Cognitive Benefits of Hearing Aids in Elderly Indian Population: A Longitudinal Study.

Age-related hearing loss is common among older individuals and is linked to cognitive impairment and a decrease in overall quality of life. Although hearing aids enhance auditory capabilities, their influence on cognitive performance in the Indian context has not been thoroughly investigated. This study investigates the cognitive benefits of hearing aids in elderly Indian patients with age-related hearing loss. A prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care centre between January 2021 and December 2022. The study included 200 elderly patients who were fitted with behind-the-ear (BTE) or receiver-in-canal (RIC) hearing aids. The assessment of cognitive function was conducted using two standardised tests: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The assessment of quality of life was conducted using the WHOQOL-OLD questionnaire, while hearing acuity was examined by pure-tone audiometry and speech perception tests. Data were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 18 months. Multiple linear regression analysis identified predictors of cognitive outcomes. There were significant enhancements in MMSE, MoCA, HHIE, and WHOQOL-OLD scores across the 18-month duration (p < 0.001). The pure-tone audiometry thresholds and speech perception scores demonstrated significant improvement (p < 0.001). Regression analysis indicated that baseline cognitive function, hearing ability, and quality of life were significant predictors of cognitive outcomes at 18 months. No severe cognitive impairment or other confounding severe medical conditions were reported. This study revealed that the use of hearing aids has a substantial positive impact on cognitive function, quality of life, and hearing ability in the older Indian population suffering from age-related hearing loss. Timely intervention and the availability of hearing aids are essential for improving cognitive health and overall well-being in this demographic. Future study should look into the consequences and influence of various hearing aid models. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-04939-7.

Uncovering the effects of pandemic conditions on hearing aid experiences: a dual perspective from audiologists and hearing aid users.

Purpose: This study examines the effects of the pandemic on hearing aid experiences from the perspectives of audiologists and patients, as well as communication challenges faced by both users and non-users of hearing aids.Materials and Methods: The study consisted of two phases: a longitudinal study examining the services provided by audiologists during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic and after the first vaccination dose. The second phase involved a survey of 120 elderly individuals with hearing loss, divided into hearing aid users and non-users for assessing communication challenges. Data was collected from comprehensive audiology clinics using a series of checklists.Results: Analysis of the frequency of services related to hearing aids revealed that during the peak period, the majority of visits were for acquiring batteries and hearing aids, while fewer visits were for fitting and fine-tuning the devices. After vaccination the pattern was changed. In the second phase, significant differences were observed between the hearing aid users and non-users with regards to their ability to comprehend speech while wearing mask, communicating at a safe distance, and following TV news.Conclusions: The distribution of requested services differed during the peak period and the post-vaccination period. There was a noticeable increase in the purchase and fitting of hearing aids after vaccination. However, patients encountered difficulties due to the limited availability of tele-audiology services and delayed services from hearing aid companies. The benefits of hearing aids were impacted by the pandemic as many people did not seek adjustments for their devices.

People who receive hearing aids without requiring further adjustments may experience difficulties in speech perception and auditory function in situations where communication barriers are increased, such as during a pandemic.The most significant challenge identified by audiologists is that people prefer in-person care. However, from the patients' perspective, the lack of tele-audiology services is the most important challenge for hearing health services. Therefore, it is crucial to focus on the development of tele-audiology in developing countries. Its implementation is as essential as training audiologists.The pandemic and its preventive measures have affected the benefits of using hearing aids, with many people not seeking the most effective adjustments in this condition.

Apple AirPods Pro as a Hearing Assistive Device in Patients with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the Apple AirPods Pro with the headphone accommodation feature as a hearing assistive device for patients with mild to moderate hearing loss (HL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 35 participants with mild to moderate HL. To determine the degree of HL in the participants, a screening test using pure-tone audiometry was conducted prior to the main tests of functional gain, word recognition score (WRS), and sentence recognition in noisy environments. The study employed two hearing devices: the Bean (a personal sound amplification product, PSAP) and the AirPods Pro. RESULTS: Regarding functional gain, there were no significant differences between the Bean and the AirPods Pro at all frequencies, except 8 kHz. In terms of WRS, both the Bean and the AirPods Pro had higher scores than the unaided condition. In sentence recognition, both the Bean and the AirPods Pro had higher scores than the unaided condition. During real-ear measurement, the Bean demonstrated consistent frequency responses, while the AirPods had a deviation exceeding 10 dB SPL at 6 kHz in the left ear. This deviation was absent for all other frequencies. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the Apple AirPods Pro, with its headphone accommodation feature, performed similarly to a validated PSAP and improved hearing compared to unaided conditions.

