ß-blockers are not all the same: pharmacologic similarities and differences, potential combinations and clinical implications.

ß-blockers are a heterogeneous class, with individual agents distinguished by selectivity for ß1- vs. ß2- and α-adrenoceptors, presence or absence of partial agonist activity at one of more ß-receptor subtype, presence or absence of additional vasodilatory properties, and lipophilicity, which determines the ease of entry the drug into the central nervous system. Cardioselectivity (ß1-adrenoceptor selectivity) helps to reduce the potential for adverse effects mediated by blockade of ß2-adrenoceptors outside the myocardium, such as cold extremities, erectile dysfunction, or exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. According to recently updated guidelines from the European Society of Hypertension, ß-blockers are included within the five major drug classes recommended as the basis of antihypertensive treatment strategies. Adding a ß-blocker to another agent with a complementary mechanism may provide a rational antihypertensive combination that minimizes the adverse impact of induced sympathetic overactivity for optimal blood pressure-lowering efficacy and clinical outcomes benefit.

Safety and tolerability of ß-blockers: importance of cardioselectivity.

Cardioselective ß-blockade is generally well tolerated in practice and contraindications to this therapy are uncommon. ß-blockers are a diverse therapeutic class, and their individual tolerability profiles are influenced strongly by their pharmacodynamic effects across different adrenergic receptors. Bisoprolol, probably the ß-blocker with the highest selectivity for blockade of ß1- vs. ß2-adrenoceptors, does not block ß2-adrenoceptors to an appreciable extent at doses in therapeutic use. Side-effects often attributed to ß-blockers, such as erectile dysfunction and adverse metabolic effects are uncommon with bisoprolol and other ß-blockers used at doses which only block ß1-adrenoceptors. Cautious use of a cardioselective ß-blocker is not contraindicated in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma and the outcomes benefits of ß-blockers in patients with coronary heart disease or heart failure are also apparent in patients with concurrent COPD. Starting with a low dose and titrating upwards carefully is important for optimising the tolerability of a ß-blocker. Most people with hypertension will receive combination antihypertensive therapy in practice, and the low-dose combination therapy approach provides a useful strategy for optimising the efficacy and tolerability of a regimen that includes a ß-blocker, compared with up-titrating an existing monotherapy.

Enteropathy and intestinal malabsorption in patients treated with antihypertensive drugs. A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in the incidence of enteropathy or intestinal malabsorption in patients taking angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), calcium channel blocker (CCB), and beta blockers (BBs) at a single center in Korea. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we utilized data from the Yangsan electronic medical records to identify 129,169 patients. These individuals were prescribed olmesartan, other ARBs, ACEI, CCB, and BBs between November 2008 and February 2021. RESULTS: Of the 44,775 patients, 51 (0.11%) were observed to have enteropathy or intestinal malabsorption. Compared with the ACEI group, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for enteropathy and intestinal malabsorption were OR=1.313 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.188-6.798], p=0.893) for olmesartan, OR=0.915 (95% CI: [0.525-1.595], p=0.754) for the other ARBs, OR=0.928 (95% CI: [0.200-4.307]; p=0.924) for the CCB, and OR=0.663 (95% CI: [0.151-2.906]; p=0.586) for the BBs group. These findings were adjusted for factors such as age, gender, duration of antihypertensive medication, and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: In a retrospective cohort study of patients on antihypertensive medications, no significant difference was found in the incidence of enteropathy or intestinal malabsorption when ACEI was compared to olmesartan, other ARBs, CCB, and BBs.

