Orthognathic surgery and aligners. A comparative assessment of periodontal health and quality of life in postsurgical orthodontic treatment with aligners versus traditional fixed appliances: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Removable clear aligners have become very popular in the last few decades, but they are still little used in the field of orthognathic surgery (OS). The objective of this study was to compare periodontal health and quality of life (QoL) associated to postsurgical orthodontic treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with dentofacial deformities undergoing OS were randomly allocated to receive postsurgical orthodontic treatment with either fixed orthodontic appliances or Invisalign. The main outcomes were periodontal health and QoL. Plaque index, probing depth and bleeding on probing were assessed as periodontal health indicators. QoL was assessed through the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ-22) and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Data were analyzed before surgery and end of treatment. Total duration of treatment was also recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were randomized, (16 women, 12 men). Periodontal assessment showed better outcomes for the Invisalign group: bleeding on probing (p=0.013), plaque index (p=0.001) and probing depth (p<0.001). The QoL questionnaires showed significant differences in favor of the Invisalign group: OHIP-14 (p=0.004) and OQLQ-22 (p=0.002). Total duration of treatment was similar in both groups (p=0.575). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to traditional orthodontics with fixed appliances, patients managed with clear aligners after OS (surgery-first approach) had better periodontal health and QoL outcomes.

The combined coronal-transconjunctival approach: an innovative surgical access for orbital exenteration in craniofacial resection.

Malignant tumours arising in the paranasal sinuses or maxilla usually spread to the surrounding regions. The skull base and the anterior cranial fossa are frequently affected as well. When the resection of a tumour involves an orbital exenteration, a transconjunctival-perilimbic incision can be added to a coronal approach in order to preserve the eyelids and the conjunctiva, avoiding cutaneous midfacial incisions. Patients with a diagnosis of malignant tumour affecting the orbit, upper jaw, paranasal sinuses, and/or anterior skull base were eligible for this technique. Tumoural invasion of the eyelids, conjunctiva, lacrimal system, or surrounding skin was considered a contraindication for this technique. A retrospective study of the clinical records was performed and age, type of tumour, location, and reconstructive technique were evaluated. Eight patients referred to the study department between 2015 and 2019 were selected. All patients underwent craniofacial surgery and orbital exenteration. The transconjunctival-perilimbic approach was combined with a coronal incision in all cases. In our experience, the transconjunctival-perilimbic approach to orbital exenteration proposed in this paper can be used successfully in skull base surgery. Combined with a coronal and transmandibular approach, it allows wide access to the facial skeleton/anterior skull base while avoiding skin incisions in the midface.