Nefroureterectomía radical asistida por robot para el carcinoma urotelial del tracto urinario superior: resultados peri y postoperatorios / Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Peri and postoperative outcomes

Introducción La nefroureterectomía radical constituye el tratamiento de los tumores uroteliales del tracto urinario superior con alto riesgo de mortalidad específica. La nefroureterectomía radical laparoscópica asistida por robot (NURAR) todavía está siendo investigada para establecer de manera concluyente la seguridad del procedimiento en el tratamiento de los tumores uroteliales del tracto urinario superior. El objetivo principal es evaluar la seguridad intra y postoperatoria de la NURAR y, posteriormente, evaluar los resultados oncológicos a mediano plazo. Métodos Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo monocéntrico basado en una recopilación de NURAR realizadas entre el 1 de enero de 2015 y el 1 de octubre de 2021. Las NURAR se llevaron a cabo con la asistencia del robot Da Vinci Si® y, desde 2017, con el robot Da Vinci Xi®. Siempre que fue posible, la totalidad del procedimiento se llevó a cabo sin reacoplamiento (re-docking). Resultados Entre el 1 de enero de 2015 y el 1 de octubre de 2021, se realizaron 29 NURAR en nuestro centro. En el 80% de los casos se pudo realizar toda la cirugía sin reacoplamiento con el robot Da Vinci Xi®. Un paciente requirió conversión a cirugía abierta por dificultad en la disección. El 50% de los tumores se clasificaron como T3 o T4. La tasa de complicaciones a los 30 días fue del 31%. La duración media de la estancia hospitalaria fue de 5 días. La supervivencia libre de enfermedad en el tiempo medio de supervivencia (27,5 meses) fue del 75,2%. Un paciente tuvo una recidiva en el compartimento de la nefrectomía y ningún paciente tuvo recidiva peritoneal o en los orificios de los trocares. Conclusión La realización de NURAR para el tratamiento de los tumores del tracto urinario superior parece cumplir los criterios de seguridad quirúrgica y oncológica (AU)

Introduction The treatment of urothelial tumours of the upper urinary tract at high risk of specific mortality is based on radical nephroureterectomy. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (RARNU) is still under investigation to definitively establish the safety of this procedure in the management of urothelial tumours of the upper urinary tract. The primary objective is to evaluate the intra- and postoperative safety of RARNU and, subsequently, to evaluate the medium-term oncological results. Methods Our study is a retrospective, mono-centric study with a collection of RARNUs conducted between 1st January 2015 and 1st October 2021. The RARNUs were performed with the assistance of the Da Vinci Si® robot, then from 2017 the Da Vinci Xi® robot. Whenever possible, the entire procedure was carried out without re-docking. Results Between 1st January 2015 and 1st October 2021, 29 RARNUs were carried out at our centre. Complete surgery without re-docking was possible in 80% of cases with the Da Vinci Xi® robot. One patient required conversion to open surgery due to difficult dissection. A percentage of 50 of tumours were classified as T3 or T4. The 30-day complication rate was 31%. The median length of hospitalisation was 5 days. The disease-free survival at the mean survival time (27.5 months) was of 75.2%. One patient had a recurrence in the nephrectomy compartment and no patient had a peritoneal or trocar orifice recurrence. Conclusion Performing RARNU for the management of tumours of the upper urinary tract appears to meet the criteria of surgical safety and those of oncological safety (AU)

Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Peri and postoperative outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of urothelial tumours of the upper urinary tract at high risk of specific mortality is based on radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (RARNU) is still under investigation to definitively establish the safety of this procedure in the management of urothelial tumours of the upper urinary tract. The primary objective is to evaluate the intra- and postoperative safety of RARNU and, subsequently, to evaluate the medium-term oncological results. METHODS: Our study is a retrospective, mono-centric study with a collection of RARNUs conducted between 1st January 2015 and 1st October 2021. The RARNUs were performed with the assistance of the Da Vinci Si® robot, then from 2017 the Da Vinci Xi® robot. Whenever possible, the entire procedure was carried out without re-docking. RESULTS: Between 1st January 2015 and 1st October 2021, 29 RARNUs were carried out at our centre. Complete surgery without re-docking was possible in 80% of cases with the Da Vinci Xi® robot. One patient required conversion to open surgery due to difficult dissection. 50% of tumours were classified as T3 or T4. The 30-day complication rate was 31%. The median length of hospitalisation was 5 days. The disease-free survival at the mean survival time (27.5 months) was of 75.2%. One patient had a recurrence in the nephrectomy compartment and no patient had a peritoneal or trocar orifice recurrence. CONCLUSION: Performing RARNU for the management of tumours of the upper urinary tract appears to meet the criteria of surgical safety and those of oncological safety.

