Multiplex detection of 14 fentanyl analogues and U-47700 in biological samples: Application to a panel of French hospitalized patients.

Synthetic opioids (SO) associated with the recent alarming increase of deaths and intoxications in United States of America and Europe are not detected by the usual first-line opiates drug screening assays. We developed a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analytical method for the multiplex detection of 14 fentanyl analogues (2-furanylfentanyl, 4-ANPP, 4-methoxybutyrylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, alfentanil, carfentanil, despropionyl-2-fluorofentanyl, fentanyl, methoxyacetylfentanyl, norfentanyl, ocfentanil, remifentanil, sufentanil and valerylfentanyl) and U-47700 in whole blood and urine samples. The method was validated according to the requirements of ISO 15189. A simple and fast liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with De-Tox Tube-A was performed leading to better recovery of molecules in urine than in blood samples. Depending on the compound, the limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 0.01 to 0.10 ng/mL and from 0.02 to 0.05 ng/mL in whole blood and urine, respectively. Calibration curves were linear in the range 0.5-50.0 ng/mL and the limit of quantification (LOQ) ranged from 0.10 to 0.40 ng/mL in blood. Internal quality controls at 1 and 40 ng/mL showed intra-day and between-day precision and accuracy bias below 10% in urine and 15% in blood. The method was applied to the screening of 211 urine samples from patients admitted in emergency or addiction departments. The presence of legal fentanyl analogues in 5 urine samples was justified by their therapeutic use as analgesics. Only one patient was concerned by fentanyl misuse and addiction whereas no illegal SO was detected. This study is not in favor of a huge misuse of SO in the Lorraine region.

Application of a screening method for fentanyl and its analogues using UHPLC-QTOF-MS with data-independent acquisition (DIA) in MSE mode and retrospective analysis of authentic forensic blood samples.

The steady appearance of new fentanyl analogues and the associated overdose deaths require the development of sensitive screening approaches to detect these compounds in biological samples and seizures. We developed a targeted screening method to detect 50 4-anilidopiperidine-related fentanyl analogues in whole blood using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in data-independent acquisition mode. Sample preparation was performed using protein precipitation on a fully automated robotic setup. Thirteen analogues were selected to validate the method. A small matrix ion enhancement effect (110-123%) was observed for all of the compounds; the recovery ranged from 67% to 81% and the process efficiency from 81% to 98%. Limit of detection was within 0.0005-0.001 mg/kg and limit of identification ranged from 0.001 to 0.005 mg/kg. In the retrospective analysis of 2339 forensic blood samples, the major finding was fentanyl (n = 56), followed by alfentanil (n = 5) and remifentanil (n = 1). Identification of 34 fentanyl analogues was based on the predicted product ions resulting from common fentanyl-specific collision-induced cleavages, particularly on the product ion result of the fragmentation on the C-N bond between the phenylamide moiety and the piperidine ring. The proposed hypothesis was supported by the targeted analysis of 16 fentanyl analogues using this method and available published mass spectral data sources for fentanyl analogues. A targeted screening method for 50 fentanyl analogues was successfully validated and implemented to analyse authentic blood samples, where identifying targeted fentanyl analogues was tentatively achieved without using reference standards.

Doxapram-mediated Increase in Cardiac Output Reduces Opioid Plasma Concentrations: A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic-Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Doxapram is an analeptic that induces ventilatory stimulation and increases blood pressure and cardiac output (CO). Its mechanism of action is the blockade of background K+ -channels expressed on type 1 carotid body cells. In the randomized controlled trial, the authors explored the role of the increase in CO by doxapram (plasma concentration (Cp) 1,000-3,500 ng/mL) on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of the potent opioid alfentanil (Cp 100-200 ng/mL). Population PK-PD analyses were performed on the doxapram PK-CO data and the alfentanil PK-antinociception data. The analyses showed that the doxapram-induced increase in CO explained the increase in alfentanil distribution and elimination clearances causing a significant reduction in plasma alfentanil Cp and antinociception. This novel approach in which one PK-PD model effectively drives another PK-PD model highlights the importance of physiological influences on PK and PD of a potent opioid with rapid onset of effect and low clinical margin of safety.