A MAUDE database analysis on the new generation of active bone conduction hearing implants.

Objective: To analyze medical device reports (MDR) submitted to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Device Facility Experience (MAUDE) database to identify adverse events (AEs) in patients implanted with novel active bone conduction hearing implants (BCIs). Methods: We conducted a search of the FDA MAUDE database on the newest generation of BCIs. Data were collected concerning device malfunctions, patient injuries, factors triggering these incidents, and the subsequent actions taken. Results: In total, 93 (16.7%) device malfunctions and 465 (83.3%) patient injuries with 358 subsequent interventions were identified, resulting in 558 AEs. Although the absolute AE number per device cannot be identified, the following trends were detected: Among the 494 AEs associated with OSI200, 55 (11.1%) reported device malfunctions and 454 (88.9%) cited patient injuries. Out of the 64 AEs linked to BCI602, 28 (59.4%) were associated with malfunctions, whereas 26 (40.6%) involved patient injuries. The most frequently reported particular AEs for the OSI200 were infection (n = 171, 34.6%), extrusion of the device (n = 107, 21.7%), and pain (n = 51, 10.3%). Conversely, no device output (n = 20, 31.3%) and loss of osseointegration (n = 7, 10.9%) were the most reported AEs for the BCI602. Various AEs led to 214 explanations and 77 revision surgeries. Sixty-seven AEs reported conservative treatment. Conclusion: The current study provides an overview of the most commonly reported complications with new active BCIs. Although providing an overview, given the limitations of the FDA MAUDE database, our results have to be interpreted with caution. Level of Evidence: 4.

Randomised Controlled Trial for the Evaluation of the Efficacy of the IDA's "Living Well" Online Counselling Tool in First-Time Adult Users with Hearing Loss.

Effective management of hearing loss through the use of modern hearing aids significantly improves communication and the quality of life for individuals experiencing auditory impairment. Complementary counselling of patients with hearing loss who will be fitted with hearing aids for the first time should be evidence-based and adapted to their individual needs. To date, several counselling protocols and tools have been developed. The aim of this randomised controlled trial study was to investigate the efficacy of the application of the IDA's "Living Well" counselling tool in first-time hearing aid users in terms of the degree of their hearing related handicap (using the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI)), their communication coping strategies (using the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired (CPHI)) and their overall satisfaction of the hearing aids (using a Likert scale). Both groups (the IDA and the control group) were fitted with hearing aids and received counselling for their hearing aids by the same audiologist. The IDA group attended an additional counselling session about communication coping strategies with the use of the "Living Well" tool. Both groups' participants were seen for their hearing aid fittings 4-6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after their fitting when the HHI and the CPHI were measured. Although there was not a statistically significant difference between the two groups for the primary and secondary outcomes, the IDA group did show a more consistent improvement of their HHI score and less frequent use of maladaptive strategies. The "Living Well" counselling tool proved to be a favourably received and helpful counselling tool in first-time hearing aid users.

Retrieval practice and word learning in children who are hard of hearing.

PURPOSE: Many children who are deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) show poorer auditory word-learning skills than children with typical hearing (TH). The goal of this study was to test the effect of retrieval practice on word learning in children who are hard of hearing (HH). METHOD: Twenty-six TH children and 16 children who are HH completed a speech perception and a vocabulary test, and a rapid word-learning game to learn new words under no retrieval, immediate retrieval, and spaced retrieval conditions. RESULT: Linear mixed-effect models revealed that learning condition and time predicted 48% of the variance in word recognition, and age predicted 15% of word recall variance. We observed no differences in word recognition and recall between TH children and children who are HH. Children learned and remembered more words in the immediate and spaced retrieval practice conditions than in the no retrieval condition. CONCLUSION: Retrieval practice is more effective for word learning and retention than passive exposure (no retrieval). Clinical and educational practices for children who are DHH could combine explicit instruction using targeted exposures and retrieval of new words with naturalistic approaches. Future studies should assess retrieval practice in real-life interventions to inform clinical and educational practices.

