RESUMEN
Radiotherapy (RT) is a standard treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is indicated for patients with locally advanced disease. Toxicities during treatment are common and can lead to early cessation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) interruptions, which can affect oncologic outcomes. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is a new biomarker to predict toxicities and overall survival. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of studies towards the associations between SMM and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and/or RT interruptions in HNC patients. A systematic literature search was conducted and yielded 270 studies. Inclusion criteria were articles published in English that investigated the effect of low SMM measured in humans with HNC on toxicities during CRT or RT. Studies that did not investigate oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx, nasopharynx cancers or carcinoma of unknown primary were excluded. This led to the inclusion of 22 original studies. The prevalence of low SMM ranged from 19.7 % to 74.7 %. SMM was often assessed by measuring the cross-sectional muscle area at the level of the third cervical vertebra on computed tomography scans. Cut-off values used to categorize patients in SMM groups varied. In the meta-analyses heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 68 % and 50 % respectively). Patients with low SMM had higher, but only borderline significant, odds of DLT during CRT (OR 1.60; 95 % CI 1.00-2.58; p = 0.0512) and RT interruptions (OR 1.89; 95 % CI 1.00-3.57; p = 0.0510) compared to patients without low SMM. To conclude, in HNC patients low SMM, defined with different methods and cut-off values, is associated with DLT and RT interruptions during (C)RT, although the difference is only borderline statistically significant.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Músculo Esquelético , Humanos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de la radiación , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although adjuvant systemic therapy (AST) helps increase breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), there is a growing concern for overtreatment. By estimating the expected BCSS of AST using PREDICT, this study aims to quantify the number of patients treated with AST without benefit to provide estimates of overtreatment. METHODS: Data of all non-metastatic unilateral breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2015 were retrieved from cancer registries from The Netherlands and the USA. The PREDICT tool was used to estimate AST survival benefit. Overtreatment was defined as the proportion of patients that would have survived regardless of or died despite AST within 10 years. Three scenarios were evaluated: actual treatment, and recommendations by the Dutch or USA guidelines. RESULTS: 59.5% of Dutch patients were treated with AST. 6.4% (interquartile interval [IQI] = 2.5, 8.2%) was expected to survive at least 10 years due to AST, leaving 93.6% (IQI = 91.8, 97.5%) without AST benefit (overtreatment). The lowest expected amount of overtreatment was in the targeted and chemotherapy subgroup, with 86.5% (IQI = 83.4, 89.6%) overtreatment, and highest in the only endocrine treatment subgroup, with 96.7% (IQI = 96.0, 98.1%) overtreatment. Similar results were obtained using data from the USA, and guideline recommendations. CONCLUSION: Based on PREDICT, AST prevents 10-year breast cancer death in 6.4% of the patients treated with AST. Consequently, AST yields no survival benefit to many treated patients. Especially improved personalization of endocrine therapy is relevant, as this therapy is widely used and is associated with the highest amount of overtreatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , SobretratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identifying patients with sentinel node (SN)-negative melanoma who are at greatest risk of recurrence is important. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Melanoma Group proposed a prognostic model that has not been validated in population-based data. The EORTC nomogram includes Breslow thickness, ulceration status and anatomical location as parameters. The aim of this study was to validate the EORTC model externally using a large national data set. METHODS: Adults with histologically proven, invasive cutaneous melanoma with a negative SN biopsy in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2014 were identified from the Dutch Pathology Registry, and relevant data were extracted. The EORTC nomogram was used to predict recurrence-free survival. The predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed by discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration. RESULTS: A total of 8795 patients met the eligibility criteria, of whom 14·7 per cent subsequently developed metastatic disease. Of these recurrences, 20·9 per cent occurred after the first 5 years of follow-up. Validation of the EORTC nomogram showed a C-statistic of 0·70 (95 per cent c.i. 0·68 to 0·71) for recurrence-free survival, with excellent calibration (R2 = 0·99; P = 0·999, Hosmer-Lemeshow test). CONCLUSION: This population-based validation confirmed the value of the EORTC nomogram in predicting recurrence-free survival in patients with SN-negative melanoma. The EORTC nomogram could be used in clinical practice for personalizing follow-up and selecting high-risk patients for trials of adjuvant systemic therapy.