PDE4D and miR-203 are promising biomarkers for canine atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) is a common genetically predisposed, inflammatory, and pruritic skin disorder that affects dogs globally. To date, there are no specific biomarkers available to diagnose CAD, and the current diagnosis is based on a combination of criteria including patient history, clinical signs, and exclusion of other relevant differential diagnoses. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the gene expression of phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), as well as miR-203 and miR-483 in plasma, in three groups: healthy dogs, CAD dogs, and other inflammatory pruritic skin diseases (OIPSD) such as pemphigus foliaceus, scabies, cutaneous lymphoma, and dermatophytosis. Our results showed that PDE4D gene expression in the CAD group is statistically higher compared to those in the healthy and OIPSD groups, suggesting PDE4D may be a specific marker for CAD. Nevertheless, no correlation was found between PDE4D gene expression levels and the lesion severity gauged by CAD severity index-4 (CADESI-4). We also showed that miR-203 is a generic marker for clinical dermatitis and differentiates both CAD and OIPSD inflammatory conditions from healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: We show that PDE4D is a potential marker to differentiate CAD from non-atopic healthy and OIPSD while miR-203 may be a potential marker for general dermatologic inflammation. Future study of PDE4D and miR-203 on a larger scale is warranted.

NOD/Scid IL2Rγnull Mice Reconstituted with PBMCs from Patients with Atopic Dermatitis or Psoriasis Vulgaris Reflect the Respective Phenotype.

NSG (NOD/Scid IL2Rγnull) mice reconstituted with PBMCs donated by patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease highly reflect the respective pathological phenotype. To determine whether these findings could be applicable to atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis vulgaris (PV), PBMCs isolated from patients with AD and PV were first subjected to immunological profiling. Subsequently, NSG mice were reconstituted with these PBMCs. Hierarchical clustering and network analysis revealed a distinct profile of patients with AD and PV with activated CD4+ T cells (CD69, CD25) occupying a central position in the AD network and CD4+ CD134+ cells acting as the main hub in the PV network. After dermal application of DMSO, both NSG mice reconstituted with PBMCs from donors with AD (ie, NSG-AD mice) and NSG mice reconstituted with PBMCs from donors with PV (ie, NSG-PV mice) exhibited increased clinical, skin, and histological scores. Immunohistochemical analysis, frequencies of splenic human leukocytes, and cytokine expression levels indicated that CD4+ CD69+ cells, M1 and TSLP receptor-expressing monocytes, switched B cells, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 3 were the driving factors of inflammation in NSG-AD mice. In contrast, inflammation in NSG-PV mice was characterized by an increase in fibroblasts in the epidermis, frequencies of CD1a-expressing monocytes, and IL-17 levels. Therefore, the pathological phenotypes of NSG-AD mice and NSG-PV mice differ and partially reflect the respective human diseases.

Proteomic alterations in patients with atopic dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin disease with a complex and multifactorial pathogenesis. The use of proteomics in understanding AD has yielded the discovery of novel biomarkers and may further expand therapeutic options. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the most recent proteomic studies and the methodologies used in AD. It describes novel biomarkers that may monitor disease course and therapeutic response. The review also highlights skin and blood biomarkers characterizing different AD phenotypes and differentiates AD from other inflammatory skin disorders. A literature search was conducted by querying Scopus, Google Scholar, Pubmed/Medline, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to June 2023. EXPERT OPINION: The integration of proteomics into research efforts in atopic dermatitis has broadened our understanding of the molecular profile of AD through the discovery of new biomarkers. In addition, proteomics may contribute to the development of targeted treatments ultimately improving personalized medicine. An increasing number of studies are utilizing proteomics to explore this heterogeneous disease.

Morphological and Clinical Patterns of Paederus Dermatitis.