Association of preoperative beta-blocker use and cardiac complications after major noncardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac complications after major noncardiac surgery are common and associated with high morbidity and mortality. How preoperative use of beta-blockers may impact perioperative cardiac complications remains unclear. METHODS: In a multicentre prospective cohort study, preoperative beta-blocker use was ascertained in consecutive patients at elevated cardiovascular risk undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Cardiac complications were prospectively monitored and centrally adjudicated by two independent experts. The primary endpoint was perioperative myocardial infarction or injury attributable to a cardiac cause (cardiac PMI) within the first three postoperative days. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, life-threatening arrhythmia, and cardiovascular death and all-cause death after 365 days. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for differences between patients receiving beta-blockers and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 3839/10 272 (37.4%) patients (mean age 74 yr; 44.8% female) received beta-blockers before surgery. Patients on beta-blockers were older, and more likely to be male with established cardiorespiratory and chronic kidney disease. Cardiac PMI occurred in 1077 patients, with a weighted odds ratio of 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.12, P=0.55) for patients on beta-blockers. Within 365 days of surgery, 971/10 272 (9.5%) MACE had occurred, with a weighted hazard ratio of 0.99 (95% CI 0.83-1.18, P=0.90) for patients on beta-blockers. CONCLUSION: Preoperative use of beta-blockers was not associated with decreased cardiac complications including cardiac perioperative myocardial infarction or injury and major adverse cardiac event. Additionally, preoperative use of beta-blockers was not associated with increased all-cause death within 30 and 365 days. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02573532.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Pregnancy: The U.S. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network Experience.

There are limited data on the causative agents and characteristics of drug-induced liver injury in pregnant individuals. Data from patients with drug-induced liver injury enrolled in the ongoing multicenter Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network between 2004 and 2022 and occurring during pregnancy or 6 months postpartum were reviewed and compared with cases of drug-induced liver injury in nonpregnant women of childbearing age. Among 325 individuals of childbearing age in the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network, 16 cases of drug-induced liver injury (5%) occurred during pregnancy or postpartum. Compared with drug-induced liver injury in nonpregnant women, pregnancy-related drug-induced liver injury was more severe ( P <.05). One elective termination and three miscarriages were documented; there were no maternal deaths. We recommend that isoniazid for latent tuberculosis be deferred to the postpartum period whenever feasible and that ß-blockers or calcium channel blockers rather than methyldopa be used for hypertension management during pregnancy.

Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Most trials that have shown a benefit of beta-blocker treatment after myocardial infarction included patients with large myocardial infarctions and were conducted in an era before modern biomarker-based diagnosis of myocardial infarction and treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention, antithrombotic agents, high-intensity statins, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonists. METHODS: In a parallel-group, open-label trial performed at 45 centers in Sweden, Estonia, and New Zealand, we randomly assigned patients with an acute myocardial infarction who had undergone coronary angiography and had a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 50% to receive either long-term treatment with a beta-blocker (metoprolol or bisoprolol) or no beta-blocker treatment. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or new myocardial infarction. RESULTS: From September 2017 through May 2023, a total of 5020 patients were enrolled (95.4% of whom were from Sweden). The median follow-up was 3.5 years (interquartile range, 2.2 to 4.7). A primary end-point event occurred in 199 of 2508 patients (7.9%) in the beta-blocker group and in 208 of 2512 patients (8.3%) in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.16; P = 0.64). Beta-blocker treatment did not appear to lead to a lower cumulative incidence of the secondary end points (death from any cause, 3.9% in the beta-blocker group and 4.1% in the no-beta-blocker group; death from cardiovascular causes, 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively; myocardial infarction, 4.5% and 4.7%; hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, 1.1% and 1.4%; and hospitalization for heart failure, 0.8% and 0.9%). With regard to safety end points, hospitalization for bradycardia, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, hypotension, syncope, or implantation of a pacemaker occurred in 3.4% of the patients in the beta-blocker group and in 3.2% of those in the no-beta-blocker group; hospitalization for asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 0.6% and 0.6%, respectively; and hospitalization for stroke in 1.4% and 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent early coronary angiography and had a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%), long-term beta-blocker treatment did not lead to a lower risk of the composite primary end point of death from any cause or new myocardial infarction than no beta-blocker use. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; REDUCE-AMI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03278509.).

