The multicenter effectiveness study of inpatient and day hospital treatment in departments of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy in Germany.

Background: Reliable outcome data of psychosomatic inpatient and day hospital treatment with a focus on psychotherapy are important to strengthen ecological validity by assessing the reality of mental health care in the field. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of inpatient and day hospital treatment in German university departments of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy in a prospective, naturalistic, multicenter design including structured assessments. Methods: Structured interviews were used to diagnose mental disorders according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV at baseline. Depression, anxiety, somatization, eating disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, as well as personality functioning were assessed by means of questionnaires on admission and at discharge. Results: 2,094 patients recruited by 19 participating university hospitals consented to participation in the study. Effect sizes for each of the outcome criteria were calculated for 4-5 sub-groups per outcome domain with differing severity at baseline. Pre-post effect sizes for patients with moderate and high symptom severity at baseline ranged from d = 0.78 to d = 3.61 with symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety showing the largest and somatization as well as personality functioning showing somewhat smaller effects. Conclusions: Inpatient and day hospital treatment in German university departments of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy is effective under field conditions. Clinical trial registration: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00016412, identifier: DRKS00016412.

What Kind of Patients Receive Inpatient and Day-Hospital Treatment in Departments of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy in Germany?

INTRODUCTION: Germany is one of the few countries with a medical specialty of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy and many treatment resources of this kind. OBJECTIVE: This observational study describes the psychosomatic treatment programs as well as a large sample of day-hospital and inpatients in great detail using structured diagnostic interviews. METHODS: Mental disorders were diagnosed according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV by means of Mini-DIPS and SCID-II. In addition to the case records, a modified version of the CSSRI was employed to collect demographic data and service use. The PHQ-D was used to assess depression, anxiety, and somatization. RESULTS: 2,094 patients from 19 departments participated in the study after giving informed consent. The sample consisted of a high proportion of "complex patients" with high comorbidity of mental and somatic diseases, severe psychopathology, and considerable social and occupational dysfunction including more than 50 days of sick leave per year in half of the sample. The most frequent diagnoses were depression, somatoform and anxiety disorders, eating disorders, personality disorders, and somato-psychic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient and day-hospital treatment in German university departments of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy is an intensive multimodal treatment for complex patients with high comorbidity and social as well as occupational dysfunction.

[On the notion of trust in psychotherapy - epistemic and evaluative aspects]. / Vertrauen in der Psychotherapie ­ epistemische und evaluative Aspekte.

On the notion of trust in psychotherapy - epistemic and evaluative aspects Objectives: One of the most consistent findings in the psychotherapy research literature is that the quality of the relationship between the patient and the therapist is a major determinant of psychotherapeutic effectiveness. Yet so far a consistent and assured definition of a helping alliance doesn't exist. Recently P. Fonagy and his research group have introduced the notion of "epistemic trust" to open up a new understanding of the effectiveness of the therapeutic relationship. Methods: The paper outlines Fonagy's et al. notion of "epistemic trust" and compares it to notions of trust devised in the humanities and social sciences from a clinical-psychodynamic perspective. Results: Fonagy et al. characterize epistemic trust as "trust in the authenticity and personal relevance of interpersonally transmitted information". Thus it enables an individual to safely learn from others and to orient himself within a primarily unknown and an ever changing social world. By contrast the humanities and social sciences offer a more comprehensive perspective insofar as trust is described as both an affective, cognitive and volitive phenomenon embedded within a specific ethical topography (evaluative trust). Conclusions: Taking trust's multidimensionality into account results in a slightly different clinical understanding of confidence building within psychotherapy and postulates a primacy of recognition over cognition in clinical encounter as well.

[The risk of medical comorbidity in mental disorders with a particular focus on depressive syndromes]. / Somatisches Krankheitsrisiko bei psychischen Erkrankungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung depressiver Syndrome.

The risk of medical comorbidity in mental disorders with a particular focus on depressive syndromes Objectives: It has long been recognized that certain mental disorders, and in particular depressive syndromes, are associated with increased medical comorbidity. However, reliable data on the prevalence of comorbid medical diagnoses as well as the impact of these comorbidities on mortality are often rare and sometimes conflicting. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to provide a critical account of the current state of research on the comorbidities of medical and mental disorders, with a particular focus on depressive syndromes. Results: Among patients with mental disorders, all-cause mortality is about doubled as compared to the general population causing a significantly shortened life expectancy in the range of one to two decades. This excess mortality is primarily due to increased physical morbidity and mortality, and it cannot be excluded that, for patients with severe mental disorders, excess mortality has been increased over time. Depressive syndromes are often linked to a broad range of somatic symptoms and can be found in diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes mellitus, overweight/obesity, and asthma. Conclusion: Current studies provide ample evidence of close interactions between physical and mental health. Further developments in the field of psychosomatic medicine should take into consideration the health-related consequences of these interactions.

Emotions, Bodily Changes, and the Social Environment: How Did Early Psychosomatic Medicine Consider the Social Dimension in Health and Disease?

OBJECTIVE: Social relationships play an important role in human health and disease processes, and the field of psychosomatic medicine currently integrates social factors in its theoretical models and clinical interventions. This article provides a historical perspective on the field of psychosomatic medicine in the United States and examines the extent to which early American psychosomatic medicine incorporated the impact of social relationships on health and disease outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed across all issues of Psychosomatic Medicine for key words related to emotions versus social processes. Article counts are compared for these key words. We then performed a narrative review to analyze how concepts of associations among emotional, interpersonal, and physiological variables evolved in early publications. RESULTS: Of 5023 articles found in Psychosomatic Medicine, 1453 contained an emotional, 936 a social search term, and 447 contained both. In the qualitative review, influences of the social environment on emotional states and physiology were recognized already in the 1930s but they only played a subordinate role in early Psychosomatic Medicine. Publications often lacked a clear working model how interpersonal events exert their impact on physiology. With increasing understanding of developmental and neural mechanisms, a more differentiated view evolved. CONCLUSIONS: Early publications in psychosomatic medicine mainly focused on associations between emotions and physiology. However, some highlighted the importance of interpersonal and social factors. Later, the understanding of emotions, social relationships, and physiology with their developmental and neurobiological correlates have led to a fuller "biopsychosociocultural" understanding of health and disease, although more research on and within these networks is urgently needed.