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A nomogram to predict sentinel node (SN) positivity [the Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) nomogram] was recently developed and externally validated using two large single-institution databases. However, there remains a need to further validate the nomogram's performance using population-based data. OBJECTIVES: To perform further validation of the nomogram using a European national patient cohort. METHODS: Patients with cutaneous melanoma who underwent SN biopsy in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2014 were included. Their data were obtained from the Dutch Pathology Registry. The predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed by discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration. Negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated at various predicted probability cutoffs. RESULTS: Of the 3049 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 23% (691) were SN positive. Validation of the MIA nomogram (including the parameters Breslow thickness, ulceration, age, melanoma subtype and lymphovascular invasion) showed a good C-statistic of 0·69 (95% confidence interval 0·66-0·71) with excellent calibration (R2 = 0·985, P = 0·40). The NPV of 90·1%, found at a 10% predicted probability cutoff for having a positive SN biopsy, implied that by using the nomogram, a 16·3% reduction in the rate of performing an SN biopsy could be achieved with an error rate of 1·6%. Validation of the MIA nomogram considering mitotic rate as present or absent showed a C-statistic of 0·70 (95% confidence interval 0·68-0·74). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based validation study in European patients with melanoma confirmed the value of the MIA nomogram in predicting SN positivity. Its use will spare low-risk patients the inconvenience, cost and potential risks of SN biopsy while ensuring that high-risk patients are still identified.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Australia , Humanos , Melanoma/cirugía , Nomogramas , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It has been claimed, without supporting evidence, that knowledge of sentinel node (SN) status does not provide more accurate prognostic information than basic clinicopathological features of a primary cutaneous melanoma. We sought to investigate this claim and to quantify any additional value of SN status in predicting survival outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for a Dutch population-based cohort of melanoma patients (n = 9272) and for a validation cohort from a large Australian melanoma treatment center (n = 5644) were analyzed. Patients were adults diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 with histologically-proven, primary invasive cutaneous melanoma who underwent SN biopsy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were carried out in the Dutch cohort to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and overall survival (OS). The findings were validated using the Australian cohort. Discrimination (Harrell's C-statistic), net benefit using decision curve analysis and net reclassification index (NRI) were calculated. RESULTS: The Dutch cohort showed an improved C-statistic from 0.74 to 0.78 for OS and from 0.74 to 0.76 for RFS when SN status was included in the model with Breslow thickness, sex, age, site, mitoses, ulceration, regression and melanoma subtype. In the Australian cohort, the C-statistic increased from 0.70 to 0.73 for OS, 0.70 to 0.74 for RFS and 0.72 to 0.76 for MSS. Decision curve analyses showed that the 3-year and 5-year risk of death or recurrence were more accurately classified with a model that included SN status. At 3 years, sensitivity increased by 12% for both OS and RFS in the development cohort, and by 10% and 6% for OS and RFS, respectively, in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of SN status significantly improved the predictive accuracy for RFS, MSS and OS when added to a comprehensive suite of established clinicopathological prognostic factors. However, clinicians and patients must consider the magnitude of the improvement when weighing up the advantages and disadvantages of SN biopsy for melanoma.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction in women treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer and to determine the association between dissatisfaction and quality of life (QoL) and depression. METHODS: Within the prospective UMBRELLA breast cancer cohort, all patients ≥ 1 year after breast conserving treatment or mastectomy with immediate reconstruction were selected. Self-reported cosmetic satisfaction was measured on a 5-point Likert scale. QoL, social functioning, and emotional functioning were measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 at 1, 2, and 3 years after inclusion. Mixed model analysis was performed to assess the difference in different domains of QoL between patients with good versus poor self-reported cosmetic satisfaction over time after adjustment for potential confounders. Depression scores were collected by means of the HADS-NL questionnaire. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to assess the difference in proportions of HADS score ≥ 8, indicating increased depression risk, between satisfied and dissatisfied patients. RESULTS: 808 patients were selected for analysis. Respectively one, two, and three years after surgery, 8% (63/808), 7% (45/626), and 8% (31/409) of patients were dissatisfied with their cosmetic outcome. Poor patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction was independently associated with impaired QoL, body image, and lower emotional and social functioning. Scores ≥ 8 on the HADS depression subscale were significantly more common in dissatisfied patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dissatisfaction with cosmetic outcome was low after breast cancer surgery followed by radiation therapy during 3 years follow-up. Knowing the association between dissatisfaction with cosmetic outcome and QoL and depression could help to improve the preoperative counseling of breast cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Imagen Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Satisfacción Personal , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Schizophrenia entails a considerable humanistic and economic burden. Improved treatment continuity to antipsychotic therapy is paramount to reduce the risk of relapse. The novel three-monthly paliperidone palmitate treatment (PP3M) offers the longest dosing interval