Alfentanil during rapid sequence induction with thiopental 4 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg: tracheal intubation conditions.

BACKGROUND: Opioids have become an integral part of anaesthesia induction. We aimed to determine the dose of alfentanil needed to obtain perfect tracheal intubation conditions during rapid sequence induction with standard doses of thiopental and rocuronium, where laryngoscopy was initiated 55 s after commencement of drug administration. The influence of covariates (sex, body weight, age, alfentanil plasma concentration at laryngoscopy) was tested. METHODS: Eighty-four healthy individuals were randomly assigned to receive one of the seven assessor-blinded alfentanil doses (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 µg/kg) in conjunction with thiopental 4 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. For drug administration, 15 s was allowed. Laryngoscopy was initiated 40 s after rocuronium and tracheal intubation concluded within 70 s after commencement of drug administration. Alfentanil doses associated with 50%, 90% and 95% probability of perfect intubation conditions were determined with logistic regression. Multiple logistic regressions were used to test the influence of covariates. The relationship between alfentanil dose and concentration at laryngoscopy was analysed with linear regression. The effects of covariates on plasma concentrations of alfentanil were tested with multiple linear regressions. RESULTS: Perfect intubation conditions of 95% probability was obtained with 56 µg/kg (confidence intervals 44-68). None of the covariates were significant predictors of perfect intubation conditions. Alfentanil plasma concentration correlated with dose and increased with increasing body weight (1.7 ng/ml/kg). CONCLUSION: Perfect intubation conditions during rapid sequence induction can be obtained with clinically relevant doses of alfentanil in most healthy patients anaesthetized with thiopental 4 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of CYP3A4 induction by rifampicin in human: influence of time between substrate and inducer administration.

The induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) is an important source of drug-drug interaction (DDI) and can result in pronounced changes in pharmacokinetics (PK). Rifampicin (RIF) is a potent inducer of CYP3A4 and also acts as a competitive inhibitor which can partially mask the induction. The objective of this study was to determine a clinical DDI study design for RIF resulting in maximum CYP3A4 induction. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to project the dynamics and magnitude of CYP3A4 induction in vivo from in vitro data generated with primary human hepatocytes. The interaction model included both inductive and inhibitory effects of RIF on CYP3A4 in gut and liver and accounting for the observed RIF auto-induction. The model has been verified for 4 CYP3A4 substrates: midazolam, triazolam, alfentanil and nifedipine using plasma concentration data from 20 clinical study designs with intravenous (n=7) and oral (n=13) administrations. Finally, the influence of the time between RIF and substrate administration was explored for the interaction between midazolam and RIF. The model integrating in vitro induction parameters correctly predicted intravenous induction but underestimated oral induction with 30% of simulated concentrations more than 2-fold higher than of observed data. The use of a 1.6-fold higher value for the maximum induction effect (Emax) improved significantly the accuracy and precision of oral induction with 82% of simulated concentrations and all predicted PK parameters within 2-fold of observed data. Our simulations suggested that a concomitant administration of RIF and midazolam resulted in significant competitive inhibition limited to intestinal enzyme. Accordingly, a maximum induction effect could be achieved with a RIF pretreatment of 600 mg/day during 5 days and a substrate administration at least 2 h after the last RIF dose. A period of 2 weeks after RIF removal was found sufficient to allow return to baseline levels of enzyme.

Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in isoflurane-anesthetized cats.

