype (Veau I best outcomes, Veau IV worst outcomes), Robin Sequence and syndrome diagnosis. There was no evidence that biological sex was associated with worse outcomes. Many studies were poor quality with minimal follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis demonstrated the association of certain patient factors with speech outcome, however the quality of the evidence was low. Uniform, prospective, multi-centre documentation of preoperative characteristics and speech outcomes is required to characterise risk factors for post-palatoplasty velopharyngeal insufficiency for speech. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered with PROSPERO CRD42017051624.

A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Haemostatic Interventions in Primary Cleft Palate Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adrenaline infiltration, topical adrenaline, systemic tranexamic acid, fibrin tissue sealants and alginate-based topical coagulants at reducing blood loss and post-operative bleeding in primary cleft palate repair. DESIGN: Systematic review according to PRISMA-P guidelines, using Covidence systematic review software to facilitate 3-stage screening and data extraction by two reviewers. SETTING: Academic cleft surgery center. INTERVENTIONS: Any peri-operative intervention to reduce intra-operative and post-operative bleeding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated blood loss, rate of post-operative bleeding, rate of return to theatre for haemostasis. RESULTS: Sixteen relevant studies were identified, with a total of 1469 study participants. Nine studies examined efficacy of infiltrating vasoconstrictors and all concluded that 1:100,000-1:400,000 adrenaline infiltration reduced intra-operative blood loss, to the range of 12-60 ml. Secondary bleeding and re-operation for haemostasis were uncommon. Tranexamic acid was studied in five randomised controlled trials, two of which demonstrated a significant reduction in blood loss compared to a control group. Use of fibrin and gelatin sponge products was examined in 3 studies, all of which reported no or minimal bleeding, but did not have quantifiable outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Infiltration with vasoconstricting agents, administration of systemic tranexamic acid and application of fibrin sealants have a well-studied and favorable safety profile in pediatric cases, and likely contribute to the relatively low incidence of post-operative bleeding and intra-operative blood loss in primary cleft palate repair.

NovoSorb Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix for Reconstruction of Multiplanar Degloving Injury of the Upper Limb.

Originally described as "wringer injuries" by MacCollum in 1938,1 traumatic multiplanar degloving injuries that occur as the result of the hand, forearm or arm being drawn between the rollers of a machine are functionally devastating and present a significant reconstructive challenge. Revascularization and comprehensive excision of devitalized bone and soft tissue, followed by appropriate skeletal fixation and vascularized soft tissue cover are the mainstays of management. To date, published case series have described local flaps and free tissue transfer for coverage of wounds that involve exposed vital structures such as nerves, vessels, and tendons.2 NovoSorb biodegradable temporizing matrix (BTM; PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia) is a bilayer bioabsorbable synthetic polymer dermal substitute, which has the ability to integrate into large wound beds and is resistant to infection.3 BTM comprises a bioabsorbable, polyurethane matrix that allows for cellular infiltration and a temporary nonbiodegradable, nonporous polyurethane layer, which limits moisture loss and provides a barrier to bacteria. Here we describe the successful use of BTM in the staged reconstruction of a high-energy industrial roller injury in an adolescent patient.

Frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Frailty has been shown to adversely impact outcomes in a number of surgical disciplines. In head and neck reconstructive surgery, frailty may represent a significant risk factor in predicting post-operative outcomes due to the common characteristics of the patient population undergoing these procedures. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the available evidence about frailty as a predictor of post-operative complications, length of hospital stay and quality of life in patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review. METHODS: The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, registration CRD42022302899. Methodology was in keeping with the PRISMA Guidelines for Systematic Reviews. MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science and CENTRAL were the databases searched. Qualitative synthesis of the included studies was carried out, and quality assessment was performed. RESULTS: Nine studies that reported data on 10,457 patients undergoing reconstruction of the head and neck were included in the review. A number of different tools were used to assess frailty, with the modified frailty index being the most frequently used. In total, 8 studies reported increased rates of complications in patients with increased levels of frailty, irrespective of the frailty tool used, with varied levels of statistical significance across the studies. CONCLUSION: An association is observed between increased rates of perioperative complications and increased levels of frailty in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction. Frailty tools may represent a useful method to risk stratify patients undergoing reconstructive head and neck surgery.