Disparities between objectively measured hearing loss and subjectively perceived aided hearing loss: A scoping review.

Objectives: This scoping review aims to summarize and synthesize research findings on the disparities between audiometrically diagnosed and aided hearing loss versus the individual's own experience of hearing loss. Methods: A systematic search strategy was employed across multiple databases to identify studies published between 1990 and October 2023 focusing on the experiences of hearing problems among individuals with aided hearing loss. The selected studies underwent screening based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These criteria revolved around including papers featuring a population of adult (+18) individuals with audiometrically measured hearing loss who had undergone technological rehabilitation. Data charting was employed to provide an overview of the studies and was additionally utilized to identify key themes. Narrative analysis was used to identify subthemes within the data set. Results: A total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. The analysis identified five themes: "disability experience and discrepancy between measured and self-perceived hearing loss"; "listening effort"; "mental burden/psychological consequences"; "factors that alleviate the consequences of HL"; and "sociodemographic factors." Conclusions: The scoping review shows that, despite the proliferation of technological options, there is a pressing need for a more concentrated effort to identify and scrutinize the supplementary facets of hearing loss that remain inadequately addressed by current hearing technology. This includes subjective experiences associated with hearing loss that may not be effectively treated solely with hearing aids.

The impact of the Cochlear™ Osia® 2 System on patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss: A comparison with Cochlear™ Baha® Attract System outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective study assessed the efficacy of the Cochlear™ Osia® 2 System compared to the previous Baha® Attract System in patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss (MHL/CHL). METHODS: In this prospective case-control study, 10 patients (2 men and 8 women) with MHL/CHL were implanted with the Osia® 2 System. Their audiological outcomes were compared with 13 patients (2 men and 11 women) who had previously been implanted with the transcutaneous Baha® Attract system. We compared the complications and compliance of the two groups. Also, in the Osia 2 System group, subjective satisfaction was assessed using the Korean version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (K-IOI-HA) questionnaire and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire. RESULTS: Complications such as poor magnetization, pain & infection, and abnormal noise were more common in the Baha Attract group, although not statistically significant. Also, the Osia 2 group exhibited better compliance. Subjective satisfaction was assessed using the K-IOI-HA and APHAB questionnaires with the Osia 2 group, revealing significantly improved scores in ease of communication, reverberation, background noise, and higher K-IOI-HA scores post-implantation. Postoperative-aided thresholds with both systems were significantly lower than preoperative-unaided thresholds, with the Osia 2 System demonstrating notably high satisfaction levels. Although both systems showed similar preoperative and postoperative word-recognition scores, the Osia 2 System provided greater audiological gain, especially at 2 kHz and 4 kHz frequencies. Additionally, the functional gain of both systems was comparable across all frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The Osia 2 System demonstrated high subjective satisfaction and improved audiological outcomes compared to the Baha Attract system in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Its superior audiological gain, particularly at critical frequencies, along with better compliance, suggests it as a favorable option for this patient population.

Brain-Controlled Augmented Hearing for Spatially Moving Conversations in Multi-Talker Environments.

Focusing on a specific conversation amidst multiple interfering talkers is challenging, especially for those with hearing loss. Brain-controlled assistive hearing devices aim to alleviate this problem by enhancing the attended speech based on the listener's neural signals using auditory attention decoding (AAD). Departing from conventional AAD studies that relied on oversimplified scenarios with stationary talkers, a realistic AAD task that involves multiple talkers taking turns as they continuously move in space in background noise is presented. Invasive electroencephalography (iEEG) data are collected from three neurosurgical patients as they focused on one of the two moving conversations. An enhanced brain-controlled assistive hearing system that combines AAD and a binaural speaker-independent speech separation model is presented. The separation model unmixes talkers while preserving their spatial location and provides talker trajectories to the neural decoder to improve AAD accuracy. Subjective and objective evaluations show that the proposed system enhances speech intelligibility and facilitates conversation tracking while maintaining spatial cues and voice quality in challenging acoustic environments. This research demonstrates the potential of this approach in real-world scenarios and marks a significant step toward developing assistive hearing technologies that adapt to the intricate dynamics of everyday auditory experiences.

Influences of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, listening effort, and sound quality among adults with severe to profound hearing loss.