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in isoflurane-anesthetized cats. Six adult cats were used. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. End-tidal isoflurane concentration was set at 2% and adjusted as required due to spontaneous movement. Fentanyl (10 µg/kg), alfentanil (100 µg/kg), or sufentanil (1 µg/kg) was administered intravenously as a bolus, on separate days. Blood samples were collected immediately before and for 8 h following drug administration. Plasma drug concentration was determined using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Compartment models were fitted to concentration-time data. A 3-compartment model best fitted the concentration-time data for all drugs, except for 1 cat in the sufentanil group (excluded from analysis). The volume of the central compartment and the volume of distribution at steady-state (L/kg) [mean ± SEM (range)], the clearance (mL/min/kg) [harmonic mean ± pseudo-SD (range)], and the terminal half-life (min) [median (range)] were 0.25 ± 0.04 (0.09-0.34), 2.18 ± 0.16 (1.79-2.83), 18.6 ± 5.0 (15-29.8), and 151 (115-211) for fentanyl; 0.10 ± 0.01 (0.07-0.14), 0.89 ± 0.16 (0.68-1.83), 11.6 ± 2.6 (9.2-15.8), and 144 (118-501) for alfentanil; and 0.06 ± 0.01 (0.04-0.10), 0.77 ± 0.07 (0.63-0.99), 17.6 ± 4.3 (13.9-24.3), and 54 (46-76) for sufentanil. Differences in clearance and volume of distribution result in similar terminal half-lives for fentanyl and alfentanil, longer than for sufentanil.

Pharmacokinetic parameter sets of alfentanil revisited: optimal parameters for use in target controlled infusion and anaesthesia display systems.

BACKGROUND: In open TCI and anaesthesia display systems, the choice of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter sets of opioids is clinically relevant. Accuracy and bias of the PK models may be affected by administration mode and the co-administered hypnotic drug. We retrospectively evaluated the performance of eight PK parameter sets for alfentanil in two data sets (infusion and bolus application). METHODS: With the dosing history from two studies in orthopaedic patients anaesthetized with propofol or inhalation anaesthetics the alfentanil plasma concentration over time was calculated with eight PK parameter sets. Median absolute performance error (MDAPE), log accuracy, median performance error (MDPE), log bias, Wobble, and Divergence were computed. Mann-Whitney rank test with Bonferroni correction was used for comparison between bolus and infusion data, repeated measures analysis of variance on ranks was used for comparison among parameter sets. RESULTS: The parameters by Scott (original and weight adjusted) and Fragen had a MDAPE ≤30% and a median log accuracy <0.15 independent of the administration mode, while MDPE was within ±20% and log bias nearly within ±0.1, respectively. The sets by Maitre and Lemmens were within these limits only in the bolus data. All other parameter sets were outside these limits. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy orthopaedic patients, the PK parameters by Scott and by Maitre were equally valid when alfentanil was given as repeated boluses. When given as infusion, the Maitre parameters were less accurate and subject to a significant bias. We cannot exclude that the difference between bolus and infusion is partially because of the different hypnotics used.

Aversive and reinforcing opioid effects: a pharmacogenomic twin study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of opioids is limited by adverse drug effects including respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, and pruritus. In addition, abuse of prescription opioids is problematic. Gaining a better understanding of the genetic and environmental mechanisms contributing to an individual's susceptibility to adverse opioid effects is essential to identify patients at risk. METHODS: A classic twin study paradigm provided estimates for the genetic and familial (genetic and/or shared environment) contribution to acute adverse and affective opioid responses, all secondary outcomes of a larger dataset. One hundred twenty-one twin pairs were recruited in a single occasion, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. The µ-opioid receptor agonist alfentanil and saline placebo were administered as target-controlled infusions under carefully monitored laboratory conditions. Measured outcomes included respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, pruritus, drug liking, and drug disliking. Demographic information was collected, and aspects of mood and sleep were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant heritability was detected for respiratory depression (30%), nausea (59%), and drug disliking (36%). Significant familial effects were detected for sedation (29%), pruritus (38%), dizziness (32%), and drug liking (26%). Significant covariates included age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, mood, and depression. Covariates affected sedation, pruritus, drug liking and disliking, and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that large-scale efforts to collect quantitative and well-defined opioid response data are not only feasible but also produce data that are suitable for genetic analysis. Genetic, environmental, and demographic factors work together to control adverse and reinforcing opioid responses, but contribute differently to specific responses.

Simultaneous determination of alfentanil and midazolam in human plasma using liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry.