[Prostatic hyperplasia: Evaluation of practices in general practice, dissemination, and impact of recommendations]. / L'hypertrophie bénigne de prostate : évaluation des pratiques en médecine générale, diffusion et impact des recommandations.

INTRODUCTION: In 2015, the French Association of Urology, by the male lower urinary tract symptoms Committee, published a practices guideline for the management of prostatic hyperplasia in general practice. Five years after the publication of these recommendation, our objective is to assess their dissemination and their impact in general practice. MATERIAL: A specially designed questionnaire was distributed online via the departmental councils of the order and to all regional unions of liberal doctors. The distribution to general practitioners was at the discretion of each organisation depending on local policies. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty responses were collected. Fifty-five percent of the population was female. 83 % of the general practitioners did not report having knowledge of the practice guideline. 77 % of doctors stated that they had not received training or information on prostatic hyperplasia in the past 5 years. Among the notable results, 51 % of general practitioners declared performing a digital rectal examination. 44 % prescribed an endorectal ultrasound. Only 7 % of doctors were aware of the existence of minimally invasive surgical techniques. CONCLUSION: The practices guideline for the management of prostatic hyperplasia in general practice proposed in 2015 by the male lower urinary tract symptoms Committee seems to be little known by general practitioners. Dissemination of these recommendations solely through publication in Progrès en Urologie seems ill-suited to consideration by general practitioners, and it seems necessary to consider other modes of dissemination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4, grade C.

[Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with neurogenic bladder]. / Néphrolithotomie percutanée chez les patients neurologiques : efficacité et morbidité à long terme.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy and morbidity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNLT) in the treatment of renal stones in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). METHODS: Retrospective, monocentric study including all patients with NLUTD who had undergone PNLT between 2005 and 2017. Pre-operative clinical data (neurological condition, voiding mode, preoperative urine culture…), peri-operative and post-operative data (success and morbidity) were collected from the patients' charts. Success was defined by the absence of residual fragment (RF), on imaging or intraoperative endoscopy. Partial efficacy was defined by the presence of RF lower than 4mm. Early complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: In all, 53 PNLTs were performed, in 35 patients, mostly with spinal cord injury. The success and partial efficacy rates were 66.0% and 71.7% respectively. The failure rate was correlated with increased stone burden (P=0.03), increased size of the largest stone (P=0.02), and the presence of complex stones (P<0.02). The rate of early complications was 41.5%, with 27.3% major, mostly septic, and bleeding. The retreatment rate within 3 years was 41.5%. CONCLUSION: In patients with NLUTD, PNLT allows a high success rate, but with a significant rate of retreatment and infectious complications. However, NLPC remains the gold standard in this population, especially for renal stones larger 20mm, allowing a higher success rate than ureteroscopy and a lower retreatment rate.

[Acute renal failure of the donor in encephalic death: A real contraindication to kidney transplantation?] / L'insuffisance rénale aiguë du donneur en mort encéphalique : une réelle contre-indication à la transplantation rénale ?

INTRODUCTION: The shortage of kidney transplants encourages the expansion of the limits of eligibility criteria for donation. Many donors who are brain dead display acute renal failure at the time of death; is this a real contraindication to harvesting? The aim of this study was to assess kidney graft survival from donors after brain death with confirmed acute renal failure, with or without anuria previous donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All of the transplants performed in two university hospitals between 2010 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients who underwent single kidney transplant from a brain-dead donor with acute renal failure (ARF) were included in this study. ARI was defined here by a decrease over 50 % of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to a threshold below 45mL/min/1.73 m2 at the time of kidney procurement. Kidney graft survival, incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and the GFR at 12 months were analyzed. Analysis of kidney transplant survival based on pre-implantation biopsies was additionally done. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty four patients were transplanted with a kidney from donor with ARF during the selected period. At the admission in ICU the average GFR was 67,7±19mL/min/1,73m2. At the time of donation, the average age of donors was 56.4±17.7 years, the GFR was 33.7±8.0mL/min/1.73 m2 16 % of donors were anuric. Cold ischemia time (CIT) was 16.8±5.0hours. The average age of recipients was 55.6±14.1 years. 81 % of the cases were primary transplants. Graft function took place within 7.8±9.4 days after transplantation. There were two non-primary functions (PNF). One hundred and fifty two patients (93 %) had a functional graft at 12 months. The mean GFR at 12 months was 46.8±20.1mL/min/1.73 m2 and 122 patients (73 %) had a GFR greater than 30mL/min/1.73 m2. Seventy-one percent of preimplantation biopsies revealed acute tubular necrosis (ATU); no cortical necrosis was observed. Survival of theses grafts was 85 %, comparable to the total population of study (P=0,21) CONCLUSION: The acute renal failure of the brain-dead donor should not alone be systematically a contraindication to harvesting and kidney transplantation.

Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in case of right kidney and multiple-renal artery kidney: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: To access the current status of the security and feasibility of right kidney (RK) and multiple-renal artery (MRA) laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) which are more challenging compared to left kidney (LK) and single renal artery (SRA) because of a shorter renal vein and more complex vascular anatomy. METHODS: We did a systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA recommendations, reporting RK or MRA donor nephrectomy performed with a laparoscopic technique compared to LK or SRA kidney LLDN. The identified and analyzed primary outcomes of interest were operating time (OT), warm ischemia time (WIT), rate of conversion and transfusion, donor length of stay (LOS), delayed graft function (DGF) and rate of graft loss (GL). RESULTS: 16 comparative studies (1397 cases) of RK-LLDN and 12 comparative studies including 15 series (993 cases) of MRA-LLDN were selected. For RK-LLDN review, conversion rate was 0.8% and blood transfusion rate 0.2%, only one case of graft venous thrombosis was reported, OT was shorter in four studies and there was no any difference of DGF and GL rate compared to LK-LLDN. For MRA-LLDN review, conversion rate was 1.3% and blood transfusion rate 1.1%, OT and WIT were longer compared to SRA-LLDN, there were more ureteral complications in two studies, and no difference in terms of vascular complications and graft loss rate. CONCLUSION: RK-LLDN and MRA-LLDN would be similar to LK-LLDN and SRA-LLDN in terms of feasibility and safety for the donor as well as graft function results for RK-LLDN.

[Long-term outcomes of prostate cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection]. / Résultats oncologiques à long terme des patients ayant un cancer de la prostate traité par prostatectomie totale et curage ganglionnaire avec atteinte métastatique ganglionnaire infraclinique.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate biochemical recurrence-free survival (RFS) and to identify useful predictors of such survival in localized prostate cancer patients (cN0) and pelvic lymph node metastasis (pN+) treated with radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter and retrospective study, assessed overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and biochemical recurrence-free survival (RFS), between January 2005 until December 2010 with 5 years of distance. We evaluated factors predicting long-term RFS in node positive prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: Thus, 30 patients were included. Median follow-up was 89.9±27.4 months. After surgery, patients were treated with surveillance (n=4, 13.5%), adjuvant hormone therapy (n=22, 73%) or combination of radio and hormone therapy, (n=4, 13.5%). During the follow-up, 50% of patients had biochemical recurrence, with a mean time period of 38±30 months. Five and 10-year RFS were 57% and 41% respectively. Extra lymph nodes extension (P=0.00021) and pathological margin status (P=0.0065) were independent predictors of 5-year RFS. CONCLUSION: Biochemical RFS of patients treated with radical prostatectomy and subclinical lymph node metastatic disease is adequate and multifactorial. However, this study identifies pathological margin status and extra lymph node extension as independent factors of b RFS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Evaluation and results of ablative therapies in prostate cancer]. / Modalités d'évaluation et résultats des traitements ablatifs dans le cancer de la prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a state of the art about methods of evaluation and present results in ablative therapies for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A review of the scientific literature was performed in Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using different associations of keywords. Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language and relevance. After selection, 102 articles were analysed. RESULTS: Analyse the results of ablative therapies is presently difficult considering the heterogeneity of indications, techniques and follow-up. However, results from the most recent and homogeneous studies are encouraging. Oncologically, postoperative biopsies (the most important criteria) are negative (without any tumor cells in the treated area) in 75 to 95%. Functionally, urinary and sexual pre-operative status is spared (or recovered early) in more than 90% of the patients treated. More and more studies underline also the correlation between the results and the technique used considering the volume of the gland and, moreover, the "index lesion" localization. CONCLUSION: The post-treatment pathological evaluation by biopsies (targeted with MRI or, perhaps in a near future, with innovative ultrasonography) is the corner stone of oncological evaluation of ablative therapies. Ongoing trials will allow to standardize the follow-up and determine the best indication and the best techniques in order to optimize oncological and functional results for each patient treated.