Background The objective of the present study was to describe the morphological and clinical patterns of paederus dermatitis (PD). Methodology This retrospective case series was conducted in the outpatient department of the Department of Dermatology, Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, between June 2023 and August 2023 among patients with a clinical diagnosis of PD. Results This study included a total of 10 patients. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 19.4 (1.9) years. More than half of the patients (60.0%) were males. Of the 10 patients included, four (40.0%) were from rural areas, three (30.0%) were from urban areas, and three (30.0%) were from semi-urban areas. The maximum number of cases was reported between June and September. The most common presenting complaint was a burning sensation in 80.0% of the patients, followed by pain in 80.0% and blisters in 20.0% of the patients. The mean (SD) duration of the lesion was 4.2 (1.3) days. Regarding the clinical pattern of lesions, linear lesions were the most common (40.0%), followed by erythematous lesions with central gray area in 30.0%, kissing lesions in 20.0%, and burnt appearance in 10.0% of the lesions. Nearly half of the patients presented with lesions in the face (40.0%), the most common site in the present study, followed by lesions in the leg (20.0%), and lesions in the axilla, chest, arm, and back (10.0% each). Conclusions Understanding the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of this condition is crucial for accurate diagnosis, timely management, and public health interventions aimed at preventing Paederus beetle-related dermatitis.

Staphylococcus aureus-specific skin resident memory T cells protect against bacteria colonization but exacerbate atopic dermatitis-like flares in mice.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) to the exacerbation of atopic dermatitis (AD) is widely documented, but its role as a primary trigger of AD skin symptoms remains poorly explored. OBJECTIVE: To reappraise the main bacterial factors and underlying immune mechanisms by which S. aureus triggers AD-like inflammation. METHODS: We capitalized on a pre-clinical model, in which different clinical isolates were applied in the absence of any prior experimental skin injury. RESULTS: We report that the development of S. aureus-induced dermatitis depended on the nature of the S. aureus strain, its viability, the concentration of the applied bacterial suspension, the production of secreted and non-secreted factors, as well as the activation of accessory gene regulatory quorum sensing system. In addition, the rising dermatitis, which exhibited the well-documented AD cytokine signature, was significantly inhibited in inflammasome adaptor protein ASC- and monocyte/macrophage-deficient animals, but not in T- and B-cell-deficient mice, suggesting a major role for the innate response in the induction of skin inflammation. However, bacterial exposure generated a robust adaptive immune response against S. aureus, and an accumulation of S. aureus-specific γδ and CD4+ tissue resident memory T (Trm) cells at the site of previous dermatitis. The latter both contributed to worsen the flares of AD-like dermatitis upon new bacteria exposures, but also, protected the mice from persistent bacterial colonization. CONCLUSION: These data highlight the induction of unique AD-like inflammation, with the generation of pro-inflammatory but protective Trm cells in a context of natural exposure to pathogenic S. aureus strains.

Efficacy of lebrikizumab in adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: 16-week results from three randomized phase 3 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13, previously demonstrated clinical efficacy in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trials that included adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD): ADvocate1, ADvocate2, and ADhere. AIM: This subset analysis evaluated 16-week physician- and patient-reported outcomes of lebrikizumab in the adolescent patients enrolled in these three trials. METHODS: Eligible adolescents (≥12 to <18 years weighing ≥40kg) were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous lebrikizumab (500 mg loading doses at baseline and Week 2 followed by 250 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo as monotherapy in ADvocate1&2, and in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in the ADhere study. Week 16 analyses included clinical efficacy outcomes (IGA (0,1) with ≥2-point improvement, EASI 75, EASI 90), patient-reported Pruritus NRS ≥4-point improvement and Sleep-Loss Scale ≥2-point improvement. RESULTS: Pooled ADvocate1&2 16-week results in lebrikizumab (N = 67) vs placebo (N = 35) were: IGA (0,1) 46.6% vs 14.3% (p < 0.01), EASI 75 62.0% vs 17.3% (p < 0.001), EASI 90 40.7% vs 11.5% (p < 0.01), Pruritus NRS 48.9% vs 13.1% (p < 0.01), and Sleep-Loss Scale 26.9% vs 6.9% (p = 0.137). Corresponding results for ADhere, (lebrikizumab + TCS, N = 32; placebo + TCS, N = 14), were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Lebrikizumab treatment demonstrated efficacy in improving the signs and symptoms of AD in adolescent patients, consistent with the ADvocate and ADhere overall population results.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids in Japanese pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years old with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis not adequately controlled with existing therapies. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients received dupilumab (n = 30) or placebo (n = 32) with concomitant topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks, then all patients received dupilumab from 16 to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline (EASI-75) to Week 16. Key secondary endpoints included changes in EASI score, proportion of patients with investigator global assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1, and changes in worst daily itch numerical rating scale (NRS) scores (evaluated in patients aged ≥6 to <12 years [n = 35]). RESULTS: At Week 16, more patients achieved EASI-75 with dupilumab than placebo (43.3% vs 18.8%; P = 0.0304), and the least squares mean (LSM) difference in percent change in EASI scores at Week 16 of dupilumab vs placebo was -39.4% (P = 0.0003). However, no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving IGA scores of 0/1 at Week 16 with dupilumab versus placebo were seen (10.0% vs 9.4%; P = 0.8476). The percent change in worst daily itch NRS scores at Week 16 was higher with dupilumab (LSM difference: -33.3%; nominal P = 0.0117). Dupilumab was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab showed consistent efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis previously insufficiently controlled with existing therapies.