A fast, sensitive and selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the determination of alfentanil and midazolam in human plasma has been developed and validated. Alfentanil and midazolam were extracted from plasma using a mixed-mode cation exchange solid phase extraction method, with recoveries of both compounds greater than 80% at 3 different concentrations (1, 10 and 100ng/ml). Compounds were analyzed on a C(18) column with a water and methanol mobile phase gradient with acetic acid as an additive, at a flow rate of 0.3ml/min. The working assay range was linear from 0.25 to 100ng/ml for each compound. The signal to noise ratio was 80 and 40 for alfentanil and midazolam, respectively, at the lowest concentration calibration standard, with less than 10% matrix suppression by human plasma at this concentration. Alfentanil and midazolam were stable in human plasma during storage at -80°C, processing, and analysis. The procedure was validated and applied to the analysis of plasma samples from healthy human subjects administered oral and intravenous alfentanil and midazolam.

Comparison of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and hollow fiber liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in water and biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and hollow fiber liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction (HF-LLLME) combined with HPLC-DAD have been applied for the determination of three narcotic drugs (alfentanil, fentanyl, and sufentanil) in biological samples (human plasma and urine). Different DLLME parameters influencing the extraction efficiency such as type and volume of the extraction solvent and the disperser solvent, concentration of NaOH, and salt addition were investigated. In the HF-LLLME, the effects of important parameters including organic solvent type, concentration of NaOH as donor solution, concentration of H(2)SO(4) as acceptor phase, salt addition, stirring rate, temperature, and extraction time were investigated and optimized. The results showed that both extraction methods exhibited good linearity, precision, enrichment factor, and detection limit. Under optimal condition, the limits of detection ranged from 0.4 to 1.9 µg/L and from 1.1 to 2.3 µg/L for DLLME and HF-LLLME, respectively. For DLLME, the intra- and inter-day precisions were 1.7-6.4% and 14.2-15.9%, respectively; and for HF-LLLME were 0.7-5.2% and 3.3-10.1%, respectively. The enrichment factors were from 275 to 325 and 190 to 237 for DLLME and HF-LLLME, respectively. The applicability of the proposed methods was investigated by analyzing biological samples. For analysis of human plasma and urine samples, HF-LLLME showed higher precision, more effective sample clean-up, higher extraction efficiency, lower organic solvent consumption than DLLME.

Mu-opioid receptor (A118G) single-nucleotide polymorphism affects alfentanil requirements for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study.

BACKGROUND: There are diverse reports concerning the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A118G in the gene coding for the mu-opioid receptor. This study assessed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in patients with acute pain (water-immersed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy). METHODS: Ninety-nine patients (ASA I-II, age 18-70) were assessed in this prospective observational study. Blinding was achieved by determining genotype only after the procedure. I.V. alfentanil was administered by patient-controlled administration (loading dose, 10 microg kg(-1); continuous infusion, 20 microg kg(-1) h(-1); bolus, 3 microg kg(-1); lockout time, 1 min); no other analgesic or sedating medication was used. RESULTS: The allelic frequency was 15.2% in our population. The G118 SNP (AG/GG) was associated with a 27% increase in plasma alfentanil concentration (P=0.034), a 54% increase in alfentanil dose (P=0.009), a 47% increase in dose per kg body weight (P=0.004), a 55% increase in dose per kg corrected for stimulus intensity (P=0.002), a 112% increase in the numbers of attempted boluses (P=0.015), a 79% increase in the numbers of successful boluses (P=0.013), and a 153% increase in the numbers of failed boluses (P=0.042). Despite the increased alfentanil self-administration, the G118 SNP was associated with a 52% increase in verbal analogue pain scores over the same period of time (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated increased opioid requirement for alfentanil in patients with the G118 SNP, who self-administered a higher dose, achieved higher plasma concentration, and yet complained of more severe pain. This observation suggests that G118 SNP impairs the analgesic response to opioids.

Differential opioid action on sensory and affective cerebral pain processing.

Low doses of morphine, the most commonly used opioid analgesic, have been shown to significantly reduce the affective but not the sensory intensive dimension of pain. This suggests differential dose-response relationships of opioid analgesia on the sensory and affective components of pain. We investigated the effects of different alfentanil plasma concentration levels (0, 19.6+/-2.7, 47.2+/-7.6, and 76.6+/-11.3 ng/ml) on pain-related brain activation achieved by short pulses of gaseous CO(2) delivered to the nasal mucosa, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on a 3.0 T MRI scanner in 16 non-carriers and 9 homozygous carriers of the mu-opioid receptor gene variant OPRM1 118A>G. Increasing opioid concentrations had differential effects in brain regions processing the sensory and affective dimensions of pain. In brain regions associated with the processing of the sensory intensity of pain (primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, posterior insular cortex), activation decreased linearly in relation to alfentanil concentrations, which was significantly less pronounced in OPRM1 118G carriers. In contrast, in brain regions known to process the affective dimension of pain (parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, anterior insula), pain-related activation disappeared at the lowest alfentanil dose, without genotype differences.

