Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Euro Surveill ; 29(21)2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785092

RESUMEN

BackgroundIn 2022 and 2023, a global outbreak of mpox affected mostly gay, bisexual and other men having sex with men (GBMSM). Outbreak control in the Netherlands included isolation, quarantine, post-exposure prophylaxis vaccination and primary preventive vaccination (PPV).AimWe describe the course of the outbreak, the vaccination programme, vaccine effectiveness (VE) of full vaccination against symptomatic disease, and trends in behaviour to generate hypotheses about factors that influenced the outbreak's decline.MethodsIn this observational study, we collected data from public health services on notified cases, number of PPV invitations and PPV doses administered. We calculated PPV uptake and coverage. Trends in behavioural data of GBMSM visiting sexual health centres were analysed for all consultations in 2022. We estimated VE using the screening method.ResultsUntil 31 December 2023, 1,294 mpox cases were reported. The outbreak peaked in early July 2022 and then declined sharply. PPV started on 25 July 2022; in total 29,851 doses were administered, 45.8% received at least one dose, 35.4% were fully vaccinated. The estimated VE was 68.2% (95% CI 4.3-89.5%). We did not observe an evident decrease in high-risk behaviour.DiscussionIt is unlikely that PPV was a driver of the outbreak's decline, as incidence started to decline well before the start of the PPV programme. The possible impact of behavioural change could not be demonstrated with the available indicators, however, the data had limitations, hampering interpretation. We hypothesise that infection-induced immunity in high-risk groups was an important factor explaining the decline.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Homosexualidad Masculina , Vacunación , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Masculino , Homosexualidad Masculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Profilaxis Posexposición , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Femenino , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Cuarentena , Programas de Inmunización , Conducta Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Euro Surveill ; 28(12)2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36951783

RESUMEN

In early May 2022, a global outbreak of mpox started among persons without travel history to regions known to be enzootic for monkeypox virus (MPXV). On 8 August 2022, the Netherlands reported its 1,000th mpox case, representing a cumulative incidence of 55 per million population, one of the highest cumulative incidences worldwide. We describe characteristics of the first 1,000 mpox cases in the Netherlands, reported between 20 May and 8 August 2022, within the context of the public health response. These cases were predominantly men who have sex with men aged 31-45 years. The vast majority of infections were acquired through sexual contact with casual partners in private or recreational settings including LGBTQIA+ venues in the Netherlands. This indicates that, although some larger upsurges occurred from point-source and/or travel-related events, the outbreak was mainly characterised by sustained transmission within the Netherlands. In addition, we estimated the protective effect of first-generation smallpox vaccine against moderate/severe mpox and found a vaccine effectiveness of 58% (95% CI: 17-78%), suggesting moderate protection against moderate/severe mpox symptoms on top of any possible protection by this vaccine against MPXV infection and disease. Communication with and supporting the at-risk population in following mitigation measures remains essential.


Asunto(s)
Mpox , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Vacuna contra Viruela , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Salud Pública , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Homosexualidad Masculina , Mpox/diagnóstico , Mpox/epidemiología , Mpox/prevención & control , Viaje , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Antígenos Virales , Monkeypox virus
5.
Euro Surveill ; 27(45)2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36367011

RESUMEN

BackgroundDifferential SARS-CoV-2 exposure between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals may confound vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates.AimWe conducted a test-negative case-control study to determine VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection and the presence of confounding by SARS-CoV-2 exposure.MethodsWe included adults tested for SARS-CoV-2 at community facilities between 4 July and 8 December 2021 (circulation period of the Delta variant). The VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection after primary vaccination with an mRNA (Comirnaty or Spikevax) or vector-based vaccine (Vaxzevria or Janssen) was calculated using logistic regression adjusting for age, sex and calendar week (Model 1). We additionally adjusted for comorbidity and education level (Model 2) and SARS-CoV-2 exposure (number of close contacts, visiting busy locations, household size, face mask wearing, contact with SARS-CoV-2 case; Model 3). We stratified by age, vaccine type and time since vaccination.ResultsVE against infection (Model 3) was 64% (95% CI: 50-73), only slightly lower than in Models 1 (68%; 95% CI: 58-76) and 2 (67%; 95% CI: 56-75). Estimates stratified by age group, vaccine and time since vaccination remained similar: mRNA VE (Model 3) among people ≥ 50 years decreased significantly (p = 0.01) from 81% (95% CI: 66-91) at < 120 days to 61% (95% CI: 22-80) at ≥ 120 days after vaccination. It decreased from 83% to 59% in Model 1 and from 81% to 56% in Model 2.ConclusionSARS-CoV-2 exposure did not majorly confound the estimated COVID-19 VE against infection, suggesting that VE can be estimated accurately using routinely collected data without exposure information.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Eficacia de las Vacunas , SARS-CoV-2 , ARN Mensajero
6.
Vaccine ; 40(46): 6664-6669, 2022 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36216647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Elderly people in long-term care facilities (LTCF) are at higher risk for (severe) COVID-19, yet evidence of vaccine effectiveness (VE) in this population is scarce. In November 2021 (Delta period), a COVID-19 outbreak occurred at a LTCF in the Netherlands, continuing despite measures and booster vaccination campaign. We investigated the outbreak to assess VE of primary COVID-19 vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality, and to describe the impact of the booster vaccination. METHODS: We calculated attack rate (AR) and case fatality (CF) per vaccination status (unvaccinated, primarily vaccinated and boostered). We calculated VE - at on average 6 months after vaccination - as 1- risk ratio (RR) using the crude risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between vaccination status (primary vaccination versus unvaccinated) and outcomes (SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality < 30 days after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2). RESULTS: The overall AR was 67% (70/105). CF was 33% (2/6) among unvaccinated cases, 12% among primarily vaccinated (7/58) and 0% (0/5) among boostered. The VE of primary vaccination was 17% (95% CI -28%; 46%) against SARS-CoV-2 infection and 70% (95% CI -44%; 96%) against mortality. Among boostered residents (N = 55), there were 25 cases in the first week after receiving the booster dose, declining to 5 in the second and none in the third week. CONCLUSION: VE of primary vaccination in residents of LTCF was very low against SARS-CoV-2 infection and moderate against mortality. There were few cases at 2 weeks after the booster dose and no deaths, despite the presence of susceptible residents. These data are consistent with the positive impact of the booster vaccination in curbing transmission. Timely booster vaccination in residents of LTCF is therefore important.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Eficacia de las Vacunas , SARS-CoV-2 , Programas de Inmunización , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control
7.
Euro Surveill ; 27(24)2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35713026