Adherence in Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic dermatologic condition requiring extended treatment times with topical application of medications. While atopic dermatitis treatments can be highly effective when used as directed, oftentimes patients do not respond as expected, raising concern for nonadherence versus nonresponse. This chapter aims to describe what is currently known about adherence in atopic dermatitis and to discuss strategies to improve adherence in order to improve treatment outcomes. Whether intentional or unintentional, nonadherence to treatment can limit patient outcomes of this disease for a variety of reasons. These include frustration with medication efficacy, inconvenience, and fear of side effects. Other factors include forgetfulness, financial burden of treatment, lack of trust in the physician, dislike of prescribed medication, or lack of understanding of disease or treatment. Several interventions have been studied with the aim of improving adherence in atopic dermatitis-such as educational workshops for patients and caregivers, earlier follow-up visits, and text messages reminders-however, these are often limited by sample size and power. Further research is needed to study both specific patterns of nonadherence in atopic dermatitis, as well as methods to improve them.

Atopic Dermatitis: Managing the Itch.

Atopic dermatitis has a substantial impact on sleep, appearance, psychological well-being, and other qualities of life. The visual appearance of lichenification, cheilitis, hyperpigmentation, ichthyosis, and erythema can be socially stigmatizing, and treatment of these symptoms is challenging. In managing pruritus in patients, practitioners should assess and document pruritus through questionnaires at each routine visit. Initially, practitioners should advise patients to employ nonpharmaceutical treatments such as emollients with wet wraps, elimination of triggers, changing scratching habits, and psychological interventions. If these methods of treatment are not successful or if the disease presentation is severe, pharmacological therapies should be employed. This chapter describes the therapeutic ladder for pruritus in atopic dermatitis and discusses each treatment modality in further detail for practitioners to advise their patients.First-line topical pharmaceutical agents include topical glucocorticoids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. Second-line topical agents include coal tar, menthol, capsaicin, or doxepin. After the use of topical agents has been exhausted, primary systemic agents can be applied. These include sedating antihistamines, nonsedating antihistamines, oral glucocorticoids, or cyclosporine A. Finally, neuromodulating or immunomodulating agents can be attempted, including SSRI/SNRIs, TCAs, immunosuppressants, neural modulators, and opioid receptor modulators. Outside of pharmacological treatments, phototherapy has been shown to provide a dramatic improvement of pruritus in atopic dermatitis and can be used at any stage of treatment including as a first-line agent.

Atopic Dermatitis Disease Education.

There has been an influx of new educational resources for atopic dermatitis (AD) patients in recent years. The two primary organizations in the United States offering educational materials, online resources, and other forms of support include the National Eczema Association (NEA) and the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Educational workshops and interventions have emerged as tools that can deliver comprehensive information on AD, such as symptoms, treatments, and disease management. In regard to these workshops, studies have proven longer interventions to be more effective. Studies have also found multidisciplinary teams, including psychologists, dietitians, and AD specialists, to be more effective in AD treatment and education. Additionally, video-based education was found to be the most effective delivery medium compared to various written modes of education. Given the psychosocial impacts of AD, support groups have been found to improve life quality and decrease disease severity, with age-specific groups offering the greatest benefits. Technology such as social media and smartphones has also improved education. Social media has allowed the rapid exchange of information to wider audiences, but due to its unregulated nature, false information has also been disseminated. Despite this, web-based interventions have still been found to be satisfying, convenient, and effective in increasing treatment awareness. The advent of smartphone applications has provided patients with access to information on AD symptoms and treatment on demand. While the effectiveness of these promising applications hasn't been confirmed by studies, patient provider interactions via smartphone (teledermatology) have been found to be as effective as in-person appointments. This chapter will discuss these different types of emerging resources available to AD patients including educational materials, interventions, support groups, organizational support, and technological resources and their effectiveness.