Mechanism of ritonavir changes in methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: II. Ritonavir effects on CYP3A and P-glycoprotein activities.

Ritonavir diminishes methadone plasma concentrations, an effect attributed to CYP3A induction, but the actual mechanisms are unknown. We determined short-term (2-day) and steady-state (2-week) ritonavir effects on intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4/5 (probed with intravenous (IV) and oral alfentanil (ALF) and with miosis) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) (fexofenadine), and on methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers. Acute ritonavir increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)(0-infinity)/dose ratio (ritonavir/control) for oral ALF 25-fold. Steady-state ritonavir increased the AUC(0-Infinity)/dose ratio for IV and oral ALF 4- and 10-fold, respectively; reduced hepatic extraction (from 0.26 to 0.07) and intestinal extraction (from 0.51 to 0); and increased bioavailability (from 37 to 95%). Acute ritonavir inhibits first-pass CYP3A > 96%. Chronic ritonavir inhibits hepatic CYP3A (> 70%) and first-pass CYP3A (> 90%). Acute and steady-state ritonavir increased the fexofenadine AUC(0-infinity) 2.8- and 1.4-fold, respectively, suggesting P-gp inhibition. Steady-state compared with acute ritonavir caused mild apparent induction of P-gp and hepatic CYP3A, but net inhibition still predominated. Ritonavir inhibited both intestinal and hepatic CYP3A and drug transport. ALF miosis noninvasively determined CYP3A inhibition by ritonavir.

Influence of CYP3A5 genotype on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the cytochrome P4503A probes alfentanil and midazolam.

The hepatic and first-pass cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) probe alfentanil (ALF) is also metabolized in vitro by CYP3A5. Human hepatic microsomal ALF metabolism is higher in livers with at least one CYP3A5*1 allele and higher CYP3A5 protein content, compared with CYP3A5*3 homozygotes with little CYP3A5. The influence of CYP3A5 genotype on ALF pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics was studied, and compared to midazolam (MDZ), another CYP3A probe. Healthy volunteers (58 men, 41 women) were genotyped for CYP3A5 *1, *3, *6, and *7 alleles. They received intravenous MDZ then ALF, and oral MDZ and ALF the next day. Plasma MDZ and ALF concentrations were determined by mass spectrometry. Dark-adapted pupil diameters were determined coincident with blood sampling. In CYP3A5(*)3/(*)3 (n=62), (*)1/(*)3 (n=28), and (*)1/(*)1 (n=8) genotypes, systemic clearances of ALF were 4.6+/-1.8, 4.8+/-1.7, and 3.9+/-1.7 ml/kg/min and those of MDZ were 7.8+/-2.3, 7.7+/-2.3, and 6.0+/-1.4 ml/kg/min, respectively (not significant), and apparent oral clearances were 11.8+/-7.2, 13.3+/-6.1, and 12.6+/-8.2 ml/kg/min for ALF and 35.2+/-19.0, 36.4+/-15.7, and 29.4+/-9.3 ml/kg/min for MDZ (not significant). Clearances were not different between African Americans (n=25) and Whites (n=68), or between CYP3A5 genotypes within African Americans. ALF pharmacodynamics was not different between CYP3A5 genotypes. There was consistent concordance between ALF and MDZ, in clearances and extraction ratios. Thus, in a relatively large cohort of healthy subjects with constitutive CYP3A activity, CYP3A5 genotype had no effect on the systemic or apparent oral clearances, or pharmacodynamics, of the CYP3A probes ALF and MDZ, despite affecting their hepatic microsomal metabolism.

