[COVID-19 in nursing homes A study of diagnosis, symptomatology and disease course]. / Covid-19 in verpleeghuizen.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the diagnosis, symptomatology and disease course of COVID-19 in nursing home (NH) residents in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHOD: Data on NH residents with suspected COVID-19 were collected from the electronic patient records. Data were collected on diagnostic status (COVID-19: confirmed/excluded (using the RT-PCR test)), symptomatology (typical/atypical and other symptoms, body temperature and oxygen saturation) and, in the case of confirmed COVID-19, on disease course (recovered/clinically improved/deteriorated, deceased). We described and compared the symptomatology in NH residents with confirmed COVID-19 and NH residents in whom COVID-19 had been excluded. We also analysed mortality risk using survival analysis. We used registrations from the period 18 March to15 April 2020 for this study. RESULTS: We reported on 1,969 NH residents with suspected COVID-19. The diagnosis was confirmed in 857 patients (43.5%); diagnosis was excluded in 1,112 (56.5%) patients. Among patients with confirmed COVID-19, 65% had coughs, 70% had fever, 33% had shortness of breath, 28% had delirium/confusion and 10% had a sore throat; in patients in whom COVID-19 was excluded these symptoms were experienced in 70%, 47%, 45%, 26% and 13% of patients, respectively. Of the patients with confirmed COVID-19, 48% died within 30 days (95% CI: 36-44%), versus 20% of the patients in whom COVID-19 was excluded (95% CI: 11-15%). CONCLUSION: There is a lot of overlap in symptomatology between NH residents with COVID-19 and those with other acute diseases. An RT-PCR test is required to be able to make the distinction better. The mortality risk in patients with confirmed COVID-19 is significantly higher than in patients in whom covid-19 is excluded.

Urine cultures in a long-term care facility (LTCF): time for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most prevalent infections in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Numerous studies have described the problem of inadequate UTI diagnosis and treatment. We assessed the role of urine cultures in the diagnosis and treatment of UTIs in a LTCF. METHODS: In a 370-bed non-academic LTCF a retrospective assessment of antibiotic (AB) prescriptions for UTIs and urine cultures was performed from July 2014 to January 2016. The reasons why physicians, including 11 nursing home physicians and 2 junior doctors, ordered urine cultures were recorded using questionnaires. RESULTS: During the study period, 378 residents were prescribed 1672 AB courses; 803 were for UTIs. One hundred and fifty-five urine cultures were obtained from 135 residents; 66 of these cultures were performed on the same day as ABs were prescribed (8% of all prescriptions for UTI), while 89 were not. There was a discrepancy between the actions that seemed logical based on the culture results and the actions that were actually taken in 75% of the cases. In these cases, initial AB treatment was not adjusted when the isolated microorganism was resistant to the AB prescribed, the urine culture was positive and no ABs had previously been administered, or ABs were prescribed and no microorganism was isolated. The most frequent reason for ordering a urine culture was to confirm the diagnosis of a UTI. CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients, AB therapy was not adjusted when the urine culture results suggested it may be appropriate. The physicians were erroneously convinced that UTIs could be diagnosed by a positive urine culture.