The case for the pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty in the management of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) occurs when there is inadequate closure of the velopharyngeal sphincter during speech. An incompetent velopharyngeal sphincter may require surgical intervention to create a functional seal between the oropharynx and the nasopharynx during speech. To date, no single pharyngoplasty procedure has emerged as superior to another, and the comparison of results between studies has been limited by variation in outcomes reporting. Here, we use the newly defined Core Outcome Set for VPD (COS-VPD) to report a consecutive series of 109 patients managed with a midline pharyngeal flap and simultaneous dissection and repositioning of the velar muscles. The overall 30-day postoperative complication rate was 3.6% (4 out of 109 patients). At 12-month follow-up, 79.3% of patients experienced a statistically significant improvement in hypernasality. Seven patients (6.4%) developed obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) postoperatively, and this was confirmed with polysomnography, with four (3.6%) patients requiring takedown of the pharyngeal flap. Seven patients in total (7.3%) required takedown of the pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty because of insufficient improvement of their VPD following the initial procedure. Patient-reported outcomes were investigated using the Velopharyngeal Effects on Life Outcome (VELO) instrument, and a mean total score of 74.5 out of 100 was recorded. We conclude that cleft surgeons should not be dissuaded by historical concerns about high rates of perioperative complications and OSA and should consider including the pharyngeal flap in their armamentarium when managing patients with VPD.

Core Outcome Set for Reporting Outcomes of Interventions for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: Final Results of the COS-VPD Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: To date, the recording of outcomes of interventions for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) has not been standardized. This makes a comparison of results between studies challenging. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for reporting outcomes in studies examining the management of VPD. DESIGN: A two-round Delphi consensus process was used to develop the COS. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: The expert Delphi panel comprised patients and caregivers of patients with VPD, surgeons and speech and language therapists specializing in cleft palate, and researchers with expertise in VPD. INTERVENTIONS: A long list of outcomes was derived from the published literature. In each round of a Delphi survey, participants were asked to score outcomes using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scale of 1 to 9, with 1 to 3 labeled "not important," 4 to 6 labeled "important but not critical," and 7 to 9 labeled "critical." MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Consensus criteria were specified a priori. Outcomes with a rating of 75% or more of the panel rating 7 to 9 and 25% or fewer rating 1 to 3 were included in the COS. RESULTS: A total of 31 core outcomes were identified from the Delphi process. This list was condensed to combine topic areas to produce a final COS of 10 outcomes, including both processes of care and patient-reported outcomes that should be considered for reporting in future studies of VPD. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the COS-VPD will facilitate consistency of outcomes data collection and comparison of results across studies.

Addition to the Toolbox of Surgical Techniques for Palatal Fistula Repair.

In response to the article by Rothermel and colleagues, the authors suggest the use of cancellous bone graft for repair of fistulae of the hard palate as an addition to the proposed toolbox.

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for reporting outcomes of management of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) is present in up to 40% of patients following cleft palate repair. Children with VPD display hypernasal speech, nasal air emission and are at a high risk for developing articulation disorders. The overall result is decreased intelligibility and acceptability of speech, as well as significant functional and social impairments. Although there are several surgical approaches for the management of children with VPD, standard treatment protocols have not been well defined. There is a need for a core outcome set (COS) to reduce outcome reporting bias and heterogeneity across studies of VPD. The COS-VPD Initiative is an international effort to establish a COS for the reporting of studies of the management of VPD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study has been developed according to the Core Outcome Set-STAandards for Development standards for the design of a COS study and will be carried out according to the guidance of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. A long list of clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be identified from a systematic review of the literature. A two-stage Delphi consensus process will be used to refine this list into a COS. An international panel of key stakeholders including patients, parents and multidisciplinary clinical and academic experts will be invited to participate in this process. Consensus criteria will be specified a priori and the steering group will ratify the final COS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval through Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin Research and Ethics Committee, Ref: GEN/683/18. The study is registered with the COMET Initiative (http://www.cometinitiative.org/studies/details/1146?result=true). The COS will be disseminated by publication in the peer-reviewed literature, presentation at international research meetings and distribution to patient-representative organisations. This will facilitate the application of the COS in future studies of the management of VPD.