Spectral frequency index monitoring during propofol-remifentanil and propofol-alfentanil total intravenous anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of spectral frequency index (SFx) monitoring to assess the depth of anaesthesia during propofol-opioid total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA). METHODS: Thirty-three patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under propofol TIVA were prospectively and randomly allocated to receive either remifentanil (bolus of 1.0 microg/kg, followed by continuous infusion from 0.25 to 0.05 microg/kg/min) [n = 18] or alfentanil (bolus of 10 microg/kg, followed by continuous infusion from 2.0 to 0.5 microg/kg/min) [n = 15]. EEG activity was monitored to achieve the desired depth of anaesthesia, and intravenous propofol was titrated to keep the SFx at 70-80%. The remifentanil and alfentanil groups were compared in relation to the plasma propofol concentration required for an adequate level of hypnosis during maintenance of anaesthesia, Pearson correlation coefficient for the relationship between the plasma propofol concentration and SFx values, recovery parameters, and recall of events during anaesthesia. RESULTS: The study groups were comparable with regard to demographic characteristics, type and duration of surgery, and time to resumption of spontaneous ventilation. No evidence of explicit recall was noted. The mean plasma propofol concentration required for an adequate level of hypnosis during maintenance of anaesthesia was significantly higher in the alfentanil group (3.20 microg/mL) compared with the remifentanil group (2.17 microg/L) [p < 0.05]. In both groups, the Pearson correlation coefficient test showed a linear correlation between SFx values and propofol concentration in the studied propofol concentration range. The mean time to orientation for name and place was significantly shorter (p < 0.05), the mean propofol concentration at orientation for name and place and at the resumption of spontaneous ventilation timepoints was significantly lower (both p < 0.01), and the mean SFx value at resumption of spontaneous ventilation timepoint was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the remifentanil group. CONCLUSIONS: As SFx is linearly related to plasma propofol concentration, this index may be used to measure anaesthetic effect during propofol anaesthesia. The results of this clinical trial are consistent with a previous computer-simulated opioid-propofol model with regard to intraoperative and recovery variables, although the recovery occurred at different propofol concentration and SFx values.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alfentanil in P-glycoprotein-competent and P-glycoprotein-deficient mice: P-glycoprotein efflux alters alfentanil brain disposition and antinociception.

Previous studies have indicated that P-glycoprotein (P-gp) attenuates the central nervous system penetration and central activity of some opioids. The impact of P-gp-mediated efflux on the disposition and efficacy of the synthetic opioid alfentanil currently is unknown. In this study, P-gp-competent [mdr1a(+/+)] and P-gp-deficient [mdr1a(-/-)] mice were used to investigate the impact of P-gp-mediated efflux on the systemic pharmacokinetics, brain disposition, and central activity of alfentanil. Equipotent doses of alfentanil were administered to mdr1a(+/+) and mdr1a(-/-) mice (0.2 and 0.067 mg/kg, respectively), and the time course of brain and serum concentrations as well as antinociception were determined. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was fit to the data and used to assess the impact of P-gp on parameters associated with alfentanil disposition and action. The mdr1a(+/+) mice were less sensitive to alfentanil than mdr1a(-/-) mice, requiring a 3-fold higher dose to produce similar antinociception. PK-PD modeling revealed no differences in alfentanil systemic pharmacokinetics between P-gp expressers and nonexpressers. However, the steady-state brain-to-serum concentration ratio (K(p,brain,ss)) was approximately 3-fold lower in mdr1a(+/+) mice compared with mdr1a(-/-) mice (0.19 +/- 0.01 versus 0.54 +/- 0.04, respectively). Consistent with the approximately 3-fold lower K(p,brain,ss), the antinociception versus serum concentration relationship in mdr1a(+/+) mice was shifted approximately 3-fold rightward compared with mdr1a(-/-) mice. However, there was no difference in the antinociception versus brain concentration relationship, or in the brain tissue EC(50) (11 +/- 1.8 versus 9.2 +/- 1.7 ng/g), between mdr1a(+/+) and mdr1a(-/-) mice. These results indicate that alfentanil is an in vivo P-gp substrate and are consistent with the hypothesis that P-gp-mediated efflux attenuates antinociception by reducing alfentanil K(p,brain,ss).

