High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T for diagnosis of NSTEMI in the elderly emergency department patient: a clinical cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of age on the diagnostic performance of high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) under routine conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 4118 consecutive emergency department (ED) patients who underwent a routine TnT measurement between 11 October 2012 and 30 November 2013 were analysed. Diagnostic accuracy of hsTnT was compared in four age categories (<50, 50-64, 65-74, ≥75 years of age) for different cut-off values. Primary endpoint was a main hospital diagnosis of NSTEMI. RESULTS: The median age of the study population (n = 4118) was 61 years (IQR: 45-75 years). NSTEMI was diagnosed in 3.3% (n = 136) of all patients. There were significant differences in hsTnT concentrations between age-groups (p < 0.001) in all patients, but not in NSTEMI patients (p = 0.297). 72.2% of all patients ≥75 years of age (583/808) without NSTEMI had hsTnT concentrations above the 99th percentile of a healthy reference population. Specificity at 14 ng/L was 93.6% (95% CI: 92.12-94.87) in patients below 50 years of age and 27.9% (95% CI: 24.78-31.08) in patients 75 years of age and older. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' age needs to be considered at least one influencing factor on hsTnT concentrations at admission and should be included in the clinical interpretation of hsTnT concentrations for further clinical workup beneath other influencing factors like comorbidities and symptom onset time. The implementation of age-specific cut-off values could be considered for single troponin testing at admission but is associated with an increased risk of underdiagnosis of NSTEMI.

Diagnostic performance of a high-sensitive troponin T assay and a troponin T point of care assay in the clinical routine of an Emergency Department: A clinical cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A point of care test (POCT) for troponin T (TnT) in the Emergency Department (ED) was compared to a high-sensitivity TnT (hsTnT) central laboratory test (CLT) to determine the influence of test system and different cut-off values on the diagnostic performance in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) under routine conditions. METHODS: All patients with routine TnT testing in the ED were enrolled. Only internal medicine patients without STEMI and with both troponin values were analyzed. TnT was measured with a contemporary sensitive POCT assay in the ED and with a hs-assay in the central laboratory. The diagnostic performance was analyzed at two different cut-off points (99th percentile and conventional rule-in cut-offs). Primary endpoint was the diagnosis of NSTEMI. RESULTS: Of all patients (n=3423), 3.6% had a diagnosis of NSTEMI (n=124). For the hsTnT assay, 28.4% of all values were at or below the lower limit of detection (LOD) as compared to 75.7% of the POC-TnT-values. The area under the receiver operating curves did not differ significantly between the assays (hsTnT: 0.912(95%-CI: 0.884-0.940); POC-TnT: 0.896(95%-CI: 0.859-0.933)). The diagnostic performance was very similar for both assays: the positive predictive value was below 50% for troponin values below 100ng/L and hardly increased for values between 100 and 600ng/L for hs and conventional assays. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of emergency patients, the diagnostic performance of conventional POC-testing was comparable to hsTnT. A 99th percentile cut-off may be useful for rule-out of NSTEMI, but seems limited for routine rule-in strategies.

Copeptin: Limited Usefulness in Early Stroke Differentiation?

Background. Stroke can be a challenging diagnosis in an emergency-setting. We sought to determine whether copeptin may be a useful biomarker to differentiate between ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), and stroke-mimics. Methods. In patients with suspected stroke arriving within 4.5 hours of symptom-onset, copeptin-levels were measured in initial blood-samples. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by vascular neurologists blinded to copeptin-values. Results. Of all 36 patients with available copeptin-values (median age 71 years, IQR: 54-76; 44% female), 20 patients (56%) were diagnosed with IS, no patient was diagnosed with hemorrhagic stroke, nine patients (25%) were diagnosed with TIA, and seven patients (19%) were stroke-mimics. Copeptin-levels (in pmol/L) tended to be higher in patients with IS [19.1 (11.2-48.5)] compared to TIA [9.4 (5.4-13.8)]. In stroke-mimics the range of values was extremely broad [33.3 (7.57-255.7)]. The diagnostic accuracy of copeptin for IS was 63% with a sensitivity of 80% and a positive predictive value of 64%. Conclusion. In this cohort of patients copeptin-levels within 4.5 hours of symptom onset were higher in patients with IS compared to TIA but the broad range of values in stroke-mimics limits diagnostic accuracy. This trial is registered with UTN: U1111-1119-7602.

Sex differences of troponin test performance in chest pain patients.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend troponin as the preferred biomarker to diagnose acute myocardial infarction (AMI) irrespective of the patient's sex. Recent reports have shown that sex-specific cut-offs should be considered but studies investigating sex-differences in the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac troponins are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the diagnostic performance of cardiac troponin at admission (cTn) under routine conditions is influenced by patient's sex. METHODS: Between 15th of February 2009 and 15th of February 2010, women (n=1648) and men (n=2305) who presented to the emergency department with chest pain (n=3954) were enrolled. The diagnostic performance of the routine, contemporary sensitive cTn assays (TnI; Stratus® CS, Siemens and TnT; Roche Diagnostics) at baseline for the diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was analyzed. RESULTS: NSTEMI was diagnosed in 7.3% (n=287) of all patients. Men were more likely to be diagnosed with NSTEMI (8.8%; n=202) as compared to women (5.2%; n=85; p<0.001). Sensitivity was 56.1% (95% CI: 44.7-67.0%) in women and 70.1% (95% CI: 63.1-76.4%) in men. Specificity was 96.8% (95% CI: 95.6-97.7%) in women and 94.5% (95% CI: 93.3-95.6%) in men. This resulted in a lower positive predictive value (PPV) for women (53.5%; 95% CI: 42.4-64.3) as compared to men (60.8%; 95% CI: 54.1-67.2) and a slightly higher negative predictive value (NPV) for women: 97.1% (95% CI: 96.0-97.9) vs. 96.3% (95% CI: 95.2-97.2) in men. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study underline that the performance of cTn for the diagnosis of NSTEMI depends on a patient's sex, with a lower sensitivity and NPV in women. The definition and implementation of sex-specific cut-off values for cTn into clinical routine seems to be highly recommendable.

Early discharge using single cardiac troponin and copeptin testing in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS): a randomized, controlled clinical process study.

AIMS: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated whether a process with single combined testing of copeptin and troponin at admission in patients with low-to-intermediate risk and suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) does not lead to a higher proportion of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) than the current standard process (non-inferiority design). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 902 patients were randomly assigned to either standard care or the copeptin group where patients with negative troponin and copeptin values at admission were eligible for discharge after final clinical assessment. The proportion of MACE (death, survived sudden cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), re-hospitalization for ACS, acute unplanned percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or documented life threatening arrhythmias) was assessed after 30 days. Intention to treat analysis showed a MACE proportion of 5.17% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.30-7.65%; 23/445] in the standard group and 5.19% (95% CI 3.32-7.69%; 23/443) in the copeptin group. In the per protocol analysis, the MACE proportion was 5.34% (95% CI 3.38-7.97%) in the standard group, and 3.01% (95% CI 1.51-5.33%) in the copeptin group. These results were also corroborated by sensitivity analyses. In the copeptin group, discharged copeptin negative patients had an event rate of 0.6% (2/362). CONCLUSION: After clinical work-up and single combined testing of troponin and copeptin to rule-out AMI, early discharge of low- to intermediate risk patients with suspected ACS seems to be safe and has the potential to shorten length of stay in the ED. However, our results need to be confirmed in larger clinical trials or registries, before a clinical directive can be propagated.