Color Doppler Ultrasound Indices as Predictors of Propranolol Response in Infantile Hemangioma: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of color Doppler ultrasonography in assessing infantile hemangioma response to treatment with oral propranolol. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between January, 2016 and December, 2022, wherein children with symptomatic (ulceration, bleeding, pain and scarring) infantile hemangioma were given oral propranol (2 mg/kg per day in three divided doses) as outpatient therapy. The clinical response was assessed three months post-initiation of treatment (intermediate clinical response) and three months post-completion of treatment (final clinical response, FCR). The primary outcome measurement was a clinical and radiological response (resistivity index (RI), pulsatility index (PI) and peak systolic velocity) to treatment. The secondary outcomes assessed were the complications related to treatment. RESULTS: Out of 601 patients who were started on propranolol, 99 developed severe adverse effects and were excluded from analysis. At FCR assessment, out of 502 participants, 64.3% (n = 323) showed excellent response, 17.7% (n = 89) showed partial, and 17.9% (n = 90) were non-responders. A significant increase in RI and PI values was noted in all children following propranolol treatment for six months. An increase > 7.5% in RI could identify responders with 92% sensitivity, 91% specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.963. An increase of > 11.5% in PI could identify responders with 86% sensitivity, 91% specificity and AUC of 0.896. Patients initially showing no response but later becoming excellent responders had significantly higher RI and PI values. CONCLUSIONS: Color Doppler ultrasonography is a valuable tool in predicting the treatment outcome of infantile hemangioma using propranolol.

Association of non-selective ß blockers with the development of renal dysfunction in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-selective ß blockers (NSBBs) may negatively influence renal function through decreasing heart rate and cardiac output. This study aimed to systematically investigate their association. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched to identify all relevant studies evaluating the association of NSBBs with renal dysfunction in cirrhotic patients. Unadjusted and adjusted data were separately extracted. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled. Subgroup meta-analyses were performed according to the proportions of ascites and Child-Pugh class B/C and the mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were finally included. Based on unadjusted data, NSBBs significantly increased the risk of developing renal dysfunction (OR = 1.49; p = 0.03), and this association remained significant in subgroup analyses of studies where the proportions of ascites was >70% and Child-Pugh class B/C was 100%. Based on adjusted data with propensity score matching (adjusted OR = 0.61; p = 0.08) and multivariable regression modelling (adjusted HR = 0.86; p = 0.713), NSBBs did not increase the risk of developing renal dysfunction, and this association remained not significant in subgroup analyses of studies where the proportions of ascites was >70% and <70%, the proportion of Child-Pugh class B/C was <100%, and the mean MELD score was <15. The quality of evidence was very low for all meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: NSBBs may not be associated with the development of renal dysfunction in liver cirrhosis. However, more evidence is required to clarify their association in specific populations.

Non-selective ß blockers (NSBBs) may negatively influence renal function through decreasing heart rate and cardiac output in liver cirrhosis.Our meta-analysis failed to support the association of NSBBs with an increased risk of developing renal dysfunction after covariate adjustment.

Possible association between ß-blocker use and a risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture.

INTRODUCTION: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a devastating type of stroke, associated with high mortality and morbidity. One of modifiable risk factors of aneurysm rupture is hypertension, however, it is still not clear whether any particular antihypertensive drugs play a significant role in the prevention of aneurysm rupture. OBJECTIVES: We decided to investigate whether there is any association between acetylsalicylic acid, α-blockers, ß­blockers, angiotensin­converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, statins, and anticoagulants and a risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 334 patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysm. Based on logistic regression models, we obtained unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with the use of vasoactive medications and with indices of tortuosity. RESULTS: We found that ß­blocker intake was significantly related to higher tortuosity of the cerebral arteries. Also, the intake of ß­blockers (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.77; P = 0.01) and statins (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.05-0.68; P = 0.01) significantly decreased the risk of aneurysm rupture, a result driven by a decreased rupture risk of anterior circulation aneurysms. No such association was found for the posterior part of the cerebral circulation. CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm located in the anterior cerebral circulation might be less likely to rupture if patients receive ß­blockers or statins.

Immediate Reaction to Propranolol: An Extremely Rare but Important Condition. A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Beta-blockers involve a group of drugs widely used nowadays. Propranolol was the first beta-blocker available in the market. It is the most prescribed first-generation betablocker and is commonly used. Beta-blocker allergy is extremely unusual. Only an isolated case of an urticaria reaction to propranolol has been published in 1975. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 44-year-old man. In 2016, he was treated with a daily dose of 5 mg of propranolol prescribed for a diagnosis of essential tremor. On the third day of medical treatment, he experienced an episode of generalized urticaria directly related to the administration of propranolol. He continued with his habitual treatment and he had no other urticaria episodes. A drug provocation test was carried out with gradually increasing doses of the culprit drug. Thirty minutes after a total cumulative dose of 5 mg, the patient had several hives on the chest, abdominal region and arms. Two weeks later, a new drug provocation test was performed to bisoprolol as an alternative beta-blocker, with good tolerance. CONCLUSION: We describe a new case of urticaria secondary to propranolol, presenting as an immediate hypersensitivity reaction. Bisoprolol has been succesfully proved to be a safe option. Bisoprolol is a second-generation beta-blocker, it is available and commercialized worldwide, which makes it a good alternative.