currently available in France. This study assesses its cost-effectiveness, versus the currently available one-monthly long-acting treatment (PP1M) in French schizophrenic patients. METHODS: A Markov model with monthly cycles was developed and adapted. It encompassed [a] administration of PP3M or PP1M in first-line, [b] a period where the patient does not receive any active treatment, and [c] a follow-up treatment line consisting of a treatment mix reflecting French clinical practice. Relapse rates in first-line were based on a pivotal non-inferiority head-to-head trial, and treatment discontinuation rates were based on French real-world data. Accounting for differences in drug exposure, time-dependent monthly relapse rates were applied following discontinuation to first line. The impact of a less frequent injection schedule for PP3M in QoL was accounted for through the application of a utility differential. The collective perspective was adopted throughout a 5-year time horizon. Four percent discount rates were applied on costs and outcomes. RESULTS: PP3M was dominant when compared to PP1M, featuring an incremental QALY of 0.123 and a cost saving effect (-669) resulting from reduced therapy costs (drug acquisition, administration and monitoring) and relapse-related costs. Sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the results. CONCLUSION: With slightly better QALY outcomes and a cost-saving effect when compared to PP1M, introducing PP3M is an improvement to the current treatment in France.
Asunto(s)
Palmitato de Paliperidona/administración & dosificación , Palmitato de Paliperidona/economía , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/economía , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/economía , Esquema de Medicación , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Palmitato de Paliperidona/efectos adversos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/patologíaRESUMEN
Background: Physical activity has been shown to reduce side-effects of breast cancer and its treatment. As physical activity levels of patients with breast cancer are largely unknown, we investigated these levels and compared them to women from the general population. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, physical activity levels of women with breast cancer participating in the UMBRELLA cohort were assessed at radiotherapy intake and thereafter every 6 months up to 3 years with the SQUASH questionnaire, which was also used in a random sample of the Dutch population. We compared physical activity levels (no activity, low, moderate or high levels of sports, leisure time or total activity) between patients and the Dutch female population using multinomial logistic regression. Standardized Prevalence Ratios (SPR) were calculated to compare adherence to Dutch physical activity guidelines. Results: Women with breast cancer (nbaseline = 1655, n6 months = 1414, n12 months = 1186, n18 months = 957, n24 months = 744, n30 months = 555, and n36 months = 377) were less likely to spend time in physical activity compared to the general population (n = 11,710) until 3 years post-diagnosis, especially after 6 months (ORhigh-vs.-no activity = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28-0.41). From 12 months onwards, patients were more likely to perform sports compared to the general population, especially patients who underwent systemic therapy. Guideline adherence was significantly lower in patients at baseline and 6 months (SPRbaseline = 89, 95% CI: 82-97; SPR6 months = 88, 95% CI: 81-96), and comparable to the general population at 12-36 months, especially in older women. Conclusions: Physical activity levels in women with breast cancer during and after treatment were lower compared to the Dutch female population. Three years post-treatment, they were still less physically active, although they spend more time in sport activities. As about half of the patients did not perform any sports, physical activity needs to be stimulated during and after treatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Ejercicio Físico , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el PacienteRESUMEN
AIM: To determine the willingness of women with extremely dense breasts to undergo breast cancer screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a research setting, and to examine reasons for women to participate or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2015, 8,061 women (50-75 years) were invited for supplemental MRI as part of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening (DENSE) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01315015), after a negative screening mammography in the national population-based mammography screening programme. Demographics of participants and non-participants were compared. All invitees were asked to report reasons for (non)participation. Ethical approval was obtained. Participants provided written informed consent. RESULTS: Of the 8,061 invitees, 66% answered that they were interested, and 59% eventually participated. Participants were on average 54-years old (interquartile range: 51-59 years), comparable to women with extremely dense breasts in the population-based screening programme (55 years). Women with higher socio-economic status (SES) were more often interested in participation than women with lower SES (68% versus 59%, p<0.001). The most frequently stated reasons for non-participation were "MRI-related inconveniences and/or self-reported contraindications to MRI" (27%) and "anxiety regarding the result of supplemental screening" (21%). "Expected personal health benefit" (68%) and "contribution to science" (43%) were the most frequent reasons for participation. CONCLUSION: Of women invited for MRI because of extremely dense breasts, 59% participated. Common reasons for non-participation were "MRI-related inconveniences" and "anxiety regarding the result of supplemental screening". In case of future implementation, availability of precise evidence on benefits and harms might reduce this anxiety.
Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Cooperación del Paciente , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with an excellent prognosis; historical studies have shown similar levels of psychological distress in patients with DCIS and with early-stage invasive breast cancer (early-IBC). It is suggested that these results might have led to better patient education about prognosis after DCIS. This study reports the current levels of anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in DCIS and early-IBC patients. METHODS: DCIS (n = 89) and early-IBC patients, T1-2N0, (n = 361) were selected from the UMBRELLA breast cancer cohort. Patient-reported outcomes were prospectively collected before the start of adjuvant radiotherapy (baseline) and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months thereafter. Mixed models were used to compare differences in levels of anxiety, depression, and HRQoL between DCIS and early-IBC patients. RESULTS: DCIS and early-IBC patients reported similar levels of anxiety, which were highest at baseline. Depression scores were comparable between groups, also after stratification by use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The proportion of patients reporting high-risk depression scores (i.e., Hospital Anxiety and Depression Sale score >8) was significantly higher among patients with DCIS at 6, 12 and 18 months, and this proportion increased over the first 18 months. Health-related quality of life was comparable between both groups. CONCLUSION: Severe depression scores are more common in DCIS patients, despite their excellent prognosis. These results suggest that further improvement of patient education and effective patient doctor communication about the prognostic differences between patients with DCIS and invasive breast cancer is still highly needed.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad/complicaciones , Ansiedad/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/complicaciones , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Depresión/complicaciones , Depresión/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intakes of specific fatty acids have been postulated to impact breast cancer risk but epidemiological data based on dietary questionnaires remain conflicting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the association between plasma phospholipid fatty acids and breast cancer risk in a case-control study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Sixty fatty acids were measured by gas chromatography in pre-diagnostic plasma phospholipids from 2982 incident breast cancer cases matched to 2982 controls. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate relative risk of breast cancer by fatty acid level. The false discovery rate (q values) was computed to control for multiple comparisons. Subgroup analyses were carried out by estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor expression in the tumours. RESULTS: A high level of palmitoleic acid [odds ratio (OR) for the highest quartile compared with the lowest OR (Q4-Q1) 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-1.64; P for trend = 0.0001, q value = 0.004] as well as a high desaturation index (DI16) (16:1n-7/16:0) [OR (Q4-Q1), 1.28; 95% C, 1.07-1.54; P for trend = 0.002, q value = 0.037], as biomarkers of de novo lipogenesis, were significantly associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Levels of industrial trans-fatty acids were positively associated with ER-negative tumours [OR for the highest tertile compared with the lowest (T3-T1)=2.01; 95% CI, 1.03-3.90; P for trend = 0.047], whereas no association was found for ER-positive tumours (P-heterogeneity =0.01). No significant association was found between n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and breast cancer risk, overall or by hormonal receptor. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that increased de novo lipogenesis, acting through increased synthesis of palmitoleic acid, could be a relevant metabolic pathway for breast tumourigenesis. Dietary trans-fatty acids derived from industrial processes may specifically increase ER-negative breast cancer risk.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Dieta , Ácidos Grasos/sangre , Fosfolípidos/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess whether socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnicity affect adjuvant systemic therapy (AST) guideline adherence in early breast cancer patients in a health care setting with assumed equal access to care. METHODS: Data from all female patients surgically treated for primary unifocal early breast cancer between January 2005 and December 2014 were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. We assessed the association between SES, ethnicity and non-adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy (ET) guideline indications with Poisson regression models, adjusting for clinicopathological variables. RESULTS: A total of 104 201 patients were included in the current analysis. Of patients without an indication, 4% and 13% received adjuvant CT or ET (overtreatment), whereas 39% and 14% of patients with an indication did not receive CT or ET (undertreatment). Medium and low SES patients were 1.01 (95% CI 1.00-1.01) and 1.01 (95% CI 1.00-1.01) times more likely to be undertreated and 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.94) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.60-0.75) times more likely to be overtreated with CT compared with high SES patients [resulting in an overall relative risk of CT use of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.83-0.87), respectively]. No association between SES and ET guideline adherence or ethnicity and CT/ET guideline adherence was observed. CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, minimal SES disparities in CT guideline adherence were observed: low SES patients are less likely be overtreated and marginally more likely to be undertreated with CT resulting in an overall decreased risk of receiving CT. No ethnical disparities in AST guideline adherence were observed.