Non-Interventional Factors Influencing Velopharyngeal Function For Speech In Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review Protocol.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to inform the development of a screening tool which pre-operatively predicts which children are likely to develop velopharyngeal insufficiency, one of the causes of poor speech outcomes, following cleft palate repair. This would be highly beneficial as it would inform pre-operative counselling of parents, allow targeted speech and language therapy, and enable meaningful comparison of outcomes between surgeons, techniques, and institutions. Currently, it is unclear which factors influence speech outcomes. A systematic review investigating the non-interventional factors which potentially influence speech outcomes following cleft palate repair is warranted. This may be illuminating in itself or provide foundations for future studies. METHODS: A systematic review will be carried out according to Cochrane methodology and reported according to PRISMA guidelines (PLoS Med 6: e1000097, 2009). Systematic review software will be used to facilitate three-stage screening by two independent reviewers experienced in cleft lip and palate. Thereafter, data extraction and GRADE assessment will be performed in duplicate by five independent reviewers experienced in cleft lip and palate. Studies reporting the proportion of patients who were recommended or underwent secondary speech surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary surgery for cleft palate will be included. The study findings will be tabulated and summarised. The primary outcome measure will be further speech surgery (either recommended or performed). The secondary outcome measure will be perceptual speech assessment for the presence of velopharyngeal insufficiency. A meta-analysis is planned. However, if this is not possible, due to the anticipated marked heterogeneity of study characteristics, pre-operative assessment, and the recorded outcome measures, a narrative synthesis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: This systematic review may provide sufficient data to inform the development of a screening tool to predict the risk of velopharyngeal insufficiency prior to cleft palate repair. However, it is anticipated that these findings will provide the foundation for future studies in this area. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered on 19 December 2016 with PROSPERO CRD42017051624.

CT-guided Lung Biopsy: Effect of Biopsy-side Down Position on Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Placement.

Background Supine or prone positioning of the patient on the gantry table is the current standard of care for CT-guided lung biopsy; positioning biopsy side down was hypothesized to be associated with lower pneumothorax rate. Purpose To assess the effect of positioning patients biopsy side down during CT-guided lung biopsy on the incidence of pneumothorax, chest drain placement, and hemoptysis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was performed between January 2013 and December 2016 in a tertiary referral oncology center. Patients undergoing CT-guided lung biopsy were either positioned in (a) the standard prone or supine position or (b) the lateral decubitus position with the biopsy side down. The relationship between patient position and pneumothorax, drain placement, and hemoptysis was assessed by using multivariable logistic regression models. Results A total of 373 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 68 years ± 10), including 196 women and 177 men, were included in the study. Among these patients, 184 were positioned either prone or supine depending on the most direct path to the lesion and 189 were positioned biopsy side down. Pneumothorax occurred in 50 of 184 (27.2%) patients who were positioned either prone or supine and in 20 of 189 (10.6%) patients who were positioned biopsy side down (P < .001). Drain placement was required in 10 of 184 (5.4%) patients who were positioned either prone or supine and in eight of 189 (4.2%) patients who were positioned biopsy side down (P = .54). Hemoptysis occurred in 19 of 184 (10.3%) patients who were positioned prone or supine and in 10 of 189 (5.3%) patients who were positioned biopsy side down (P = .07). Prone or supine patient position (P = .001, odds ratio [OR] = 2.7 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.4, 4.9]), emphysema along the needle path (P = .02, OR = 2.1 [95% CI: 1.1, 4.0]), and lesion size (P = .02, OR = 1.0 [95% CI: 0.9, 1.0]) were independent risk factors for developing pneumothorax. Conclusion Positioning a patient biopsy side down for percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy reduced the incidence of pneumothorax compared with the supine or prone position. © RSNA, 2019.

