RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the affective theory of mind (ToM) of people with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy older adults and also investigated the relationship between affective ToM and cognitive and clinical functioning in AD people. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 156 older adults with AD and 40 healthy older adults. We used an experimental task involving reasoning processes in different contextual situations. RESULTS: The affective ToM was impaired in AD groups compared with healthy group, with moderate AD group showing lower performance than mild AD group. The affective ToM task of mild AD group was significantly correlated with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and education years. Linear regression showed only education years as a predictor of ToM task performance. The neuropsychiatric symptoms and functionality were not correlated with the affective ToM. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that people with mild and moderate AD presented impairments in affective ToM that can be explained by the difficulties to infer emotion from reasoning processes. In addition, the education years variable proved to be an affective ToM performance's predictor for the mild AD group, but not for the moderate AD group, indicating that ToM abilities are affected differently in different stages of AD. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and functionality seem to have no influence on affective ToM impairments in people with AD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Teoría de la Mente , Humanos , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Emociones , CogniciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Social cognition (SC) impairments contribute to the dependence of people with Alzheimer disease (AD), influencing their functional disability and the burden on family members and caregivers. Our objective was to longitudinally investigate the relationship between SC and cognitive and clinical variables in persons with AD and their caregivers. We also evaluated the different SC predictors from 3 perspectives: people with AD, caregivers of people with AD, and discrepancy analysis. METHODS: In all, 137 dyads (people with AD and their caregivers) underwent 2 assessments: at baseline (M1) and after 1 year (M2). During follow-up, 58 dyads were excluded, and the study was thus concluded with 79. RESULTS: Longitudinal analysis of the people with AD showed that while some cognitive functions declined (which is consistent with disease progression), SC impairments showed a more stable pattern. Another interesting result was related to SC predictors. For people with AD, SC was associated with cognition at both time points. For caregivers, besides cognition, other predictors included reduced functional abilities and quality of life in people with AD. These results are consistent with the discrepancy predictors. CONCLUSION: The stable pattern in SC functioning over 12 months in AD suggests that this neurocognitive domain may be influenced more by emotional processing than by cognitive impairment. In addition, the SC predictors showed that the investigation of different points of view enables a more global understanding, contributing to better and more targeted treatment for the patient.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Humanos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Brasil , Cognición Social , Cognición , Cuidadores/psicologíaRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic has raised significant concerns about the management and care for people with dementia and their caregivers. In this context, this work will discuss how social isolation or social distancing caused by the pandemic may impact the clinical management of people with dementia, caregivers' health, and dementia research. The pandemic disrupts all forms of social interaction and may increase the behavioral impairment of people with dementia. Regarding pharmacological treatment, telemedicine is an option, but the context of social isolation raises questions about how to manage people with dementia with lack of cognitive stimulation and non-pharmacological treatment. In addition, the impact of the pandemic on caregivers should be considered. There is some evidence that telephone counseling can reduce depressive symptoms of caregivers of people with dementia. In dementia research, social isolation imposes researchers to modify their study protocols in order to continue collecting data by developing remote tools to assess the participants such as electronic informed consent and online questionnaires and tests. Thus, there is an urgent need for the evaluation and refinement of interventions to address several cognitive, behavioral, and clinical aspects of the long-term impact of the pandemic in dementia.
A pandemia causada pelo COVID-19 desencadeia grandes preocupações sobre o manejo e cuidados com as pessoas com demência e seus cuidadores. Neste contexto, discutiremos como o isolamento social causado pela pandemia pode impactar o manejo clínico de pessoas com demência, a saúde do cuidador e a pesquisa sobre demência. A pandemia interrompe todas as formas de interação social e pode causar aumento do comprometimento dos sintomas neuropsiquiátricos nas pessoas com demência. Em relação ao tratamento farmacológico, a telemedicina é uma opção, mas o contexto de isolamento social levanta questões sobre como manejar as pessoas com demência com falta de estimulação cognitiva ou intervenções nãofarmacológicas. Além disso, o impacto da pandemia sobre os cuidadores deve ser considerado. Existem evidências de que o aconselhamento telefônico pode reduzir os sintomas depressivos dos cuidadores. Além disso, o isolamento social impõe que pesquisadores modifiquem seus protocolos de pesquisa com o objetivo de continuar coletando dados, através do desenvolvimento de ferramentas remotas para avaliar os participantes, como o consentimento livre e esclarecido eletrônico e questionários e testes online. Assim, há uma necessidade urgente de avaliação e refinamento das intervenções para abordar aspectos cognitivos, comportamentais e clínicos do impacto de longo prazo da pandemia na demência.