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Etnicidad , Adhesión a Directriz , Clase Social , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países BajosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In oncology, RCTs are often beset by slow recruitment, limited generalizability, and strong preferences for interventions by patients and physicians. The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) is an innovative design with the potential to overcome those challenges. In cmRCT, a prospective cohort serves as an infrastructure for multiple RCTs. We implemented cmRCT in a clinical breast cancer setting by creating UMBRELLA-a large prospective cohort of breast cancer and DCIS patients/survivors. METHODS: For all participants, clinical data and patient-reported outcomes (PROs, i.e., quality of life, fatigue, anxiety and depression, physical activity, work ability, and cosmetic satisfaction) are being collected at regular time-intervals for a period of 10 years. These data are being used both for observational and randomized studies. For each intervention to be tested against standard care, a subcohort of eligible patients is identified within UMBRELLA. From this subcohort, a random sample of patients is offered the intervention. Their outcomes are compared to the outcomes of patients receiving standard care. RESULTS: So far, between October 2013 and July 2016, we have recruited 1308 participants. In this period, 1308/1486 (88%) patients who were invited for participation in UMBRELLA consented to cohort participation. Of these patients, 1138 (87%) gave broad consent for randomization to future interventions. Return rate for PROs at baseline were 80%, and varied from 67 to 74% during follow-up. Several observational studies-and the first randomized intervention study-are currently ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Results from UMBRELLA show that this novel study design is feasible and acceptable to patients in a clinical breast cancer setting. We invite researchers who are interested in conducting randomized or observational studies within the UMBRELLA cohort to contact the UMBRELLA scientific advisory board.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A shift towards less burdening and more patient friendly treatments for breast cancer is currently ongoing. In low-risk patients with early-stage disease, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative for whole breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery. MRI-guided single dose ablative APBI has the potential to offer a minimally burdening, non-invasive treatment that could replace current breast-conserving therapy. METHODS: The ABLATIVE study is a prospective, single arm, multicenter study evaluating preoperative, single dose, ablative radiation treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Patients with core biopsy proven non-lobular invasive breast cancer, (estrogen receptor positive, Her2 negative, maximum tumor size 3.0 cm on diagnostic MRI) and a negative sentinel node biopsy are eligible. Radiotherapy (RT) planning will be performed using a contrast enhanced (CE) planning CT-scan, co-registered with a CE-MRI, both in supine RT position. A total of twenty-five consecutive patients will be treated with a single ablative RT dose of 20 Gy to the tumor and 15 Gy to the tumorbed. Follow-up MRIs are scheduled within 1 week, 2, 4 and 6 months after single-dose RT. Breast-conserving surgery is scheduled at six months following RT. Primary study endpoint is pathological complete response. Secondary study endpoints are the radiological response and toxicity. Furthermore, patients will fill out questionnaires on quality of life and functional status. Cosmetic outcome will be evaluated by the treating radiation oncologist, patient and 'Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment cosmetic results' software. Recurrence and survival rates will be assessed. The patients will be followed up to 10 years after diagnosis. If patients give additional informed consent, a biopsy and a part of the irradiated specimen will be stored at the local Biobank and used for future research on radiotherapy response associated genotyping. DISCUSSION: The ABLATIVE study evaluates MRI-guided single dose ablative RT in patients with early-stage breast cancer, aiming at a less burdening and non-invasive alternative for current breast-conserving treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02316561 . The trial was registrated prospectively on October 10th 2014.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Epidemiological studies have reported inconsistent findings for the association between B vitamins and breast cancer (BC) risk. We investigated the relationship between biomarkers of folate and vitamin B12 and the risk of BC in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Plasma concentrations of folate and vitamin B12 were determined in 2,491 BC cases individually matched to 2,521 controls among women who provided baseline blood samples. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios by quartiles of either plasma B vitamin. Subgroup analyses by menopausal status, hormone receptor status of breast tumors (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR] and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]), alcohol intake and MTHFR polymorphisms (677C > T and 1298A > C) were also performed. Plasma levels of folate and vitamin B12 were not significantly associated with the overall risk of BC or by hormone receptor status. A marginally positive association was found between vitamin B12 status and BC risk in women consuming above the median level of alcohol (ORQ4-Q1 = 1.26; 95% CI 1.00-1.58; Ptrend = 0.05). Vitamin B12 status was also positively associated with BC risk in women with plasma folate levels below the median value (ORQ4-Q1 = 1.29; 95% CI 1.02-1.62; Ptrend = 0.03). Overall, folate and vitamin B12 status was not clearly associated with BC risk in this prospective cohort study. However, potential interactions between vitamin B12 and alcohol or folate on the risk of BC deserve further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Deficiencia de Ácido Fólico/epidemiología , Ácido Fólico/sangre , Metilenotetrahidrofolato Reductasa (NADPH2)/genética , Deficiencia de Vitamina B 12/epidemiología , Vitamina B 12/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dieta , Estrógenos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Deficiencia de Ácido Fólico/sangre , Estudios de Seguimiento , Genes erbB-2 , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/sangre , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/epidemiología , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Progesterona , Factores de Riesgo , Deficiencia de Vitamina B 12/sangreRESUMEN
Over recent years, adjuvant systemic treatment guidelines (AST) for early-stage breast cancer have changed considerably. We aimed to assess the impact of these guideline changes on the administration of AST in early-stage breast cancer patients and to what extent these guidelines are adhered to at a nation-wide level. We used Netherlands Cancer Registry data to describe trends in AST prescription, adherence to AST guidelines, and to identify clinicopathological determinants of nonadherence. Between 1990 and 2012, 231,648 Dutch patients were diagnosed with early breast cancer, of whom 124,472 received AST. Adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) use increased from 23 % of patients (1990) to 56 % (2012), and chemotherapy from 11 to 44 %. In 2009-2012, 8 % of patients received ET and 3 % received chemotherapy without guideline indication. Conversely, 10-29 % of patients did not receive ET and chemotherapy, respectively, despite a guideline indication. Unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics generally decreased the chance of undertreatment and increased the chance for overtreatment. Remarkable was the increased chance of ET undertreatment in younger women (RR < 35 vs 60-69 years 1.79; 95 % CI 1.30-2.47) and in women with HER2+ disease (RR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.46-1.85). Over the years, AST guidelines expanded resulting in much more Dutch early breast cancer patients receiving AST. In the majority of cases, AST administration was guideline concordant, but the high frequency of chemotherapy undertreatment in some subgroups suggests limited AST guideline support in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Adhesión a Directriz , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Países Bajos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Radioiodine therapy using I-131 is widely used for treatment of thyroid disease or neuroendocrine tumors. Monitoring treatment by accurate dosimetry requires quantitative imaging. The high energy photons however render quantitative SPECT reconstruction challenging, potentially requiring accurate correction for scatter and collimator effects. The goal of this work is to assess the effectiveness of various correction methods on these effects using phantom studies. A SPECT/CT acquisition of the NEMA IEC body phantom was performed. Images were reconstructed using the following parameters: (1) without scatter correction, (2) with triple energy window (TEW) scatter correction and (3) with Monte Carlo-based scatter correction. For modelling the collimator-detector response (CDR), both (a) geometric Gaussian CDRs as well as (b) Monte Carlo simulated CDRs were compared. Quantitative accuracy, contrast to noise ratios and recovery coefficients were calculated, as well as the background variability and the residual count error in the lung insert. The Monte Carlo scatter corrected reconstruction method was shown to be intrinsically quantitative, requiring no experimentally acquired calibration factor. It resulted in a more accurate quantification of the background compartment activity density compared with TEW or no scatter correction. The quantification error relative to a dose calibrator derived measurement was found to be <1%,-26% and 33%, respectively. The adverse effects of partial volume were significantly smaller with the Monte Carlo simulated CDR correction compared with geometric Gaussian or no CDR modelling. Scatter correction showed a small effect on quantification of small volumes. When using a weighting factor, TEW correction was comparable to Monte Carlo reconstruction in all measured parameters, although this approach is clinically impractical since this factor may be patient dependent. Monte Carlo based scatter correction including accurately simulated CDR modelling is the most robust and reliable method to reconstruct accurate quantitative iodine-131 SPECT images.