History of Psychoactive Medication a Risk Factor for Neurocognitive Decline After Cardiac Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Neurocognitive decline (NCD) is a common complication after cardiac surgery with implications for outcomes and quality of life. Identifying risk factors can help surgeons implement preventative measures, optimize modifiable risk factors, and counsel patients about risk and prognosis. METHODS: Prospective cohort study at a single academic center. 104 patients planned to undergo cardiac surgery were enrolled. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) was used to measure neurocognitive function preoperatively, on postoperative day four, and postoperative day 30. NCD is defined as a change in RBANS scaled score of < -8 from baseline to postoperative day 4. Patient charts were reviewed for medication history: beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, statins, oral hypoglycemic agents, and psychoactive medications. Charts were also reviewed to calculate postoperative opioid usage. RESULTS: NCD was detected in 42.9% of patients. Incidence of NCD was significantly higher in patients taking a psychoactive medication (56.8%) than patients not (31.9%), P < 0.03. There was no relationship between historical use of beta-blocker, calcium-channel blocker, statin, or oral hypoglycemic medications and incidence of NCD. Simple linear regression showed no relationship between change in RBANS total scaled score and opioid usage. There was no difference in incidence of NCD at 1 mo. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of taking psychoactive medications prior to cardiac surgery have an increased risk of acute postoperative NCD.

Beta-blocker use and survival after pancreatic cancer surgery: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: We examined the association between use of beta-blockers and survival in pancreatic cancer patients after curative-intent surgery. METHODS: Using Danish healthcare registries, we conducted a population-based cohort study of all patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for pancreatic cancer in Denmark 1997-2021. We defined beta-blocker use according to exposure before surgery as current (≤90 days), recent (91-365 days), or former (366-730 days) use, requiring at least one filled prescription. Patients were followed from the date of surgery for up to 5 years. We used Cox regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs) of deaths with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for age, sex, year of diagnosis, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, liver disease, alcohol, and smoking. We also conducted an active comparator analysis, where we used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor blockers as comparators instead of nonusers. RESULTS: We included 2592 patients, of which 16.7% were beta-blocker users. Median survival for the entire population was 24.4 months. Beta-blocker use was associated with increased mortality (adjusted HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04-1.34). This was evident in current (adjusted HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.38) and recent (adjusted HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.04-1.59) but not former (adjusted HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.64-1.43) users. In the active comparator analysis, the association between beta-blocker exposure and mortality attenuated slightly (adjusted HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.93-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: We observed an association between beta-blocker use and increased mortality in patients operated for pancreatic cancer. Findings are likely explained by confounding by indication.

Beta-blockers in Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Atrial Fibrillation Prevention.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (HTN LVH) is a key risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible role of beta-blockers (BBs) in addition to a renin-angiotensinaldosterone system (RAAS) blocker in AF prevention in patients with HTN LVH. METHODS: We performed a PubMed, Elsevier, SAGE, Oxford, and Google Scholar search with the search items 'beta blocker hypertension left ventricular hypertrophy patient' from 2013-2023. In the end, a 'snowball search', based on the references of relevant papers as well as from papers that cited them was performed. RESULTS: HTN LVH is a risk factor for AF. In turn, AF substantially complicates HTN LVH and contributes to the genesis of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The prognosis of HFpEF is comparable with that of HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), and, regardless of the type, HF is associated with five-year mortality of 50-75%. The antiarrhythmic properties of BBs are wellrecognized, and BBs as a class of drugs are - in general - recommended to decrease the incidence of AF in HTN. CONCLUSION: BBs are recommended (as a class) for AF prevention in several contemporary guidelines for HTN. LVH regression in HTN - used as a single criterion for the choice of antihypertensive medication - does not capture this protective effect. Consequently, it is worth studying how meaningful this antiarrhythmic action (to prevent AF) of BBs is in patients with HTN LVH in addition to a RAAS blocker.