Introduction: Noise reduction (NR) algorithms have been integrated into modern digital hearing aids to reduce noise annoyance and enhance speech intelligibility. This study aimed to evaluate the influences of a novel hearing aid NR algorithm on individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Methods: Twenty-five participants with severe-to-profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss underwent three tests (speech intelligibility, listening effort, and subjective sound quality in noise) to investigate the influences of NR. All three tests were performed under three NR strength levels (Off, Moderate, and Strong) for both speech in noise program (SpiN) and speech in loud noise program (SpiLN), comprising six different hearing aid conditions. Results: NR activation significantly reduced listening effort. Subjective sound quality assessments also exhibited benefits of activated NR in terms of noise suppression, listening comfort, satisfaction, and speech clarity. Discussion: Individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss still experienced advantages from NR technology in both listening effort measure and subjective sound quality assessments. Importantly, these benefits did not adversely affect speech intelligibility.

"I don't really know how to help her." Family caregivers' capabilities, opportunities and motivations to provide hearing support to long-term care home residents with dementia.

PURPOSE: Hearing loss is highly prevalent in long-term care home (LTCH) residents with dementia ("residents") and exacerbates confusion and communication difficulties. Residents rely on caregivers, including family, for hearing-related care. This study aims to understand the drivers of family caregivers' provision of hearing support to LTCH residents using the Behaviour Change Wheel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This exploratory two-stage study was guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). A self-report survey (N = 87) and interviews (N = 6) explored drivers behind the provision of hearing support. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and a within-participants ANOVA. Deductive coding of TDF domains alongside thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. RESULTS: Provision of hearing support was variable. Gaps in family caregivers' psychological capability, reflective motivation and physical opportunity were identified. Barriers included lacking knowledge, unclear caregiver responsibilities, deprioritising hearing support, COVID-19 restrictions and fragmented collaborations with audiology services. CONCLUSIONS: Future behaviour-change interventions to facilitate family caregivers' provision of hearing support to LTCH residents should include: Improving knowledge of how to provide effective hearing support, establishing caregiver responsibilities and increasing the resources for hearing support within LTCHs.

Interventions to aid family caregivers in providing hearing support for their relative with dementia should be designed to address gaps in capabilities, opportunities and motivations, as barriers are present in all three constructs.Audiologists should signpost family caregivers to educational resources about traditional hearing aids and assistive listening devices to be used within the long-term care homes (LTCH) and understand the benefits of domiciliary audiology appointments for LTCH residents.Care staff and family to discuss roles and responsibilities for hearing support and document these in care plans when the resident first moves to the LTCH e.g., accompanying resident to external audiology appointments.

Associations of frailty, self-reported balance problems, hearing abilities, and posturography in a sample of older adults.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for self-reported balance problems, and to analyse associations between hearing and balance. DESIGN: A battery of tests was administered to assess hearing and balance performance, as well as additional health-related factors indicative of frailty and fall risk. In a retrospective analysis, logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for self-reported balance problems and linear regression was used to identify associations between hearing ability and functional balance. STUDY SAMPLE: For the risk factor analysis, 199 volunteers aged 55-81 years (mean:67) were divided into two groups according to their self-reported balance problems. Only participants lacking self-reported balance problems (n = 157) were included in the second analysis. RESULTS: Female gender, frailty, and fine-motor skills were statistically significant predictors of self-reported balance problems. Functional balance performance was related to hearing impairment for dynamic, but not for static, balance tasks. CONCLUSION: For a holistic approach to healthcare and regardless of age, individuals with multiple comorbidities and/or phenotypic signs of frailty should be considered at risk for falls. For further research, it was shown that dynamic, rather than static, balance tasks may be needed to gain deeper insights into the relationship between hearing and balance.

Emotional prosodic expression of children with hearing aids or cochlear implants, rated by adults and peers.

OBJECTIVE: The emotional prosodic expression potential of children with cochlear implants is poorer than that of normal hearing peers. Though little is known about children with hearing aids. DESIGN: This study was set up to generate a better understanding of hearing aid users' prosodic identifiability compared to cochlear implant users and peers without hearing loss. STUDY SAMPLE: Emotional utterances of 75 Dutch speaking children (7 - 12 yr; 26 CHA, 23 CCI, 26 CNH) were gathered. Utterances were evaluated blindly by normal hearing Dutch listeners: 22 children and 9 adults (17 - 24 yrs) for resemblance to three emotions (happiness, sadness, anger). RESULTS: Emotions were more accurately recognised by adults than by children. Both children and adults correctly judged happiness significantly less often in CCI than in CNH. Also, adult listeners confused happiness with sadness more often in both CHA and CCI than in CNH. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adults are able to accurately evaluate the emotions expressed through speech by children with varying degrees of hearing loss, ranging from mild to profound, nearly as well as they can with typically hearing children. The favourable outcomes emphasise the resilience of children with hearing loss in developing effective emotional communication skills.