Voriconazole, but not terbinafine, markedly reduces alfentanil clearance and prolongs its half-life.

OBJECTIVE: Alfentanil is a short-acting synthetic opioid analgesic, which is extensively metabolized, mainly by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes. Concomitant administration of alfentanil and CYP3A inhibitors may lead to clinically important drug interactions. We investigated the possible interactions between alfentanil and orally administered voriconazole and terbinafine. METHODS: A randomized crossover study design in 3 phases was used. Twelve healthy volunteers were given 20 microg/kg intravenous alfentanil without pretreatment (control), after oral voriconazole administration (400 mg twice on the first day and 200 mg twice on the second day), or after oral terbinafine administration (250 mg once daily for 3 days). Plasma concentrations of alfentanil were measured for 10 hours, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by use of noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Voriconazole decreased the mean plasma clearance of intravenous alfentanil by 85%, from the control value of 4.4+/-2.4 mL.min-1.kg-1 to 0.67+/-0.27 mL.min-1.kg-1 (P<.001), and prolonged its elimination half-life from 1.5+/-0.49 hours to 6.6+/-1.8 hours (P<.001). The area under the alfentanil plasma concentration-time curve was increased by 6-fold by voriconazole (P<.001). Terbinafine had no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of alfentanil. Alfentanil administration caused nausea in 5 volunteers and vomiting in 2. These side effects all occurred in volunteers in the voriconazole phase. CONCLUSION: Oral voriconazole, but not terbinafine, markedly inhibited the metabolism of alfentanil. Caution should be exercised when alfentanil is given to patients receiving voriconazole. It is reasonable to assume that patients receiving voriconazole require 70% to 90% less alfentanil for the maintenance of analgesia than patients who are not receiving concomitant CYP3A inhibitors.

The mu-opioid receptor gene polymorphism 118A>G depletes alfentanil-induced analgesia and protects against respiratory depression in homozygous carriers.

AIM: To investigate whether OPRM1 118A>G polymorphism affects analgesic and respiratory depressive effects of alfentanil and assess its role for the therapeutic range of alfentanil. METHODS: In an open-label, single-occasion design, 10 non-carriers, four heterozygous and six homozygous carriers of the variant OPRM1 118G allele received a computerized infusion of alfentanil to achieve target effect-site concentrations of 0, 33.33, 66.67 and 100 ng/ml. At each concentration level, analgesia was assessed by means of electrically and chemically induced pain, and respiratory depression was quantified by hypercapnic challenge and breathing frequency. RESULTS: The relationship between the percent change of tolerance to electrical stimuli and measured alfentanil concentrations, described by power models, was flatter in carriers of the 118G variant allele than in non-carriers, indicating decreased opioid analgesia (P<0.05). For chemically induced pain, a flatter analgesia versus concentration relationship was found only for homozygous carriers of the 118G allele (P<0.05). The relationship between the percent changes in respiratory parameters was significantly flatter (P<0.01) only in homozygous carriers as compared to heterozygous carriers and non-carriers of the 118G allele. Higher alfentanil concentrations were needed in homozygous carriers as compared to wild-type subjects (2-4 times) to produce the same degree of analgesia, whereas 10-12 times higher alfentanil concentrations were needed to produce the same degree of respiratory depression. CONCLUSION: OPRM1 118A>G polymorphism affects both analgesic and respiratory depressive effects of alfentanil. However, while the analgesic effects are already partly decreased in heterozygous carriers, depending on the pain model, the respiratory depressive effects are decreased in homozygous carriers of the variant 118G allele. The therapeutic range of alfentanil was only broadened in homozygous carriers.