Descent of the human larynx: An unrecognized factor in airway distress in babies with cleft palate?

The intranarial epiglottis, a feature of all newborn mammals, allows suckling and breathing to continue almost simultaneously by separating an oral food stream from a nasal airstream. In contrast to other mammals, the human larynx descends in the neck between birth and six months, extending the distance between the caudal aspect of the soft palate and the cephalic tip of the epiglottis. The mechanism of airway protection changes from a pattern in which an upright epiglottis is grasped by an intact palatopharyngeal sphincter to one in which the epiglottis folds down over the laryngeal aditus and the adducted vocal folds. The comparative anatomy and anthropological literature describing laryngeal descent was reviewed. A series of MRI images were used to illustrate the normal descent of the human larynx, which take place in infants in the first six months of life. Based on this information, we hypothesize that a cleft palate, by interrupting the sphincter function of palatopharyngeus on a high neonatal epiglottis, precipitates a need for premature and rapid maturation of the neonate's airway protection pattern, particularly during feeding. This may explain why, even in the absence of Robin sequence, some babies with cleft palates suffer respiratory distress during feeding.

Surgery for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review of Interventions and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review sought to evaluate the consensus in the literature regarding the surgical management of VPD and to determine whether a particular procedure results in superior speech outcome or less morbidity Design: A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA-P guidelines. Systematic review software was used to facilitate 3-stage screening and data extraction by 2 reviewers. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Studies that reported perceptual speech assessment or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients who had undergone surgery for VPD were included in the review. INTERVENTIONS: Four categories of surgery for VPD were examined-pharyngeal flap, sphincter pharyngoplasty, palatoplasty, and posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceptual speech assessment, need for further surgery, and occurrence of OSA were the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Eighty-three relevant studies were identified, comprising data on 4011 patients. Pharyngeal flap was the most common procedure (64% of patients). Overall, 70.7% of patients attained normal resonance and 65.3% attained normal nasal emission. There was no notable difference in speech outcomes, need for further surgery, or occurrence of OSA across the 4 categories of surgery examined. Heterogeneous groups of patients were reported upon and a variety of perceptual speech assessment scales were used. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of consensus in the literature to guide procedure selection for patients with VPD. The development of a standardized minimum data set to record postoperative speech, OSA, and patient-reported outcomes is required.

Patient awareness and sun protection behaviour following excision of basal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding disease awareness and sun protection behaviour in patients previously treated for non-melanoma skin cancer. METHODS: Using a telephone-administered questionnaire, we investigated these characteristics in 250 patients in the west of Ireland who had undergone excision of basal cell carcinomas between January 2011 and December 2012. RESULTS: Only 28.8% of respondents knew that the lesion they had excised was a BCC and understood that there was a significant chance of developing another similar lesion in the next 3 years. Women and patients under age 65 were significantly better informed about their diagnosis than men (p = 0.021 and 0.000 respectively). The majority of patients (71.2%) knew that the overall effect of UV radiation on the skin was harmful and did employ some form of sun protection (avoid midday sun 72%; stay in shade 74%; wear hat 73.6%; wear sunscreen 72.8%). Females were statistically more likely to exercise better sun-protection behaviour (p = 0.002). While 76.8% of patients undertook some form of outdoor activity every day, only 22.8% wore sunscreen every day. CONCLUSIONS: Greater efforts should be made to communicate disease details and sun protection implications associated with basal cell carcinoma, especially to male patients. Improved population specific skin cancer awareness may lead to earlier detection and thus decrease both the patient morbidity and economic burden associated with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.

Experience of plastic surgery registrars in a European Working Time Directive compliant rota.