The Impact of Midodrine on Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients Admitted With Systolic Heart Failure.

ABSTRACT: Midodrine is occasionally used off-label to treat hypotension associated with advanced heart failure (HF); however, its association with changes in prescription of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is unknown. We sought to evaluate the effect of midodrine on the GDMT prescription pattern and clinical outcomes of patients with decompensated systolic HF. We retrospectively identified 114 patients admitted to our hospital in 2020 with decompensated systolic HF who were prescribed midodrine on discharge and compared them with 358 patients with decompensated systolic HF who were not prescribed midodrine. At 6 months, the midodrine group had more initiation or up-titration of beta blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors compared with the nonmidodrine group. Survival at 6 months was similar between the 2 groups, but the midodrine group had more frequent rehospitalization for HF. Our findings suggest that midodrine is associated with improved GDMT in patients with decompensated HF but may be associated with worse prognosis.

Exploration of the optimal time to discontinue propranolol treatment in infantile hemangiomas: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Relapse of infantile hemangiomas after withdrawal from propranolol treatment is common. Early withdrawal is believed to increase the risk of relapse. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the optimal time to discontinue propranolol treatment for infantile hemangiomas. METHODS: A prospective study conducted at a tertiary referral center. RESULTS: Compared to withdrawal after 1-month maintenance treatment, withdrawal after 3-month maintenance, corresponding achieving maximum regression of infantile hemangiomas, was associated with a lower major relapse rate (P = .041). The relapse (P = .055) and adverse event rates (P = .154) between the 2 withdrawal modes were not statistically significant. Compared with direct withdrawal, the relapse (P = .396), major relapse (P = .963), and adverse event rates (P = .458) of gradual withdrawal were not statistically different. Patients with/without relapse could be best distinguished according to whether withdrawal followed a 3-month maintenance and age >13 months (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.603). Patients with/without major relapse could be best distinguished according to whether withdrawal was accompanied by 3-month maintenance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.610). LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study are nonrandomization and single-center design. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal propranolol withdrawal time to avoid relapse is when the patient is aged >13 months and the lesion has maintained for 3 months after reaching maximum regression, while the optimal time to prevent major relapse is after 3 months of maintenance.

Oral atenolol compared to oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma. / Atenolol oral comparado con propranolol oral para hemangioma infantil.

Introduction: Infantile hemangioma is the most frequent benign vascular tumor in childhood, with an incidence of 3 to 10%. When patients require treatment, oral propranolol, a non-selective lipophilic beta-blocker, is usually considered the therapy of choice. However, its use has been associated with several adverse events related to its ß-2 action and its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Because of this, oral atenolol, a hydrophilic ß-1 receptor-selective beta-blocker, may represent a valid treatment alternative. Nonetheless, there is still controversy regarding the efficacy and safety of atenolol when compared with propranolol as monotherapy for this condition. Methods: We searched Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health science, which is maintained by screening multiple sources of information, including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, among others. Data were extracted from the identified reviews, data from the primary studies were analyzed, a meta-analysis was performed, and a summary table of the results was prepared using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Results: Nine systematic reviews were identified, including 10 primary studies and three randomized trials. The three randomized trials were included in the analysis of this investigation. Conclusion: The use of oral atenolol compared with oral propranolol as monotherapies may result in little or no difference in terms of likelihood of complete remission, decrease in Hemangioma Activity Score, likelihood of post-treatment relapse, and risk of adverse events and severe adverse events, in infantile hemangioma (low certainty of evidence).