Closed-loop control of mean arterial blood pressure during surgery with alfentanil: clinical evaluation of a novel model-based predictive controller.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to hypnosis, there is no surrogate parameter for analgesia in anesthetized patients. Opioids are titrated to suppress blood pressure response to noxious stimulation. The authors evaluated a novel model predictive controller for closed-loop administration of alfentanil using mean arterial blood pressure and predicted plasma alfentanil concentration (Cp Alf) as input parameters. METHODS: The authors studied 13 healthy patients scheduled to undergo minor lumbar and cervical spine surgery. After induction with propofol, alfentanil, and mivacurium and tracheal intubation, isoflurane was titrated to maintain the Bispectral Index at 55 (+/- 5), and the alfentanil administration was switched from manual to closed-loop control. The controller adjusted the alfentanil infusion rate to maintain the mean arterial blood pressure near the set-point (70 mmHg) while minimizing the Cp Alf toward the set-point plasma alfentanil concentration (Cp Alfref) (100 ng/ml). RESULTS: Two patients were excluded because of loss of arterial pressure signal and protocol violation. The alfentanil infusion was closed-loop controlled for a mean (SD) of 98.9 (1.5)% of presurgery time and 95.5 (4.3)% of surgery time. The mean (SD) end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were 0.78 (0.1) and 0.86 (0.1) vol%, the Cp Alf values were 122 (35) and 181 (58) ng/ml, and the Bispectral Index values were 51 (9) and 52 (4) before surgery and during surgery, respectively. The mean (SD) absolute deviations of mean arterial blood pressure were 7.6 (2.6) and 10.0 (4.2) mmHg (P = 0.262), and the median performance error, median absolute performance error, and wobble were 4.2 (6.2) and 8.8 (9.4)% (P = 0.002), 7.9 (3.8) and 11.8 (6.3)% (P = 0.129), and 14.5 (8.4) and 5.7 (1.2)% (P = 0.002) before surgery and during surgery, respectively. A post hoc simulation showed that the Cp Alfref decreased the predicted Cp Alf compared with mean arterial blood pressure alone. CONCLUSION: The authors' controller has a similar set-point precision as previous hypnotic controllers and provides adequate alfentanil dosing during surgery. It may help to standardize opioid dosing in research and may be a further step toward a multiple input-multiple output controller.

Sensitivity of intravenous and oral alfentanil and pupillary miosis as minimally invasive and noninvasive probes for hepatic and first-pass CYP3A activity.

This investigation determined the ability of alfentanil miosis and single-point concentrations to detect various degrees of CYP3A inhibition. Results were compared with those for midazolam, an alternative CYP3A probe. Twelve volunteers were studied in a randomized 4-way crossover, targeting 12%, 25%, and 50% inhibition of hepatic CYP3A. They received 0, 100, 200, or 400 mg oral fluconazole, followed 1 hour later by 1 mg intravenous midazolam and then 15 microg/kg intravenous alfentanil 1 hour later. The next day, they received fluconazole, followed by 3 mg oral midazolam and 40 microg/kg oral alfentanil. Dark-adapted pupil diameters were measured coincident with blood sampling. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios (fluconazole/control) after 100, 200, and 400 mg fluconazole were (geometric mean) 1.3*, 1.4*, and 2.0* for intravenous midazolam and 1.2*, 1.6*, and 2.2* for intravenous alfentanil (*significantly different from control), indicating 16% to 21%, 31% to 36%, and 43% to 53% inhibition of hepatic CYP3A. Single-point concentration ratios were 1.5*, 1.8*, and 2.4* for intravenous midazolam (at 5 hours) and 1.2*, 1.6*, and 2.2* for intravenous alfentanil (at 4 hours). Pupil miosis AUC ratios were 0.9, 1.0, and 1.2*. After oral dosing, plasma AUC ratios were 2.3*, 3.6*, and 5.3* for midazolam and 1.8*, 2.9*, and 4.9* for alfentanil; plasma single-point ratios were 2.4*, 4.5*, and 6.9* for midazolam and 1.8*, 2.9*, and 4.9* for alfentanil, and alfentanil miosis ratios were 1.1, 1.9*, and 2.7*. Plasma concentration AUC ratios of alfentanil and midazolam were equivalent for detecting hepatic and first-pass CYP3A inhibition. Single-point concentrations were an acceptable surrogate for formal AUC determinations and as sensitive as AUCs for detecting CYP3A inhibition. Alfentanil miosis could detect 50% to 70% inhibition of CYP3A activity, but was less sensitive than plasma AUCs. Further refinements are needed to increase the sensitivity of alfentanil miosis for detecting small CYP3A changes.