BACKGROUND: Surgical training requires exposure to clinical decision-making and operative experience in a supervised environment. It is recognised that learning ability is compromised when fatigued. The European Working Time Directive requires a decrease in working hours, but compliance reduces trainees' clinical exposure, which has profound implications for plastic surgery training. The aim of this study was to evaluate plastic surgery registrars' experience of an EWTD-compliant rota, and to examine its impact on patient care, education, and logbook activity. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to plastic surgery registrars in a university teaching hospital. Registrars were asked to rate 31 items on a five-point Likert scale, including statements on patient care, clinical and operative duties, training, and quality-of-life. Interquartile deviations explored consensus among responses. Operative caseload was objectively evaluated using eLogbook data to compare activity at equal time points before and after implementation of the EWTD rota. RESULTS: Highest levels of consensus among respondents were found in positive statements addressing alertness and preparation for theatre, as well as time to read and study for exams. Registrars agreed that EWTD compliance improved their quality-of-life. However, it was felt that continuity of patient care was compromised by work hours restriction. Registrars were concerned about their operative experience. eLogbook data confirmed a fall-off in mean caseload of 31.8% compared to activity prior to EWTD rota implementation. CONCLUSION: While EWTD compliant rotas promote trainee quality-of-life and satisfaction with training, attention needs to be paid to optimising operative opportunities.

Is satisfaction with surgeon a determining factor in patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction?

BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcomes are increasingly being taken into account in planning health service provision. Few studies have examined how the process of care influences patients' perception of outcome. The aim of the current study was to quantify patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction and to examine the demographic, disease and process-of-care variables that contributed to satisfaction with breasts and overall outcome. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed and the BREAST-Q outcomes assessment instrument was used to evaluate patient-reported psychosocial, physical and sexual well-being, as well as satisfaction with breasts, overall outcome and process of care. To identify factors predictive of satisfaction with breasts and overall outcome, the relation between covariates and each of these scales was assessed using linear regression models. RESULTS: Sixty one patients, with a mean age of 50 years, completed the survey. Mean satisfaction with breasts was 59.6% and satisfaction with overall outcome was 73.2%. Satisfaction across health-related quality of life scales ranged from 44.6% for sexual well-being to 74.6% for physical well-being. The mean rating for psychosocial well-being was 67.9%. Satisfaction ratings for surgeon, medical staff and office staff were all over 90%. Satisfaction with plastic surgeon was predictive of satisfaction with outcome and satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001 and 0.021 respectively). DISCUSSION: The surgeon-patient relationship significantly influences patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction. Further service development must recognize the need for additional time and personnel to deliver high standard, patient-centered care.

Public perception of Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Public perception of Plastic Surgery is strongly influenced by the media and may not reflect the broad scope of work within the speciality. The aim of this study was to provide an assessment of the general public's perception of plastic surgical practice and to report the perceived importance of Plastic Surgery relative to other specialities working within a large tertiary referral centre. METHODS: 899 members of the public who attended our Emergency Department completed a questionnaire where they matched eight surgical specialities with 30 operative procedures and ranked the importance of 30 different hospital specialities using a Likert scale. RESULTS: The majority of respondents correctly identified plastic surgeons as performing each of the cosmetic procedures listed (abdominoplasty 63.7%; breast augmentation 59.1%; facelift 61.35%; liposuction 59.7%). Plastic Surgery was identified as the primary speciality involved in breast reconstruction (49.3%) and burns surgery (43.0%). There was poor understanding of the role of plastic surgeons in hand surgery, with only 4.7% of respondents attributing tendon repair to plastic surgeons. Plastic Surgery ranked lowest of 30 specialities in terms of importance in providing care for patients within the hospital. CONCLUSION: Plastic Surgery is often misunderstood within the wider community and misconceptions reflect the influence of the media in highlighting certain aspects of the speciality. It behoves our professional organisations to highlight the importance of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery within major tertiary referral centres.