Asunto(s)
Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Radioisótopos de Yodo , Fantasmas de Imagen , Radiometría/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/métodos , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Dispersión de RadiaciónRESUMEN
We obtained costs and mortality data in two retrospective cohorts totaling 159 patients who have diabetes mellitus and onset of a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Data were collected from 2005 to 2013, with a follow-up period through September 30, 2014. A total of 106 patients entered an evidence-based limb salvage protocol (LSP) for Wagner Grade 3 or 4 (WG3/4) DFU and intention-to-treat adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy. A second cohort of 53 patients had a primary lower extremity amputation (LEA), either below the knee (BKA) or above the knee (AKA) and were not part of the LSP. Ninety-six of 106 patients completed the LSP/HBO2with an average cost of USD $33,100. Eighty-eight of 96 patients (91.7%) who completed the LSP/HBO2had intact lower extremities at one year. Thirty-four of the 96 patients (35.4%) died during the follow-up period. Costs for a historical cohort of 53 patients having a primary major LEA range from USD $66,300 to USD $73,000. Twenty-five of the 53 patients (47.2%) died. The difference in cost of care and mortality between an LSP with adjunctive HBO2therapy vs. primary LEA is staggering. We conclude that an aggressive limb salvage program that includes HBO2 therapy is cost-effective.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/economía , Amputación Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Pie Diabético , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/economía , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/mortalidad , Recuperación del Miembro/economía , Recuperación del Miembro/mortalidad , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Pie Diabético/clasificación , Pie Diabético/economía , Pie Diabético/mortalidad , Pie Diabético/terapia , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , UtahRESUMEN
Since the generalisability of trial-based economic evaluations may be limited, there is an increasing focus on real-world cost-effectiveness. Real-world studies involve evaluating the effects and costs of treatments in daily clinical practice. This study reports on the real-world resource use and costs of adjuvant treatments of stage III colon cancer in a population-based observational study. Analyses were based on a detailed retrospective medical chart review which was conducted for 206 patients with colon cancer treated in 2005 and 2006 in the Netherlands. Mean total costs per patient were 9681 for 5-FU/LV, 9736 for capecitabine, 32,793 for FOLFOX and 18,361 for CAPOX. Drug costs and the costs related to hospitalisations for chemotherapy administration were the main cost drivers. We identified a potential for substantial cost-savings when the 48 h administration of 5FU/LV in the FOLFOX regimen were to take place in an outpatient setting or be replaced by oral capecitabine as in the CAPOX regimen. This analysis based on detailed real-life data clearly indicates that clinical choices made in oncology based on efficacy of therapy have economic consequences. Considering today's reality of finite healthcare resources, these economic consequences deserve a formal role in clinical decision making, for instance in guideline development.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/economía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/economía , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Neoplasias del Colon/economía , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Clinical trial EMR 62202-006 demonstrates prolonged median locoregional control (24.4 vs. 14.9 months), progression-free survival (17.1 vs. 12.4 months) and overall survival (49.0 vs. 29.3 months) for patients who receive cetuximab added to the comparator radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). In the Netherlands, hospitals receive reimbursement for cetuximab conditional on cost-effectiveness in daily practice. To estimate the real-world incremental cost per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for radiotherapy + cetuximab over radiotherapy alone in first line treatment of LA SCCHN, a Markov model is constructed with health states "alive without progression", "alive following progression" and "death". Transition probabilities per month are estimated from clinical trial data and retrospectively collected real-world data from two Dutch head and neck cancer treatment centres (2007-2010, n = 141). 5-year, 10-year and lifetime horizons are used, without and with discounting (4 % costs, 1.5 % effects) to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Two scenarios explore different assumptions on prognosis of real-world versus trial patients. Adding cetuximab to radiotherapy results in increased costs and health gains in both scenarios and across each of the time horizons. Incremental costs per QALY gained range between