RESUMEN

In May 2022, monkeypox outbreaks have been reported in countries not endemic for monkeypox. We estimated the monkeypox incubation period, using reported exposure and symptom-onset times for 18 cases detected and confirmed in the Netherlands up to 31 May 2022. Mean incubation period was 9.0 [corrected] days (5th-95th percentiles: 4.2-17.3), underpinning the current recommendation to monitor or isolate/quarantine case contacts for 21 days. However, as the incubation period may differ between different transmission routes, further epidemiological investigations are needed.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Mpox , Humanos , Periodo de Incubación de Enfermedades Infecciosas , Mpox/diagnóstico , Mpox/epidemiología , Monkeypox virus , Países Bajos/epidemiología
8.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(5): 1012-1016, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35271792

RESUMEN

We report a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 superspreading event in the Netherlands after distancing rules were lifted in nightclubs, despite requiring a negative test or vaccination. This occurrence illustrates the potential for rapid dissemination of variants in largely unvaccinated populations under such conditions. We detected subsequent community transmission of this strain.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Genómica , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/genética
9.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 23(6): 1011-1018.e2, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34688608

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Assessing the impact of a virtual antibiotic team (VAT) on appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing behavior of older care physicians, regarding urinary tract (UTI), respiratory tract (RTI), and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), in residents of long-term care facilities (LTCF). DESIGN: Before-after trial; introduction of a VAT consisting of a clinical microbiologist, older care physician, and a pharmacist. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight LTCFs in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: The VAT was introduced on April 1, 2019. Meetings were held via weekly teleconferencing. VAT advised about treatment indication, antibiotic choice, and additional diagnostics. Data were retrospectively extracted from resident files regarding infection episodes for which antibiotics had been prescribed during 12 months before (period I) and 11 months after VAT introduction (period II). Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions was assessed using national guidelines and an algorithm developed for antimicrobial stewardship in nursing homes. Antibiotic prescription rates per 100 person-years (py) were estimated and compared between periods using incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Proportions of appropriate antibiotic prescriptions were compared between periods using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 524 infection episodes for which antibiotics were prescribed were identified: 284 in period I and 240 in period II. Antibiotic prescription rates before VAT introduction were 73 per 100 py in period I and decreased to 68 in period II (IRR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.1). Of all prescriptions, 23.9% were assessed as appropriate during period I, which increased to 40.4% in period II (P < .001). Appropriate antibiotic use increased after VAT introduction for RTI (12.5% to 48.2%, P < .001) and SSTI (47.5% to 74.3%, P = .02) but remained similar for UTI (23.5% to 28.8%, P = .29). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: After implementation of VAT in LTCFs, appropriate antibiotic use increased significantly overall, and for RTI and SSTI particularly. Improving prescribing behavior regarding UTI might need extra strategies.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Telemedicina , Infecciones Urinarias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico
10.
Ann Intensive Care ; 6(1): 85, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27589986

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a frequently occurring syndrome in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or medium care unit (MCU), yet the pathophysiology remains poorly understood. An excess of central serotonin can lead to an altered mental status, associated with autonomic hyperactivity, and neuromuscular excitation. Drugs with serotonergic properties are frequently and for prolonged periods administered to ICU/MCU patients. Therefore, central serotonergic toxicity may constitute a predisposing, contributing or precipitating factor in the emergence of delirium. The purpose of the present study is to determine the number of patients admitted to the ICU or MCU who are diagnosed with delirium and who show characteristics of serotonin toxicity in association with the administration of serotonergic drugs. METHODS: During a 10-week prospective observational cohort study in the ICU and MCU, patients aged 18 or older, diagnosed with delirium in the ICU or MCU, were included. Patients were considered as delirious in case of a positive CAM-ICU and/or at the start of haloperidol prescription on suspicion of delirium. Once included, patients were screened for recent administered serotonergic drugs and screened for physical signs associated with serotonin toxicity by a standardized physical examination by a specifically trained physician. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients diagnosed with delirium were enrolled. In 44 out of 61 patients (72 %), the use of drugs potentially contributing to serotonergic toxicity was recorded. Out of 44 patients, seven (16 %) patients showed physical signs of serotonin toxicity and in addition met the Hunter serotonin toxicity criteria, suggesting the presence of serotonergic toxicity. None of these patients were recognized as such by the treating physicians. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of delirious patients in the ICU might in fact be classified as suffering from central serotonin toxicity. The awareness of potential serotonin toxicity is low among physicians.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...