Introducción: El hemangioma infantil corresponde al tumor vascular benigno más frecuente de la infancia, con una incidencia de 3 a 10%. Entre los pacientes que requieren tratamiento el uso oral de propranolol, un betabloqueador no selectivo de tipo lipofílico, es usualmente considerado como la terapia de elección. Sin embargo, su uso se ha asociado a diversos efectos adversos, relacionados con su acción ß-2, y a su capacidad de cruzar la barrera hematoencefálica. Debido a esto, el uso oral de atenolol, un betabloqueador selectivo de receptores ß-1, de tipo hidrofílico, podría representar una alternativa válida de tratamiento. Sin embargo, aún existe controversia en relación con la eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento con atenolol como monoterapia, en comparación con el uso de propranolol como monoterapia para esta condición. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el tamizaje de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Se extrajeron los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, se analizaron los datos de los estudios primarios, se realizó un metanálisis y se preparó una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Resultados: Se identificaron nueve revisiones sistemáticas, que en conjunto incluyeron 10 estudios primarios y tres ensayos aleatorizados. Se incluyeron los tres ensayos aleatorizados en el análisis del presente trabajo. Conclusiones: El uso de atenolol oral como monoterapia, comparado con el uso de propranolol oral como monoterapia, podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en cuanto a la probabilidad de remisión completa, la disminución del , la probabilidad de recaída posterior al tratamiento y el riesgo de presentar efectos adversos y efectos adversos severos, en el hemangioma infantil (certeza de la evidencia baja).

Nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blocker use and risk of Parkinson's disease: from multiple real-world evidence.

BACKGROUND: People with hypertension have a higher risk of developing Parkinson's disease (PD), epidemiological evidence suggests that multiple antihypertensives may affect the occurrence and development of PD with inconsistent results. With multisource data, we sought to determine whether specific antihypertensive classes elevated or reduced the risk for PD. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach that combines 4 methodologies. First, we conducted a disproportionality analysis using the reports causing adverse events in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) to explore the effect of different classes of antihypertensive medications on the risk of PD; based on the findings from FAERS, a meta-analysis and a UK Biobank cohort analysis were used to further assess the association of drug use with PD; finally, we employed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to validate the causal relationship between the drug target and the occurrence of PD. RESULTS: In the disproportionality analysis using the FAERS (N = 187,266), nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blockers (NBBs) were demonstrated to have a significant association with PD (reporting odds ratio (ROR) = 3.13; 95% CI 2.33-4.22). In the meta-analysis of 12 studies with 12,183,809 participants, PD risk was elevated in NBBs (RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.19-2.09) when stratified by subtypes of BBs. Among the 105,763 participants included in the cohort analysis using data from the UK Biobank, individuals who used NBBs had a significantly increased risk of PD compared to nonusers (HR, 1.47; 95% CI 1.04-2.06). The MR analysis revealed a significant association between higher expression of the ß2 adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) gene, a drug target blocked by NBBs, and a reduced risk of PD (OR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our comprehensive study indicated that regular NBB use is associated with an increased risk of PD. In light of the detrimental effects of NBBs on PD, some people should choose alternative antihypertensive treatments.

Effects of cohort, genotype, variant, and maternal ß-blocker treatment on foetal heart rate predictors of inherited long QT syndrome.

AIMS: In long QT syndrome (LQTS), primary prevention improves outcome; thus, early identification is key. The most common LQTS phenotype is a foetal heart rate (FHR) < 3rd percentile for gestational age (GA) but the effects of cohort, genotype, variant, and maternal ß-blocker therapy on FHR are unknown. We assessed the influence of these factors on FHR in pregnancies with familial LQTS and developed a FHR/GA threshold for LQTS. METHODS AND RESULTS: In an international cohort of pregnancies in which one parent had LQTS, LQTS genotype, familial variant, and maternal ß-blocker effects on FHR were assessed. We developed a testing algorithm for LQTS using FHR and GA as continuous predictors. Data included 1966 FHRs at 7-42 weeks' GA from 267 pregnancies/164 LQTS families [220 LQTS type 1 (LQT1), 35 LQTS type 2 (LQT2), and 12 LQTS type 3 (LQT3)]. The FHRs were significantly lower in LQT1 and LQT2 but not LQT3 or LQTS negative. The LQT1 variants with non-nonsense and severe function loss (current density or ß-adrenergic response) had lower FHR. Maternal ß-blockers potentiated bradycardia in LQT1 and LQT2 but did not affect FHR in LQTS negative. A FHR/GA threshold predicted LQT1 and LQT2 with 74.9% accuracy, 71% sensitivity, and 81% specificity. CONCLUSION: Genotype, LQT1 variant, and maternal ß-blocker therapy affect FHR. A predictive threshold of FHR/GA significantly improves the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for LQT1 and LQT2, above the infant's a priori 50% probability. We speculate this model may be useful in screening for LQTS in perinatal subjects without a known LQTS family history.