Factors associated with nonword repetition skills in 4-to 6-year-old deaf and hard-of-hearing and typically hearing children.

Children identified as deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) exhibit an increased risk of speech and language difficulties. Nonword repetition (NWR) is a potential tool for identifying language difficulties in children with limited experience with the target language. In this study, we explored associations between auditory, linguistic, demographic and cognitive factors and NWR performance in DHH children and their typically hearing (TH) peers. We also examined the effect of the group on NWR outcomes when different factors were statistically controlled for. Our study included 68 4- to 6-year-old children: 18 with bilateral hearing aids (BiHAs), 18 with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) and 32 with TH. The participants completed the Finnish Nonword Repetition Test comprising 24 test items with varying syllable lengths. The assessment methods also included tests of phonological, lexical, language comprehension and sentence repetition skills, along with a measure of nonverbal intelligence. The results showed that none of the auditory, linguistic, demographic and cognitive factors examined in the present study were correlated with NWR performance in the BiHA group, while significant correlations between NWR skills and linguistic abilities were observed in the BiCI group. The DHH children showed extraordinary difficulties in NWR compared to their TH peers, and these group differences remained after controlling for linguistic and demographic variables. The NWR task may be a potential clinical tool for identifying DHH children at risk for poor language outcomes and in need of speech and language intervention.

A laughing matter? Managing hearing difficulties in real life everyday social interactions with adults with hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the interactional management of hearing difficulties and hearing aids (HAs) in real-life, video-recorded social interactions with adults with hearing loss (HL) and their families/friends. DESIGN: 32 video-recordings in various social settings were analysed using Conversation Analysis. STUDY SAMPLE: 20 adults with HL and their families/friends. RESULTS: HL and/or HAs did not typically become explicit in conversation. When adults with HL' hearing difficulties did become explicit in the conversation, they were typically accompanied by laughter/humour. Sometimes the humour/laughter was initiated by the person with HL themselves (i.e. self-directed joking) but more frequently it was initiated by someone else within the conversation (i.e. a tease). CONCLUSIONS: The findings display the management of the "to tell or not to tell" dilemma in practice, and how humour was often used to lighten the tension when "telling" about HL and/or HAs. The findings also highlight that not all humour is equal: there are different outcomes for adults with HL depending on who initiated the humour/laughter within the context of the interaction. This study highlights stigma-in-action - how stigma related to HL and/or HAs is occasioned and managed within real-life social interactions.

Corrigendum: Hearing rehabilitation of adults with auditory processing disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence-based interventions.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1406916.].

Comparison between the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids Questionnaire and Real-Ear Measurement.

INTRODUCTION: The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA) is a questionnaire widely used to assess the subjective benefits of hearing aids. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between IOI-HA outcomes and target mismatch in real-ear measurement (REM). METHODS: Thirty-four ears of 25 patients who had worn hearing aids were evaluated using the Korean version of the IOI-HA and REM after fitting for 2 months. Real-ear insertion gain (REIG) was measured at three different levels of input intensity - 50, 65, and 80 dB sound pressure level (SPL) - and a frequency range of 0.25-6 kHz. Factors 1 and 2 and total IOI-HA scores were compared with the mismatches of REIGs and target gains of REM. RESULTS: Factor 1, factor 2, and total IOI-HA scores were 14.6 ± 3.5, 11.4 ± 2.2, and 25.9 ± 5.1, respectively. The averages of the difference of REIGs and target gains in REM at 50, 65, and 80 dB SPL input levels were -3.1 ± 6.7, -2.3 ± 7.2, and -3.0 ± 8.2, respectively. Factors 1 and 2 scores of the IOI-HA showed significant correlations with target mismatch in REM at 1 kHz and 0.75 kHz frequencies, respectively. Total IOI-HA scores had significant correlations with target mismatches in REM at 0.75 and 1 kHz frequencies. CONCLUSION: IOI-HA scores correlated with target mismatch in REM at mid frequencies. The IOI-HA can be a useful screening measure for evaluating the necessity of further adjustments in hearing aids through REM at mid frequencies.