Adult patients with alopecia areata report a significantly better medication adherence compared to those with atopic dermatitis: Results from a large cross-sectional cohort study.

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) and atopic dermatitis (AD) are chronic skin diseases where the suboptimal medication adherence (MA) may result in poor clinical outcomes. Objective: To assess the impact of AA on MA among adults compared to AD. Methods: Patient reported MA of adults with AA were compared with AD. Patients were identified from the Danish Skin Cohort, a nationwide prospective cohort of dermatological patients in Denmark. We used the Medication Adherence Report Scale- 5, a self-reporting questionnaire, to assess MA. Demographic and disease characteristics were collected. Logistic regression was conducted. Results: Patients with AA reported higher MA than AD (mean 21.81 vs 18.29). Logistic regression analyses showed AA diagnosis had a statistically significant positive effect on MA (odds ratio = 3.94, 95% CI 2.01-8.89). Men reported significantly higher MA (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% CI 1.14-1.94). Current disease severity did not impact MA. Limitations: Data were self-reported by patients. Data regarding the specific treatment undergone by patients were not available. Conclusion: Patients with AA have significantly higher MA compared to patients with AD. The stability of AA patients' symptoms may lead to higher MA due to a desire for disease control. Conversely, the sporadicity of AD symptoms could negatively affect adherence, causing fluctuations in medication use.

Genetically proxied interleukin-6 receptor inhibition increases risk of atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Dermatitis has been reported after initiation of IL-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), while genetic association studies of atopic dermatitis (AD) have implicated IL-6R pathway signalling. However, causality remains unclear. As indications for IL-6Ri expand, so do the clinical importance of determining whether there is mechanistic evidence linking it to AD. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between IL-6Ri and risk of AD. METHODS: To genetically mimic IL-6Ri, we selected single nucleotide polymorphisms within or near the IL6R gene associated with C-reactive protein (CRP) at genome-wide significance among 343,524 individuals. Genetic data for AD were obtained from 10,788 cases and 30,047 controls of European ancestry. We used the inverse-variance weighted and pleiotropy-robust methods and examined genetic confounding using colocalization. Analyses were replicated using 13,473 AD Finnish cases and 2,385 East Asian cases. Results from three independent analyses were pooled by meta-analysis. RESULTS: Genetically proxied IL-6Ri was associated with increased risk of AD (OR 1.78 per 4.4 mg/l reduction in CRP; 95%CI 1.28, 2.48; p=6.5x10-4). Results were replicated using Finnish outcome data (OR 2.07; 95%CI 1.58, 2.72; p=1.57x10-7), and Eastern Asian datasets (OR 1.68; 95%CI 1.12, 2.54; p=0.013). Meta-analysis of three independent populations (OR 1.89; 95%CI 1.57, 2.28; p=2.68x10-11) showed no statistical evidence of heterogeneity (p=0.65). We found no statistical evidence for pleiotropy or genetic confounding. CONCLUSION: This genetic investigation provides consistent evidence, across independent multi-ancestry populations, that IL-6R signalling is causally implicated in AD susceptibility. Clinicians should remain vigilant for adverse effects resembling AD when using IL-6R inhibitors for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

The Therapeutic Potential of Essential Oils in Managing Inflammatory Skin Conditions: A Scoping Review.