A theory of coverage rate differences for hearing aids around the world based on correlational observation and analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to ascertain likely reasons for explaining variation in coverage rates for hearing aids (HAs) among various countries around the world. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of past coverage rates and their association to demographic and economic variables of apriori logical consideration. STUDY SAMPLE: Data was obtained on macroeconomic conditions from 37 countries in the OECD and estimated coverage rates for HAs using recent actual sales data. RESULTS: Two variables were identified with a very strong correlation (R = 0.97, R2 = 0.95) to coverage rates. The first variable was the level of subsidy provided for the citizens to obtain HAs. The second variable was the GNI/capita which reflects the income available to citizens to make the purchase of HAs. CONCLUSION: In countries where subsidy for HAs are made available through either public or private health service/insurance, an increase in coverage rates is likely to occur. The effect of subsidy is likely to surpass any effect of OTC HAs that has been demonstrated to date. Where and when feasible, subsidy presence and encouraging income generation among able citizens of a country should be sought in tandem - a complex interplay of improving coverage rates for HAs with economics.

Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Nationwide Survey Study to Understand Perspectives in Primary Care.

OBJECTIVES: The expansion of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids has raised inquiries regarding primary care physicians' (PCP) knowledge, perspective, and perceived roles. We aimed to understand PCP perspectives on OTC hearing aids via nationwide online surveys. METHODS: RedCap survey was distributed to PCPs via online forums and public mailing lists. Outcomes included PCPs' attitudes toward, perceived role surrounding, confidence managing, and knowledge of OTC hearing aids. Regression analyses were performed to identify associated factors including demographics and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Cohort included 111 PCPs primarily working in non-rural (83.8%) outpatient academic medical centers (47.5%), with a mean (SD) of 16.9 (11.6) years practicing. Most reported unfamiliarity (61.3%) with OTC hearing aids but viewed them positively (91.9%). They often perceived themselves as poor sources of OTC hearing aid information (63.1%) but desired involvement (90.1%) and believed associated knowledge is important (98.2%). Rural practice environment was associated with less familiarity toward OTC hearing aids (ß = -0.72, [95% CI -1.40 to -0.04]). Respondents answered 5.0 (2.4) of 10 OTC hearing aid knowledge questions correctly. Using 5-point Likert scale, participants reported most confidence recognizing signs/symptoms of hearing loss 3.71 (0.84), but less confidence educating 1.68 (0.96) about and determining candidacy 1.72 (1.05) for OTC hearing aids. Participants reported continuing medical education courses and published guidelines would effectively improve their OTC hearing aid knowledge. CONCLUSION: PCPs displayed positive attitudes toward OTC hearing aids and valued involvement. Addressing unfamiliarity/knowledge gaps surrounding OTC hearing aids through courses and published guidelines may help clarify misconceptions and promote hearing health care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

Socioeconomic Disparities and Other Factors Affecting Time to Dispensing of Pediatric Hearing Aids.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric hearing loss can significantly impact speech, language, social, and educational development. Providing access to speech and environmental sounds using amplification devices, such as hearing aids, can help improve developmental outcomes. However, timely rehabilitation and intervention may be delayed due to limited access to resources, further prolonging the adverse effects of childhood hearing loss. The aim of this study was to investigate socioeconomic barriers in time to dispensing hearing aids in a diverse pediatric patient population. METHODS: Data from an existing internal database from a tertiary pediatric hospital were analyzed from January 2020 through August 2022 for barriers associated with hearing aid (HA) dispensing delays. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained. Multivariate regression and survival analysis statistics were used to identify factors associated with delayed time to dispensing hearing aids. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients who had been appropriately diagnosed and fit, 108 (89.3%) had received hearings aids and 13 (10.7%) had not at the time of the study. Of those who had received HA, time to dispensing was not significantly impacted by sex, race, ethnicity, language, or income level. Insurance was found to be an influencing factor in time to receiving the HA. CONCLUSION: Factors such as insurance and hearing loss laterality contribute to delays in receiving hearing aids. Identifying these specific barriers and disparities in hearing rehabilitation services will prove vital in facilitating an expedited and equitable pathway to receiving hearing aids. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.