Conventional therapy is commonly used for the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions, but undesirable effects, such as erythema, dryness, skin thinning, and resistance to treatment, may cause poor patient compliance. Therefore, patients may seek complementary treatment with herbal plant products including essential oils (EOs). This scoping review aims to generate a broad overview of the EOs used to treat inflammatory skin conditions, namely, acne vulgaris, dermatitis and eczema, psoriasis, and rosacea, in a clinical setting. The quality, efficacy, and safety of various EOs, as well as the way in which they are prepared, are reviewed, and the potential, as well as the limitations, of EOs for the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions are discussed. Twenty-nine eligible studies (case studies, uncontrolled clinical studies, and randomized clinical studies) on the applications of EOs for inflammatory skin conditions were retrieved from scientific electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library). As an initial result, tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil emerged as the most studied EO. The clinical studies with tea tree oil gel for acne treatment showed an efficacy with fewer adverse reactions compared to conventional treatments. The uncontrolled studies indicated the potential efficacy of ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi) oil, eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) oil, and cedarwood (Cedrus libani) oil in the treatment of acne, but further research is required to reach conclusive evidence. The placebo-controlled studies revealed the positive effects of kanuka (Kunzea ericoides) oil and frankincense (Boswellia spp.) oil in the treatment of psoriasis and eczema. The quality verification of the EO products was inconsistent, with some studies lacking analyses and transparency. The quality limitations of some studies included a small sample size, a short duration, and the absence of a control group. This present review underscores the need for extended, well-designed clinical studies to further assess the efficacy and safety of EOs for treating inflammatory skin conditions with products of assured quality and to further elucidate the mechanisms of action involved.

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 2-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)hydrazinecarbothioamides as a potential EGR-1 inhibitor for targeted therapy of atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense itching and frequent skin barrier dysfunctions. EGR-1 is a transcription factor that aggravates the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis by promoting the production of various inflammatory cytokines. Three 2-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)hydrazinecarbothioamides (IT21, IT23, and IT25) were identified as novel inhibitors of EGR-1 DNA-binding activity. In silico docking experiments were performed to elucidate the binding conditions of the EGR-1 zinc-finger (ZnF) DNA-binding domain. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays confirmed the targeted binding effect on the EGR-1 ZnF DNA-binding domain, leading to dose-dependent dissociation of the EGR-1-DNA complex. At the functional cellular level, IT21, IT23, and IT25 effectively reduced mRNA expression of TNFα-induced EGR-1-regulated inflammatory genes, particularly in HaCaT keratinocytes inflamed by TNFα. In the in vivo efficacy study, IT21, IT23, and IT25 demonstrated the potential to alleviate atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in the ear skin of BALB/c mice. These findings suggest that targeting the EGR-1 ZnF DNA-binding domain with 2-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)hydrazinecarbothioamide derivatives (IT21, IT23, and IT25) could serve as lead compounds for the development of potential therapeutic agents against inflammatory skin disorders, including atopic dermatitis.

Low rates of vaccination among atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis patients on biologics.

Biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are immunomodulating and immunosuppressing medications utilized to treat atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis (PSO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and alopecia areata (AA). Special recommendations must be considered when prescribing vaccinations in this population, as the pneumococcal and herpes zoster vaccine are recommended to patients ≥ 19-years-old (rather than ≥ 65-years-old and ≥ 50-years-old as in the general population, respectively), along with a yearly influenza and up to date COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, TNF-α and JAK-inhibitors may increase the risk of latent Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation among high-risk patients. Prior to prescribing these medications, a quantitative HepB Surface Antibody (HepB SA) test is performed to determine immunity. This study utilized the SlicerDicer function on EPIC Medical Records to search for any patient ≥ 19-years-old prescribed a biologic or JAK inhibitor for AD, PSO, PsA, or AA between 10/2003 and 10/2023 at a large tertiary institution. Vaccination rates among patients on biologics and JAK inhibitors were low, with rates being significantly lower in patients 19-64 years-old, compared to those ≥ 65 years-old for most disease states (p < 0.01). Among AD, PSO/PsA, and AA patients, on average, 9.39% were vaccinated for influenza, 6.76% for herpes zoster, 16.56% for pneumococcal pneumonia, and 63.98% for COVID-19. Only 3.16% of patients were adequately vaccinated for HepB after an abnormal HepB SA test. Here, extremely low rates of vaccination among patients on biologics and JAK inhibitors at our institution were highlighted, emphasizing the imperative need for ensuring vaccination in this group.